Skip to main content
Log in

On the weighting of the mean-absolute-deviation cost minimization model

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The mean-absolute-deviation cost minimization model, which aims to minimize sum of the mean value and the absolute deviation (AD) of the total cost multiplied by a given non-negative weighting, is one of a number of typical robust optimization models. This paper first uses a straightforward example to show that the solution obtained by this model with some weightings is not actually an optimal decision. This example also illustrates that the mean-absolute-deviation cost minimization model cannot be regarded as the conventional weighted transformation of the relevant multiobjective minimization model aiming to simultaneously minimize the mean value and AD. This paper further proves that the optimal solution obtained by the mean-absolute-deviation cost minimization model with the weighting not exceeding 0.5 will not be absolutely dominated by any other solution. This tight upper bound provides a useful guideline for practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L and Nemirovski A (2009). Robust Optimization. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chankong V and Haimes YY (1983). Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology. North Holland: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno H and Yamazaki H (1991). Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Management Science 37 (5): 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai K-K and Ng W-L (2005). A stochastic approach to hotel revenue optimization. Computers & Operations Research 32 (5): 1059–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai KK, Wang M and Liang L (2007). A stochastic approach to professional services firms’ revenue optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 182 (3): 971–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung SCH, Wu Y and Lai KK (2002). A robust optimization model for a cross-border logistics problem with fleet composition in an uncertain environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 36 (11–13): 1221–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung SCH, Lai KK, Ng W-L and Wu Y (2007a). A robust optimization model for production planning of perishable products. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (4): 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung SCH, Tsang SOS, Ng WL and Wu Y (2007b). A robust optimization model for multi-site production planning problem in an uncertain environment. European Journal of Operational Research 181 (1): 224–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansini R, Ogryczak W and Speranza MG (2003). LP solvable models for portfolio optimization: a classification and computational comparison. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 14 (3): 187–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ and Zenios SA (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research 43 (2): 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Option Trading Tips (2011). S&P 100 index. http://www.optiontradingtips.com/resources/historical-data/sp100.html, accessed 4 May 2011.

  • Pan F and Nagi R (2010). Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Computers and Operations Research 37 (4): 668–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C-S and Li H-L (2000). A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems. International Journal of Production Economics 64 (1–3): 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the research grants -WBS No. R-264-000-244-720 and WBS No. R-302-000-014-720- from the NOL Fellowship Programme of Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q Meng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Meng, Q. & Liu, Z. On the weighting of the mean-absolute-deviation cost minimization model. J Oper Res Soc 64, 622–628 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.73

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.73

Keywords

Navigation