Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New technology development by Swedish MNEs in emerging markets: the role of co-location of R&D and production

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firm-level data from Swedish manufacturing MNEs show that their local R&D units in emerging countries now mainly develop new technology in co-location with manufacturing plants. This complements findings that co-located units have previously mainly locally adapted parent companies’ existing technology. This implies that co-located R&D units of Western MNEs in emerging countries now play a more important strategic role than was previously assumed, especially in China, India, and other Asian countries with large and growing markets, specific demand characteristics, strong domestic producers, rapid industrial and technological change, and a capability to develop and produce complex products and systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The concept of 'emerging market' is interpreted here broadly, to incorporate all countries outside Western Europe, North America, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.

References

  • Abele, E., T. Meyer, U. Näher, G. Strube, and R. Sykes (eds.). 2008. Global production: A handbook for strategy and implementation. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcacer, J., and M. Delgado. 2016. Spatial organization of firms and location choices through the value chain. Management Science 62 (11): 3213–3234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcacer, J., and M. Zhao. 2012. Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Science 58 (4): 734–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, B. 2005. Foreign direct investment in industrial research and development: A study of German MNCs. Research Policy 34 (4): 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, B., and T.C. Ambos. 2009. Location choice, management and performance of international R&D investments in peripheral economies. International Journal of Technology Management 48 (1): 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. 1990. Towards an economic model of Japanese firms. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S., A. Tuncay-Celikel, and V. Ujjual. 2013. Internationalisation of R&D into emerging markets: Fiat’s R&D in Brazil, Turkey and India. Long Range Planning 47 (1–2): 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., B. Leten, and S. Suzuki. 2013. How global is R&D? Firm-level determinants of home-country bias in R&D. Journal of International Business Studies 44 (8): 765–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. 2002. Managing internal R&D networks in global firms: What sort of knowledge is involved? Long Range Planning 35 (3): 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, G., P. Dewhurst, and W.A. Knight. 2010. Product design for manufacture and assembly, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutellier, R., O. Gassmann, and M. von Zedtwitz. 2008. Managing global innovation: Uncovering the secrets of future competitiveness, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruche, G. 2009. The emergence of China and India as new competitors in MNCs’ innovation networks. Competition and Change 13 (3): 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. 1995. The globalisation of technology: What remains of the product cycle model? Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (1): 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., and L. Piscitello. 2010. Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: The role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies 39 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.C. 2007. The upgrading of multinationals’ regional innovation networks in China. Asia Pacific Business Review 13 (3): 373–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, L.M.D., and G.D. Santangelo. 2012. Do overseas R&D laboratories in emerging markets contribute to home knowledge creation? An extension of the double diamond model. Management International Review 52 (2): 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A., and M. Hobday (eds.). 2005. The business of projects: Managing innovation in complex products and systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H., and S.M. Lundan. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H., and S.M. Lundan. 2009. The internationalization of corporate R&D: A review of the evidence and some policy implications for home countries. Review of Policy Research 26 (1–2): 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission, European. 2014. The 2014 EU survey on R&D investment business trends. Luxembourg: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fors, G., and R. Svensson. 2002. R&D and foreign sales in Swedish multinationals: A simultaneous relationship? Research Policy 31 (1): 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., and Z. Han. 2004. Motivations and barriers of foreign R&D activities in China. R&D Management 34 (4): 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerybadze, A. and Merk, S. 2014. Globalisation of R&D and host-country patenting of multinational corporations in emerging countries. International Journal of Technology Management 64(2,3,4): 148–176.

  • Giroud, A., Y.J. Ha, and M. Yamin. 2014. Foreign subsidiaries’ internal and external R&D cooperation in South Korea: Explanatory factors and interaction. Asian Business & Management 13 (3): 227–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., and R. Ramamurti. 2011. Reverse innovation, emerging markets and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal 1 (3–4): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O. 1999. Internationalization of corporate R&D: A study of Japanese and Swedish corporations. Research Policy 28 (2–3): 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L. 1981. Organization and evolution of foreign R&D in Swedish multinationals. Geografiska Annaler B 63 (1): 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L. 1995. Learning through acquisitions: Management and integration of foreign R&D laboratories. International Studies of Management and Organisation 25 (1–2): 121–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L. 2014. Internationalisation of research and development. In The Oxford handbook of innovation management, ed. M. Dodgson, D.M. Gann, and N. Phillips, 548–558. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L., and R. Nobel. 1993a. Foreign research and development in Swedish multinationals. Research Policy 22 (5–6): 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L., and R. Nobel. 1993b. Determinants of foreign R&D in Swedish MNCs. Research Policy 22 (5–6): 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L., and U. Zander. 1988. International management of R&D: The Swedish experience. R&D Management 18 (3): 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. 1998. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy 26 (6): 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. 2000. The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy 29 (7–8): 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M., and H. Rush. 2007. Upgrading the technological capabilities of foreign transnational subsidiaries in developing countries: The case of electronics in Thailand. Research Policy 36 (9): 1335–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S., and P. McCann. 2013. Multinationals and economic geography: Location, technology and innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iguchi, C. 2012. Globalisation of R&D by TNC subsidiaries: The case of South-East Asian countries. Asian Business & Management 11 (1): 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITPS. 2011. Forskning och utveckling i internationella företag 2009 (R&D in international corporations). Tillväxtanalys, Statistik 2011:03. Available www.tillvaxtanalys.se/in-english/publications/statistics/statistics/2013-05-30-research-and-development-in-enterprises-in-2011.html, accessed 13 December 2016.

  • ITPS. 2013. Forskning och utveckling i internationella företag 2011 (R&D in international corporations). Tillväxtanalys, Statistik 2013: 04. Available www.tillvaxtanalys.se/in-english/publications/statistics/statistics/2013-05-30-research-and-development-in-enterprises-in-2011.html, accessed 13 December 2016.

  • Ivarsson, I., Alvstam, C. and Vahlne, J.E. 2016. Global technology development by co-locating R&D and manufacturing: The case of Swedish manufacturing MNEs. Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.

  • Ivarsson, I., and T. Jonsson. 2003. Local technological competence and asset-seeking FDI: An empirical study of manufacturing and wholesale affiliates in Sweden. International Business Review 12 (3): 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, B., and H. Lööf. 2006. Global location of R&D. In The internationalization of corporate R&D: Leveraging the changing geography of innovation, ed. M. Karlsson, 89–103. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabag, S.F., A. Tuncay-Celikel, and C. Berggren. 2011. The limits of R&D internationalization and the importance of local initiatives: Turkey as a critical case. World Development 39 (8): 1347–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., and R. Florida. 1994. The organization and geography of Japanese R&D: Results from a survey of Japanese electronics and biotechnology firms. Research Policy 23 (3): 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketokivi, M., and J. Ali-Yrkkö. 2009. Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: Post-industrial myth or economic reality? Review of Policy Research 26 (1–2): 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. 1999a. Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries—results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy 28 (2–3): 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. 1999b. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies 30 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., and D.R. Yue. 2005. Managing global research and development in China: Patterns of R&D configuration and evolution. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (3): 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolopoulus, D., K.E. Söderquist, and R. Pearce. 2011. Coordinating decentralized research and development laboratories: A survey analysis. Journal of International Management 17 (2): 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, M. 2002. Next to production or to technological clusters? The economics and management of R&D location. Journal of Management and Governance 6 (2): 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., and J. Moodysson. 2013. Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge-sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania. Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (2): 170–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st-century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23 (1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medcof, J.W. 1997. A taxonomy of internationally dispersed technology units and its application to management issues. R&D Management 27 (4): 301–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P., T. Brady, A. Davies, and J. Hall. 2003. Capacity utilisation revisited: Software, control and large technical systems. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (3): 477–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olausson, D., T. Magnusson, and N. Lakemond. 2009. Preserving the link between R&D and manufacturing: Exploring challenges related to vertical integration and product/process newness. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 15 (2): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. 2005. Innovation processes. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, 86–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. 1989. The internationalization of research and development by multinational enterprises. London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G., and W.C. Shih. 2012a. Does America really need manufacturing? Harvard Business Review 90 (3): 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G., and W.C. Shih. 2012b. Producing prosperity: Why America needs a manufacturing renaissance. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebnyakov, N., and J. Kristensen. 2011. Building innovation subsidiaries in emerging markets: The experience of Novo Nordisk. Research-Technology Management 54 (4): 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, M.Y. and Zhu, H. 2014. The evolution of R&D capability in multinational corporations in emerging markets: Evidence from China. International Journal of Technology Management 64(2,3,4): 210–231.

  • Reddy, P. 2010. Global innovation in emerging economies. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronstadt, R. 1977. Research and Development Abroad by U.S. Multinationals, New York: Praeger.

  • Schanz, C., S. Hüsig, M. Dowling, and A. Gerybadze. 2011. ‘Low cost-high tech’ innovations for China: Why setting up a separate R&D unit is not always the best approach. R&D Management 41 (3): 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedschlag, I., D. Smith, C. Turcue, and X. Zhang. 2013. What determines the location choice of R&D activities by multinational firms? Research Policy 42 (8): 1420–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S., U. Näher, and M.D. Lauritzen. 2008. R&D: Aligning the interface with production. In Global production: A handbook for strategy and implementation, ed. E. Abele, T. Meyer, U. Näher, G. Strube, and R. Sykes, 350–371. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Storm, P., T. Lager, and P. Samuelsson. 2013. Managing the manufacturing-R&D interface in the process industries. R&D Management 43 (3): 252–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., and K. Wen. 2007. Uncertainties, imitative behaviours and foreign R&D location: Explaining the overconcentration of foreign R&D in Beijing and Shanghai within China. Asia Pacific Business Review 13 (3): 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G.I. (ed.). 1992. Integrating design and manufacturing for competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, C.-H. 2011. Subsidiaries’ local linkage characteristics and R&D assignments in a small developing economy. Asian Business & Management 10 (2): 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2005. World investment report: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahlne, J.-E., and I. Ivarsson. 2014. Globalization of Swedish MNCs: Empirical evidence and theoretical explanations. Journal of International Business Studies 45 (3): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahlne, J.-E., I. Ivarsson, and J. Johanson. 2011. The tortuous road to globalization for Volvo´s heavy truck business: Extending the scope of the Uppsala model. International Business Review 20 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M., S. Corsi, P.W. Søberg, and R. Frega. 2014. A typology of reverse innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management Innovation 32 (1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M., and O. Gassmann. 2002. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy 31 (4): 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, S.C., and K.B. Clark. 1992. Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P.J. 2010. Cost innovation: Preparing for a ‘value-for-money’ revolution. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P.J., R. Ramamurti, A. Fleury, and M.Z. Fleury. 2013. The competitive advantage of emerging-country multinationals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B. and Gassmann, O. (2014) Organising for reverse innovation in Western MNCs: The role of frugal product innovation capabilities. International Journal of Technology Management 64(2,3,4): 255–275.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for International Business Studies, Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law, Gothenburg University, P.O Box 610, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Inge Ivarsson & Claes Göran Alvstam

Authors
  1. Inge Ivarsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claes Göran Alvstam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inge Ivarsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivarsson, I., Alvstam, C.G. New technology development by Swedish MNEs in emerging markets: the role of co-location of R&D and production. Asian Bus Manage 16, 92–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-016-0013-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-016-0013-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation