Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperation or competition? Factors and conditions affecting regional port governance in South China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

Hong Kong is an international port heavily influenced by the ‘active non-interventionist’ policy and, until very recently, segregated from China's national/regional planning due to its special political and economic status. However, the port is now facing considerable challenges, notably increased trade between China and overseas markets, challenges from neighbouring ports, notably Shenzhen and Guangzhou, the increasing importance of intra-Asian trade and the economic turmoil in 2008, which accelerated the industrial transformation of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in South China. Hence, Hong Kong is compelled to undergo strategic changes, notably its gradual integration into China's national and regional planning, and to integrate itself within the PRD so as to establish a system with different PRD ports that is functionally complementary to each other. How such a newly developed regional port cluster should develop, notably the division of responsibilities of cargo flows between Hong Kong and other PRD ports, however, is still rather ambiguous. By developing a game theory model and calibrated on the basis of the PRD context, this article investigates the factors and conditions affecting regional port governance in South China, notably alliance formation for ports serving partially overlapping hinterlands. This article serves as an important step in developing an effective, fully integrated regional transportation system within the PRD, and to help it to become an efficient logistics hub in the Asia-Pacific region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a more detailed analysis of the impacts of institutions on port operation and management, see Ng and Pallis (2010) and Tongzon and Ng (2011).

  2. We adopted the THC set by CSAV shipping line, assuming that the THC charged by a shipping line to its shippers can largely reflect the port service levied by the port to the shipping line.

References

  • Aaker, D. (1984) Developing Business Strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2008) The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development. Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development, World Bank Group. Working Paper No. 10.

  • Avery, P. (2000) Strategies for Container Ports. Cargo Systems Report, IIR, London.

  • Boyer, R. and Hollingsworth, J.R. (eds.) (1997) From national embeddedness to spatial and institutional nestedness. In: Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 433–484.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. (1996) Co-opetition. New York: Currency Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1992) The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review 82 (4): 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of PRC. (2009) The Outline of the Plan for the Reform and Development of the PRD (2008–2020). Beijing, China: National Development and Reform Commission, Government of PRC.

  • Hall, P.A. (1986) Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.V. (2003) Regional institutional convergence? Reflections from the Baltimore Waterfront. Economic Geography 79 (3): 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, W. (2007) Port competition between Los Angeles and Long Beach. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 98 (3): 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. and Oosterlynk, S. (2008) Cultural political economy: On making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology. Geoforum 39 (3): 1155–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorde, T. and Teece, D. (1989) Competition and co-operation: Striking the right balance. California Management Review 31 (3): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juhel, M. (2000) Globalisation and partnerships in ports: Trends for the 21st century. Ports and Harbours 45 (5): 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M. and Scheinkman, J.A (1983) Quantity pre-commitment and Bertrand competition yield cournot outcomes. Bell Journal of Economics 14 (2): 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2011) Container port competition and complementarity in supply chain systems: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta. Maritime Economics and Logistics 13 (2): 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M. (2002) Electronic commerce in China: Emerging success stories. Information and Management 39 (7): 571–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A.K.Y. (2006) Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: An agenda for future research in port competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics 8 (3): 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A.K.Y. (2012) Container liner shipping, port development and competition. In: D.W. Song and P.M. Panayides (eds.) Maritime Logistics: Contemporary Issues. Bingley, UK: Emerald, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A.K.Y. and Pallis, A.A. (2010) Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: Generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environment and Planning A 42 (9): 2147–2167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noorda, R. (1993) Co-opetition. Electronic Business Buyer, December: 8–12.

  • Notteboom, T.E. (2009) Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent gateway ports. Environment and Planning A 41 (3): 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T.E. and Rodrigue, J.P. (2005) Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management 32 (3): 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T.E. and Winkelmans, W. (2001) Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy and Management 28 (1): 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1986) Changing patterns of international competition. California Management Review 28 (2): 9–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sit, V.F.S. (2009) Strategy for coordinated transport infrastructure development in the greater Pearl River Delta Region. Paper presented at the Seminar on Regional Planning in the Greater Pearl River Delta Region, organized by Planning Department, Hong Kong SAR Government, 21 September.

  • Song, D.W. (2002) Regional container port competition and co-operation: The case of Hong Kong and South China. Journal of Transport Geography 10 (2): 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D.W. (2003) Port co-opetition in concept and practice. Maritime Policy and Management 30 (1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D.W. (2004) The motivation for port co-opetition: Strategic implications to Korea. Journal of Shipping and Logistics 43 (1): 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M. (1991) Global Corporate Alliances and the Competitive Edge: Strategies and Tactics for Management. New York: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hong Kong SAR Government and Guangdong Provincial Government. (2010) Framework agreement on Hong Kong/Guangdong co-operation, http://www.info.gov.hk, last accessed March 2011.

  • Tongzon, J.L. and Ng, A.K.Y. (2011) Institutions and the evolution of economic activities in developing economies: Lessons from East Asian seaports. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Santiago de Chile, Chile; Melbourne, Australia: The International Association of Maritime Economists, 25–28 October.

  • UNCTAD. (1996) Potentialities for Regional Port Co-operation. Geneva, Switzerland: NCTAD/SDD/PORT/5.

  • Wang, J.J. (2010) Hong Kong in the transition from load centre to logistics hub: Process and puzzles. Unpublished presentation.

  • Wang, J.J. and Ng, A.K.Y. (2011) The geographical connectedness of Chinese ports with foreland markets: A new trend? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 102 (2): 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.J. and Olivier, D. (2007) Hong Kong and Shenzhen: The Nexus in South China. In: K.P.B. Cullinane and D.W. Song (eds.) Asian Container Ports: Development, Competition and Co-operation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (2000) The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. (2007) Hong Kong: Asia's world port. In: K.P.B. Cullinane and D.W. Song (eds.) Asian Container Ports: Development, Competition and Co-operation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2007) The World Bank Port Reform Toolkit, 2nd edn. Washington DC: The World Bank Group.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Adolf K.Y. Ng was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (project code: A-PL60). Xiaowen Fu was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (project code: A-PK01). The authors would like to thank the reviewers in providing useful advice. Usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, K., Ng, A., Lam, J. et al. Cooperation or competition? Factors and conditions affecting regional port governance in South China. Marit Econ Logist 14, 386–408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2012.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2012.13

Keywords

Navigation