Abstract
We introduce and study the generalized Wigner operator. By definition, such an operator transforms the Wigner wave function into a local relativistic field corresponding to an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group by extended discrete transformations, with integer helicities \(\lambda \) and \( - \lambda \). It is shown that the relativistic fields constructed in this way are gauge potentials and satisfy the relations that determine free massless higher spin fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In an alternative formulation, which we will also use here, the representation is given on the Fourier components of such functions (see details in [11]).
Some similar constructions for fields of half-integer helicities were considered in [12].
The connection between the Poincaré group and its covering, as well as the choice of the test momentum for the stability subgroup and the definition of the Wigner operator in 2-dimensional spinor space, are presented in Appendix 1.
See also [21] for analysis of massive representations.
From the point of view of the proper Poincare group, such representations are reducible. In the extended Poincare group, they become irreducible due to discrete transformations relating fields with helicity and .
REFERENCES
E. P. Wigner, “On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group,” Ann. Math. 40, 149 (1939).
E. P. Wigner, “Relativistische Wellengleichungen,” Z. Phys. 124, 665 (1948).
V. Bargmann and E. P. Wigner, “Group theoretical discussion of relativistic wave equations,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 34, 211 (1948).
L. Fonda and G. C. Ghirardi, Symmetry Principles in Quantum Physics (Marcel Deccer, New York, 1970).
Yu. V. Novozhilov, Introduction to Elementary Particles Theory (Fiz.-Mat. Lit., Moscow, 1972; Pergamon, 2013).
A. Barut and R. Rachka, Theory of Group Representations and Applications, Vol. 2 (WSPC, 1986; Mir, Moscow, 1980).
Tung Wu-Ki, Theory Group (World Scientific, 1985).
X. Bekaert and E. D. Skvortsov, “Elementary particles with continuous spin,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730019 (2017).
N. Ya. Vilenkin, Special Functions and Theory of Group Representations (Nauka, Moscow, 1965; Am. Math. Soc., 1968)
D. P. Zhelobenko and A. I. Shtern, Presentations of Li Groups (Nauka, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].
I. L. Bukhbinder, A. P. Isaev, M. A. Podoinitsyn, and S. A. Fedoruk, “Generalization of the Bargmann-Wigner construction for describing fields of infinite spin,” submitted to Teor. Mat. Fiz.
V. G. Zima and S. A. Fedoruk, “Covariant quantization of d=4 Brink–Schwarz superparticle using Lorentz harmonics,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 102, 420 (1995).
S. Weinberg, “Feynman rules for any spin,” Phys. Rev. B 133, 1318 (1964).
S. Weinberg, “Feynman rules for any spin. II. Massless particles,” Phys. Rev. B 134, 882 (1964).
I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or a Walk Through Superspace (IOP Publ., Bristol, 1998).
D. M. Gitman and A. L. Shelepin, “Fields on the Poincare group: arbitrary spin description and relativistic wave equations,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 40, 603–684 (2001).
I. L. Buchbinder, D. M. Gitman, and A. L. Shelepin, “Discrete symmetries as automorphisms of the proper Poincare group,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 41, 753–790 (2002).
X. Bekaert and J. Mourad, “The continuous spin limit of higher spin field equations,” J. High Energy Phys. 0601, 115 (2006).
P. Schuster and N. Toro, “On the theory of continuous-spin particles: wavefunctions and soft-factor scattering amplitudes,” J. High Energy Phys. 09, 104 (2013).
P. Schuster and N. Toro, “On the theory of continuous-spin particles: helicity correspondence in radiation and forces,” J. High Energy Phys. 09, 105 (2013).
A. P. Isaev and M. A. Podoinitsyn, “Two-spinor description of massive particles and relativistic spin projection operators,” Nucl. Phys. B 929, 452 (2018).
Funding
The work of I.L.B. is supported by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, project no. QZOY-2023-0003. The work of S.A.F. is supported by RSF grant no. 21-12-00129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Appendices
APPENDIX 1
1.1 COVERING OF THE \(4D\) LORENTZ GROUP. WIGNER OPERATORS
The relationship between the Lorentz group and its covering group \(SL(2,\mathbb{C})\) is formulated in the frame work of space \(\mathcal{H}\) of Hermitian \((2 \times 2)\) matrices. In this case the basis matrices are \({{\sigma }^{0}} = {{I}_{2}}\) and \({{\sigma }^{i}}\), \(i = 1,2,3\) are the \(\sigma \)-Pauli matrices. These matrices establish a one-to-one correspondence between the set of vectors in the space \({{x}_{\mu }} \in {{\mathbb{R}}^{{1,3}}}\) and the set \(\mathcal{H}\) of Hermitian matrices \(X = {{x}_{\mu }}{{\sigma }^{\mu }} \in \mathcal{H}\). The action of the group \(SL(2,\mathbb{C})\) on the set \(\mathcal{H}\)
leads to the group homomorphism \(SL(2,\mathbb{C}) \to S{{O}^{ \uparrow }}(1,3)\) represented in (2.2).
As a test 4-momentum of a massless particle, we take the vector \(\mathop p\limits^\circ {\kern 1pt} \in {{\mathbb{R}}^{{1,3}}}\), which has the following components
The Wigner operator \({{A}_{{(p)}}} \in SL(2,\mathbb{C})\) is defined by the matrix equation
where \((x\sigma ): = {{x}_{\mu }}{{\sigma }^{\mu }}\). The arbitrariness in the definition of Wigner operators is fixed by the equality \({{A}_{{(\mathop p\limits^\circ )}}} = {{I}_{2}}\). Relation (A.3) in vector representation has the form \(\Lambda _{\nu }^{\mu }({{A}_{{(p)}}}){\kern 1pt} {{\mathop p\limits^\circ }_{\mu }} = {{p}_{\nu }}\). The matrices \(h \in SL(2,\mathbb{C})\) from the stability subgroup \({{G}_{{\mathop p\limits^\circ }}}\) preserve the test momentum,
In the case of an isotropic 4-momentum (A.2), the elements \(h \in {{G}_{{\mathop p\limits^\circ }}} \simeq ISO(2)\) have the form
i.e., the matrix \(h\) depends on three parameters \(\theta \in [0,2\pi ]\) and \(\vec {b} = ({{b}_{1}},{{b}_{2}}) \in {{\mathbb{R}}^{2}}\).
The Wigner operator \({{A}_{{(p)}}}\) is defined up to right multiplication by an element from the stability subgroup \({{G}_{{\mathop p\limits^\circ }}}\) and thus parameterizes the coset space \(SL(2,\mathbb{C})/{{G}_{{\mathop p\limits^\circ }}}\). The relation \(A{\kern 1pt} {{A}_{{(p)}}} = {{A}_{{(\Lambda p)}}}{\kern 1pt} {{h}_{{A,p}}}\) defining the action of the element \(A \in SL(2,\mathbb{C})\) on the coset space \(SL(2,\mathbb{C})/{{G}_{{\mathop p\limits^\circ }}}\) parameterized by the Wigner operator leads to two consequences
where the indices at \({{h}_{{A,p}}}\) indicate that the element of the test momentum stability subgroup depends on \(A \in SL(2,\mathbb{C})\) and the 4-momentum \(p\).
The parameters that correspond to the stability subgroup element \({{h}_{{A,p}}}\) specified in (A.6) are denoted by \({{\theta }_{{A,p}}}\) and \({{\vec {b}}_{{A,p}}}\) and are determined from the relation
where \({{{\mathbf{b}}}_{{A,p}}} = ({{b}_{{A,p}}}{{)}_{1}} + i{{({{b}_{{A,p}}})}_{2}}\). The parameters \({{\theta }_{{A,{{\Lambda }^{{ - 1}}}p}}}\) and \({{\vec {b}}_{{A,{{\Lambda }^{{ - 1}}}p}}}\) corresponding to the second relation from (A.6), are determined from \({{\theta }_{{A,p}}}\) and \({{\vec {b}}_{{A,p}}}\) by the substitution: \(p \to \Lambda {{(A)}^{{ - 1}}}p\). Taking into account (A.6), the condition \({{A}_{{(\mathop p\limits^\circ )}}} = {{I}_{2}}\) leads to the equalities:
APPENDIX 2
1.1 PAULI–LUBANSKI PSEUDOVECTOR FOR FIELDS WITH AN ADDITIONAL VECTOR VARIABLE
The Poincaré group generators \({{\hat {P}}_{\nu }}\), \({{\hat {M}}_{{\nu \mu }}}\), acting in the field space \(\Psi (p,\eta )\), have the form
The Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector in the reference frame of a test momentum is defined as follows:
Its components have the following form:
where the variables defined in (4.4) are used. It can be shown that in an arbitrary reference frame the components of the Pauli-Lubanski vector are given by the expressions:
APPENDIX 3
1.1 POLARIZATION VECTORS
Here we give expressions for the 4-polarization vectors used in the paper.
In the standard momentum frame, the 4-polarization vectors that are orthogonal to each other and to the massless test momentum \(\mathop p\limits^\circ {\kern 1pt} \), have components
In an arbitrary basis, they are denoted by
The following linear combinations of vectors (C.2) are also used:
which, by construction, satisfy the equations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchbinder, I.L., Isaev, A.P., Podoinitsyn, M.A. et al. Generalized Wigner Operators and Relativistic Gauge Fields. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 20, 605–612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477123040167
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477123040167