Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric enhancements of the Esau–Williams heuristic for the capacitated minimum spanning tree problem

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The Capacitated Minimum Spanning Tree Problem is NP-hard and several heuristic solution methods have been proposed. They can be classified as classical ones and metaheuristics. Recent developments have shown that metaheuristics outperform classical heuristics. However, they require long computation times and there are difficulties in their parameter calibration and coding phases. This explains the popularity of the Esau–Williams (EW) heuristic in practice, and its use in many successful metaheuristics and second-order greedy methods. In this work, we are concerned with the EW heuristic and we propose simple new enhancements. Based on our computational experiments, we can say that they considerably improve its accuracy with minor increase in computation time, and without harming its simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja RK, Orlin JB and Sharma D (2001). Multi-exchange neighborhood structures for the capacitated minimum spanning tree problem. Math Prog Ser A 91: 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja RK, Orlin JB and Sharma D (2003). A composite very large-scale neighborhood structure for the capacitated minimum spanning tree problem. Opns Res Lett 31: 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altınel İK and Öncan T (2005). A new enhancement of the Clarke and Wright savings heuristic for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. J Opl Res Soc 56: 954–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amberg A, Domschke W and Voss S (1996). Capacitated minimum spanning trees: Algorithms using intelligent search. Combin Optim: Theory Pract 1: 9–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley JE (2005). ORLIB: Operations Research Library, http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~mastjjb/jeb/info.html, last accessed October 2007.

  • Bruno G and Laporte G (2002). A simple enhancement of the Esau–Williams heuristic for the capacitated minimum spanning tree problem. J Opl Res Soc 53: 583–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerini PM, Galbiati G and Maffioli F (1980). Complexity of spanning tree problems: Part I. Eur J Opl Res 5: 346–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerini PM, Galbiati G and Maffioli F (1983). On the complexity of finding multi-constrained spanning trees. Disc Appl Math 5: 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke G and Wright JW (1964). Scheduling of vehicles from a central depot to a number of depots. Opns Res 12: 568–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai HK and Fujino S (2000). On designing constrained local access networks. In: Sudborough IH and Hsu DF (eds). Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (ISPAN'00). IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 167–176.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Esau LR and Williams KC (1966). On teleprocessing system design. Part II—A method for approximating the optimal network. IBM Syst J 5: 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell T (1967). Bases for vehicle fleet scheduling. Opl Res Quart 18: 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavish B (1991). Topological design of telecommunication networks—Local access design methods. Ann Ops Res 33: 17–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall L (1996). Experience with a cutting plane algorithm for the capacitated spanning tree problem. INFORMS J Comput 8: 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jothi R and Raghavachari B (2003). Design of local access networks. In: Gonzalez T (ed). Proceedings of the 15th IASTED International. Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems (PDCS). Acta Press: Marina del Rey, CA, USA, pp. 883–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnaugh M (1976). A new class of algorithms for multipoint network optimization. IEEE Trans Commun 24: 500–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershenbaum A, Boorstyn R and Oppenheim R (1980). Second-order greedy algorithms for centralized teleprocessing network design. IEEE Trans Commun 28: 1835–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martello S and Toth P (1990). Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paessens H (1988). The savings algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. Eur J Opl Res 34: 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou CH (1978). The complexity of the capacitated tree problem. Networks 8: 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson R and Pirkul H (2000). Heuristic procedure neural networks for the CMST problem. Comput Opns Res 27: 1171–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson R, Pirkul H and Rolland E (1999). A memory adaptive reasoning technique for solving the capacitated minimum spanning tree problem. J Heuristics 5: 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharaiha YM, Gendreau M, Laporte G and Osman IH (1997). A tabu search algorithm for the capacitated shortest spanning tree problem. Networks 29: 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yellow P (1970). A computational modification to the savings method of vehicle scheduling. Opl Res Quart 21: 281–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially supported by Boǧaziçi Research Fund Grant No: 04HA301D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Öncan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Öncan, T., Altınel, İ. Parametric enhancements of the Esau–Williams heuristic for the capacitated minimum spanning tree problem. J Oper Res Soc 60, 259–267 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602548

Keywords

Navigation