Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An evaluation of the elements and characteristics of historical building façades in the context of Malaysia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inconsistencies among historical building facade elements potentially tarnish the image in a historical area. This study identifies visual elements and features of historical facades, such as shape, architectural style, colour and decoration that enhance the historical image of a region. In a time-interval random sampling questionnaire, 220 respondents aged 20–50 years and above were selected from passers-by who frequented the study area. The research zone chosen is located in a historical quarter of the Kuala Lumpur city centre, where the five best and worst historical facades were ranked by the public for further content analysis. According to analysis results, arches, pilasters, columns, ornaments and detailing represent historical components. Legibility, coherence and harmonious repetition of these elements are characteristics strongly projecting the image of historical facades. Conversely, inconsistent colours and non-standardized advertisement boards may spoil the historical appearance. The findings of the present study can assist urban designers and planners to consider the public’s evaluation of historical building facades for prospective conservation projects. Therefore, the results of this work are refined into a series of suggestions that provide insight regarding an improved historical representation of the study area for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas Zadeh, F. and Sulaiman, A.B. (2010) Dynamic street environment. Justice and Sustainability 15 (5): 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C.H. and Kilicoglu, O. (2009) Architecture and engineering students’ evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness. Environmental Psychology 29 (1): 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askari, A.H. and Dola, K.B. (2009) Influence of building façade visual elements on its historical image: Case of Kuala Lumpur city, Malaysia. Design and Built Environment 5 (December): 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baper, S.Y. and Hassan, A.S. (2012) Factors affecting the continuity of architectural identity. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences 1 (3): 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerli, A. and Martín, J.D. (2004) Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research 31 (3): 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. and Gifford, R. (2001) Architects predict lay evaluations of large contemporary buildings: Whose conceptual properties? Environmental Psychology 21 (1): 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cevik, S., Vural, S., Tavsan, F. and Asik, O. (2008) An example to renovation-revitalization works in historical city centres: Kunduracilar Street/Trabzon-Turkey. Building and Environment 43 (5): 950–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chon, K.S. (1990) The role of destination image in tourism: A review and discussion. Tourist Review 45 (2): 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City Hall Kuala Lumpur. (2008) Draft Kuala Lumpur 2020 City Plan. Vol. 2, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

  • Cohen, E. (1972) Toward a sociology of international tourism. An International Quarterly of the Social Science 39 (1): 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1979) A phenomenology of tourist experiences. Sociology 13 (2): 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubukcu, E. and Kahraman, I. (2008) Hue, saturation, lightness, and building exterior preference: An empirical study in Turkey comparing architects’ and non architects’ evaluative and cognitive judgments. Color Research & Application 33 (5): 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, K. and Nasar, J.L. (1989) The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments. Environmental Psychology 9 (4): 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, E., Ellingham, I. and Platt, S. (2008) Reconciling the architectural preferences of architects and the public: The ordered preference model. Environment and Behaviour 40 (5): 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. (2003) The Survey Handbook, 2nd edn. USA, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, M.P. and Hidalgo, M.C. (2005) Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes. Psychology 40 (1): 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerhall, C.M. (2000) Clustering predictors of landscape preference in the traditional Swedish cultural landscape: Prospect-refuge, mystery, age and management. Environmental Psychology 20 (1): 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, T. (2004) Lasnamäe Track and Field Centre MAJA, Estonian Architectural Review, 26 May, http://www.solness.ee/maja/?mid=130&id=271, accessed 10 October 2009.

  • Heritage of Malaysia Trust. (1990) A Handbook Malaysian Architectural Heritage Survey. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Badan Warisan Malaysia Press.

  • Hertzman, E., Anderson, D. and Rowley, S. (2008) Edutainment heritage tourist attractions: A portrait of visitors’ experiences at storyeum. Museum Management and Curatorship 23 (2): 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.R. (1992) A cognitive analysis of preference for Urban spaces. Environmental Psychology 12 (3): 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.R. and Bryce, A.G. (2007) Mystery and preference in within-forest settings. Environment and Behaviour 39 (6): 779–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.R. and Shier, R.L. (2000) Complexity, age, and building preference. Environment and Behaviour 32 (4): 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C.W. (2007) Evaluation of the façade of buildings in the ‘Type I Residential Area’ of the 7th Land Consideration District in Taichung City. MSc thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, China.

  • Huxtable, A.L. (2004) Building façade, 15 February, http://www.class.uidaho.eduedu/communityresearch/facade_ remodeling.htm, accessed 15 March 2009.

  • Ikemi, M. (2005) The effects of mystery on preference for residential facades. Environmental Psychology 25 (2): 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imamoglu, Ç. (2000) Complexity, preference and familiarity: Architecture and non architecture Turkish students’ assessments of traditional and modern house façades. Environmental Psychology 20 (1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ja’afar, N.H., Ahmad Bashri, S. and Shuhana, S.H. (2012a) Traditional street activities in Kuala Lumpur city centre. Multidisciplinary Thoughts 2 (1): 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ja’afar, N.H., Ahmad Bashri, S. and Shuhana, S.H. (2012b) The contribution of landscape features on traditional streets in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 50 (2012): 643–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ja’afar, N.H. and Usman, I.M.S. (2009) Physical and transportation elements of traditional street in Malaysia. Social Sciences 9 (4): 669–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. and Christensen, L.B. (2011) Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. USA, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1979) Perception and landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. Paper presented at the Our National Landscape Conferences, Berkeley, CA, USA.

  • Kaplan, S. and Kaplan, R. (1982) Cognition and Environment. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. and Ryan, R.L. (1998) With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaack, U.T.K., Bilow, M. and Auer, A.T. (2007) Façades: Principles of Construction. Boston, MA; Basel, Switzerland; Berlin, Germany: Birkhaüser-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, F. and Baud-Bovy, M. (1977) Tourism and Recreational Development. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekagul, A. (2002) Toward preservation of the traditional marketplace: A preference study of traditional and modern shopping environments in Bangkok, Thailand. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

  • Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. USA, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marina, M. and Renato, T. (2006) Aesthetic, perception and preference for historical and modern buildings. Cognitive Processing 7 (1): 66–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maulan, S. (2006) A perceptual study of wetlands: Implications for wetland restoration in the urban areas in Malaysia. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

  • Milman, A. and Pizam, A. (1995) The role of awareness of familiarity with a destination: The Central Florida case. Travel Research 33 (3): 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo, G. (2000) Cultural and heritage tourism: The great debates. In: B. Faulkner, G. Moscardo and L. Eric (eds.) Tourism in the 21 Century: Lessons from Experience. London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moughtin, C., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (1995) Urban Design: Ornament and Decoration. Great Britain, UK: Butterworth Architecture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J.H. (2007) The historic character of buildings and districts, 20 May, http://architecture.about.com/library/bl-preservationbrief-siding02.htm, accessed 17 June 2007.

  • Naoi, T. (2003) Tourists evaluation of destinations: The cognitive perspective. Travel & Tourism Marketing 14 (1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naoi, T., Airey, D., Iijima, S.H. and Niininen, O. (2006) Visitors evaluation of a historical district: Repertory grid analysis and laddering analysis with photographs. Tourism Management 27 (3): 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J.L. (1994) Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behaviour 26 (3): 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J.L., Stamps III, A.E. and Hanyu, K. (2005) Form and function in public buildings. Environmental Psychology 25 (2): 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S.C. (1973) Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity? Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration 14 (3): 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N. (2003) The sensory value of ornament. Communication and Cognition 36 (3): 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari, R.M., Sen, D.E., Al, S., Kahya, N.C. and Sagsöz, A. (2011) The effects of traditions, customs and beliefs on architectural design: The example of Turkey. Academic Research 3 (3): 780–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, L.L. (1996) Urban conservation policy and the preservation of historical and cultural heritage: The case of Singapore. Cities 13 (6): 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps III, A.E. (1999) Architectural detail, Van der Laan septaves and pixel counts. Design Studies 20 (1): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps III, A.E. (1994) Formal and non-formal stimulus factors in environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79 (1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps III, A.E. (2004) Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Environmental Psychology 24 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavernor, R. (2007) Visual and cultural sustainability: The impact of tall buildings on London. Landscape and Urban Planning 83 (1): 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utaberta, N., Jalali, A., Johar, S., Surat, M and Che-Ani, A.I. (2012) Building facade studay in Lahijan city, Iran: The impact of facade’s visual elements on historical image. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 67 (July): 701–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, D.J. and Young, M. (1998) Evaluative images and tourism: The use of personal construct to describe the structure of destination images. Travel Research 36 (3): 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J.C. and Baldwin, E.D. (2012) Historic preservation, significance, and age value: A comparative phenomenology of Historic Charleston and the nearby new-urbanist community of I’On. Environmental Psychology 32 (4): 384–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly funded by Universiti Putra Malaysia. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Special thanks should be given to Professor Dr. Dato’ Ar. Elias @ Ilias Bin Salleh and Dr.Suhardi Maulan for their helpful comments and suggestions, which guided this study to be more meaningful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, 43400, UPM Serdang, Malaysia

    Amir Hossein Askari & Kamariah Binti Dola

  2. Azad University of Sepidan, Fars, Iran

    Soha Soltani

Authors
  1. Amir Hossein Askari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamariah Binti Dola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soha Soltani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Hossein Askari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossein Askari, A., Dola, K. & Soltani, S. An evaluation of the elements and characteristics of historical building façades in the context of Malaysia. Urban Des Int 19, 113–124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.18

Keywords

Search

Navigation