Skip to main content
Log in

Religion and American foreign policy in the context of the postsecular turn in world politics and the social sciences

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Politics Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite longstanding research on religion and American politics, there has been little sustained attention to the relationship between religion and American foreign policy. This state of affairs is changing and markedly so. The past few years have witnessed an ever-growing stream of books across disciplines and perspectives seeking to understand and explain why, when and how religious individuals, organizations, ideas, identities and practices matter (or ought to matter) to America’s international conduct across time and issues. Why this sudden change? This review article contextualizes and relates this literature to the wider postsecular turn in the social world and the social sciences. It argues that research on religion and American policy has much to gain from a more consistent dialogue and engagement with the broader postsecular literature in international relations, and vice versa. The article concludes by highlighting seven promising avenues for further theoretical reflection and empirical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is not to say that there has been no attention at all. For the most part, though, the current literature on religion and American foreign policy has been rather narrowly focused and driven by presentist concerns, in particular about Protestant Evangelicals, the Christian Right and their apparent connections to George W. Bush’s foreign policy, see: Bacevich and Prodromou (2004), Mead (2006), Marsden (2008). There has also been little systematic attention to religious lobbies, beyond a rather hagiographic volume edited by Elliott Abrams (2001). A growing interest is emerging on the role of religion on public opinion about foreign policy (Guth, 2009). Diplomatic historians have equally tended to neglect religion. For a rare exception focusing on the Cold War see: Kirby (2003). For a general discussion about the paucity of accounts exploring the role of religion in American diplomatic history, see: Preston (2006).

  2. It is possible to divide this literature in two broad camps. The first calling for faith-based approaches to conflict resolution internationally along with greater diplomatic efforts to understand and engage religious communities abroad. See, for example: Seiple and Hoover (2004), Albright (2006), Chicago Council (2010). The second literature is more focused on making either the moral and/or security case for putting the international promotion of religious freedoms at the center of American foreign policy and strategic thinking. See, for example: Farr (2008), Grim and Finke (2010), Hertzke (2013).

  3. A huge literature has grown around the continued and apparent increased political salience of religion in the social world. For early sociological accounts see: Casanova (1994), Kepel (1994), Berger (1999). For a number of key texts in IR see: Hatzopoulos and Petito (2003a), Thomas (2005), Toft et al (2011).

  4. Some of the most cited events leading to this upsurge of interest in religion are: the multiplication of seemingly intractable conflicts along sectarian lines since the end of the Cold War; the attacks of 9/11; the emergence of political Islam as a security concern; George W. Bush’s publicly vaunted personal piety and religiously charged rhetoric in the context of the War on Terror; and Barack Obama’s speech to the Muslim world in Cairo in 2009 and his stated philosophical interest in the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr.

  5. For the standard texts on American exceptionalism see: Schlesinger (1977), Lipset (1996). For scholarship that explicitly links American exceptionalism to foreign policy, see: McDougall (1997), Mead (2002), Lieven (2005).

  6. The deep connection between American Protestantism and liberal values, for instance, was already widely discussed in Tocqueville’s (2000) masterpiece. For more contemporary perspectives, see: Noll (2009), Wald and Calhoun-Brown (2011, Ch.3).

  7. Eisenhower officially joined a church only once he became president, also he was the first president ever to be both baptized while in office and give his own prayer during the inauguration ceremony (Inboden, 2010, pp.257–262).

  8. Eisenhower institutionalized the National Prayer Breakfast, adopted ‘In God we Trust’ as the country’s motto, and added ‘one nation, under God’ to the Pledge of Allegiance (Inboden, 2010, p.257).

  9. As Preston also intriguingly puts it: ‘Christian realism was not simply a doctrine practiced by Christians but an ethical worldview that nonetheless sanctioned war under certain circumstances. This was just war theory for Protestants’ (2012, p.308).

  10. In his writings Schmitt principally traced a homology between the political sovereign and God, and the legal exception and the religious miracle.

  11. For a critique of ‘instrumental’ approaches to religion in IR, see: Hasenclever and Rittberger (2003).

  12. Preston tells a fascinating story about the American–Spanish wars, which is worth summarizing quickly here. At that time, once President McKinley had framed the war against Spain in Cuba (and then Philippines) as a moral and Christian imperative, religious periodicals – which then had a much wider reach than most other secular ones – had a pivotal role in building support popular by in informing readers that a war for Cuba would be both just and necessary (2012, p.213).

  13. For important entries in this debate see for instance: Hatzopoulos and Petito (2003b), Thomas (2005), Horowitz (2009), Lynch (2009), Philpott (2009), Sheikh (2012).

  14. In particular the work of Mohammed Ahrari (1987).

  15. Here he cites the work by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye (1973) and by Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink (1998)

  16. See for example: Huntington (1996), Rudolph and Piscatori (1997), Philpott (2002), Thomas (2005), Katzenstein and Byrnes (2006), Shani (2008), Mendelsohn (2012).

  17. Compare this, for instance, with the excellent work by Nukhet Sandal (2011) who draws from constructivist IR theorizing on epistemic communities to conceptualize religious agency, while simultaneously showing how a focus on religious groups can expand our understanding of epistemic communities and move forward ‘secular’ constructivist IR theorizing.

  18. See note 16. For a good and balanced overview of the role of religious transnational actors in world politics and how these often interact in complex ways with the nation state, see: Haynes (2012).

  19. See for example, among many, the Journal of Religious History’s (2008) Special Issue on Religion and Empire.

  20. As Preston and Inboden’s books show presidents during the Cold War did often reach out to the Catholic Roman Pope and other religious groups in order to form a faith-based coalition against the Soviet Union. Many of these efforts, which were largely carried undercover, often failed and the policy of engaging with religious groups was not really systematically institutionalized within the American foreign policy apparatus. Official diplomatic relations were established only in 1984 with Ronald Reagan, after decades-long attempts to do so. Till then political opposition to establishing a permanent ambassador to the Holy Sea was rooted very much in Protestant loathing of Catholicism rhetorically couched in terms of a breach to church-state disestablishment norms (Preston, 2012, p.414).

  21. http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/william-inboden (accessed 15 February 2013).

  22. Note I am not taking here the default secularist position, if one may call it so, that necessarily equates religion with some pre-modern and irrational violent force. I am mostly, instead, injecting a note of caution towards seeing religion as the cure to (as well as the cause of) most major problems in the world.

  23. Bush did, for example, instinctively and metaphorically describe America’s fight against Islamist terrorism as a ‘crusade’; nevertheless, he soon abandoned the terminology recognizing its bitter historical and religiously charged connotation for Arabs and Muslims.

References

  • Abrams, E . (2001) The Influence of Faith: Religious Groups and U.S. Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrari, M.E . (1987) Ethnic Groups and US Foreign Policy. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, M.K . (2006) The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on America, God, and World Affairs. Large print edn. New York, NY: Harper Large Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacevich, A. and Prodromou, E . (2004) God Is not neutral: Religion and US foreign policy AFTER 9/11. Orbis 48 (1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L . (1999) The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Grand Rapids, MI: Ethics and Public Policy Center; Eermans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D . (2007) Obama, gospel and verse. New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/opinion/26brooks.html?_r=0, accessed 20 January 2007.

  • Bush, G.W . (2001) Remarks by the President Upon Arrival 2001 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/print/20010916-2.html, accessed 10 January 2012.

  • Byrnes, T.A . (2011) Reverse Mission: Transnational Religious Communities and the Making of Us Foreign Policy. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J . (1994) Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J. and Joustra, R . (2010) God and Global Order: The Power of Religion in American Foreign Policy. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Council (2010) Engaging religious communities abroad: A new imperative for U.S. foreign policy. In: Report of the Task Force on Religion and the Making of U.S. Foreign Policy. R.S. Appleby and R. Cizik (eds.) Chicago: Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R . (1981) Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, H . and Sullivan, L.E . (2006) Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World. Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, T.F . (2008) World of Faith and Freedom: Why International Religious Liberty is Vital to American National Security. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M . (1996) National Interests in International Society, Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P.S., Kim, D.K., Torpey, J. and Van Antwerpen, J . (2012) The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society. Brooklyn, NY: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grim, B.J. and Finke, R . (2010) The Price of Freedom Denied: Religious Persecution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, J.L. (ed.) (2009) Religion and American public opinion: Foreign policy issues. In: The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics. Guth, J.L., Kellstedt, L.A. and Smidt, C.E. (eds.) New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 243–265.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, J.L., Smidt, C.E. and Kellstedt, L.A . (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J . (2006) Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, A. and Rittberger, V . (2003) Does religion make a difference? Theoretical approaches to the impact of faith on political conflict. In: Religion in International Relations: the Return from Exile. Hatzopoulos, P. and Petito, F. (eds.) New York; Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107–145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzopoulos, P. and Petito, F . (2003a) Religion in International Relations: The Return from Exile. 1st edn, New York; Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzopoulos, P. and Petito, F . (2003b) The return from exile: An introduction. In: Religion in International Relations: The Return from Exile. New York; Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J . (2012) Religious Transnational Actors and Soft Power. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzke, A.D . (2013) The Future of Religious Freedom: Global Challenges. Ofrod, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M.C . (2009) Long time going: Religion and the duration of crusading. International Security 34 (2): 162–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.P . (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, E.S . (2010) The Global Securitization of Religion. The Immanent Frame. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/03/23/global-securitization/, accessed 15 February 2013.

  • Hurd, E.S . (2012a) Believing in Religious Freedom. The Immanent Frame. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2012/03/01/believing-in-religious-freedom/, accessed 15 February 2013.

  • Hurd, E.S . (2012b) The Tragedy of Religious Freedom in Syria. Chicago Tribune. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-03-29/news/ct-perspec-0329-syria-20120329_1_religious-freedom-alawites-and-christians-syrian-revolt, accessed 20 August 2012.

  • Inboden, W . (2010) Religion and American Foreign Policy, 1945–1960: The Soul of Containment. Paperback Edition (ed.) Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P . (2007) The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity. Rev. and expanded (ed.) Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D.M . (2003) Faith-based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D.M . (2011) Religion, Terror, and Error: US Foreign Policy and the Challenge of Spiritual Engagement. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D.M. and Sampson, C . (1994) Religion, The Missing Dimension of Statecraft. Edited by Center for Strategic and International Studies New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Religious History (2008) Special issue on religion and empire. Journal of Religious History 32 (2): 159–280.

  • Katzenstein, P.J. and Byrnes, T.A . (2006) Transnational religion in an expanding Europe. Perspectives on Politics 4 (04): 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. and Sikkink, K . (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S . (1973) Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepel, G . (1994) The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the Modern World. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D . (2003) Religion and the Cold War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, A . (2005) America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism. New edition ed. London: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M . (1996) American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, C . (2009) A neo-weberian approach to religion in international politics. International Theory 1 (3): 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M . (2002) Good Muslim, bad Muslim: A political perspective on culture and terrorism. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 766–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, L . (2008) For God's Sake: The Christian Right and US Foreign Policy. London; New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W.A . (1997) Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World Since 1776. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, W.R . (2002) Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How it Changed the World. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, W.R . (2006) God's country. Foreign Affairs 85 (5): 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, B . (2012) God vs. Westphalia: Radical Islamist movements and the battle for organizing the world. Review of International Studies 38 (3): 589–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nexon, D.H . (2009) The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. and Bacevich, A.J . (2008) The Irony of American History. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, M.A . (2009) Religion and the American founding. In: E.S. Corwin, A.K. Lyman and J.L. Guth (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics. Vol.xi. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B . (2009) President Obama Addresses Muslim World in Cairo. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/04/AR2009060401117.html, accessed 25 November 2011.

  • PEW (2002) Among Wealthy Nations U.S. Stands Alone in its Embrace of Religion. http://pewglobal.org/reports/display.php?ReportID=167, accessed 02/04 2010.

  • Philpott, D . (2001) Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D . (2002) The challenge of September 11 to secularism in international relations. World Politics 55 (1): 66–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D . (2009) Has the study of global politics found religion? Annual Review of Political Science 12: 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A . (2006) Bridging the gap between the sacred and the secular in the history of American foreign relations. Diplomatic History 30 (5): 783–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A . (2012) Sword of the Spirit, Shield of Faith: Religion in American War and Diplomacy. 1st edn. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS (2012) Special issue: The postsecular in international relations. Review of International Studies 38 (5): 931–1115.

  • Rock, S.R . (2011) Faith and Foreign Policy: The Views and Influence of U.S. Christians and Christian Organizations. New York, NY: Continuum International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O . (2010) Holy Ignorance: When Religion and Culture Diverge. London: Hurst & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, S.H . and Piscatori, J.P . (1997) Transnational Religion and Fading States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandal, N.A . (2011) Religious actors as epistemic communities in conflict transformation: The cases of South Africa and Northern Ireland. Review of International Studies 37 (3): 929–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A.M . (1977) America: Experiment or destiny? The American Historical Review 82 (3): 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. and Schwab, G . (2006) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiple, R.A. and Hoover, D . (2004) Religion and Security: The New Nexus in International Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani, G . (2008) Toward a post Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory. International Studies Review 10 (4): 722–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, M.K . (2012) How does religion matter? Pathways to religion in international relations. Review of International Studies 38 (2): 365–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S . (2005) The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century. New York; Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tjalve, V.S . (2008) Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Dissent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A.D . (2000) Democracy in America. The Complete and Unabridged. Volumes I and II edn. New York, NY: Bantam.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, M.D ., Philpott, D. and Shah, T.S . (2011) God's Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, K.D . and Calhoun-Brown, A . (2011) Religion and Politics in the United States. 5th edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R . (2009) Boundless Faith: the Global Outreach of American Churches. London, England: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bettiza, G. Religion and American foreign policy in the context of the postsecular turn in world politics and the social sciences. Int Polit Rev 1, 11–26 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ipr.2013.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ipr.2013.1

Keywords

Navigation