Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From toleration to recognition: explaining change and stability in party responses to the Danish People’s Party

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

The opposition from other Danish political parties toward the Danish People’s Party (DPP) predominantly takes the form of tolerant opposition. DPP is mostly treated as an ordinary political opponent, and the main governing parties in Denmark (the Social Democrats and Liberals) have adapted to the challenge by intensifying their co-optation and cooperation strategies, in effect recognizing their policies and rhetoric on immigration. Subsequently, opposition from the international community and civil society has increasingly conflated its critique of DPP with the ruling government. Using process-tracing methods sampling newspaper articles, the article sheds light on facilitating and constraining factors explaining variation in the timing and execution of strategies undertaken by the main governing parties. Analysis focuses on a period after DPP’s emergence (1997–2001) and a period involving extensive cooperation between DPP and other parties (2014–2019). I conclude that political collaborators, liberal democratic ideology and institutions, and civil society have been unable to constrain dominant factions within the parties which sought to respond to DPP success by addressing popular grievances and societal developments through co-optation and cooperation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 24syv. 2022a. Ministertid: Anders Samuelsen, 6 February.

  • 24syv. 2022b. Ministertid: Søren Pind, 16 January.

  • Adams, J. 2012. Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. 1999. De fremmede som skjult dagsorden. In Vælgere med omtanke: en analyse af folketingsvalget 1998, ed. J.L. Andersen, et al. Aarhus: Systime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J.G. 2003. The Danish People’s Party and new cleavages in Danish politics.

  • Backlund, A. 2020. Isolating the radical right: Coalition Formation and Policy Adaptation in Sweden. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T., et al. 2010. If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining Social Democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political Studies 58 (3): 410–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., and R.B. Pedersen. 2013. Process tracing methods: Foundation and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, L. 1997. Leadership change and party change. Party Politics 3 (3): 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, L. 1999. Denmark. European Journal of Political Research 36: 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørklund, T. and Andersen, J.G. 2002. Anti-immigration parties in Denmark and Norway: The progress parties and the Danish People’s Party. Shadows Over Europe: The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe, pp. 107–136.

  • Bourne, A.K. 2023. Initiatives opposing populist parties in Europe: Types, methods and patterns. Comparative European Politics Vol(no.): ###–###.

  • Budge, I., L. Ezrow, and M.D. McDonald. 2010. Ideology, party factionalism and policy change: An integrated dynamic theory. British Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 781–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.J. 2016. The Danish People’s Party: Combining cooperation and radical positions. In Radical right-wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream?, ed. T. Akkerman, S.L. De Lange, and M. Rooduijn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.J. 2017. Conflict and co-operation among the Danish mainstream as a condition for adaptation to the populist radical right. In The European mainstream and the populist radical right, ed. P. Odmalm and E. Hepburn, 49–70. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.J., and H.H. Pedersen. 2014. Minority coalition governance in Denmark. Party Politics 20 (6): 940–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, W.M. 2001. Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats. West European Politics 24 (3): 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerholm, A. 2016. Why do political parties change their policy positions? A Review. Political Studies Review 14 (4): 501–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. 2008. European liberalisms: An essay in comparative political thought. European Journal of Political Theory 7 (1): 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. 2006. Single-outcome studies: A methodological primer. International Sociology 21 (5): 707–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjertsen, M.N. 2018. Der må bare være grænser for, hvornår flertallet må bøje sig for mindretallet. Jyllands-Posten, 4 June.

  • Green-Pedersen, C., and J. Krogstrup. 2008. Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research 47 (5): 610–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, C., and P. Odmalm. 2008. Going different ways? Right-wing parties and the immigrant issue in Denmark and Sweden. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (3): 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K.M., and R. Stubager. 2017. Oprør fra udkanten. Copenhagen: Djøf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardis, A. 1998. Uffe angriber Pias demagogi. Aktuelt, 27 February.

  • Harmel, R., and K. Janda. 1994. An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (3): 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, A.S. 2018. Strategies of mainstream parties towards their right-wing populist challengers: Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland in comparison. West European Politics 41 (2): 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervik, P. 2006. The emergence of neo-nationalism in Denmark, 1992–2001. In Neo-Nationalism in Europe and Beyond, ed. A. Gingrich and M. Banks, 92–106. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, F., and M. Vinæs. 2020. When does accommodation work? Electoral effects of mainstream left position-taking on immigration. British Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 949–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L. 2006. Folketinget og Udlændingepolitikken - diskurser om naturaliserede, indvandrere og flygtninge 1973–2002. Spirit phD Series 4: 1–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jønsson, H.V. 2018. Fra lige muligheder til ret og pligt: Socialdemokratiets integrationspolitik i den moderne velfærdsstats tidsalder. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karker, A., Eskholm, B. and Nielsen, T. 2001. Fogh skruer bissen på. B.T., 5 October.

  • Klarskov, K. 2017. Venstre styrer mod ideologisk opgør om burkaer. Politiken, 11 August.

  • Kosiara-Pedersen, K. 2018. The Danish Liberal Parties. Liberal Parties in Europe, pp. 44–59.

  • Kosiara-Pedersen, K. 2020. The Danish People’s Party. The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics. (November), pp. 312–328.

  • Kulager, F. 2021. Socialdemokraterne blødte vælgere til DF. Så hyrede de manden her, der med en simpel metode fik dem tilbage i folden. Zetland, 16 March.

  • Larsen, S. and Nielsen, K.E. 2000. S-vrede mod Karen Jespersen. Berlingske Tidende, 9 September.

  • Meguid, B.M. 2008. Party competition between unequals: Strategies and electoral fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meret, S. 2021. Denmark. In Populism and new patterns of political competition in Western Europe, ed. D. Albertazzi and D. Vampa, 168–186. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. 2016. The global rise of populism. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. 2017. Liberal illiberalism? The reshaping of the contemporary populist radical right in Northern Europe. Politics and Governance 5 (4): 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L.L. 2020. Om de fleste og det meste. Copenhagen: Politikens Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissmann, M. 2014. Manipulation af virkeligheden. Berlingske Tidende, 21 July.

  • Ritzau. 2000. Udlændingepakke gik glat igennem. Ritzau, 16 May.

  • Rosendahl, N. 2019. Lars Løkke siger nej til at bygge regering på et parti, der vil ud af konventionerne. Men det har han gjort i fire år. Information, 11 May.

  • Rummens, S., and K. Abts. 2010. Defending democracy: The concentric containment of political extremism. Political Studies 58 (4): 649–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydgren, J. 2004. Explaining the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties: The case of Denmark. West European Politics 27 (3): 474–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo, S., and J. Rydgren. 2021. The battle over working-class voters. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.C. 2017. Undertrykkelsens slør. Facebook. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/hans.c.schmidt.58/posts/734944016696989.

  • Skærbæk, M. 2017. Venstre-ordfører om burkaforbud: ‘Det handler også om Ku Klux Klan-hætter’. Politiken, 6 October.

  • Søndberg, A. 2015. Søren Espersen truer med at vælte Lars Løkke. TV2 Nyhederne, 21 September. Available at: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2015-09-21-soeren-espersen-truer-med-at-vaelte-lars-loekke.

  • Statsministeriet. 1999. Statsminister Poul Nyrup Rasmussens replik ved åbningsdebatten i Folketinget den 7. oktober 1999.

  • Strøm, K. 1990. A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 565–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K., I. Budge, and M.J. Laver. 1994. Constraints on cabinet formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K., and W.C. Müller. 1999. Policy, office, or votes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubager, R., et al. 2021. The Danish voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubager, R., Hansen, K.M. and Jensen, J.S. 2020. Danske vælgere 1971–2019. 4th edn. Det Danske Valgprojekt.

  • Tesfaye, M. 2017. Velkommen Mustafa: 50 års socialdemokratisk udlændingepolitik. Gyldendal.

  • Thobo-Carlsen, J. 1999. S-oprør mod indvandring. Berlingske Tidende, 20 December.

  • Venstre. 2001. Venstre siger stop med snak: Udlændingelovene skal til kasseeftersyn. Venstre.

  • Westersø, R. 2019. Løkke opløser blå blok i 11. time - vil danne regering henover midten. TV2 Nyhederne, 4 June.

  • Winther, B. 2016. Socialdemokrater vil være EU-skeptiske: ‘Det er helt på Månen’. Berlingske Tidende, 25 November.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Angela Bourne, Francesco Campo, Tore Vincents Olsen, Bénédicte Laumond, Anthoula Malkopoulou, Aleksandra Moroska-Bonkiewicz, Patrick Nitzschner, Juha Tuovinen, Franciszek Tyszka, Katarzyna Domagała, and 2 anonymous reviewers for Comparative European Politics for comments on earlier versions of this paper. All errors remain are fully mine.

Funding

This research was in part financed by the Carlsberg Foundation Grant CF20-0008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 14.2, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Mathias Holst Nicolaisen

Authors
  1. Mathias Holst Nicolaisen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Holst Nicolaisen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nicolaisen, M.H. From toleration to recognition: explaining change and stability in party responses to the Danish People’s Party. Comp Eur Polit 21, 799–816 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00338-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00338-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation