Abstract
With the growing awareness of environmental issues available across various media platforms, consumers, particularly the younger generation, are more conscious of their consumption and its impact on the environment. This trend can be observed in the surging demand for environmentally friendly and animal-test-free products on the market. However, despite the young consumer group’s critical role in the marketplace, existing research in this area remains limited, demanding further investigation. Recognising the significance of this trend, this study employs a two-stage partial least squares structural equation modelling-artificial neural network (PLS-SEM-ANN) approach to analyse the antecedents influencing green consumption among young Chinese consumers. This study proposes a conceptual research model that extends the norm activation model (NAM) by analysing 366 self-reported questionnaires. The first-stage PLS-SEM results reveal significant positive correlations between personal norms (PN), environmental knowledge (EK), information availability (IA), social norms (SN) and green consumption intention (GCI). However, face consciousness (FC) was found to have no significant effect on GCI. The second-stage ANN sensitivity analysis shows that PN emerged as the most influential factor on GCI, followed by IA, SN, and EK. This ranking diverges from the PLS-SEM results, suggesting potential hidden nonlinear relationships between IA, SN, EK and GCI. Among the significant predictors of PN, the ascription of responsibility (AR) ranks first, followed by an awareness of consequence (AC) and SN. With its unique two-stage PLS-SEM-ANN approach to green consumption among young consumers, this study offers valuable insights for both marketers and researchers. Marketers gain a new tool to predict GCI more effectively, while researchers can explore the intricate interplay of factors shaping sustainable consumption choices. Methodologically, the present study is one of the few that applies extended NAM using two-stage PLS-SEM-ANN in the context of green consumption.
Introduction
The deterioration of China’s environment is mainly caused by unsustainable production and consumption patterns (Wang et al., 2021b). Since then, consumers’ awareness of environmental protection has grown stronger, taking into account health and the interests of future generations (Tewari et al., 2022). Continuing consumer concerns about consumption patterns and environmental issues are also putting pressure on governments and marketers (Kabadayi et al., 2015). As an alternative to traditional consumption patterns, green consumerism has been widely discussed by marketers and consumers (Tong et al., 2020). Green consumption is a new type of consumption behaviour that conforms to human health and environmental protection standards for the welfare of the whole society and future generations (Chen et al., 2023). Mason et al. (2022) believed that changing consumer patterns, such as choosing greener products, buying sustainable goods, or even promoting shared use, is a key factor in achieving sustainability. However, studies found that consumers’ green behaviour remains underexplored and in a promising stage that requires more in-depth investigations (Sultan et al., 2020; Vita et al., 2019).
Over the years, the consumption attitudes and ideas of the young generation have changed dramatically (Maichum et al., 2017), and they have been regarded as the improvers of environmental problems (Tewari et al., 2022). Young consumers influence the environment not only through their personal behaviour but also through their consumption demand, which can influence the decision-making of enterprises and governments (Hansmann et al., 2020). Because marketers value young consumers’ consumption potential (Gulzari et al., 2022), their perceptions of green consumption provide policymakers with directions for improvement. In addition, consumers born in Generations Y and Z (born after 1980) account for 70 percent of total consumption; thus, making changes to their consumption habits is crucial for achieving sustainable development. It was reported that most of the young consumers receive good environmental education at school, and the effectiveness of this education needs further confirmation (Akhtar et al., 2022).
In addition, young consumers’ consumption behaviour is inexorably impacted by their external environment, such as the information they receive (Cham et al., 2022; Long et al., 2022), cultural values (Halder et al., 2020) and social norms (SNs) (Cham et al., 2023; Kim and Seock, 2019). Normative beliefs have been found to have a significant behavioural impact (Schultz et al., 2016). However, normative social influence is often underestimated (Nolan et al., 2008; Shao et al., 2022). A SN is a widely recognised code of behaviour that has a certain social influence (Lin and Niu, 2018). Individuals often conform to SNs in their daily activities to fit in and avoid social pressure (Aertsens et al., 2009; Ong et al., 2022). Currently, China actively promotes green consumption, and young people frequently receive green education through schools and mass media. Whether this social pressure and consumption orientation will translate into increased green consumption among young consumers remains an empirical question.
Meanwhile, evidence suggests that cultural values play a crucial role in explaining individuals’ environmental intentions (Halder et al., 2020). Incorporating cultural dimensions into research allows for the analysis of cultural norms and characteristics that transcend national boundaries, thereby enhancing explanatory power (Patterson et al., 2006). In East Asian cultures, the concept of “face” occupies significant space in daily actions and thought (Fam et al., 2023; Li and Su, 2007). This face consciousness (FC) reflects individuals’ personality traits, influencing their purchasing decisions and interpersonal communication (Liu et al., 2021). Some scholars believe that green consumption can improve an individual’s status and image (Sun et al., 2017), thanks to the environmental protection attributes and higher prices associated with green products (de Morais et al., 2021). However, the effect of age on green consumption remains mixed in the existing literature (Das et al., 2018; Tan et al., 2022). As a result, there is a lack of research into the specific cultural influences that shape young consumer behaviour in China.
Furthermore, due to a lack of comprehensive information about green products or the high cost of accessing them, consumers may be hesitant to choose green products (Niedermeier et al., 2021). Consumers’ perceptions of the ease of accessing information significantly influence their willingness to choose eco-friendly options (Niedermeier et al., 2021; Shao et al., 2022). When consumers realise that the decision-making process can be simplified by utilising the characteristics of green products, information about the environmental benefits of consuming green can outweigh the price issue and lead them to purchase eco-friendly goods (Joshi and Rahman, 2015). Environmental knowledge (EK), an integral part of environmental literacy, increases people’s understanding of the environment and leads to more environmentally responsible behaviour (Ramdas and Mohamed, 2014). As consumers gain knowledge about green products, they are more likely to choose them.
The extant literature has employed various theoretical frameworks, such as the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), value-belief-norm theory (VBN), and norm activation model (NAM), to examine consumers’ pro-environmental intentions and behaviours. TPB delves into consumers’ pro-environmental behaviour from the perspective of self-interest, while VBN and NAM are grounded in consumers’ altruistic behaviour (Schwartz, 1977). These theoretical foundations have been widely applied in studies on pro-environmental behaviours among young consumers (Ahmed et al., 2021; Becerra et al., 2023). Moreover, Saphores et al. (2012) posit that pro-environmental behaviour is closely tied to the ethical choices of individuals. Consequently, NAM has often been prioritised in research to investigate pro-environmental behaviour among youth (Si et al., 2022).
However, some scholars have criticised NAM for its predominantly altruistic perspective, contending that it places excessive emphasis on ethical considerations while overlooking external social concerns (Long et al., 2022). Compared to conventional alternatives, consumers often perceive green products as expensive and premium (Chekima et al., 2016), and they tend to prefer them only when they personally feel responsible for environmental well-being (Confente and Scarpi, 2021). Therefore, the act of consuming green products inherently involves moral considerations. Upon reviewing previous studies, it becomes apparent that NAM requires expansion rather than simple application to various scenarios. As argued by Han et al. (2019), effectively interpreting consumers’ pro-environmental intentions and behaviours necessitates broadening the scope of the NAM.
Given these research gaps, this study aims to integrate FC, information availability (IA), SNs, and consumers’ EK into the NAM to investigate young Chinese consumers’ green consumption intentions. Particularly, we aim (1) to expand the NAM by including cultural and external environmental factors, (2) to assess the relative significance of FC in young consumers’ green consumption intention in China, (3) to examine the IA’s influence on the model in building intentions, and (4) to investigate how EK and SNs influence young consumer purchasing intention.
Theoretical framework and hypothesis development
Norm activation model
NAM was proposed by Schwartz (1973) and is widely used to explain and predict a range of altruistic and sustainable behaviours. Its applications extend beyond individual consumers to encompass diverse contexts, including manufacturing industry adoption of green IT (Asadi et al., 2019), tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviour (Wu et al., 2022), and restaurant food waste mitigation (Long et al., 2022). NAM believes that people will act altruistically for the benefit of society and the environment, even if these actions are sometimes against their self-interest (Ding Li et al., 2019). According to the NAM model, altruistic behaviour is a noble manifestation of value, and people will internalise social responsibility and moral obligation and embody this value as personal norms. While societal expectations often aim to foster an environment of helping others, individual differences ensure that not everyone readily conforms to such a social orientation. This inherent heterogeneity translates into variations in the generation of altruistic behaviour, with personal norms acting as key triggers (Munerah et al., 2021). The fundamental construct of NAM is Personal Norm (PN), which also has two activators: ascription of responsibility (AR) and awareness of consequence (AC) (Onwezen et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2022).
PN is defined as individuals’ moral expectations, which can inspire an individual’s inner sense of responsibility (Pearce et al., 2022) and are closely related to consumers’ intrinsic values and moral obligations (Rezaei et al., 2019; Ru et al., 2019). For example, when a consumer’s behaviour aligns with their personal norms, they tend to experience positive emotions like pride, self-respect, and security (Kutaula et al., 2022). Consistent with Schwartz (1977), PN is deeply rooted in the self-expectations and obligations arising from an individual’s internalised values. Prior studies have established a positive link between PN and intentions. For example, Choi et al. (2015) showed that PN effectively explained consumers’ intentions to visit a green hotel. In a similar vein, Pearce et al. (2022) found that individuals holding positive PNs are more likely to engage in pro-environmental behaviours.
AR refers to the feeling of responsibility for the problems (Steg and De Groot, 2010). Past studies consistently reported that when people perceive that their actions might lead to negative consequences, their sense of responsibility increases (Schwartz, 1977; Tan et al., 2019). This aligns with Ebreo et al.’s (2003) study, which found that individuals tend to engage in waste reduction behaviour when they feel personally responsible for waste generation. A favourable effect of AR on PN has been demonstrated in prior research (Munerah et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2022). For instance, Vaske et al. (2015) found that increasing AR boosts consumers’ PN in a study on carbon footprint reduction. Similarly, Wu et al. (2022) investigated tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviour and found that AR positively influences PN.
AC, in contrast to AR, focuses on how individuals’ actions might negatively impact others (Gkargkavouzi et al., 2019). NAM posits that people are motivated to act altruistically for the benefit of society or the environment, even if these actions are sometimes against their self-interest (Li et al., 2019). Therefore, from a moral standpoint, people are more likely to act sustainably when they realise their behaviour has adverse environmental consequences (Klockner and Ohms, 2009). Empirical evidence supports this, with Liu et al. (2017) demonstrating that AC positively influences PN, encouraging people to adopt environmentally friendly modes of transportation. Similarly, D’Arco and Marino (2022) found a positive and significant association between AC and environmental citizenship behaviour, mediated by PN in both the private and public spheres.
H1: PN positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ green consumption intention.
H2: AR positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ PN.
H2b: Youth consumers’ PN mediate the impact of AR on buying green products positively.
H3: AC positively and significantly influence PN.
H3b: Youth consumers’ PN mediate the impact of AC on buying green products positively.
Face consciousness
FC refers to “individuals’ desire to enhance, maintain, and avoid losing face in social activities” (Qi and Ploeger, 2021). Values are persistent beliefs people form about specific patterns of behaviour. Understanding the diverse characteristics of consumers’ pro-environment behaviour requires recognising the significant influence of cultural values and SNs across different countries (Diamantopoulos et al., 2003). Influenced by Confucianism, Chinese people closely associate face with their social status or reputation, leading them to focus more on the symbolic value of goods or brands (Ding et al., 2022). To enhance their status and project a “face-saving” image, consumers may prioritise buying products with high public recognition to elicit praise from others (Cham and Easvaralingam, 2012; Liu et al., 2021).
Studies have revealed that the moral dimension of FC can prompt consumers towards socially conscious behaviour and preferences for ethical or eco-friendly products. For instance, Ding et al. (2022) found a significant influence of FC significantly influences on consumers’ intention to purchase traceable seafood. Similarly, Qi and Ploeger (2021) observed a positive relationship between FC and consumers’ intention to buy green food. Moreover, Wu et al. (2022) discovered that FC encourages tourists in the West Lake scenic area to adopt environmentally friendly travel practices.
H4: FC positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ green consumption intention.
Social norms
SN refers to the shared expectations and behaviours that guide individuals within a community (Munerah et al., 2021). However, some scholars criticise NAM for neglecting the influence of these external social factors (Long et al., 2022). Fortunately, integrating SN into NAM models has been shown to significantly enhance its explanatory power. Notably, Hunecke et al. (2001) successfully expanded NAM when studying consumers’ travel mode choices. Their research found that SN positively influenced PN generation and the desire to use public transport. Building upon the NAM framework, Han et al. (2019) integrated SN and emotions to explore the decision-making process of consumers choosing pro-environmental green cruise projects when travelling. Their study found that SN inspires customers to actively engage in positive word-of-mouth activities. This, in turn, enhances individual social pressure and increases the likelihood of their participation in the green cruise project. Further expanding the NAM model, Long et al. (2022) incorporated SN alongside other factors to effectively predict young Chinese consumers’ food waste behaviour. This research demonstrates the model’s potential for understanding diverse pro-environmental actions.
Existing research has consistently highlighted the direct influence of SN as a motivational factor on PN (Onwezen et al., 2013). In essence, our behaviours are mainly guided by PN, which is shaped by SN within our social circles (Gleim and Lawson, 2014; Gleim et al., 2013). This close link is further supported by Han et al.’s. (2019) research study on pro-environmental cruise choices, where SN acted as a key driver for positive word-of-mouth behaviour, ultimately influencing individual participation. Further, expanding on this dynamic, Munerah et al. (2021) investigated the green beauty product purchasing habits of Malaysian consumers. Their findings confirmed the crucial role of PN as a link between SN and consumers’ purchase intentions. This suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in pro-environmental behaviours when they perceive these actions as aligning with the SNs around them.
Additionally, numerous prior studies have documented a strong correlation between SN and intention. For example, Youn et al. (2020) found that consumers’ intentions to dine at traditional restaurants were favourably impacted by SN. Similarly, Yeh et al. (2021) observed a significant influence of SN on consumers’ intentions to choose green hotels. The impact of SN on consumers’ intentions to buy vegan products was also validated by D’Souza (2022). Based on the discussion, the following hypotheses are developed:
H5a: SN positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ PN.
H5b: SN positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ green consumption intention.
H5c: Youth consumers’ PN mediate the impact of SN on buying green products positively.
Environmental knowledge
EK encompasses an individual’s capacity to recognise environmental concepts, comprehend environmental problems, and adopt solutions to address them (Fryxell and Lo, 2003). However, some researchers argue that NAM neglects the role of consumers’ own abilities, such as their perceived consumption validity and knowledge base (Munerah et al., 2021; Onwezen et al., 2014). Furthermore, existing research lacks empirical testing of whether knowledge effectively triggers the specification activation process, a key component of NAM (Ünal et al., 2018). Koo and Chung (2014) proposed that mastering EK is a prerequisite for engaging in pro-environmental behaviour, which itself can serve as a reflection of EK. Individuals with greater EK are more likely to exhibit pro-environment behaviour (Vicente-Molina et al., 2013). However, Kennedy et al. (2009) found a contrasting perspective among Canadian respondents, where a lack of EK emerged as the primary barrier to adopting sustainable practices.
The link between EK and pro-environmental intentions or behaviours is widely acknowledged by researchers. For example, Sharma and Foropon (2019) found that there is a direct association between EK and green purchase intention. Similarly, Wang et al. (2014) identified EK as a key factor explaining sustainable consumption intentions. Sun et al. (2019) observed a direct influence of EK on green product consumption in China. Furthermore, Zameer and Yasmeen (2022) highlighted that knowledge about green products significantly enhances individuals’ desire to make green purchases. In light of the above-discussed evidence, the following hypothesis is developed:
H6: EK positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ green consumption intention.
Information availability
IA refers to the process by which consumers actively seek and gather information about products or services before making a purchase decision (Kumar and Yadav, 2021). In the context of understanding how information influences consumption intention, Momsen and Ohndorf (2022) proposed that readily available product information acts as signals of varying value. This suggests that consumers encounter information that may or may not be helpful in their search for green products. Wang et al. (2021a) further argued that providing consumers with reliable energy-saving information and government-approved certification marks can effectively reduce information barriers. This empowers consumers to make informed choices and manufacturers to prioritise transparency, ultimately leading to the selection of appropriate energy-saving products. Lin and Niu (2018) proposed that readily available environmental information empowers consumers to translate their EK into impactful behaviours. This engagement stems from the utilitarian attitude cultivated by understanding the nutritional value of green food. Therefore, Qi and Ploeger (2021) advocated for marketers to prioritise enhancing nutritional information clarity, accessibility, and efficacy communication for green food products. This strategy aims to cultivate positive consumer perception and ultimately drive informed purchasing decisions.
In addition, IA availability fuels green consumption intentions because green product buyers often seek a deeper understanding of how their choices impact the environment. Maniatis (2016) found that manufacturers advertising their products’ environmental benefits saw a surge in sales, highlighting consumers’ interest in such information. The inconvenience and time investment of independent research can dampen purchase intentions. Therefore, utilitarian shoppers use readily available information to evaluate potential purchases (Kumar and Yadav, 2021; Nystrand and Olsen, 2020). Wu et al. (2021) further confirmed this, demonstrating that positive traceable information about organic food enhances purchase desire. Ultimately, the more information available, the greater the perceived control consumers exert over their purchasing decisions (Khare and Rakesh, 2011). Consequently, it can be hypothesised that:
H7: IA positively and significantly influence youth consumers’ green consumption intention.
The conceptual model constructed in the present study is shown in Fig. 1.
Methodology
Measures
To ensure validity and reliability, the survey items were drawn from and adapted from established research. Tewari et al. (2022) provided four items for measuring green consumption intention, while Long et al.’s (2022) four items were adopted for PN. Wu et al.’s (2022) scale was utilised for AC, and Yue et al.’s (2020) established scale was used to measure AR. Inspired by Kumar and Yadav (2021), five items describing consumers’ grasp of green product knowledge were used to measure EK. SNs were assessed using five items, adapted from Munerah et al. (2021). Finally, FC was measured using three items developed by Liu et al. (2021). A two-item modified scale by Kumar and Yadav (2021) was used to measure IA. All items employed a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”.
A structured questionnaire survey gathered data on both consumers’ green consumption intentions and basic demographic information. Prior to the formal investigation, a pilot study with 35 English-speaking participants was conducted to assess the reliability of the measurement items. Subsequently, the questions were translated into Chinese. Finally, native speakers used back translation on all measurements to ensure accurate content and meaning, following the approach outlined by De Silva et al. (2021).
Data collection
The researchers distributed questionnaires through Wenjuanxing, China’s most popular online survey platform. This platform boasts a nationwide user base, ensuring the representativeness of our sample. The target population comprises Generation Y and Z consumers, recognised as key drivers of green consumption. Therefore, potential respondents were pre-screened, and only those aged 18–43 were invited to participate. During the formal survey, respondents were informed of the survey’s purpose and the estimated completion time. The survey ran from March 13–27, yielding 403 responses. After removing outliers and blatantly illogical submissions, 366 responses remained for analysis. Based on the calculation of G*Power 3.1.9.7, the study had a satisfactory sample size, as it exceeded the minimum sample requirement of 160. In empirical studies related to pro-environmental consumption, it has been indicated that a sample size between 100 and 500 can produce valid and reliable results (Ding et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2021). Table 1 presents the participants’ demographic information.
Data analysis and result
A hybrid PLS-SEM-ANN approach was employed for statistical analysis in the present study. Initially, the relationship between latent constructs was tested using PLS-SEM (Hair et al., 2019), with Smart-PLS 4 used to assess the inner and outer models (Ringle et al., 2015). However, PLS-SEM has limitations in estimating nonlinear relationships between variables (Wang et al., 2022). While artificial neural networking (ANN) analysis can explore nonlinear relationships, it lacks hypothesis testing. This limitation necessitated a hybrid approach, combining ANN with PLS-SEM to unlock a more robust and predictive research model (Leong et al., 2020). The steps of data analysis are illustrated in Fig. 2.
Common method variance
Responding to the same questionnaire can introduce unavoidable systematic errors, potentially leading to common method variance (CMV) (Sharma et al., 2021). CMV can diminish the validity of data and hinder hypothesis testing (Hair et al., 2019). Hence, this study employed two methods to assess CMV. Firstly, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) (Kock and Lynn, 2012) was utilised, a common tool for detecting collinearity issues (Kumar and Yadav, 2021). When the VIF value is less than 3.3, it is considered that CMV does not exist. Our analysis revealed that all measured items had VIF values below 2.8, suggesting that CMV is not a concern in this study. Additionally, a “method” approach was employed to estimate potential CMV issues (Liang et al., 2007; Low et al., 2023). As shown in Table 2, the average Rs2 to Rm2 ratio of 98.25 further confirms the absence of CMV in this study.
Measurement model assessment
All measurement items in this study exhibited Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding 0.7, as shown in Table 3. This suggests that the data possesses satisfactory internal consistency. The values of standardised factor loadings (>0.7) and composite reliability (>0.7) surpass the thresholds recommended by Hair et al. (2014). Furthermore, the average variance extracted (AVE) affirms the convergent validity of all items, exceeding the cut-off value of 0.5.
In this study, the Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) was employed to assess the discriminant validity of constructs. HTMT reflects the ratio of the average correlation between items within the same construct (Cheah et al., 2018; Henseler et al., 2015). While a value exceeding 0.9 indicates poor discriminant validity (Henseler et al., 2015), Hair et al. (2019) proposed a stricter criterion of HTMT being below 0.85. As presented in Table 4, the HTMT values for this study demonstrate good discriminant validity.
Structural model-hypothesis testing
This study employed SmartPLS 4 bootstrapping analysis with 5,000 randomly selected sub-samples to test the hypotheses of the structural model (Hair et al., 2021). The results, presented in Table 5 and Fig. 3, indicate that PN, SN, EK, and IA are significantly and positively linked with GCI, AR, and AC, and SN has a significant positive impact on PN. Therefore, H1, H2, H3, H5a, H5b, H6, and H7 are accepted, while H4 is rejected. Effect sizes (f2) were applied to assess the predictive relevance of research hypotheses, with the f2 values presented in Table 5 ranging between 0.015 and 0.320. These values indicate that the research model’s hypotheses have small to medium effect sizes.
Mediation effects of personal norm
This study posits that subjective norms (SN), ascription responsibility (AR), and awareness of consequences (AC) indirectly influence young consumers’ green consumption intentions through personal norms (PN). The mediation effect is evaluated using the bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrapping method, as indicated in Table 6. The indirect effects of subjective norms, ascription responsibility, and awareness of consequences on green consumption intention are significant, supporting H2b, H3b, and H5c. Following the suggestion of Hair et al. (2021), we conclude that PN partially mediates the relationship between SN and GCI. This conclusion is drawn based on SN having both a significant direct effect (β = 0.163, p < 0.05) and an indirect effect (β = 0.172, p < 0.001) on GCI.
Predictive relevance and PLS Predict
As displayed in Table 7, the value of R2 shows that, on average, 60.2% of the variance in GCI and 61.7% of the variance in PN can be explained by the variation of the independent variables in the model (Shmueli et al., 2016). In terms of Q2, the values of PN and GCI are obviously above zero, demonstrating the model has predictive relevance (Hair et al., 2017).
PLS Predict procedure with 10 folds was conducted, following Hair et al. (2019). As shown in Table 8, GCI’s and PN’s Q2 prediction values are greater than zero, indicating that the model’s predictive power is reliable. In addition, the RMSE values of constructs calculated by the PLS-SEM method are all smaller than those calculated by LM (except PN1), suggesting the considerable predictive power of this study (Munerah et al., 2021).
Importance performance map analysis
Importance performance map analysis (IPMA) enables the direct assessment of construct performance by revealing their average latent variable scores (Wang et al., 2019). Therefore, IPMA visualises the impact of each construct on the dependent variable through graphs. Figure 4 displays the IPMA results for GCI. Among the constructs, PN (0.470) exhibits the best performance, followed by AC (0.365) and AR (0.330). Nevertheless, FC (0.006) falls slightly below the average in importance.
Artificial neural networking analysis
ANN addresses the limitation of PLS-SEM, which solely studies linear hypothesis relations and has gained widespread application in decision-making tasks (Wang et al., 2022). In this study, ANN was employed to assess the robustness of PLS-SEM and explore latent variables. Both the GCI and PN models in this study reveal significant variables. SPSS’s artificial neural network analysis was used to establish models for GCI, PN, and their respective significant variables. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) serves as a measure of the error between the training and test data. As shown in Table 9, the average difference between the training and test RMSE values in both models is less than 0.5 (Sharma et al., 2021), indicating that these models have predictive accuracy and effectively capture the relationships between significant variables and predictors.
The employed ANN model utilises a three-tiered layer structure (Leong et al., 2020). The sigmoid function was chosen as the activation function for its advantages in handling both low- and high-end data (Sharma et al., 2021). In this study, PN, SN, EK, and IA constitute the input layer, while GCI forms the output layer. Notably, AR, AC, and SN serve as the input layers for PN. This structure is depicted in Figs. 5–6. The ANN model effectively reveals the nonlinear relationships between variables. Furthermore, the combination of PLS-SEM and ANN enhances the model’s explanatory power (Sharma et al., 2021).
Sensitivity analysis provides an intuitive ranking of significant variables (Mishra et al. 2022), calculated by dividing the average importance of each significant variable by its largest importance. The results are presented as percentages within each ANN model (Sharma et al., 2021). Table 10 reveals that PN has the strongest predictive ability for GCI, which aligns with the PLS-SEM results. However, the order of influence for other significant variables differs between the two methods. Additionally, AR emerges as the strongest predictor for PN, followed by AC and SN, mirroring the PLS-SEM findings.
Discussion
While several studies have explored the green consumption intentions of younger generations, few have specifically examined the influence of “face”, a key concept in traditional Chinese culture, on young consumers’ green choices. To address this gap, this study extends the NAM model by incorporating EK, IA, subjective norms, and FC to predict green consumption intention in young consumers. This study employed a two-stage PLS-SEM-ANN approach to analyse the collected data. The findings show that, with the exception of FC, all other variables significantly impact green consumption intention. Additionally, the ANN results suggest that further investigation is necessary to fully comprehend the influence of other external factors.
Our results provide robust support for H1, demonstrating that PN significantly enhances young consumers’ GCI. This finding aligns with Gleim and Lawson (2014) and Rezaei et al. (2019), who concluded that personal norms ultimately determine whether individual decisions translate into action. As posited by Schwartz (1977), personal norms represent our internal moral convictions. In the context of green consumption, which directly addresses environmental concerns, a strong moral dimension is crucial (Hunecke et al., 2001). Young consumers, having grown up witnessing China’s environmental pollution first-hand (Lee, 2008), possess heightened sensitivity to environmental issues, making them more likely to form internal moral constraints that drive green consumption behaviour. In addition, personal norms are influenced by SN, reflecting people’s tendency to conform to group expectations (Song et al., 2019). This explains the significant influence of SN on PN, supporting H5. This finding is in line with Thøgersen’s (2006) assertion that subjective norms play a direct role in shaping personal norms, especially when analysing sustainable environmental behaviour.
AR and AC demonstrate significant positive relationships with PN, supporting H2a and H3a. This finding aligns with established research by Han et al. (2021) and Munerah et al. (2021). Furthermore, the mediating role of PN within the relationships between AR, AC, SN, and green consumption intention is confirmed, offering support for H2b, H3b, and H5c. Notably, AR and AC are foundational variables in the NAM model, indirectly influencing intention through their impact on PN (Schwartz, 1977). This implies that a stronger perception of environmental consequences and a greater sense of personal responsibility led to more robust personal norms, ultimately driving green consumption behaviour (Song et al., 2019).
However, contrary to H4, this study found that FC does not significantly influence young consumers’ GCI. This finding departs from previous studies that have attributed FC to consumers’ pursuit of conspicuous goods or luxury goods (Islam et al., 2022; Kumar et al., 2021). These studies suggest that consumers opt for conspicuous goods to enhance their social standing and gain face within their social circles. Such purchases, therefore, serve primarily self-interested motives. However, the primary objective of purchasing green goods is to contribute to environmental sustainability, a goal driven by altruism and with a higher moral compass among consumers. Previous studies have established a strong relationship between income and luxury consumption (Dubois and Duquesne, 1993). Income might be a more influential factor in deterring young consumers from choosing green products over luxury goods, rather than “face” concerns.
This study also found that EK significantly promotes young consumers’ desire to buy green products, thereby confirming H6. This finding aligns with research suggesting that consumer knowledge directly translates into behaviour (Hosta and Zabkar, 2021). The environmental education young consumers receive has significantly enhanced their EK and awareness (Zsóka et al., 2013). Greater EK empowers consumers to recognise the environmental implications of production and consumption practices when making purchasing decisions, consequently influencing their choices (Lin and Niu, 2018; Roh et al., 2022).
The next point that needs to be discussed is the positive relationship between IA and GCI, which is consistent with the findings in Kumar and Yadav (2021) and Hosta and Zabkar (2021), thus supporting H7. In sustainable consumption, readily available information plays a crucial role. Limited information can hinder consumers’ desire to purchase green products (Laato et al., 2020). Fortunately, young consumers have access to real-time information about green products through various online platforms. This convenient access not only saves them money but also allows them to stay informed about environmental issues. Information released by the government and enterprises about the environmental consequences of unsustainable consumption can further heighten their environmental sensitivity.
Conclusion
Theoretically, this study expands the boundaries of green consumption research by incorporating FC and IA into the NAM framework to analyse GCI in young Chinese consumers. While the existing literature has explored FC’s role in luxury or conspicuous goods consumption (e.g., Islam et al., 2022; Zhang and Wang, 2019), this study extends this concept to the green consumption literature. Recognising the additional influence of IA on young consumers’ decisions, this study offers new insights for producers and policymakers. Furthermore, integrating concepts like EK and SN into the green consumption study addresses the limitations of the NAM model and provides a valuable theoretical foundation for future research. In addition to the above, the findings also highlight EK as a key antecedent of young consumers’ green consumption. This underscores the need for schools and governments to prioritise environmental education initiatives across social groups. Additionally, the research suggests valuable avenues for enterprise marketing. Highlighting green products’ pro-social image and environmental attributes can resonate strongly with young consumers.
Limitations and future directions
This study suggests several areas for future exploration. First, the primary focus is on the influence of “face”, a traditional Chinese cultural factor, on consumer behaviour. However, East Asian and Western cultures differ significantly. Future studies should use diverse datasets from China to validate the model’s generalisability across different cultural contexts. Secondly, due to budgetary constraints, non-probability sampling was employed in this research, limiting the generalisability of the findings. To enhance the external validity of research results and reduce selection bias, it is recommended that future studies adopt probability sampling techniques to obtain a wider range of data. For instance, we should sample from every province in China to prevent sample clustering. Furthermore, the synergistic effect of antecedents was not demonstrated in this study, and subsequent studies are recommended to use fsQCA to analyse the combined effect of antecedents on outcomes. Thirdly, price sensitivity is known to impact consumer behaviour (Barman et al., 2022) and may have a direct bearing on young consumers’ ability to afford green products. In subsequent studies, we aim to incorporate price sensitivity into the model or investigate its moderating effect.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Aertsens J, Verbeke W, Mondelaers K, Van Huylenbroeck G (2009) Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. Brit Food J 111(10):1140–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992961
Ahmed N, Li C, Khan A, Qalati SA, Naz S, Rana F (2021) Purchase intention toward organic food among young consumers using theory of planned behavior: role of environmental concerns and environmental awareness. J Environ Plann Man 64(5):796–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1785404
Akhtar S, Khan KU, Atlas F, Irfan M (2022) Stimulating student’s pro-environmental behavior in higher education institutions: an ability–motivation–opportunity perspective. Environ Dev Sustain 24(3):4128–4149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01609-4
Asadi S, Nilashi M, Safaei M, Abdullah R, Saeed F, Yadegaridehkordi E, Samad S (2019) Investigating factors influencing decision-makers’ intention to adopt Green IT in Malaysian manufacturing industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 148:36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.028
Barman A, Das R, & De PK (2022). An analysis of optimal pricing strategy and inventory scheduling policy for a non-instantaneous deteriorating item in a two-layer supply chain. Appl Intell 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02646-2
Becerra EP, Carrete L, Arroyo P (2023) A study of the antecedents and effects of green self-identity on green behavioral intentions of young adults. J Bus Res 155:113380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113380
Cham TH, Easvaralingam Y (2012) Service quality, image and loyalty towards Malaysian hotels. Int J Serv Econ Manag 4(4):267–281. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSEM.2012.050951
Cham TH, Cheah JH, Memon MA, Fam KS, László J (2022) Digitalization and its impact on contemporary marketing strategies and practices. J Mark Analytics 10(2):103–105. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-022-00167-6
Cham TH, Cheng BL, Lee YH, Cheah JH (2023) Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying. Curr Psychol 42(22):19116–19136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03089-9
Cheah JH, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Ramayah T, Ting H (2018) Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: on using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. Int J Contemp Hosp M 30(11):3192–3210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649
Chekima B, Wafa S, Igau OA, Chekima S, Sondoh SL (2016) Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? J Clean Prod 112:3436–3450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.102
Chen J, Huang Y, Wu EQ, Ip R, Wang K (2023) How does rural tourism experience affect green consumption in terms of memorable rural-based tourism experiences, connectedness to nature and environmental awareness? J Hosp Tour Manag 54:166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.12.006
Choi H, Jang J, Kandampully J (2015) Application of the extended VBN theory to understand consumers’ decisions about green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag 51:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.004
Confente I, Scarpi D (2021) Achieving environmentally responsible behavior for tourists and residents: A norm activation theory perspective. J Travel Res 60(6):1196–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520938875
D'Arco M, Marino V (2022) Environmental citizenship behavior and sustainability apps: an empirical investigation. Transform Gov-People 16(2):185–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2021-0118
D'Souza C (2022) Game meats: consumption values, theory of planned behaviour, and the moderating role of food neophobia/neophiliac behaviour. J Retail Consum Serv 66:102953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102953
Das R, Richman R, Brown C (2018) Demographic determinants of Canada's households' adoption of energy efficiency measures: observations from the Households and Environment Survey, 2013. Energ Effic 11(2):465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9578-4
de Morais LHL, Pinto DC, Cruz-Jesus F (2021) Circular economy engagement: altruism, status, and cultural orientation as drivers for sustainable consumption. Sustain Prod Consum 27:523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.019
De Silva M, Wang P, Kuah ATH (2021) Why wouldn’t green appeal drive purchase intention? Moderation effects of consumption values in the UK and China. J Bus Res 122:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.016
Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM (2003) Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 56(6):465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7
Ding L, Liu M, Yang Y, Ma W (2022) Understanding Chinese consumers’ purchase intention towards traceable seafood using an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model. Mar Policy 137:104973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.104973
Dubois B, Duquesne P (1993) The market for luxury goods: income versus culture. Eur J Mark 27(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569310024530
Ebreo A, Vining J, Cristancho S(2003) Responsibility for environmental problems and the consequences of waste reduction: a test of the norm-activation model J Environ Syst 29(3):219–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/EQGD-2DAA-KAAJ-W1DC
Fam KS, Cheng BL, Cham TH, Tan CYM, Ting H (2023) The role of cultural differences in customer retention: evidence from the high-contact service industry. J Hosp Tour Res 47(1):257–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211014944
Fryxell GE, Lo CWH (2003) The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: an empirical examination of managers in China. J Bus Ethics 46(1):45–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024773012398
Gkargkavouzi A, Halkos G, Matsiori S (2019) Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context: integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm, self-identity and habit. Resour Conserv Recycl 148:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.039
Gleim M, Lawson SJ (2014) Spanning the gap: an examination of the factors leading to the green gap. J Int Consum Mark 31(6):503–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2014-0988
Gleim MR, Smith JS, Andrews D, Cronin JJ (2013) Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. J Retail 89(1):44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001
Gulzari A, Wang Y, Prybutok V (2022) A green experience with eco-friendly cars: a young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. J Retail Consum Serv 65:102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102877
Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev 26(2):106–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
Hair Jr, JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, & Sarstedt M (2021) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications
Hair Jr JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M (2017) PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal 1(2):107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Halder P, Hansen EN, Kangas J, Laukkanen T (2020) How national culture and ethics matter in consumers' green consumption values. J Clean Prod 265:121754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121754
Han H, Hwang J, Lee MJ, Kim J (2019) Word-of-mouth, buying, and sacrifice intentions for eco-cruises: exploring the function of norm activation and value-attitude-behavior. Tour Manag 70:430–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.006
Han W, Wang Y, Scott M (2021) Social media activation of pro-environmental personal norms: an exploration of informational, normative and emotional linkages to personal norm activatio. J Travel Tour Mark 38(6):568–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2021.1969319
Hansmann R, Laurenti R, Mehdi T, Binder CR (2020) Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: a comparison of university students and staff from diverse faculties at a Swiss University. J Clean Prod 268:121864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121864
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hosta M, Zabkar V (2021) Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. J Bus Ethics 171(2):273–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04416-0
Hunecke M, Blöbaum A, Matthies E, Höger R (2001) Responsibility and environment: Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environ Behav 33(6):830–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973269
Islam T, Wang Y, Ali A, Akhtar N (2022) Path to sustainable luxury brand consumption: face consciousness, materialism, pride and risk of embarrassment. J Int Consum Mark 39(1):11–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2020-4099
Joshi Y, & Rahman Z (2015) Factors affecting green purchase behaviourand future research directions. Int Strat Manag Rev 3(1–2): 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
Kabadayi ET, Dursun İ, Alan AK, Tuğer AT (2015) Green purchase intention of young Turkish consumers: effects of consumer's guilt, self-monitoring and perceived consumer effectiveness. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 207:165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.167
Kennedy EH, Beckley TM, McFarlane BL, Nadeau S (2009) Why we don't" walk the talk": Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Hum Ecol Rev 16(2):151–160. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707539
Khare A, Rakesh S (2011) Antecedents of online shopping behavior in india: an examination. J Internet Commer 10(4):227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2011.622691
Kim SH, Seock YK (2019) The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: the mediating role of personal norms. J Retail Consum Serv 51:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.023
Klockner CA, Ohms S (2009) The importance of personal norms for purchasing organic milk. Brit Food J 111(11):1173–1187. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700911001013
Kock N, & Lynn G (2012) Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(7):1–40. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2152644
Koo C, Chung N (2014) Examining the eco-technological knowledge of Smart Green IT adoption behavior: a self-determination perspective. Technol Forecast Soc 88:140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.025
Kumar A, Paul J, Starčević S (2021) Do brands make consumers happy?-A masstige theory perspective. J Retail Consum Serv 58:102318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102318
Kumar S, Yadav R (2021) The impact of shopping motivation on sustainable consumption: a study in the context of green apparel. J Clean Prod 295:126239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126239
Kutaula S, Gillani A, Leonidou LC, Christodoulides P (2022) Integrating fair trade with circular economy: personality traits, consumer engagement, and ethically-minded behavior. J Bus Res 144:1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.044
Laato S, Islam AN, Farooq A, Dhir A (2020) Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: the stimulus-organism-response approach. J Retail Consum Serv 57:102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102224
Lee K (2008) Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers Marketing intelligence planning. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839
Leong LY, Hew TS, Ooi KB, Wei J (2020) Predicting mobile wallet resistance: a two-staged structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach. Int J Inf Manag 51(102047):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102047
Li D, Zhao L, Ma S, Shao S, Zhang L (2019) What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
Li JJ, Su C (2007) How face influences consumption. Int J Mark Res 49(2):237–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, & Xue Y (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures andthe mediating role of top management. MIS quart: 59–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148781
Lin ST, Niu HJ (2018) Green consumption: Environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior. Bus Strateg Environ 27(8):1679–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2233
Liu R, Ding ZH, Wang YW, Jiang XH, Jiang X, Sun WB, Liu MZ (2021) The relationship between symbolic meanings and adoption intention of electric vehicles in China: the moderating effects of consumer self-identity and face consciousness. J Clean Prod 288:125116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125116
Liu Y, Sheng H, Mundorf N, Redding C, Ye Y (2017) Integrating norm activation model and theory of planned behavior to understand sustainable transport behavior: evidence from China. Int J Env Res Public Health 14(12):1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121593
Long F, Ooi C-S, Gui T, Ngah AH (2022) Examining young Chinese consumers’ engagement in restaurant food waste mitigation from the perspective of cultural values and information publicity. Appetite 175:106021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106021
Low MP, Cham TH, Chang YS, Lim XJ (2023) Advancing on weighted PLS-SEM in examining the trust-based recommendation system in pioneering product promotion effectiveness. Qual Quant 57(Suppl 4):607–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01147-1
Maichum K, Parichatnon S, Peng K-C (2017) The influence of environmental concern and environmental attitude on purchase intention towards green products: a case study of young consumers in Thailand. Int J Bus Mark Manag Decis 2(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3525917
Mason MC, Pauluzzo R, Umar RM (2022) Recycling habits and environmental responses to fast-fashion consumption: Enhancing the theory of planned behavior to predict Generation Y consumers’ purchase decisions. Waste Manag 139:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.012
Momsen K, Ohndorf M (2022) Information avoidance, selective exposure, and fake (?) news: Theory and experimental evidence on green consumption. J Econ Psychol 88:102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102457
Munerah S, Koay KY, Thambiah S (2021) Factors influencing non-green consumers’ purchase intention: A partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach. J Clean Prod 280:124192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124192
Niedermeier A, Emberger-Klein A. & Menrad K (2021) Drivers and barriers for purchasing green Fast-Moving Consumer Goods: A study of consumer preferences of glue sticks in Germany. J Clean Prod 284: 124804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124804
Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2008) Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers Soc Psychol B 34(7):913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
Nystrand BT, Olsen SO (2020) Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway. Food Qual Prefer 80:103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103827
Ong JW, Rahim MFA, Lim W, Nizat MNM (2022) Agricultural technology adoption as a journey: proposing the technology adoption journey map. Int J Technol 13(5):1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5863
Onwezen MC, Antonides G, Bartels J (2013) The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J Econ Psychol 39:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005
Onwezen MC, Bartels J, Antonides G (2014) Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. J Econ Psychol 40:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.003
Patterson PG, Cowley E, Prasongsukarn K (2006) Service failure recovery: The moderating impact of individual-level cultural value orientation on perceptions of justice. Int J Res Mark 23(3):263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004
Pearce J, Huang S, Dowling RK, Smith AJ (2022) Effects of social and personal norms, and connectedness to nature, on pro-environmental behavior: A study of Western Australian protected area visitors. Tour Manag Perspect 42:100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100966
Qi X, Ploeger A (2021) An integrated framework to explain consumers' purchase intentions toward green food in the Chinese context. Food Qual Prefer 92:104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104229
Ramdas M, & Mohamed B (2014) Impacts of tourism on environmental attributes, environmental literacy and willingness to pay: A conceptual and theoretical review.Procedia Soc Behav Sci 144:378–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.307
Rezaei R, Safa L, Damalas CA, Ganjkhanloo MM (2019) Drivers of farmers' intention to use integrated pest management: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. J Environ Manag 236:328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.097
Ringle CM, Wende S, & Becker, J-M (2015) SmartPLS 3 Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH http://www.smartpls.com
Roh T, Seok J, Kim Y (2022) Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust. J Retail Consum Serv 67:102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102988
Ru XJ, Qin HB, Wang SY (2019) Young people's behaviour intentions towards reducing PM25 in China: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Resour Conserv Recy 141:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019
Saphores J-DM, Ogunseitan OA, Shapiro AA (2012) Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: An analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of U.S. households. Resour Conserv Recy 60:49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.003
Schultz PW, Messina A, Tronu G, Limas EF, Gupta R, Estrada M (2016) Personalized normative feedback and the moderating role of personal norms: A field experiment to reduce residential water consumption. Environ Behav 48(5):686–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102988
Schwartz SH (1973) Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. J Exp Soc Psychol 9(4):349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90071-1
Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 10:221–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Shao J, Li W, Aneye C, Fang W (2022) Facilitating mechanism of green products purchasing with a premium price—Moderating by sustainability‐related information. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma 29(3):686–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2229
Sharma A, Dwivedi YK, Arya V, Siddiqui MQ (2021) Does SMS advertising still have relevance to increase consumer purchase intention? A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Comput Hum Behav 124:106919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106919
Sharma A, Foropon C (2019) Green product attributes and green purchase behavior A theory of planned behavior perspective with implications for circular economy. Manag Decis 57(4):1018–1042. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2018-1092
Shmueli G, Ray S, Estrada JMV, Chatla SB (2016) The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. J Bus Res 69(10):4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
Si H, Yu Z, Jiang Q, Shu Y, Hua W, Lv X (2022) Better future with better us: Exploring young people's energy-saving behavior based on norm activation theory. Front Public Health 10:1042325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042325
Song Y, Zhao C, Zhang M (2019) Does haze pollution promote the consumption of energy-saving appliances in China? An empirical study based on norm activation model. Resour Conserv Recy 145:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.041
Steg L, De Groot J (2010) Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. Brit J Soc Psychol 49(4):725–743. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X477745
Sultan P, Tarafder T, Pearson D, Henryks J (2020) Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: Moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in organic food consumption. Food Qual Prefer 81:103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103838
Sun G, Chen J, Li J (2017) Need for uniqueness as a mediator of the relationship between face consciousness and status consumption in China. Int J Psychol 52(5):349–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12216
Sun YH, Liu NN, Zhao MZ (2019) Factors and mechanisms affecting green consumption in China: A multilevel analysis. J Clean Prod 209:481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.241
Tan JX, Cham TH, Zawawi D, Aziz YA (2019) Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Mediating Effect of Organization Commitment in the Hotel Industry. Asian J Bus Res 9(2):121–139. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.190064
Tan TM, Makkonen H, Kaur P, Salo J (2022) How do ethical consumers utilize sharing economy platforms as part of their sustainable resale behavior? The role of consumers’ green consumption values. Technol Forecast Soc 176:121432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121432
Tewari A, Mathur S, Srivastava S, Gangwar D (2022) Examining the role of receptivity to green communication, altruism and openness to change on young consumers' intention to purchase green apparel: A multi-analytical approach. J Retail Consum Serv 66:102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102938
Thøgersen J (2006) Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. J Environ Psychol 26(4):247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004
Tong QM, Anders S, Zhang JB, Zhang L (2020) The roles of pollution concerns and environmental knowledge in making green food choices: Evidence from Chinese consumers. Food Res Int 130:108881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108881
Ünal AB, Steg L, Gorsira M (2018) Values versus environmental knowledge as triggers of a process of activation of personal norms for eco-driving. Environ Behav 50(10):1092–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517728991
Vaske JJ, Jacobs MH, Espinosa TK (2015) Carbon footprint mitigation on vacation: A norm activation model. J OUTDOOR REC TOUR 11:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.05.002
Vicente-Molina MA, Fernández-Sáinz A, Izagirre-Olaizola J (2013) Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. J Clean Prod 61:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
Vita G, Lundstrom JR, Hertwich EG, Quist J, Ivanova D, Stadler K, Wood R (2019) The Environmental Impact of Green Consumption and Sufficiency Lifestyles Scenarios in Europe: Connecting Local Sustainability Visions to Global Consequences. Ecol Econ 164:106322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002
Wang B, Deng N, Liu X, Sun Q, Wang Z (2021a) Effect of energy efficiency labels on household appliance choice in China: Sustainable consumption or irrational intertemporal choice. Resour Conserv Recy 169:105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105458
Wang G, Tan GW-H, Yuan Y, Ooi K-B, Dwivedi YK (2022) Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: a deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Technol Forecast Soc 175:121345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121345
Wang J, Shen M, Chu M (2021b) Why is green consumption easier said than done? Exploring the green consumption attitude-intention gap in China with behavioral reasoning theory. Clean Res Consum 2:100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100015
Wang P, Liu Q, Qi Y (2014) Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China. J Clean Prod 63:152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.007
Wang SY, Wang JP, Zhao SL, Yang S (2019) Information publicity and resident's waste separation behavior: An empirical study based on the norm activation model. Waste Manag 87:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.038
Wu JX, Wu HC, Hsieh CM, Ramkissoon H (2022) Face consciousness, personal norms, and environmentally responsible behavior of Chinese tourists: Evidence from a lake tourism site. J Hosp Tour Manag 50:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.01.010
Wu X, Xiong J, Yan J, Wang Y (2021) Perceived quality of traceability information and its effect on purchase intention towards organic food. J Mark Manag-Uk 37(13-14):1267–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1910328
Yeh S-S, Guan X, Chiang T-Y, Ho J-L, Huan T-CT (2021) Reinterpreting the theory of planned behavior and its application to green hotel consumption intention. Int J Hosp Manag 94:102827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102827
Youn H, Yin R, Kim J-H, Li JJ (2020) Examining traditional restaurant diners’ intention: An application of the VBN theory. Int J Hosp Manag 85:102360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102360
Yue BB, Sheng GH, She SX, Xu JQ (2020) Impact of Consumer Environmental Responsibility on Green Consumption Behavior in China: The Role of Environmental Concern and Price Sensitivity. Sustainability-Basel 12(5):2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052074
Zameer H, Yasmeen H (2022) Green innovation and environmental awareness driven green purchase intentions. Mark Intell Plan 40(5):624–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-12-2021-0457
Zhang X-a, Wang W (2019) Face consciousness and conspicuous luxury consumption in China. J Contemp Mark Sci 2(1):63–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-01-2019-0002
Zsóka Á, Szerényi ZM, Széchy A, Kocsis T (2013) Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. J Clean Prod 48:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by International Collaborative Science and Technology Finance (Jinan) Innovation Laboratory (JNSX2023078).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yanyan Zhang contributed to conceptualisation, data collection, software, developing the theoretical model, writing-original draft, and addressing the reviewer’s comments. Tat-Huei Cham contributed to conceptualisation, methodology, developing the theoretical model and editing. Chuen Khee Pek contributed to conceptualisation and proofreading. Choi-Meng Leong contributed to developing the theoretical model.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of economics at Shandong Women’s University (Study #2023-02-03) and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable standards.
Informed consent
All individuals participated in the study were provided a statement of informed consent. The informed consent clearly explained their rights as research subjects/participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Cham, TH., Pek, C.K. et al. Is face and information availability important in green purchasing among young consumers?. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 878 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03377-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03377-8
- Springer Nature Limited