Skip to main content
Log in

End members, dominant valency, and identifying minerals of mixed composition

  • New Minerals, Nomenclature, and Classification
  • Published:
Geology of Ore Deposits Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two rules for identifying and naming minerals of mixed composition are compared. Olivine, monoclinic pyroxene, tourmaline, and mica are given as examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. D. Borneman-Starynkevich, Guidebook for Calculation of Mineral Formulas (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bulach, Berechung Von Mineralformeln (Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3. A. G. Bulakh, “Isomorphism and Choice of Mineral Name” Zap. Ross. Mineral. O-va 138(3), 108–111 (2009). [Geol. Ore Deposits, Zap. Russian Mineral. Soc. 52 (7), (2010)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. G. Bulakh, Guidebook and Tables for Calculation of Mineral Formulas (Nedra, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. G. Bulakh, V. G. Krivovichev, and A. A. Zolotarev, Mineral Formulas. Thermodynamic Analysis in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Practical Guidebook and Handbook (St. Petersburg State Univ., St. Petersburg, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. G. Bulakh, V. G. Krivovichev, and A. A. Zolotarev, General Mineralogy, 4th Ed. (Akademiya, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. A. Deer, R. A. Howie, and J. Zussman, Rock-Forming Minerals (Wiley, New York, 1962–1963; Mir, Moscow, 1965–1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Dolivo-Dobrovol’sky and Yu. L. Gul’bin, Physical Chemistry of Geological Processes. Methods of Physicochemical Calculation of Mineral-Forming Processes (Mining Institute, St. Petersburg, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Hatert and E. Burke, “The IMA-CNMNC Dominant-Constituent Rule Revisited and Extended,” Can. Mineral. 46(4), 717–728 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. C. Hawthorne, “The Use of End-Member Charge-Arrangements in Defining New Mineral Species and Heterovalent Substitutions in Complex Minerals,” Can. Mineral. 40, 699–710 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V. G. Krivovichev and A. A. Zolotarev, Imaging of Chemical Composition of Minerals (St. Petersburg State Univ., St. Petersburg, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. G. Krivovichev, “Graphic Imaging of Chemical Composition of Minerals and the 50% Rule for Defining Mineral Species,” Zap. Vseross. Mineral. O-va, 127(4), 72–78 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Larsen and H. Berman, Microscopic Determination of Nonopaque Minerals (US Geol. Surv. Bull. 848, 1934; Nedra, Moscow, 1965).

  14. A. N. Winchell and H. Winchell, Elements of Optical Mineralogy. II. Descriptions of Minerals, 4th Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1951; Inostrannaya Literatura, Moscow, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.-R. Wenk and A. G. Bulakh, Minerals. Their Constitution and Origin (University Press, Cambridge, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Bulakh.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.G. Bulakh, 2009, published in Zapiski RMO (Proceedings of the Russian Mineralogical Society), 2009, No. 4, pp. 39–44.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bulakh, A.G. End members, dominant valency, and identifying minerals of mixed composition. Geol. Ore Deposits 52, 614–617 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701510070123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701510070123

Keywords

Navigation