Skip to main content
Log in

Linking the individual forgetting context with customer capital from a seller's perspective

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Customer capital is a result of interaction between an organization and its customers. Customers change their characteristics, including addresses, behaviour and preferences; but as the customer requirements change, basic beliefs or processes that is, things that individuals take for granted at an implicit and an explicit level of knowledge, must also change. This paper aims to identify the role of an individual forgetting context on customer capital in today's organization through an empirical study of 229 sellers (front-line contact people) in the Spanish optometry industry. Two structural equation models have been used, resulting in the conclusion that before obtaining an up-to-date memory, it is necessary to identify new ways of doing and interpreting things, which in turn result in a shift in relations that favour the customers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgün A, Lynn GS and Byrne J (2006). Antecedents and consequences of unlearning in new product development teams. Prod Innovat Mngt 23: 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC and Gerbing D (1988). Structural modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP (1980). Causal models in marketing . John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP and Yi Y (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci 16(1): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WE and Sinkula JM (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J Acad Market Sci 27(4): 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkner LR and Birkner RK (1998). Learning organization update. Occupation Hazards 60(10): 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis N (2001). CKO wanted—evangelical skills necessary: A review of the chief knowledge officer position. Knowl Process Mngt 8(1): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis N, Keow WC and Richardson S (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. J Intellect Cap 1(1): 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS and Duguid P (2000). Balancing act: How to capture knowledge without killing it. Harvard Bus Rev 78(3): 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno E (1998). Medición del capital intelectual: modelo Intelect . Instituto Universitario Euroforum Escorial: Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caddy I (2000). Intellectual capital: Recognizing both assets and liabilities. J Intellect Cap 2(1): 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile P (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Org Sci 13: 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines EG and McIver SP (1981). Analysing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In: Bohrnstedt GW and Borgatta EF (eds). Social Measurement: Current Issues. Sage: Beverly Hill, CA, pp. 65–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra JG and Dewhurst FW (2006). Linking shared organisational context and relational capital through unlearning: An initial empirical investigation in SMEs. Learn Org 13(1): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 16(1): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1998). Toward a knowledge context. Calif Mngt Rev 40(3): 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross R and Baird L (2000). Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Mngt Rev 41(3): 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day GS (1994a). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J Market 58(4): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day GS (1994b). Continuous learning about markets. Calif Mngt Rev 36(4): 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande R and Zaltman G (1982). Factors affecting the use of market research information: A path analysis. J Market Res 19: 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy J (2000). Measuring customer capital. Strategy Leader 28(5): 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey L and Prusak L (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. Calif Mngt Rev 40(3): 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French E and Delahaye B (1996). Individual change transition: Moving in circles can be good for you. Leader Org Dev J 17(7): 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL and Black WC (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber G (1991). Organisational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Org Sci 2(1): 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LR, Muliak SA and Brett JM (1982). Causal Analysis Assumptions, Models and Data . Sage: Beverly Hill, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis I (1982). Victims of Groupthink, 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog K and Sörbom D (2001). LISREL 8.50 . Scientific Software: Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1993). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev 70(1): 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan R and Lahey LL (2001). How the Way We Talk Can Change the Way We Work: Seven Languages of Transformation . Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Mngt Rev 35(1): 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EE and Galbraith JR (1994). Avoiding the corporate dinosaur syndrome. Org Dyn 23(2): 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG and Shapira Z (1982). Behavioral decision theory and organizational decision theory. In: Ungson GR and Brounstein DN (eds). Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Kent Publishing: Boston, pp. 92–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin De Holan P and Phillips N (2004). The remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Mngt Sci 50(11): 1603–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy AM, Krueger DA and Schoenecker TS (1990). Changes in the time allocation patterns of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 15(2): 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation . Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins D (2003). King Arthur's Table: How Collaborative Conversations Create Smart Organizations. John Wiley & Sons: NJ.

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY and Podsakoff NP (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK and Ramaswamy V (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Bus Rev 78(1): 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein E (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Mngt Rev 34(2): 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes F and Sallis J (2003). Promoting relationship learning. J Market 67(July): 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization . Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi R, Smith DC and Park CW (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. J Market Res 38(1): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula JM (2002). Market-based success, organizational routines, and unlearning. J Bus Ind Market 17(4): 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin S (1992). Learning through failure. Res Org Behav 14: 231–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater SF and Narver JC (1995). Market orientation and the learning organisation. J Market 59(July): 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender JC (1998). The dynamics of individual and organisational knowledge. In: Eden C and Spender JC (eds). Managerial and Organisational Cognition. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J Mngt Stud 29(6): 713–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH (1996). Unlearning ineffective or obsolete technologies. Int J Technol Mngt 11(7/8): 725–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996). Exploring stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strateg Mngt J 17: 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Plann 33(1): 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomke S and Reinertsen D (1998). Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. Calif Mngt Rev 41(1): 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M-T Sánchez-Polo.

Appendix A: Questionnaire items

Appendix A: Questionnaire items

Table A1

Table 4 Table a1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cegarra-Navarro, JG., Sánchez-Polo, MT. Linking the individual forgetting context with customer capital from a seller's perspective. J Oper Res Soc 59, 1614–1623 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602491

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602491

Keywords

Navigation