Abstract
Students of French politics often puzzle over why a country that has experienced deep economic and social change over the past quarter-century should find it so difficult to enact political reforms. Some find the explanation in the fact that globalization and Europeanization have reduced the power of national government in ways that are especially important in countries where statist traditions once supported large-scale economic and social interventions. But the gap between a dynamic society and a stalemate politics is hardly a new one for France. Fifty years ago, at the end of the Fourth Republic, the French also despaired of their government and of their chances of reforming it. The advent to power of General de Gaulle opened a period of transformation in which changes that had long been in the works in the economy and society could break through. Today again, even with leadership of a less heroic stripe, change at the top might have a similarly liberating effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Chapter 3 and Postscript to the American edition (1959).
See also the results of the IFOP-Fiducial 14–15 December 2006 survey, which found 59 per cent of the public hoping for ‘beaucoup de changements’ from the forthcoming election but only 13 per cent expecting that would happen.
See also Jacquet et al (2000), Lamy (2004) and Cohen and Sabel (2005).
I owe this story to Strange (1997).
On theories of change associated with the ‘varieties of capitalism’ models, see Hall and Soskice (2001) and Boyer (2004).
The innovative ideological role of leaders I have in mind here is one that Richard J. Samuels analyzes in his study of Italian and Japanese leadership (2003).
The section that follows draws on Berger (2006).
I owe this formulation to Meunier (2006) and Gordon and Meunier (2001). See also Tiberghien (2007).
From the poem ‘Die Lösung’, written at the time of the 1953 East German demonstrations [‘ … daß das Volk/Das Vertrauen der Regierung verscherzt habe … Wäre es da/Nicht doch einfacher, die Regierung/Löste das Volk auf und/ Wählte ein anderes?’]. Thanks to Bernd Widdig for finding the passage and translating it.
References
Abdelal, R. (2007) Capital Rules: Norms, Institutions, and the International Monetary System. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Aron, R. (1960) France: Steadfast and Changing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Berger, S. (2006) La Crise de la représentation. In: P.D. Culpepper, P. Hall, and B. Palier (eds.) La France en mutation 1980–2005. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
Boyer, R. (2004) La théorie de la régulation. Les fondamentaux. Paris: La Découverte.
Chauvel, L. (2006) Les Classes moyennes à la derive. Paris: Seuil.
Cohen, D. (2006) Trois leçons sur la société post-industrielle. Paris: Seuil.
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (2005) Global democracy? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (4): 763–797.
Gordon, P. and Meunier, S. (2001) The French Challenge: Adapting to Globalization. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoffmann, S. (1956) Le Mouvement Poujade. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
Hoffmann, S. (1974) Decline or Renewal? France Since the 1930s. New York: Viking Press.
IFOP. http://www.ifop.com/europe/sondages/opinionf/nvlvague.asp, accessed 26 December 2006.
IPSOS. http://www.ipsos.fr/Canalipsos/articles/2000.asp, accessed 30 December 2006.
Jacquet, P., Pisani-Ferry, J. and Tubiana, L. (2000) Gouvernance mondiale. Paris: La Documentation française. Rapport de Synthèse: Rapport du CAE 37.
Lamy, P. (2004) La Démocratie-monde. Paris: Seuil.
Marx, K. (1852) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers [1852] 1994.
Mayer, N. (2003) Ces Français qui votent Le Pen. Paris: Flammarion.
Meunier, S. (2006) Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose? French Politics 4 (3): 333–341.
Pech, T. and Rosanvallon, P. (2006) Introduction. In: La Nouvelle Critique sociale. Paris: Seuil/Le Monde.
Samuels, R.J. (2003) Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and Their Legacies in Italy and Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Shonfield, A. (1965) Modern Capitalism. London: Oxford University Press.
Strange, S. (1997) Casino Capitalism. London: St. Martins Press.
Tiberghien, Y. (2007) Entrepreneurial States: Reforming Corporate Governance in France, Japan, and Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
TNS-SOFRES. http://www.tns-sofres.com/etudes/pol/290505_teinturier.htm, accessed 30 December 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article draws on a lecture at the Conférence annuelle de l’Ecole Doctorale, Sciences Po, 29 January 2007. Its title refers to Hoffmann (1974).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berger, S. ‘Decline or Renewal’: France and the Hoffmann Paradigm. Fr Polit 7, 391–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2009.28
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2009.28