Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attractiveness of Centers and Secondary Cities of Regions for Internal Migrants in Russia

  • POPULATION- GEOGRAPHY
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—The article examines the intensity of intraregional and interregional net-migration of the populations of centers and secondary (in terms of population) cities of  74 Russian regions for 2012–2016. The informational basis of the study is a database of municipality indicators for the corresponding years. The low city saturation of the Russian space should logically lead to the fact that in intraregional migration, secondary cities, as important centers of social and economic life, should be attractive for migration, i.e., have a positive net migration rate. In fact, this is observed in 42 regions. In the remainder, the final balance of intraregional migration in secondary cities is negative. Migration can also be considered an indicator of the well-being of secondary cities both in terms of availability of their own sustainable hinterland and socioeconomically. Regional centers are attractive for intraregional migrants almost everywhere. This uniformity results from the concentration of financial and other flows and authority in the capital cities of regions and, regardless of the socioeconomic situation, better quality of life in regional centers compared to other municipalities in their regions. The interregional migration indicators are a more ambiguous characteristics: from the viewpoint of the balance considered in the article, not only regional secondary cities, but also many regional centers, are unattractive for interregional migrants. Limited demographic resources and the presence of two powerful centers of migration attraction at the country level (Moscow and St. Petersburg) leave no opportunities for migration increase owing to interregional migrants to most regional centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Not all federal subjects had the necessary series of statistical data; in addition, federal cities and some regions in which there was only one city were not considered.

  2. We considered differences of views on secondary cities in more detail in [6].

  3. The starting point of the period is associated with the change in rules of statistical migrant registration that occurred in 2011. For more details, see [13].

  4. http://усадьбы48.рф/suburbiya/. Accessed March 10, 2020.

  5. In fact, migration from the eastern and northern regions to the central and southern ones began as early as the late Soviet period.

REFERENCES

  1. Breslavsky, A.S., Rural migrants in post-Soviet Ulan-Ude: expectations, strategies, and settling, Oikumena, 2012, no. 4, pp. 55–61.

  2. Vakulenko, E.S., Migration processes in Russian cities: an econometric analysis, Prikl. Ekonometrika, 2012, no. 25 (1), pp. 25–50.

  3. Vendina, O.I., Russian space: old and new development criteria, in Krupnye goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii (Large Cities and Globalization Challenges), Kolosov, V.A. and Ekkert, D., Eds., Smolensk: Oikumena, 2003, pp. 114–127.

  4. Zubarevich, N.V., Rent of the capital status, Pro Contra, 2012, nos. 11–12, pp. 6–18.

  5. Kagansky, V.L., Boom of secondary cities, Russ. Zh., 2005. http://old.russ.ru/culture/20050221_kag.html. Accessed March 10, 2020.

  6. Karachurina, L.B., Population dynamics of centers and secondary cities of Russia’s regions: trends towards polycentricity? Reg. Res. Russ., 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518040032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karachurina, L.B. and Mkrtchyan, N.V., The dynamics of the population of municipalities of Russian Federation as a reflection of the center−peripheral concept of spatial development (1989–2002), Reg. Issled., 2010, no. 3 (29), pp. 69–83.

  8. Karachurina, L.B. and Mkrtchyan, N.V., Changes of population numbers in administrative districts and cities of Russia (1989–2010): central–peripheral ratio, in Voprosy geografii. Vyp. 135. Geografiya naseleniya i sotsial’naya geografiya (Problems of Geography, No. 135: Population Geography and Social Geography), Alekseev, A.I. and Tkachenko, A.A., Eds., Moscow: Kodeks, 2013, pp. 82–107.

  9. Lappo, G.M., Vice-capitals of Russian regions, Geografiya, 2008, no. 3, pp. 5–13.

  10. Leksin, V.N. and Karacharovsky, V.V., Causes and consequences of overconcentration of economic and social potentials of Russia in its largest cities, Ross. Ekon. Zh., 2007, nos. 1–2, pp. 26-46.

  11. Mkrtchyan, N.V., Population dynamics of Russia’s regions and the role of migration: critical assessment based on the 2002 and 2010 censuses, Reg. Res. Russ., 2011, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 228-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mkrtchyan, N.V., From Russia to Russia: where from and where do internal migrants move, Mir Ross., 2003, no. 2, pp. 151–164.

  13. Naselenie Rossii 2013. Dvadtsat’ pervyi ezhegodnyi demograficheskii doklad (Population of Russia 2013. Twenty First Annual Demographic Report), Zakharov, S.V., Ed., Moscow: Vyssh. Shk. Ekon., 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nefedova, T.G., Migration attractiveness of the cities as an indicator of transformation of post-Soviet urban space of Russia, Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnol., 2014, no. 2, pp. 106–135.

  15. Pokshishevsky, V.V., Problem of a “secondary” city, II Sovetsko-Pol’skii seminar po urbanizatsii “Problemy urbanizatsii i rasseleniya” (The II Soviet-Polish Seminar on Urbanization “Problems of Urbanization and Settlement Pattern”), Moscow: Mysl’, 1976, pp. 178–187.

  16. Treivish, A.I., Russia: population and space, Demoscope Weekly, 2003, no. 95-96. http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2003/095/tema05.php.

  17. Treivish, A.I., Gorod, raion, strana i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda (City, Region, Country, and the World. Development of Russia as Viewed by a Regional Geographer), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2009.

  18. Angel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D., and Blei, A., Atlas of Urban Expansion, Cambridge: Lincoln Inst. Land Policy, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Argent, N. and Walmsley, J., Rural youth migration trends in Australia: an overview of recent trends and two inland case studies, Geogr. Res., 2008, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008.00505.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, X. and Kanna, A., Rethinking Global Urbanism: Comparative Insights from Secondary Cities, New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Karachurina, L. and Mkrtchyan, N., Age-specific net migration patterns in the municipal formations of Russia, GeoJournal, 2018, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9757-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrill, R., Aging in place, age specific migration and natural decrease, Ann. Reg. Sci., 1995, vol. 29, pp. 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raymer, J., Abel, G., and Smith, P.W.F., Combining census and registration data to estimate detailed elderly migration flows in England and Wales, J. R. Stat. Soc., A, 2007, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 891–908.

  24. Roberts, B., The Systems of Secondary Cities. Definition, Trends and Policy Responses in International Development, Brussels: Cities Alliance, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. ESPON 1.4.1. The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Towns (SMESTO). Final Report, Vienna: Austrian Inst. Reg. Stud. Spatial Plann., 2006.

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics in 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research University Higher School of Economics, 101000, Moscow, Russia

    L. B. Karachurina

Authors
  1. L. B. Karachurina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. B. Karachurina.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karachurina, L.B. Attractiveness of Centers and Secondary Cities of Regions for Internal Migrants in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ. 10, 352–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520030065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520030065

Keywords:

Search

Navigation