Abstract
Using the latest most accurate values of post-Newtonian parameters γ and β obtained by MESSENGER we impose restrictions on the recently proposed hybrid f(R)-gravity model in its scalar–tensor representation. We show that the presence of a light scalar field in this theory does not contradict the experimental data based not only on the γ parameter (as was shown earlier), but also on all other PPN parameters. The application of parameterized post-Newtonian formalism to gravitational theories with massive fields is also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 607, 665 (2004).
F. Zwicky, Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110 (1933).
J. H. Oort, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands 6, 249 (1932).
P. G. Bergmann, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1, 25 (1968).
A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13, 3 (2010).
S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rep. 692, 1 (2017).
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rep. 505, 59 (2011).
A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123512 (2003).
F. Briscese, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 646, 105 (2007).
D. Saez-Gomez, Gen. Rel. Grav. 41, 1527 (2009).
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 657, 238 (2007).
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 77, 026007 (2008).
S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and D. Saez-Gomez, Phys. Lett. B 681, 74 (2009).
G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, P. Tretyakov, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 79, 044001 (2009).
G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 77, 046009 (2008).
S. D. Odintsov, D. Saez-Gomez, and G. S. Sharov, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 862 (2017).
S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40, 357 (2008).
T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010).
T. Chiba, Phys. Lett. B 575, 1 (2003).
G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261102 (2005).
G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023511 (2007).
J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004).
S. Capozziello and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 77, 107501 (2008).
J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004).
W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064004 (2007).
T. Koivisto and H. Kurki-Suonio, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 2355 (2006).
T. Koivisto, Phys. Rev. D 73, 083517 (2006).
T. Harko, T. S. Koivisto, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 85, 084016 (2012).
C. G. Böhmer, F. S. N. Lobo, and N. Tamanini, Phys. Rev. D 88, 104019 (2013).
N. A. Lima and V. Smer-Barreto, Astrophys. J. 818, 186 (2016).
I. Leanizbarrutia, F. S. N. Lobo, and D. Sáez-Gómez, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084046 (2017).
S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T. S. Koivisto, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04, 011 (2013).
S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T. S. Koivisto, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 024 (2013).
S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T. S. Koivisto, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, Astropart. Phys. 50–52C, 65 (2013).
S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T. S. Koivisto, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 86, 127504 (2012).
B. Danila, T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, and M. K. Mak, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044031 (2017).
S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T. S. Koivisto, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, Universe 1, 199 (2015).
C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 191101 (2018).
A. Fienga, J. Laskar, P. Kuchynka, H. Manche, G. Desvignes, M. Gastineau, I. Cognard, and G. Theureau, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 111, 363 (2011).
A. Verma, A. Fienga, J. Laskar, H. Manche, and M. Gastineau, Astron. Astrophys. 561, A115 (2014).
A. Fienga, J. Laskar, P. Exertier, H. Manche, and M. Gastineau, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 123, 325 (2015).
K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. 169, 1017 (1968).
C. M. Will, Astrophys. J. 163, 611 (1971).
C. M. Will and K. Nordtvedt, Astrophys. J. 177, 757 (1972).
C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993).
J. Alsing, E. Berti, C. M. Will, and H. Zaglauer, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064041 (2012).
T. Helbig, Astrophys. J. 382, 223 (1991).
L. Perivolaropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 81, 047501 (2010).
Y. Nutku, Astrophys. J. 155, 999 (1969).
B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, Nature (London, U.K.) 425, 374 (2003).
C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 4 (2014).
T. P. Sotiriou and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084007 (2007).
D. L. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2374 (1974).
E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
R. S. Park, W. M. Folkner, A. S. Konopliv, J. G. Williams, D. E. Smith, and M. T. Zuber, Astron. J. 153, 121 (2017).
P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035009 (2016).
P. I. Dyadina, N. A. Avdeev, and S. O. Alexeyev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, 947 (2019).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank N.A. Avdeev and V.V. Kolybasova for discussions and comments on the topics of this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the grant 18-32-00785 from Russian Foundation for Basic Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendices
POINT-MASS AND PERFECT FLUID PPN METRIC
Point-mass metric [47]:
here wi is coordinate velocity of PPN coordinate system relative to the mean rest frame of the universe.
Perfect fluid metric [57]:
where PPN potentials are represented
Here “PF”-potentials are responsible for preferred frames effects.
THE PERFECT FLUID METRIC OF THE HYBRID f(R)-GRAVITY
The perfect fluid metric of hybrid f(R)-gravity:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyadina, P.I., Labazova, S.P. & Alexeyev, S.O. Post-Newtonian Limit of Hybrid Metric-Palatini f(R)-Gravity. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 129, 838–848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776119110025
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776119110025