Skip to main content
Log in

Fields of application of SSM: a categorization of publications

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this article, we introduce a classification scheme for publications of articles on SSM. Generally speaking, the publications can be divided into empirically orientated and theoretically orientated papers. Within each of these two categories a further subdivision is made. This subdivision consists on the one hand of a division into type of organizations and on the other hand of type of organization processes. The resulting model then gives one the opportunity to classify new publications and to search for papers to use in further research. It also shows the state of the art of possible areas of applications of SSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1999). Re-Creating the Corporation, A Design of Organisations for the 21st Century. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahaus C and van de Water H (1994). On responsibility and authority. Syst Res 11 (4): 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbnor I and Bjerke B (1997). Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge. Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1970). Intervention Theory and Method: A Behavioural Science View. Addison-Wesley Publishing: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris (1980). Inner Contradictions of Rigorous Research. Academic Press: New York.

  • Casti JL (1995). COMPLEXification, Explaining a Paradoxical World Through the Science of Surprise. HarperPerennial: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti JL (1997a). Reality Rules: I Picturing the World in Mathematics—The Fundamentals. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti JL (1997b). Reality Rules: II Picturing the World in Mathematics—The Frontiers. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1972). Towards a system-based methodology for real world problem solving. J Syst Eng 3: 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Plenum: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB and Holwell S (1988). Information, Systems and Information Systems. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB and Scholes J (1990). SSM in Action. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christis J (2005). Theory and practice of soft systems methodology: a performative contradiction. Syst Res Behav Sci 22: 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan GA, Pines D and Meltzer D (1994). Complexity Metaphors, Models, and Reality. A proceedings volume in the Santa Fe Institute studies in the science of complexity. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald LA (1996). Organizations and Other Things Fractal. A Primer on Chaos for Agents of Change. The Consultancy: Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald LA (2002). Chaos: The lens that transcends. J Org Change Manage 15 (4) (Special Issue ‘Chaos: Applications in Organizational Change’).

  • Flood R and Jackson MC (1991). Creative Problem Solving. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • French WL, Bell CH and Zawacki RA (1989). Organization Development. RD Irwin, Inc. Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantz H and Schreiber T (2004). Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreher H (1994). Some recurring themes in using SSM. J Opl Res Soc 45: 1293–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (1999). Social theory and system dynamics practice. Eur J Opl Res 113 (3): 501–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2000). Should system dynamics be described as a ‘hard’ or ‘deterministic’ systems approach? Syst Res Behav SCI 17: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2001a). Rerum cognoscere causas: Part I—How do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate? Syst Dyn Rev 17: 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2001b). Rerum cognoscere causas. Part II—Opportunities generated by the agency/structure debate and suggestions for clarifying the social theoretic position of system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 17: 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledington P and Donaldson J (1997). Soft OR and management practice. J Opl Res Soc 48: 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2000). Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods. Int Trans Opl Res 7 (6): 673–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Taylor S (1992). The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J Opl Res Soc 43: 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine GNI (1989). Exploring Complexity: An Introduction. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Ulloa R and Paucar-Caceres A (2005). Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): A combination of soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD). Syst Practice Action Res 8 (3): 303–334.

  • Rosenhead J and Mingers J (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack N, Chambers SS and Johnston R (2001). Operations Management. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz SH (1994). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JAM (1996). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Water H (1999). A maintenance model for quality management. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 17 (7): 756–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Water H and de Vries J (1992). The organization of quality management: from abstract model to real, example. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 9 (2): 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eijnatten FM (2001). Chaordic Systems for Holonic Organizational Renewal. Research in Organizational Change and Development, Volume 13. JAI Press/Elsevier: San Francisco, pp. 213–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijnatten FM and van Galen MC (2002). Chaos, dialog and the dolphin's strategy. J Org Change Manage 15 (4): 391–402 (Special Issue ‘Chaos: Applications in Organizational Change’).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems JC (1989). From Data to Model. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willems JC (1997). Introduction to Mathematical Systems Theory, A Behavior Approach. Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Rozier.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table A1

Table 18 Table a1

Appendix B

Every article in Appendix A is coded. In this appendix you will find the description of each code.

Table A2

Table 19 Table a2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van de Water, H., Schinkel, M. & Rozier, R. Fields of application of SSM: a categorization of publications. J Oper Res Soc 58, 271–287 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602156

Keywords

Navigation