Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building Bridges: Social Movements and Civil Society in Times of Crisis

  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social movement studies and studies on civil society and, related to them, studies on voluntarism and the third sector, are burgeoning fields of knowledge, which have, however, only rarely interacted with each other. In fact, social movement scholars have devoted little attention to the concept of civil society, not even when addressing issues of “social capital”. Vice versa, civil society scholars have, with few exceptions, not considered social movements as cognate phenomena. This is all the more puzzling as there is instead ample theoretical and empirical overlapping, which calls for the building of bridges between these fields of study. In political and media discourse some organizations, individuals or events are defined interchangeably as linked to either social movements or civil society. In the social sciences, however, the core conceptualizations have pointed towards different elements as characterizing these phenomena. In particular, social movement studies can contribute to the literature on voluntarism a toolkit of concepts and theory oriented to understand social and political conflicts, learning from the literature on voluntarism about conceptions and practices of solidarity. In this article, I will address some (potential) interactions between the two fields, looking at differences and similarities in the conceptualizations of the two phenomena as well as in their empirical analysis as they have developed in time. I will first of all address conceptualizations in these cognate fields with attention to their theoretical developments. Then, I will point towards some recent trends that have blurred the distinction between social movements and civil society, voluntarism and third sector policies, looking in particular not only at more established analyses of NGOization of social movements, but also, and especially, of what can be defined as an SMOization of civil society—that is, the hybridization of more established civil society organizations into social movement organizations, especially when facing politicization in times of crises and increasing criminalization of solidarity activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. C. (1998). Real civil society. Dilemma of institutionalization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H., & Sherer, N. (2015). Voluntary action and social movements. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Oxford handbook on social movements (pp. 494–511). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H., & Themudo, N. (2002). Organizational forms of global civil society: Implications of going global. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. Ahheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 191–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosi, L., & Zamponi, L. (2019). Resistere alla crisi. I percorsi dell’azione sociale diretta. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandoke, N. (2003). The concepts of the civil society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2004). Post democracy. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2009a). Democracy in social movements. Lomdon: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2009b). Another Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of crisis. Bringing capitalism back into the analysis of protest. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2017). Where did the revolution go?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2018a). Contentious moves. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2018b). Protests as critical junctures: Some reflections towards a momentous approach to social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Mosca, L., & Reiter, H. (2006). Globalization from below. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2004). Movimenti senza protesta? L’ambientalismo in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2011). Social movements and civil society. In B. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (Eds.). (2015). Introduction: The social movement field. Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2020). Social movements. An introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Pavan, E. (2018). The nexus between media, communication and social movements. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 29–37). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. Sociological Review, 40, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M. (1995). Green networks. A structural analysis of the Italian environmental movement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., & Bison, I. (2004). Organizations, coalitions, and movements. Theory and Society, 33, 281–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (Eds.). (2003). Social movements and networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, B. (2011). Introduction: Civil society and the geometry of human relations. In B. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B. (2004). Civil society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B., Foley, M., & Diani, M. (Eds.). (2001). Beyond tocqueville: Social capital, civil society, and political process in comparative perspective. Hannover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, J. (2011). The history of civil society idea. In B. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 15–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a rational society. Student protest, science and politics. London: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimichalis, C. (2018). Crisis spaces: Structures, struggles and solidarity in southern Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, C., & Pezzani, L. (2017). Blaming the rescuers. London. https://blamingtherescuers.org/report/.

  • Isin, E. F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In F. Engin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, L. (2011). Global civil society. In B. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 93–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., & Maloney, W. (1997). The protest business?. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society. An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (1988). Democracy and Civil Society. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2003). Global civil society?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (1996). The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspective on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing (pp. 152–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1993). Civil society: An inquiry into the usefulness of an historical term. The British Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 375–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1965). Protest and city politics. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1989). Consensus movements: City twinings and derailed dissent in the American eighties. Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change, 11, 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamidis, H. (2018). From protest to production: Enlarging the boundaries of social movements in crisis-ridden Greece. Ph.D. thesis. Firenze: Scuola Normale Superiore.

  • Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. E. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. A micro-social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (2001). Civil society: A signifier of plurality and sense of wholeness. In J. R. Blau (Ed.), The Blackwell companion of sociology (pp. 73–85). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R. (2011). The nonprofit sector. In B. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 29–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D., Soule, S., & Kriesi, H. (Eds.). (2004). The Blackwell companion to social movements. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazzioli, M. (2018). Crimes of solidarity migration and containment through rescue. Radical Philosophy, 2(01), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilsation to revolution. Reading, mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1977). The self-production of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deth, J. W., Maraffi, M., Newton, K., & Whiteley, P. F. (Eds.). (1999). Social capital and european democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1998). The idea of civil society: A path to social reconstruction. In E. J. Dionne (Ed.), Community works: The revival of civil society in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. N., & McCarthy, J. (1987). Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donatella Della Porta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Della Porta, D. Building Bridges: Social Movements and Civil Society in Times of Crisis. Voluntas 31, 938–948 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00199-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00199-5

Keywords

Navigation