Advertisement

Place Branding and Public Diplomacy

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 133–146 | Cite as

The politics of meaning and the city brand: The controversy over the branding of Ankara

  • Craig Hayden
  • Efe Sevin
Original Article

Abstract

This article presents analysis of a period of public argumentation over the city logo of Ankara, the capital of Turkey. These arguments comprise a 17-year episode of controversy that reveals insights into the politics of meaning behind city's brand. Ankara's logo functions as a contested ‘collective representation’ of the city's brand identity, and paved the way to further discussions on its history, cultural identity and politics by various internal stakeholders. The significance of this research is two-fold. First, the Ankara case contributes to existing studies of place branding and semiotics, by examining the contending positions that complicate Ankara's historical identity and the range of stakeholders that make up the ‘managerial apparatus’ of brand meaning. Drawing on communication studies, ‘controversy’ provides an analytical vehicle to consider claims to brand ownership, legitimacy and authority by various stakeholders, as well as to demonstrate the potential of public argumentation to transform and shape the practice of place branding.

Keywords

Ankara logo controversy argumentation semiotics critical studies 

References

  1. Adams, P.C. (2009) Geographies of Media and Communication: A Critical Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Akşam. (2009) Gökçek yine Ankara’nın amblemini değiştiriyor. 23 May, http://www.mimdap.org/?p=19736, accessed 10 February 2012.
  3. Aktif Haber. (2011) Ankara’nın ambleminde son sözü Danıştay söyledi. 16 July, http://www.aktifhaber.com/baskentin-yeni-amblemi-belirlendi-469041h.htm, accessed 5 February 2012.
  4. Anholt, S. (2007) Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anholt, S. (2010) Places Identity, Image and Reputation. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Ankara Haber Ajansi HaberVs. (2008) Güneş’e özlem. 4 April, http://tr.habervesaire.com/haber/474/, accessed 7 February 2012.
  7. Aronczyk, M. (2008) ‘Living the brand’: Nationality, globality, and the identity strategies of nation branding consultants. International Journal of Communication 2: 41–65.Google Scholar
  8. Ashworth, G. and Kavaratzis, M. (2009) Beyond the logo: Brand management for cities. Journal of Brand Management 16 (8): 520–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basu, A. and Wang, J. (2009) The role of branding in public health campaigns. Journal of Communication Management 13 (1): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigumigu. (2007) Kış güneşi bi başka parlar. Blog post, 20 January, http://www.bigumigu.com/bigu/haber.asp?hid=1487, accessed 5 February 2012.
  11. Boisen, M. (2012) The roots of place branding: Fundamental issues to be solve. Presented at the International Place Branding Conference Special Edition: Roots – Politics – Methods, Utrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Boisen, M., Terlouw, K. and van Gorp, B. (2011) The selective nature of place branding and the layering of spatial identities. Journal of Place Management and Development 4 (2): 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braun, E. and Zenker, S. (2010) Towards an integrated approach for place brand management. Presented at the 50th European Regional Science Association Congress, Jönköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  14. Chandler, D. (2007) Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Cinar, A. (2005) Modernity, Islam, and secularism in Turkey bodies, Places, and Time. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. CNNTürk. (2008) Ankara’da amblem tartışması sürüyor. 12 August, http://www.cnnturk.com/2008/turkiye/08/11/ankarada.amblem.tartismasi.suruyor/490110.0/index.html, accessed 2 February 2012.
  17. CNNTürk. (2011) İşte Ankara’nın yeni amblemi. 17 July, http://www.cnnturk.com/2011/turkiye/07/15/iste.ankaranin.yeni.amblemi/623087.0/, accessed 15 February 2012.
  18. Cumhuriyet. (2008) Karar ne zaman uygulanacak? 1 August, http://v3.arkitera.com/h32444-karar-ne-zaman-uygulanacak.html, accessed 12 February 2012.
  19. Dündar, C. (2008) Ankara minare ile boynuz arasında. Milliyet, 12 April, http://gundem.milliyet.com.tr/-/can-dundar/guncel/gundemyazardetay/12.04.2008/516052/default.htm, accessed 11 February 2012.
  20. Eğrikavuk, I. (2011) Ankara's Hittite Sun Debate Reignited with Court's Ruling. Hurriyet Daily News, 15 September, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=ankara8217s-hittite-sun-debate-reignited-with-court8217s-ruling-2011-09-15, accessed 11 February 2012.
  21. FarkEtmez.net. (2010) Ankara Belediyesi’ne Yeni Logo. Blog post, 17 June, http://www.farketmez.net/ankara-belediyesine-yeni-logo, accessed 7 February 2012.
  22. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2007) Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2 (3): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Floch, J.-M. (2001) Semiotics, Marketing, and Communication: Beneath the Signs, the Strategies. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  24. Freire, J.R. (2005) Geo-branding, are we talking nonsense? A theoretical reflection on brands applied to places. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 1 (4): 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gertner, D. (2011a) A (tentative) meta-analysis of the ‘place marketing’ and ‘place branding’ literature. Journal of Brand Management 19 (2): 112–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gertner, D. (2011b) Unfolding and configuring two decades of research and publications on place marketing and place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 7 (2): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilboa, E. (2008) Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Göle, N. (1997) Secularism and Islamism in Turkey: The making of elites and counter-elites. Middle East Journal 51 (1): 46–58.Google Scholar
  29. Goodnight, G.T. (1991) Controversy. In: D.W. Parson (ed.) Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  30. Goodnight, G.T. (2003) Predicaments of communication, argument, and power: Towards a critical theory of controversy. Informal Logic 23 (2): 119–137.Google Scholar
  31. Griffiths, R. (1998) Making sameness: Place marketing and the new urban entrepreneurialism. In: Oatley, N. (ed.) Cities, Economic Competition, and Urban Policy. London: Paul Chapman, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
  32. Haber Sol. (2011) Gökçek ‘Hitit güneşi’ne neden taktı? 14 September, http://haber.sol.org.tr/kent-gundemleri/gokcek-hitit-gunesine-neden-takti-haberi-46387, accessed 7 February 2012.
  33. Habermas, J. (2001) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hankinson, G. (2004) Relational network brands: Towards a conceptual model of place brands. Journal of Vacation Marketing 10 (2): 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hatch, M.J. and Rubin, J. (2006) The hermeneutics of branding. Journal of Brand Management 14 (1/2): 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayden, C. (2012) The Rhetoric of Soft Power: Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  37. Hürriyet. (2000) Gökçek’in referandumuna ret. 15 August, http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/printnews.aspx?DocID=-174919, accessed 8 February 2012.
  38. Hürriyet. (2001a) Ankara’da amblem kavgası. 27 January, http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/printnews.aspx?DocID=-220348, accessed 8 February 2012.
  39. Hürriyet. (2001b) Ankara Belediyesi’nin amblem belirleme yetkisi yok. 15 April, http://arama.hurriyet.com.tr/arsivnewsmobile.aspx?id=-237656, accessed 8 February 2012.
  40. Hürriyet. (2011) Ankara’nın ambleminde son sözü Danıştay söyledi. 13 September, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/18718557.asp, accessed 8 February 2012.
  41. İl Gazetesi. (2010) MHP Ankara l Başkanlığı’ndan logo teklifi. 29 July, http://www.ilgazetesi.com.tr/2010/07/29/mhp-ankara-il-baskanligi'ndan-logo-teklifi/050073/, accessed 8 February 2012.Google Scholar
  42. Iık, T. (2005) Yine sembol tartışılıyor. 9 February, http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=142972, accessed 3 January 2012.
  43. Jansen, S.C. (2008) Designer nations: Neo-liberal nation branding – Brand Estonia. Social Identities 14 (1): 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaneva, N. (2011) Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication 5: 117–141.Google Scholar
  45. Kaneva, N. and Popescu, D. (2011) National identity lite: Nation branding in post-Communist Romania and Bulgaria. International Journal of Cultural Studies 14 (2): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kavaratzis, M. (2005) Place branding: A review of trends and conceptual models. Marketing Review 5 (4): 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kavaratzis, M. and Ashworth, G. (2006) City branding: An effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 2 (3): 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koller, V. (2008) ‘The world in one city’: Semiotic and cognitive aspects of city branding. Journal of Language and Politics 7 (3): 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lash, S. and Lury, C. (2007) Global Culture Industry: The Mediation of Things. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  50. Manning, P. (2010) The semiotics of brand. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marsh, D. and Fawcett, P. (2011) Branding, politics and democracy. Policy Studies 32 (5): 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mick, D.G. (1986) Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (2): 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgan, N., Pritchard, A. and Pride, R. (2004) Destination Branding: Creating the Unique Destination Proposition, 2nd edn. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  54. NTVMSNBC. (2001) Valilik’ten Belediye’ye amblem tepkisi. 26 January, http://arsiv.ntvmsnbc.com/news/59467.asp, accessed 2 March 2012.
  55. Olins, W. (2004) On Brand. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  56. Olson, K.M. and Goodnight, G.T. (1994) Entanglements of consumption, cruelty, privacy, and fashion: The social controversy over fur. Quarterly Journal of Speech 80 (3): 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Osman, N. (2008a) Ankara'nın Yeni Amblemi ptal Edildi! wowTurkey.Google Scholar
  58. Osman, N. (2008b) Ankara'nın Yeni Amblemi ptal Edildi! wowTurkey.Google Scholar
  59. Özer, A. (2003) Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin Başkenti Ankara çin Düşünülen Amblem ve Tartışmalar. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2 (1): 95–108.Google Scholar
  60. Peirce, C.S. (1931) Collected Writings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Potter, E. (2009) Branding Canada Projecting Canada's Soft Power through Public Diplomacy. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sabah. (2011) Ankara’nın logosu belli oldu. 17 September, http://www.sabah.com.tr/Yasam/2011/09/17/ankaranin-logosu-belli-oldu, accessed 2 March 2012.
  63. Sevin, E. (2010) Controlling the Message: A Strategic Approach to Nation Branding. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic.Google Scholar
  64. Sevin, E. (2011) Thinking about place branding: Ethics of concept. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 7 (3): 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Şeyler. (2007) Hitit Güneşi Ankara’ya yeniden doğuyor!, Blog post, 20 January, http://settar.blogspot.com/2007/01/hitit-gnei-ankaraya-yeniden-douyor.html, accessed 3 March 2012.
  66. Son Sayfa. (2011) Ankara’da amblem savaşı. 22 July, http://www.sonsayfa.com/Haberler/Guncel/Ankarada-amblem-savasi-198376.html, accessed 3 March 2012.
  67. Szondi, G. (2008) Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy.Google Scholar
  68. TMMOB. (2008) Ankara Hitit Güneşi Amblemine Geri Dönüyor. Blog Post, n.d., http://www.mimarlarodasi.org.tr/index.cfm?sayfa=belge&sub=detail&bid=2&mid=2&recid=10856, accessed 3 March 2012.
  69. van Ham, P. (2001) The rise of the brand state. Foreign Affairs 80 (5): 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Ham, P. (2010) Social Power in International Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Van Assche, K. and Lo, M.C. (2011) Planning, preservation and place branding: A tale of sharing assets and narratives. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 7 (2): 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vatan. (2008) Cami gidiyor Hitit güneşi geliyor. 10 April, http://haber.gazetevatan.com/Haber/172291/1/Gundem, accessed 3 March 2012.
  73. Wang, J. (2006) Localising public diplomacy: The role of sub-national actors in nation branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 2 (1): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Warnaby, G. and Medway, D. (2010) Semiotics and place branding: The influence of the built and natural environment in city logos. In: G.J. Ashworth and M. Kavaratzis (eds.) Towards Effective Place Brand Management Branding European Cities and Regions. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  75. Yeni Şafak. (2011) Ankara’nın yeni logosu belli oldu. 17 September, http://yenisafak.com.tr/Gundem/?t=17.09.2011&i=341234, accessed 14 February 2012.

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International Service, American UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations