French Politics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 272–285 | Cite as

Untangling myths and facts: Who supported the Québec Charter of Values?

  • Charles Tessier
  • Éric Montigny
Data, Measures and Methods


In 2013–2014, the Parti Québécois’ (PQ) Québec Charter of Values was hotly debated in the province of Quebec and the rest of Canada. For some Canadians, it was seen as a calculated move from the PQ to win a majority in the next provincial election, highlighting the stereotypical Quebec citizen’s aversion towards immigrants. For others, it was an important policy that confirmed the secular status of Quebec. The media played a large role in depicting the average Charter supporter. The goal of this study is to empirically test the claims regarding the sociodemographic profile of the Charter’s supporters. Using opinion poll data, we demonstrate that most of these assumptions were false, and that the nature of the support evolved during the debate.


Quebec political behaviour contact theory secularism policy 



The authors would like to thank CROP for the data, and the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture for its financial support.


  1. Allport, G. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  2. Bartels, L.M. (2002) Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastien, F., Bélanger, É. and Gélineau, F. (dir) (2013) Les québécois aux urnes. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  4. Benoit, S. (2013) La stratégie de la peur. La Presse 24 September: A23.Google Scholar
  5. Boivin, S. (2013) Des gains nets pour la Charte. Le Soleil 12 November: 3.Google Scholar
  6. Bouchard, G. (2012) L’interculturalisme. Montréal: Boréal.Google Scholar
  7. Corbeil, M. (2013) La charte et le PQ comparés au Tea Party. Le Soleil 13 November: 16.Google Scholar
  8. David, M. (2014) Les vieux péquistes. Le Devoir 23 January: A3.Google Scholar
  9. Espenshade, T.J. and Hempstead, K. (1996) Contemporary American attitudes toward U.S. immigration. International Migration Review 30 (2): 535–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaines, B.J., Kuklinski, J.H., Quirk, P.J., Peyton, B. and Verkuilen, J. (2007) Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 957–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guilbault, J. (2013) Lettre d’un souverainiste mou au PQ. La Presse 23 October: A29.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, B.C. and Dowds, L. (2006) Social contact, cultural marginality or economic self-interest? Attitudes towards immigrants in Northern Ireland. Journal of Ethnics and Migration Studies 32 (3): 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackman, M.R. and Crane, M. (1986) Some of my best friends are black … : Interracial friendship and whites’ racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (4): 459–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, G., Tomz, M. and Wittenberg, J. (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, G., Tomz, M. and Wittenberg, J. (2003) CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. 2.1 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. 5 January. Available at
  16. O’Rourke, K.H. (2006) The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy 22 (4): 838–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pelletier, F. (2014) Appeler un chat un chien. Le Devoir 15 January: A7.Google Scholar
  18. Pettigrew, T.F. (1997) Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (2): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Richez, E. and Bodet, A.M. (2012) Fear and disappointment: Explaining the persistence of support for Quebec secession. Journal of Elections, Public Opinions and Parties 22 (1): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scheve, K.F. and Slaughter, M.J. (2001) Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sibley, C.G. et al (2013) A dual process model of attitudes towards immigration: Person x residential area effects in a national sample. Political Psychology 34 (4): 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, M.C. (1998) How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review 63 (4): 512–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceFaculty of Social Sciences, Université LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations