Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge mobilisation in communities through socio-technical systems

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

Enterprises in both the public and private sector undertake knowledge management (KM) initiatives through which they hope to engender a new, more adaptive and flexible culture of learning and innovation in their organisations. Creative activities involving social learning and innovation are, however, more common in less formal entities such as communities of practice at work and community service organisations in civil society. This paper presents the results and implications of collaborative research into the understanding, development and evaluation of socio-technical systems (STS) designed to mobilise collective knowledge in diverse community settings. The research concerns information and communication technologies (ICT)-mediated activities of communities in the broader civil society and also those in formal organisations. The paper describes and critically evaluates a set of three STS that have the potential to support the collective knowledge of innovative groups, teams and networks, which can all be considered forms of community. The findings could be of strategic value to business, government and community service organisations initiating KM programmes aimed at using collective learning to support innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Now called Eviva. See: www.eviva.com.au

  2. Zing Technologies Pty Ltd.

References

  • AA (1999) On-line communities in business. Report from the On-Line Communities Research Study, Arthur Andersen.

  • AS5037-2005 (2005) Australian Standard Knowledge Management. Standards Australia, Sydney.

  • AS5037(INT)-2003 (2003) Interim Australian Standard – Knowledge Management. Standards Australia, Sydney.

  • Benson S and Standing C (2001) Effective knowledge management: knowledge, thinking and the personal-corporate knowledge nexus problem. Information Systems Frontiers 3 (2), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland R and Tenkasi R (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organisation Science 6 (4), 350–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic D and Jerram CA (2002) Sensemaking view of knowledge in organisations. Proceedings of ECIS2002, pp 894–904, Gdansk.

  • Chae B, Koch H and Paradice D (2001) Social shaping of knowledge management. 7th American Conference on Information Systems, Boston, 2087–2093.

  • Cherns A (1976) The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations 29 (8), 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes E (2002) Knowledge management: a sociotechnical perspective. In Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World (COAKES E, WILLIS D and CLARKE S, Eds), pp 4–14, Springer-Verlag, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Prusak L (2000) Working Knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Perspectives on Activity Theory (ENGESTR Y, MIETTINEN R and PUNAMAKI R, Eds), pp 377–406, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y, Miettinen R and Punamaki R (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan H (2003) An activity-based model of collective knowledge. Proceedings of HICSS36, Hawaii.

  • Hasan H and Crawford K (2003a) A multifaceted approach to distributed communities of learning and practice. Proceedings of ISGLOB03, IFIP 8.2/9.3, Athens.

  • Hasan H and Crawford K (2003b) Socio-technical systems for knowledge mobilisation in communities. Proceedings of ACIS2003, Perth.

  • Hasan H and Gould E (2001) Support for the sense making activity of managers. DSS Journal, special issue on Knowledge Management 31 (3), 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev AN (1981) Problems of the Development of Mind. Progress, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linger H and Warne L (2001) Making the invisible visible: modelling social learning in knowledge management context. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, Special Edition 2001, 56–66.

  • Lock Lee L and Neff M (2003) How information technologies can help build and sustain an organisation's CoP: spanning the socio-technical divide: In Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice (HILRETH P and KIMBLE C, Eds), pp 165–183, Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff J (2000) Action Research in Organisations. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB and Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 6 (8), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell D, Porter G, McGuire D, Garavan T, Hefferman M and Cleary P (2003) Creating intellectual capital: a Habermasian community of practice introduction. Journal of European Industrial Training 27 (2), 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece J, Rogers Y and Sharp H (2002) Interaction Design. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz V (2002) Managing knowledge in a knowledge business. In Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World (COAKES E, WILLIS D and CLARKE S, Eds), pp 43–51, Springer-Verlag, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S (1999) Knowledge as shared procedures. In Perspectives on Activity Theory (ENGESTROM Y, MIETTINEN R and PUNAMAKI R, Eds), pp 70–86, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Virkkunen J and Kuutti K (2000) Understanding organisational learning by focusing on ‘activity systems’. Accounting, Management and Information Technology 10, 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warne L, Ali I and Pascoe C (2002) Sharing knowledge through effective team building: trust vs the information power dynamic. Proceeding of ACKMIDS2002 Melbourne, 9–10 December 2002.

  • Warne L, Ali I, Linger H and Pascoe C (2003) Socio-technical foundations for knowledge management. In Australian Studies in Knowledge Management (HASAN H and HANDZIC M, Eds), pp 277–321, University of Wollongong Press, Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2005) Knowledge management systems: representation and communication in context. Systems, Signs & Action 1 (1), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R and Snyder W (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Discovery Grant, DP0211336, from the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Hasan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasan, H., Crawford, K. Knowledge mobilisation in communities through socio-technical systems. Knowl Manage Res Pract 5, 237–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500144

Keywords

Navigation