Skip to main content
Log in

‘Decline or Renewal’: France and the Hoffmann Paradigm

  • Symposium Article
  • Published:
French Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Students of French politics often puzzle over why a country that has experienced deep economic and social change over the past quarter-century should find it so difficult to enact political reforms. Some find the explanation in the fact that globalization and Europeanization have reduced the power of national government in ways that are especially important in countries where statist traditions once supported large-scale economic and social interventions. But the gap between a dynamic society and a stalemate politics is hardly a new one for France. Fifty years ago, at the end of the Fourth Republic, the French also despaired of their government and of their chances of reforming it. The advent to power of General de Gaulle opened a period of transformation in which changes that had long been in the works in the economy and society could break through. Today again, even with leadership of a less heroic stripe, change at the top might have a similarly liberating effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Chapter 3 and Postscript to the American edition (1959).

  2. See also the results of the IFOP-Fiducial 14–15 December 2006 survey, which found 59 per cent of the public hoping for ‘beaucoup de changements’ from the forthcoming election but only 13 per cent expecting that would happen.

  3. See also Jacquet et al (2000), Lamy (2004) and Cohen and Sabel (2005).

  4. I owe this story to Strange (1997).

  5. On theories of change associated with the ‘varieties of capitalism’ models, see Hall and Soskice (2001) and Boyer (2004).

  6. The innovative ideological role of leaders I have in mind here is one that Richard J. Samuels analyzes in his study of Italian and Japanese leadership (2003).

  7. The section that follows draws on Berger (2006).

  8. I owe this formulation to Meunier (2006) and Gordon and Meunier (2001). See also Tiberghien (2007).

  9. From the poem ‘Die Lösung’, written at the time of the 1953 East German demonstrations [‘ … daß das Volk/Das Vertrauen der Regierung verscherzt habe … Wäre es da/Nicht doch einfacher, die Regierung/Löste das Volk auf und/ Wählte ein anderes?’]. Thanks to Bernd Widdig for finding the passage and translating it.

References

  • Abdelal, R. (2007) Capital Rules: Norms, Institutions, and the International Monetary System. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1960) France: Steadfast and Changing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (2006) La Crise de la représentation. In: P.D. Culpepper, P. Hall, and B. Palier (eds.) La France en mutation 1980–2005. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2004) La théorie de la régulation. Les fondamentaux. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvel, L. (2006) Les Classes moyennes à la derive. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (2006) Trois leçons sur la société post-industrielle. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (2005) Global democracy? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (4): 763–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. and Meunier, S. (2001) The French Challenge: Adapting to Globalization. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1956) Le Mouvement Poujade. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1974) Decline or Renewal? France Since the 1930s. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOP. http://www.ifop.com/europe/sondages/opinionf/nvlvague.asp, accessed 26 December 2006.

  • IPSOS. http://www.ipsos.fr/Canalipsos/articles/2000.asp, accessed 30 December 2006.

  • Jacquet, P., Pisani-Ferry, J. and Tubiana, L. (2000) Gouvernance mondiale. Paris: La Documentation française. Rapport de Synthèse: Rapport du CAE 37.

  • Lamy, P. (2004) La Démocratie-monde. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1852) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers [1852] 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, N. (2003) Ces Français qui votent Le Pen. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. (2006) Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose? French Politics 4 (3): 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pech, T. and Rosanvallon, P. (2006) Introduction. In: La Nouvelle Critique sociale. Paris: Seuil/Le Monde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, R.J. (2003) Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and Their Legacies in Italy and Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonfield, A. (1965) Modern Capitalism. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1997) Casino Capitalism. London: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, Y. (2007) Entrepreneurial States: Reforming Corporate Governance in France, Japan, and Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TNS-SOFRES. http://www.tns-sofres.com/etudes/pol/290505_teinturier.htm, accessed 30 December 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article draws on a lecture at the Conférence annuelle de l’Ecole Doctorale, Sciences Po, 29 January 2007. Its title refers to Hoffmann (1974).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, S. ‘Decline or Renewal’: France and the Hoffmann Paradigm. Fr Polit 7, 391–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2009.28

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2009.28

Keywords

Navigation