Skip to main content
Log in

The “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis and a Responsible Nuclear Policy

  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1980s, one of the fundamental topics of scientific debate was the discussion of the global consequences of nuclear war. At that time, the hypothesis of “nuclear winter” emerged, in which scientists attempted to analyze the theoretical possibility of a sharp cooling of the Earth after mass fires and find natural analogues of a potential climatic catastrophe. In the following decades, the “nuclear winter” hypothesis went through various stages of criticism and reassessment. In the early 2000s, studies of the problem became regional in nature, focusing mainly on the possible consequences of local nuclear conflicts. In this article, the authors analyze the stages of development of research on the “nuclear winter” hypothesis, focusing on the Russian and American approaches, and conclude that the body of work produced by American and Soviet scientists in 1983–1985 represents the first attempts by the scientific community to conceptualize the problem of responsible nuclear policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. R. Wolfson and F. Dalnoki-Veress, “The devastating effects of nuclear weapons,” MIT Press Reader, Mar. 2 (2022). https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/devastating-effects-of-nuclear-weapons-war/. Cited January 25, 2023.

  2. Paul Crutzen (a Dutch atmospheric chemist who studied the relationship between nitrogen oxides and ozone photochemistry) moved from Stockholm University to Oxford and then to Boulder, and by that time he was Director of the Air Chemistry Department at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany. John Burks was an Associate Professor of chemistry at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and a Researcher at that university’s Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. For more details, see Badash 2009.

  3. Martin 1988.

  4. Crutzen, Birks 1982.

  5. Barton et al. 1984.

  6. Turco et al. 1983.

  7. Horowitz et al. 1984; Sagan et al. 1986.

  8. Turco et al. 1983.

  9. For detailed biographies of the scientists, see Dörries 2011.

  10. Badash 2009.

  11. Dörries 2011; Badash 2009.

  12. Chester et al. 1984.

  13. Thompson et al. 1986.

  14. Thompson et al. 1986.

  15. R. Wolfson and F. Dalnoki-Veress, “The devastating effects of nuclear weapons,” MIT Press Reader, Mar. 2 (2022). https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/devastating-effects-of-nuclear-weapons-war/. Cited January 25, 2023.

  16. Aleksandrov, Stenchikov 1983; Golitsyn, Ginzburg 1983.

  17. Aleksandrov 1982.

  18. Tarko 2022.

  19. For more information about this stage, see Samoylovskaya 2023.

  20. Barloewen et al. 2010, 396.

  21. Sagan 1983, 275.

  22. Hippel 1983.

  23. Teller 1984.

  24. D. Horowitz was a Professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; R.J. Lieber was a Professor of government at Georgetown University. Horowitz et al. 1984.

  25. Horowitz et al. 1984, 995.

  26. For more information on the topic of strategic relations between Russia and NATO in the context of events in Ukraine, see Stefanovich et al. 2023.

  27. Horowitz et al. 1984, 996.

  28. Horowitz et al. 1984, 1002.

  29. For contemporary discussions on threshold values, see Bogdanov 2023.

  30. Thompson et al. 1986.

  31. Sagan 1983.

  32. Hippel 1983; Teller 1985.

  33. Walker 2010.

  34. For a more detailed analysis of discussions on strategic issues in the context of the “nuclear winter” hypothesis, see Badash 2009.

  35. “Reagan’s nuclear war briefing declassified,” National Security Archive. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/ 2016-12-22/reagans-nuclear-war-briefing-declassified#_ednref9. Cited January 1, 2023.

  36. Coupe et al. 2019.

  37. Nacht et al. 2010.

  38. Toon et al. 2019.

  39. Ginzburg et al. 1992.

  40. Bracken 2000.

  41. Bracken 2000.

  42. Кокошин 2003.

  43. Bivens 2022.

  44. H. Kristensen, M. Korda, E. Johns, and K. Kohn, “Status of world nuclear forces,” Federation of American Scientists, Mar. 31 (2023). https://fas.org/initiative/status-world-nuclear-forces/. Cited January 25, 2023.

  45. Nuclear ammunition, Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. https://encyclopedia.mil.ru/encyclopedia/dictionary/ details_rvsn.htm?id=13804@morfDictionary

  46. Sagan 1983.

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Aleksandrov, “Atmospheric general circulation model with baroclinic adjustment,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 265 (5), 1094–1097 (1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. von Barloewen and G. Naumova, Book of Knowledge: Conversations with Outstanding Thinkers of Our Time (Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. V. Bogdanov, “Deterrence in the era of small forms,” Russ. Glob. Aff. 21 (3), 42–52 (2023) [in Russian]. https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/sderzhivanie-v-epohu-malyh-form/

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. S. Golitsyn and A. S. Ginzburg, Climatic Consequences of a Possible Nuclear Conflict and Some Natural Analogues (IFA AN SSSR, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Kokoshin, Nuclear Conflicts in the 21st Century (Types, Forms, Possible Participants) (Bukinist, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. A. Samoylovskaya, “On the Prohibition of Nuclear Tests in Three Environments: Between Fear and Doubt,” Polis. Political Studies, No. 6, 52–65 (2023) [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.06.05

  7. V. V. Aleksandrov and G. L. Stenchikov, On the Modeling of the Climatic Consequences of the Nuclear War (Computing Centre of AS USSR, Moscow, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Badash, A Nuclear Winter’s Tale : Science and Politics in the 1980s (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. I. J. Barton, and W. P. Garth, “‘Twilight at Noon’ overstated,” Ambio  13 (1), 49–51 (1984). http://www.jstor.org/stable/4312989

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Bivens, Nuclear Famine: Even a “Limited” Nuclear War Would Cause Abrupt Climate Disruption and Global Starvation (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, 2022). https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ENGLISH-Nuclear-Famine-Report-Final-bleed-marks.pdf

  11. P. Bracken, “The Second Nuclear Age,” Foreign Aff. 79 (1), 146–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/20049619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. V. Chester, F. C. Kornegay, and A. M. Perry,  A Preliminary Review of the TTAPS Nuclear Winter Scenarios (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, 1984). https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/16/027/16027025.pdf

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Coupe, C. G. Bardeen, A. Robock, and O. B. Toon, “Nuclear winter responses to nuclear war between the United States and Russia in the whole atmosphere community climate model version 4 and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., No. 124, 8522–8543 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030509

  14. P. J. Crutzen and J. W. Birks, “The atmosphere after a nuclear war: Twilight at noon,” Ambio 11 (2/3), 114–125 (1982). http://www.jstor.org/stable/4312777

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Dörries, “The politics of atmospheric sciences: ‘Nuclear winter’ and global climate change,” Osiris 26 (1), 198–223 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1086/661272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Ginzburg, V. Haritonenko, and O. Kurliand-skaya, “Possible effects of smoke from Kuwaiti oil fires on climate and society,” in Climate Change and Energy Policy (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992), pp. 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. von Hippel, “The myths of Edward Teller,” Bull. At. Sci. 39 (3), 6–12 (1983).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1983.11458958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Horowitz, R. J. Lieber, E. N. Luttwak, P. Clawson, R. Seitz, and C. Sagan, “Nuclear winter,” Foreign Aff. 62 (4), 995–1002 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/20041916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Martin, “Nuclear winter: Science and politics,” Sci. Public Policy 15 (5), 321–334 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/15.5.321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Nacht, M. Frank, and S. Prussin, “The second nuclear age (1992–Present),” in Nuclear Security: The Nexus Among Science, Technology and Policy (Springer, Cham., 2010), p. 213–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75085-5_5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Sagan, “Nuclear war and climatic catastrophe: Some policy implications,” Foreign Aff. 62 (2), 257–292 (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/20041818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Sagan, R. Turco, G. W. Rathjens, R. H. Siegel, S. L. Thompson, and S. H. Schneider, “The nuclear winter debate,” Foreign Aff. 65 (1), 163–178 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/20042868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. V. Stefanovich and A. S. Ermakov, “Guns before butter: A new reality?” Russ. Glob. Aff. 21 (4), 24–46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-4-24-46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. M. Tarko, “About the history and modeling of nuclear winter,” Norwegian J. Dev. Int. Sci., No. 97, 3–13 (2022).

  25. E. Teller, “Climatic change with nuclear war,” Nature 318 (99) (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/318099a0

  26. E. Teller, “Widespread after-effects of nuclear war,” Nature 310, 621–624 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/310621a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. L. Thompson and S. H. Schneider, “Nuclear winter reappraised,” Foreign Aff. 64 (5), 981–1005 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/20042777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O. B. Toon, C. G. Bardeen, A. Robock, L. Xia, H. Kristensen, M. McKinzie, R. J. Peterson, C. S, Har-rison, N. S, Lovenduski, and R. P. Turco, “Rapidly expanding nuclear arsenals in Pakistan and India portend regional and global catastrophe,” Sci. Adv. 5 (10), 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay5478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. P. Turco, O. B. Toon, T. P. Ackerman, J. B. Pollack, and C. Sagan, “Nuclear winter: Global consequences of multiple nuclear explosions,” Science 222, 1283–1292 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. W. Walker, “The UK, threshold status and responsible nuclear sovereignty,” Int. Aff. 86 (2), 447–464 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. S. Ginzburg or N. A. Samoylovskaya.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by B. Alekseev

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Aleksandr Samuilovich Ginzburg, Dr. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), is Head of the Laboratory of Mathematical Ecology and Chief Researcher at the Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Russian Academy of Sciences. Natalya Aleksandrovna Samoylovskaya is a Junior Researcher at the Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ginzburg, A.S., Samoylovskaya, N.A. The “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis and a Responsible Nuclear Policy. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331624010015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331624010015

Keywords:

Navigation