Abstract
Postnatal cell fate is postulated to be primarily determined by the local tissue microenvironment. Here, we find that Mediator 1 (Med1) dependent epigenetic mechanisms dictate tissue-specific lineage commitment and progression of dental epithelia. Deletion of Med1, a key component of the Mediator complex linking enhancer activities to gene transcription, provokes a tissue extrinsic lineage shift, causing hair generation in incisors. Med1 deficiency gives rise to unusual hair growth via primitive cellular aggregates. Mechanistically, we find that MED1 establishes super-enhancers that control enamel lineage transcription factors in dental stem cells and their progenies. However, Med1 deficiency reshapes the enhancer landscape and causes a switch from the dental transcriptional program towards hair and epidermis on incisors in vivo, and in dental epithelial stem cells in vitro. Med1 loss also provokes an increase in the number and size of enhancers. Interestingly, control dental epithelia already exhibit enhancers for hair and epidermal key transcription factors; these transform into super-enhancers upon Med1 loss suggesting that these epigenetic mechanisms cause the shift towards epidermal and hair lineages. Thus, we propose a role for Med1 in safeguarding lineage specific enhancers, highlight the central role of enhancer accessibility in lineage reprogramming and provide insights into ectodermal regeneration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Postnatal cell fates are controlled by selective transcriptional programs, that are coordinated by an underlying epigenetic machinery and cellular microenvironments1,2,3,4. Ectoderm evolves into multiple lineages including enamel forming dental lineages, or to hair and epidermis generating skin epithelia5,6,7. Adult stem cells are endowed with tissue-specific potential maintaining however the ability to differentiate into different cell types8,9,10. To date, the mechanisms controlling specific cell lineage commitment are yet not fully understood, and accordingly, the factors safeguarding dental or epidermal cell lineages are still largely elusive. Understanding these mechanisms is also crucial for our efforts in combating diseases like alopecia or tooth loss as it might create entry points for the development of bioengineering strategies for the regeneration of tissues like tooth enamel and skin hair, which have been challenging7.
The mouse incisor provides an excellent model system to study postnatal lineage commitment and progression. Dental epithelial stem cells (DE-SCs) residing in the cervical loop (CL) at the proximal end of incisors support the continuous growth of the incisors throughout the lifespan of a mouse. In contrast, dental epithelia on molars are not regenerated once molars are developed. DE-SCs regenerate the enamel organ on incisor by giving rise to all the dental epithelia including enamel matrix producing ameloblasts, Notch1 regulated stratum intermedium (SI), and others11,12,13,14,15,16.
Skin epithelia are derived from the same ectoderm and are divided into the interfollicular epidermis and the hair follicles during embryonic stages of skin formation6. Postnatally, hair follicle stem cells residing in the bulge region of hair follicles regenerate hair in the skin17,18. Hair follicles are essential for hair growth and regeneration in mammals and are characterized by a complex multilayered bulb structure containing the outer root sheath (ORS), the companion layer (Cl), the inner root sheath (IRS), and the medulla/cortex; all these structures are characterized by the selective expression of different hair keratins19,20, such as Keratin (KRT) 75 which labels Cl, KRT71 found in IRS, and KRT31 which is expressed in hair cortex, as well as the epithelial marker KRT14 which marks ORS. Following the initial developmental cycle, hair is maintained by hair follicle cycling in mice. This is characterized by an anagen phase during which the hair follicle expands, followed by a transitional catagen phase which leads to the involution of the hair follicle, and telogen, the resting phase. The cycle then begins a new in response to signals from the dermal papilla, a specialized mesenchymal group of cells attached to the proximal end of the hair bulb21,22. The shift between these phases involves substantial changes in gene expression patterns, which can be activated by injury. For example, hair depilation induces new hair growth by stimulating the anagen phase with induction of genes such as those encoding hair keratins23.
Several transcription factors and pathways have been shown to induce dental as well as hair and epidermal cell differentiation. During embryonic development, dental and skin epithelia share similar transcriptional networks as they are derived from the same ectoderm. Postnatally however, each lineage is controlled by specific transcription factors. For example, paired like homeodomain 2 (Pitx2)24, Nk homeobox 3 (Nkx2-3)25, and ISL LIM homeobox 1 (Isl1)26 are implicated in enamel epithelial homeostasis7 while transcription factors and signaling genes including HR lysine demethylase and nuclear receptor corepressor (Hr also called hairless) and Ras and Rab interactor 2 (Rin2) are important in controlling hair differentiation as mutations in these genes cause alopecia (hair loss)27,28. On the other hand, AP1 factors (Fos/Jun) and the tumor proteins of the p53 family including Tp63 are crucial to direct postnatal epidermal differentiation in the skin20. Nevertheless, the check point factors specifying dental vs epidermal cell fate are still largely elusive.
The Mediator complex controls cell lineage. MED1 is a functional subunit of the Mediator complex, that facilitates gene transcription by linking enhancers to the RNA polymerase complex at transcriptional start sites (TSS) in gene promoters. MED1 has been shown to localize at typical enhancers (TE) and super-enhancers (SE) which represent distal regulatory elements recognized as key epigenetic hubs to determine cell identity and properties4,29. As such, the Mediator complex facilitates the expression of cell fate driving transcription factors and genes. In fact, Med1 assures pluripotency of embryonic stem (ES) cells by enforcing the expression of Klf4, Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog, four key reprogramming factors. In addition, reduced expression of Mediator subunits like Med1 triggers differentiation of ES cells4,29. Deletion of Med1 also affects somatic cell fates such as shown in epidermal cells in skin30,31,32,33,34. Med1 ablation hinders invariant natural killer T cell development35 and prevents luminal cell maturation in the mammary epithelia in mice36,37. These data indicate a role for Med1 in controlling lineage commitment in somatic cells as well. However, the exact role of Med1 is not fully understood as previous biochemical studies indicated that removal of Med1 disturbs selective transcription38, but is dispensable for Mediator complex formation38.
In the present study, we investigate the role of Med1 in governing ectoderm lineage development. Using a conditional knockout (cKO) mouse for Med1, we show that ablation of Med1 in ectoderm derived epithelial cells causes hair generation on incisors while they lose their ability to produce enamel resulting in severe enamel dysplasia33,39,40. We describe a unique cellular arrangement by which Med1 ablation causes ectopic hair growth on incisors, and using an integrative multi-omics approach we demonstrated that this intriguing phenomenon is due to a reshape of the enhancer landscape in which ectoderm conserved enhancers are amplified to induce epidermal and hair driving transcription factors.
Results
Lack of Med1 in dental epithelia causes ectopic hair on incisors
During postnatal murine tooth maintenance, CL residing dental epithelial stem cells (DE-SCs) differentiate into Notch1 regulated SI, ameloblasts, and other epithelia to mineralize enamel on the incisor surface (Fig. 1a, top). Intriguingly, deletion of Med1 from Krt14 expressing DE-SCs and their progenies provoked a major phenotypical shift in the dental compartment causing enamel formation to be replaced by unusual, ectopic hair growth on mouse incisors but not on molars as we have previously reported33. This phenomenon has also been observed in two further unrelated mouse models41,42 and has been described in a few clinical cases43. As hair growth on the skin depends on multiple cell populations arranged to form hair follicles (Fig. 1a, bottom), the question arises on how hair development is achieved in a dental environment. Therefore, we evaluated the cellular processes leading to hair development in Med1 cKO incisors by comparing it with physiological hair in skin. Although hair grown on incisors of our mouse model showed a comparable hair architecture (cuticle), composition (guard hair and zig-zag hair), and morphology as naturally grown skin hair (Fig. 1b), hair formation significantly differed on incisors in which hair supporting tissues and root structures lacked hair follicles (Fig. 1b). In fact, while skin grown hair is regenerated from large anagen follicles in response to signals from the dermal papilla and maintained by small telogen follicles (Fig. 1c, bottom orange arrows), we found that dental hair is surrounded by atypical cell clusters without typical hair follicle-like structures in Med1 cKO incisors (Fig. 1c top, yellow triangles, and Supplementary Fig. 1e, blue arrows with dotted lined region). These abnormal cell clusters originated from a disorganized SI layer (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b, red triangles) that progressed into expanded papillary layers (Supplementary Fig. 1c, yellow triangles) to form the hair bases in dental mesenchymal tissues (Supplementary Fig. 1e, blue triangles). NOTCH1 positive SI/SR derived papillary cells formed unusual cell aggregates and differentiated into the hair lineage as demonstrated by the expression of the hair follicle marker KRT71 at 4 weeks of age (Supplementary Fig. 1d). At adult stages (3 months of age and later), these aggregates formed aberrant pocket-like structures (Fig. 2a). Although the NOTCH1 expressing SI/SR derived cell clusters gave rise to cells expressing the hair marker KRT71 and the epidermal marker Loricrin (LOR) at 3 months of age (Fig. 2a, b), the spatial organization of these cells was scattered and randomly distributed (Fig. 2b two left panels, arrows). This clearly differs from the well-defined cellular framework found along hair follicles and on the surface of the interfollicular epidermis in the skin (Fig. 2b, right panels, orange arrows). Furthermore, hair depilation of skin initiated the hair cycle by enlarging hair follicles (anagen) (Fig. 2c left 3 panels, orange arrows) and by inducing the expression of hair keratin Krt31 (Supplementary Fig. 2a, skin). In contrast, dental hair depilation did not activate any follicle-like structures in the hair supporting tissues on Med1 null incisors (Fig. 2c two right panels, blue arrows), in either distal or proximal incisor regions (Supplementary Fig. 2b) nor was the expression of the hair marker Krt31 induced (Supplementary Fig. 2a tooth). Nevertheless, hair grew back at its original length 12 days after depilation in Med1 cKO incisors (Fig. 2d blue arrow), as occurred in normal skin (Supplementary Fig. 2c). These results demonstrate that hair can grow and is regenerated through SI-derived dental epithelia (Fig. 2e).
To better understand dental hair growth and regeneration, we compared hair follicles of the skin, including distinct hair follicle layers, mesenchymal cells such as dermal papilla, and the presence of melanocytes to pigment the hair, with the cell clusters found around dental hair in Med1 cKO mice.
In the skin, hair follicles have distinct cellular layers. Using 4 different antibodies, these layers were well distinguishable in cross sections of normal skin hair follicles (4 weeks, anagen). They form ring structures in which the ORS layer (KRT14, red) was outmost, followed by a KRT75 positive Cl layer and an internal KRT71 expressing IRS layer (Supplementary Fig. 3b left 3 panels) as shown in the diagram in Supplementary Fig. 3a). The innermost layer was positive for KRT31 (Supplementary Fig. 3b). The arrangement and spatial distancing from KRT14 positive cells were also observable in sagittal sections (Supplementary Fig. 3b far right panels), as shown in the diagram (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Next, we assessed if these organized structures can also be found around the bases of dental hair in Med1 cKO mice. Here, cells expressing KRT75, KRT71, or KRT31 were found as well but they were scatted and did not form follicle structures (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b), thus clearly differing from the skin. Also, no spatial distancing from KRT14 positive cells was observable in sagittal sections (Supplementary Fig. 4b, yellow triangles in upper panels) nor were ring-like structures found at cross sections (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b lower panels).
These results were further confirmed when cryosections of hair generating tissue dissected from Med1 cKO mandibles (Supplementary Fig. 5a) were analyzed. Again, three hair keratins (KRT75, KRT71, KRT31) were distributed randomly near hair shafts, but did not organize into hair follicle structures (Supplementary Fig. 5b).
Regarding the presence of dermal papilla, such structures were also missing in the roots of incisor-grown hair lacking hair bulbs (HE stains in Fig. 1c, and Supplementary Fig. 1a–e). Nevertheless, we found the mesenchymal protein VIMENTIN (red) in KRT71 expressing hair generating cell clusters in Med1 cKO mice (6 months)(Supplementary Fig. 5c yellow triangles). Although VIMENTIN does not represent a classic marker for dermal papilla, it was localized in this structure in the skin44. Again, VIMENTIN expressing cells were scattered and did not form well organized structures, suggesting lack of papilla-like structures in Med1 cKO mice.
Next, we assessed melanin accumulation in the pocket tissues of Med1 cKO incisors which generated well-pigmented black hair (C57BL6 background) (Supplementary Fig. 6a, yellow arrows). Brown-colored melanin-producing cells were randomly distributed (Supplementary Fig. 6a, enlarged images) again differing from the skin in which the melanin is discretely accumulated inside of the hair bulbs (Supplementary Fig. 6b, 4 week anagen). In addition, mRNA expressions of melanocyte markers were elevated in incisors of Med1 cKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 6c, RNA-seq) indicating the presence of melanocyte-like cells. It is plausible that this type of cell might be generated through an aberrant lineage conversion of neural crest cells, multipotent stem cells that regenerate mandibular cells including dental mesenchymal cells45.
Altogether, these results demonstrate that Med1 cKO incisors generate all the components needed for hair growth and regeneration as found in the skin, but they fail to organize them in well-defined hair follicle structures. Expression of hair and epidermal markers in the hair generating dental cell aggregates further indicates that the presence of certain transcriptional patterns allow for the generation of hair via a primitive cellular environment.
Med1 deficiency is sufficient to switch the dental transcriptional program towards hair and epidermis in incisors in vivo
Cell identity and cell lineage progression tightly associate with a timed expression of specific gene-sets. As loss of Med1 causes hair growth in the dental compartment, using total gene expression datasets we investigated the expression patterns of epidermal and hair-related gene sets at distinct anatomical locations of incisors in Med1 cKO mice (Fig. 3a, diagram). Our analyses revealed that, compared to control mice, in Med1 cKO mice some epidermal genes are already induced in the DE-SCs containing CL region at 4 weeks of age (Fig. 3b left panel, blue dotted box, Fig. 3c pale blue bar). Subsequently, as DE-SCs differentiate towards the secretory (Sec) and maturation (Mat) stages, expression of many epidermal genes strongly increase in Med1 deficient tissue (Fig. 3b). Intriguingly, hair-related genes were not yet detected in the CL locus but become clearly upregulated downstream in the Sec and Mat regions (Fig. 3b right panel, Fig. 3c blue bar). Different hair keratin genes representing distinct layers of hair follicles were upregulated, including KRT75 for supportive companion layer, KRT31 for hair cortex, and KRT71 for IRS (Fig. 3b right panel). Immunostaining confirmed the sequential induction of epidermal and hair markers as the epidermal markers LOR and KRT1 were detected in the secretory stage as we have previously described39 but KRT71 was expressed only at the maturation stage (Supplementary Fig. 1d). These data illustrate how in cKO mice the expression of selected gene-sets during dental hair development parallels embryonic and postnatal skin development in wild-type mice, where epidermal development occurs first (E15) (Fig. 3c orange bar), followed by hair follicle formation (E18) (Fig. 3c yellow bar). These results demonstrate that Med1 deficiency is sufficient to implement epidermal and hair-related transcriptional programs priming dental stem cells towards skin epithelial differentiation in vivo.
Med1 deletion redirects dental epithelial stem cells towards an epidermal fate in vitro
Although deletion of Med1 causes a lineage shift in vivo, the question arises if aberrant dental hair growth is due to lineage predisposition of dental epithelial stem cells. To investigate this phenomenon, dental stem cells from CL tissues were cultured. CL tissues from 8–10 weeks old control and Med1 cKO mice were micro-dissected and digested cells were plated until self-renewing stem cell colonies formed (Fig. 4a, b). An enhanced proliferation rate was observed for the Med1 deficient cells as shown by the increased number of BrdU positive cells as well as by the generation of larger colonies (Fig. 4b, cKO). Confirming and expanding these results, IPA (ingenuity pathway analysis) of whole transcriptomic data from these cultures not only revealed an upregulation of cell growth and proliferation related pathways in Med1 null cells, but also showed that these cells spontaneously differentiate into the epidermal lineage in monolayer cultures (Fig. 4c, d), even without factors or mesenchymal feeder cells to induce epidermal differentiation. In fact, like Sec tissue from cKO mice (Fig. 4d, middle column), an extensive set of epidermal-related genes are clearly upregulated in cultured Med1 null DE-SCs as well (Fig. 4d right column). Of note, in contrast to our in vivo data shown above, genes related to hair differentiation are only partially induced in vitro (Fig. 4d), suggesting that full hair differentiation requires additional external processes. Furthermore, IPA analysis also identified members of the p53 family (Tp63/53/73) as top upstream inducers of epidermal differentiation (Fig. 4e) that are linked to the key epidermal AP-1 transcription factors Fos and Jun (Fig. 4f), resembling their roles in the skin. Collectively, these results show that Med1 deletion reprograms DE-SCs towards epidermal fates through a cell intrinsic mechanism. Together with our in vivo observation in Med1 cKO mice, these results lead us to investigate the underlying epigenetic and transcriptional mechanism, by which Med1 assures enamel lineage and Med1 deficiency causes a cell lineage shift.
Med1 regulates enamel lineage driving transcription factors through super-enhancers
Lineage commitment and reprogramming are controlled by cell fate driving transcription factors. Mediator including MED1 subunit orchestrates these key factors by associating with super-enhancers29. Therefore, we first assessed the genome wide distribution of MED1 during dental epithelial development in control mice (4 week), then identified MED1-regulated transcription factors through super-enhancer analyses. For this purpose, we performed MED1 ChIP-seq of the stem cell containing head region of the CL (CLH) as well as of the CL tail area (CLT) which includes the stem cell progenies (Fig. 5a, left diagram). MED1 peaks were found in the distal intergenic regions, whereby an accumulation of peaks was observable in CLT vs CLH tissues (Supplementary Fig. 7a). MED1 peaks associated with several hundred super-enhancers in the CLH and CLT tissues (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 7b). These include super-enhancers at genomic loci near lineage driving transcription factors. In the CLH tissues, these encompass enamel lineage transcription factors like Pitx2, Isl1, and Nkx2-3 (Fig. 5b left panel and Fig. 5c left 3 panels), which may prime adult stem cells to an enamel fate, consistent with their essential roles in tooth morphogenesis during embryonic development25,46. In contrast, in CLT samples MED1 super-enhancers were found around key transcription factors like Satb1 homeobox 1 (Satb1) and Runx family transcription factor 1 (Runx1) and 2 (Runx2) which control later cellular processes like differentiation and enamel mineralization46,47,48 (Fig. 5b right panel and Fig. 5c right 3 panels). Of note, the mRNA expression levels of these transcription factors were strongly reduced in CLT tissues in Med1 cKO mice (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig 7d), further implicating their role in enamel formation as Med1 null mice show severe enamel dysplasia40. In addition, MED1 levels were also enriched around the promoters of these transcription factors but not for ameloblast markers (Supplementary Fig. 7e), indicating that MED1 directly activates enamel fate related transcription factors rather than supporting late differentiation. These data suggest that Med1 programs dental stem cells and their progenies to commit and progress towards the enamel lineage by controlling the expression of lineage driving transcription factors (Fig. 5e).
Intriguingly, in Med1 cKO CLT tissues we also found enhancers around a different set of transcription factors (Supplementary Fig. 7c, pink labeled). These are involved in epidermal differentiation of the skin and included the genes of early growth response (Egr3), CCAAT enhancer binding protein b (Cebpb), Fos like 2 (Fosl2) (AP-1 transcription factor subunit), Kruppel like factor 3 (Klf3), Forkhead box C1 (Foxc1), Foxo3, tumor protein Tp63, and hair fate driving factors like Hr and Rin2. Their mRNA expressions were substantially upregulated in CLT tissues of Med1 cKO mice (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 7d), implicating their roles in inducing epidermal and hair fates in Med1 cKO incisors.
Med1 deficiency reshapes the enhancer landscape in DE-SCs and their progenies
As loss of Med1 inhibits the expression of Med1-associated enamel lineage driving transcription factors while inducing epidermal transcription factors in CL tissues, we next probed if this is linked to epigenetic changes in promoter and enhancer patterns upon loss of Med1. To test this hypothesis, we performed ChIP-Seq analysis against an alternative enhancer marker, histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac), in CLH and CLT tissues of 4-week-old Med1 cKO mice and their littermate controls (Fig. 6a) as MED1 is not present in the Med1 cKO tissues. It is known that histone acetylation (H3K27ac) generally co-localizes with Mediator components such as MED1 at distal regulatory elements like typical and super-enhancers and acts as a major inducer of gene expression by increasing chromatin accessibility29,49. Compared to controls, we found major genomic changes in the H3K27ac binding patterns of Med1 cKO CLT tissues. These were associated with biological functions such as enamel mineralization and tooth morphogenesis (Fig. 6b blue bars), as well as epidermal and hair development (yellow bars), consistent with the observations made in the Med1 cKO phenotypes. These results suggest that phenotypic and transcriptional changes are due to epigenetic changes. In addition, Med1 deletion substantially increased the number of super-enhancers (Fig. 6c) as well as typical enhancers (Supplementary Fig. 8a) in both, CLH and CLT tissues. Some of these new enhancers were found around loci coding for epidermal and hair lineage genes (Fig. 6c) that become upregulated upon loss of Med1 in CLT tissue. For example, a new super-enhancer was formed at the locus coding for the epidermal transcription factor Fosl2 (Ap-1 factor) (Fig. 6d blue bar in boxed region, Supplementary Fig. 8b), directly linking its increased mRNA expression to the loss of Med1 (see Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 7d). Corroborating these results and in line with our transcriptional network studies in Med1 null cell cultures (see Fig. 4f), we also found that the binding motifs for the epidermal inducible transcription factors, Tp53/63, Egr1, and AP-1 are significantly enriched in super-enhancers in cKO CLT tissues compared to controls (Fig. 6e). Collectively, these data demonstrate that loss of Med1 alters the epigenetic landscapes in DE-SCs and their progenies. These results prompted us to investigate the epigenetic mechanism by which Med1 deficiency induces epidermal and hair lineages more in detail.
Med1 deficiency induces epidermal and hair driving transcription factors via amplification of ectoderm conserved enhancers
During embryonic development, dental and skin epithelia are derived from the same ectoderm by sharing transcriptional networks. Through analyses of the H3K27ac enhancer profiles of epidermal keratinocytes and hair follicle cells from published data sets50, we further found that even though dental epithelia usually do not commit to epidermal fates, they widely share enhancers (TE/SE) with both epidermis and hair follicle derived cells for most of the transcription factors induced upon Med1 loss (Fig. 7a). Importantly, Med1 deficiency elevated and upgraded these shared enhancers into transcriptionally active super-enhancers as outlined for the Hr (hairless) locus (Fig. 7b, pink bar and Supplementary Fig. 8c). Loss of Med1 also expanded enhancer size for epidermal factors Foxo3 and Cebpb (Supplementary Fig. 8d). In addition, enhancers near many hair-lineage related genes were elevated to super-enhancers upon the loss of Med1 in CLT (Fig. 7c and Supplementary Fig. 8e) which coincided with an induction at their mRNA levels that were measured by RNA-seq (Fig. 7d, Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). Intriguingly, these factors controlling hair lineage were shown to be regulated by super-enhancers in the skin before4. Besides the generation of new super-enhancers, we also found an increase in H3K27ac levels around promoters of these genes (Supplementary Fig. 8f), which further positively corelated with an increased gene expression (Fig. 7e). In Med1 cKO CLH tissues, increased H3K27ac promoter levels positively correlated with an elevated expression of genes involved in preventing ossification (Supplementary Fig. 9b upper arrow and Supplementary Fig. 10a, b), and H3K27ac occupancy increased in ossification inhibiting transcription factors of Sox9 and Tob1 loci in their enhancers (Supplementary Fig. 10c). Although we found positive correlations between H3K27ac levels and gene expression, monomethylation of lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4me1) may be required to promote actual gene expression51.
These results further corroborates the dental phenotype of our mouse model which is not only characterized by hair growth but also by enamel dysplasia, and demonstrate that cell fate switch is at least in part due to an inflation of developmentally conserved epidermal and hair enhancers.
In summary, we propose an epigenetic model in which Med1 safeguards enamel lineage commitment and progression of dental stem cells and their progenies. Med1 deletion shifts dental stem cells to epidermal fates by amplifying the ectodermal conserved enhancers around hair and epidermal genes.
Discussion
Adult stem cell fate is heavily linked to their tissue of origin2,3,52. It is postulated that the local cellular and endocrine microenvironment primes and directs tissue-specific lineage commitment and differentiation via cellular, transcription, and epigenetic mechanisms2,4. Here we show that deletion of Med1, a key component of the enhancer-associated Mediator complex, causes ectopic hair growth on incisors throughout the lifespan of the knockout mice, consistent with continuous incisor growth. Our results suggest that hair growth is driven by a cell fate switch of adult stem cells residing in the incisors. Hair is first generated 4 weeks postnatally which coincides with the point in time when dental stem cells start to regenerate enamel epithelia on incisors. As mouse molars lack adult stem cells, hair may not be regenerated in these teeth. Unlike hair growth in the skin which relies on functionally structured follicles, dental hair is generated from primitive, cellular aggregates which lack typical hair follicle structures. Furthermore, as shown by our depilation experiments, dental hair regrows without induction of the hair cycle, a follicle-dependent process required for regeneration of hair in the skin. Thus, our results question the current knowledge that mammalian hair can only be generated from hair follicles consisting of multiple cell layers bearing defined functions. In addition, our study also illustrates how deletion of Med1 induces a lineage shift in vivo. Despite that the cellular agglomerates which cause hair growth on incisors exhibit a scattered cellular setup, the mRNA expression profiles found in these structures mimic those of dedicated hair and epidermal cells found in skin epithelia. Thus, while Med1 negative DE-SCs reside in the dental environment, they are driven towards lineages characteristic for skin epithelia.
Lineage commitment and differentiation are orchestrated by epigenetic programs and regulatory elements including transcription factors and enhancers4,29,49. Our results elucidate that already at early dental differentiation stages MED1 containing super-enhancers selectively populate genomic loci coding for enamel fate driven transcription factors in DE-SCs and their progenies. This outlines how Med1 controls and programs enamel epithelia’s differentiation at multiple stages as it primes DE-SCs towards the dental lineage via activation of Nkx2-3, Pitx2, and Isl1 and calibrates lineage progression of DE-SC progenies by regulating the expression of Runx1/2 and Satb1. These findings are consistent with previous studies that Nkx2-3 controls cusp formation in embryonic dental epithelia25, and that Nkx2-3, Pitx2 and Runx2 are essential for dental development24,25,46. Isl1 is required for patterning and mineralization of enamel26, Runx2 for enamel mineralization46,47, and Satb1 for cell polarity and enamel matrix secretion in amelogenesis48.
Intriguingly, although MED1 is a well-recognized super-enhancer component, loss of Med1 in CL tissues does not compromise super-enhancer formation. These results are consistent with previous biochemical observations showing that MED1 is dispensable for the formation of the Mediator complex as 9 major Mediator subunits are still found in the complex even after MED1 is removed38. Our results demonstrated that Med1 removal significantly widens the genomic enhancer landscape instead. In the dental setting, this does not increase the potency of DE-SCs but rather drives these cells into epidermal linages. This coincides with a shift in the super-enhancer profiles around loci coding for transcription factors like Hr (hairless) and Rin2 which are essential for hair formation27,28 as well as Egr1/3, CEBP/a, CEBP/b, and Fosl2 which control epidermal differentiation in the skin53,54. Furthermore, our data show that Tp63/53 binding sites are enriched in super-enhancers in Med1 cKO mice. These are master regulators for the development of stratified epithelia in vivo20 and drive epidermal differentiation in vitro. In fact, Med1 null mice activate Tp63 driven epidermal differentiation in the skin, resulting in an accumulation of epidermal markers and lipids in upper hair follicle keratinocytes resulting in hair loss33.
Building on our previous studies39, these results elucidate a central role for Med1 in assuring enamel lineage. Our results also reveal that basal enhancers are already present at hair and epidermis driving transcription factor loci in dental epithelia suggesting that a basal epigenetic memory granting multipotency is already established in pre-occurring ectoderm during embryonic development. Consequently, Med1 guarantees adult stem cells to commit to enamel lineages by restricting super-enhancer formation to lineage-specific loci. In addition, as loss of Med1 causes DE-SCs to differentiate into a developmentally related lineage, reprogramming of DE-SCs into lineages originating from the same germ layer (ectoderm) might be easier than overcoming more strict and embryonically set epigenetic barriers29.
Hair and tooth are difficult organs to regenerate through pluripotent stem cells based regenerative approaches, so that no clinical trials have been reported even after extensive efforts55. A deep understanding of the cellular and epigenetic mechanisms controlling these lineages and their reprogramming possibilities creates new entry points for the development of strategies to combat hair and tooth-related diseases. Our results establish that hair formation is achievable in tissues outside of the skin, even without the presence of hair follicles. Similarly, hair was also observed in dental tissues in other mouse models (Sox21 KO56, Stim1-R304W mutation42, and Fam83H-KO41) and in a few clinical cases showing clinical relevance of this study43. Hair was also accidentally generated after DE-SCs were transplanted into renal capsules during an effort to regenerate enamel57. This suggests that hair could be generated via genetically engineered cell clusters which might be easier and faster than traditional strategies. This would be of great benefit as it would greatly simplify in vitro hair generation and allow hair growth without hair follicles which are very challenging to regenerate58. Similarly, enamel regeneration might also be feasible by using foreskin-derived epidermal stem cells. In fact, cultured epidermal stem cells derived from skin have been shown to differentiate into functional ameloblasts in vitro59. Overall, these findings, elucidate possibilities to develop strategies to overcome hair and enamel-associated diseases.
Methods
Krt14-driven Med1 cKO mice
Conditional Med1 knockout (cKO) mice were generated as shown in our previous publication33. Floxed (exon 8–10) Med1 mice60 (C57/BL6 background) were mated with keratin 14 (Krt14) promoter driven Cre recombinase mice (The Jackson Laboratory, C57BL/6 background). All mice were housed in a selected pathogen-free barrier environment with ad libitum access to food and water, 12-hour light and dark cycles, temperature between 20–26 C. Genotyping was performed by PCR33 and Cre negative littermate mice served as controls (Ctrl). We did not distinguish between male and female mice as in the cKO group, both generate equal amounts of hair in their incisors. All the experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Ethics Committee at the San Francisco Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center under the protocol number Bikle 20-019. We have complied with all relevant ethical regulations for mouse handling and treatments.
Dental epithelial stem cell culture
CL tissue was separated from 10-week Med1 cKO and Ctrl mice, and epithelial tissues were separated and treated by dispase (5 U/ml Stem Cell Technology) to separate mesenchymal tissues. Epithelial tissues are further dissociated by accutase (Sigma Milipore), and cells were plated under low density to generate colonies and maintained with DMEM media supplemented with recombinant EGF 20 ng/ml (R&D), FGF 25 ng/ml (R&D), and 1X B27 supplement (Gibco). After 8 days of culture, the number and size of colonies are evaluated, and RNA is prepared for microarray.
BrdU staining
DE-SC are labeled by BrdU and stained by a BrdU staining kit (Abcam) by following manufacturer’s instruction.
Histological analysis
Mouse mandibles were dissected from Med1 cKO and littermate control (Ctrl) mice and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4 °C overnight and decalcified in 0.5 M EDTA for 2–3 weeks. Subsequently they were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax or OCT compounds using standard protocols. The whole mandible was then serially sectioned at a thickness of 7–10 μm (either sagittal or cross sections). Alternatively, hair generating tissues were dissected from Med1 cKO mice (approximately 6 months), fixed briefly in 4% PFA for 4 h and processed the same way as above without decalcification. Ultimately, slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and imaged with brightfield microscopy.
Immunofluorescence on paraffin sections
Paraffin-embedded mandible sections were pretreated in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0, Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min using a microwave for antigen retrieval. The specimens were then blocked by Power Block (BioGenex) and incubated with primary antibodies against KRT71 (Progen Lot 208291), LORICRIN (LOR) (Biolegend 905104 former Covance, PRBP-145P-100 D13GF02260 (AF621) Lot 14892401), NOTCH1 (Cell signaling (D1E11) XP® Rabbit mAb Lot 3608 T), and VIMENTIN (Abcam). They were subsequently incubated with species-specific secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorescent dyes (Invitrogen Molecular probes), including Alexa 594 (red) and Alexa 488 (green) and counterstained with DAPI. Images were taken with a confocal microscope (LSM510, Carl Zeiss).
Immunofluorescence on WT skin and Med1 cKO mandible cryosections
Frozen sections of whole mandible, or dental hair generating tissues dissected from Med1 cKO mice (6 month), or the dissected back skin from wild-type mice at 4 weeks (anagen) were stained. Skin and tooth tissues were stained by the same protocols in parallel for comparison purposes. These sections were stained with different combinations of two primary antibodies raised against guinea pig or rabbit to distinguish two antigens with different colors (green and red in secondary reaction) called as double staining. The first primary antibody raised in guinea pig is against hair keratin including KRT71 (same as above 1:100), or KRT75 (ARP, anti-cytokeratin K6HF (K75) Lot 20411-01 1:100), or KRT31 (Progen, Lot 203211 1:100). The second primary antibody raised in rabbit is against either KRT14 (Biolegend 905304 former Covance PRB-155P Lot 14834401 1:1000) or NOTCH1 (same as above 1:200). The sections were subsequently incubated with secondary antibodies containing both Alexa 488 (green) conjugated anti-guinea pig antibody and Alexa 594 (red) bound anti-rabbit antibody (1:1000), then counter stained with DAPI. Different blocking methods using bovine serum or Power Block (BioGenex) were applied. Images were taken with a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss) and processed by ZenPro software.
RNA expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated from 4-week-old total CL, CLH, CLT, Sec, or Mat tissues of Med1 cKO and littermate Ctrl mice using the Pico Pure RNA purification kit (ABI). RNA from cultured dental epithelial stem cells was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). RNAs were analyzed for quality and purity using the Pico Chip kit on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) to meet the processing criteria of the UCLA Genomic Core facility for the Illumina array platform (Mouse Ref-8 v2.0 Ambion) or RIN score values for RNA-seq. Microarray data generation and primary microarray data analysis was described7,39. Microarray data were used for differential pathway analysis with Ingenuity IPA software (Ingenuity) and results were considered significant for p-values less than 0.05. Heat maps were then generated with MeV software using fold changes Log2(cKO/Ctrl). For RNA-Seq analysis, RNA integrity was analyzed with a 2100 Bioanalyzer with an RNA 6000 kit (Agilent Technologies). RNA-Seq libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq v2 library preparation kit and sequenced with paired-end 50 bp reads on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 in biological duplicates.
For quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), cDNA was synthesized from ∼0.5 μg RNA using the SuperScript III first strand synthesis system (Invitrogen) or cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit with RNase Inhibitor (ABI Thermofisher) as described by the supplier and subjected to RT-qPCR amplification using the QuantiTect SYBR-Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) or Powerup SYBR green master mix (ABI Thermofisher) in 7500 or QuantStudio Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) using the following conditions: 10 min 95 °C followed by 45 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C and 30 s at 72 °C. Relative mRNA levels were compared to the housekeeping gene Gapdh and determined with the ΔΔCt method. Primers for the analyzed genes are derived from PrimerBank. All RT-qPCR assays were performed in triplicates.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
Chromatin IP was performed by using the LowCell# ChIP kit (Diagenode) for H3K27ac, and the iDeal ChIP-kit (Diagenode) for MED1 according to the manufacturer’s protocols with some modifications as described below. Dissected CLH or CLT tissues were cross-linked with 1% paraformaldehyde for 8 min (H3K27ac) or for 15 min (MED1) and subsequently quenched with 0.125 M glycine. Epidermal keratinocytes containing stem and their progenies were isolated from mouse skin were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Chromatin was then sonicated with a Covaris S2200 ultra-sonicator (Covaris, Inc.) to obtain DNA fragments with an average length of 300 ± 50 bp. The fragment size was verified with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Sheared chromatin was thereafter immunoprecipitated with Protein A-coated magnetic beads (Diagenode) preincubated with 4.5 µg/IP MED1 antibody (former Bethyl laboratories, Thermo Fisher A300-793A lot 9,10), or 3 µg/IP H3K27ac antibody (ab4729, Abcam, lot GR3211959-1 and GR3303561-2). Chromatin input samples were used as reference. Complexes were then washed and eluted from the beads with washing buffer and crosslinks were reversed by incubation at 65 °C for 4 h. Immunoprecipitated DNA along with genomic DNA (Inputs) were purified using the IPure v2 kit (Diagenode). IP efficiency was confirmed by qPCR using primers provided in the kits. For each experiment, CL tissues (right and left) were dissected from 2–4 mice from Med1 cKO and littermate controls and pooled (total 4–8 CL tissues) before immunoprecipitation. We then repeated the Chip-seq experiments using a different litter using the same approaches. ChIP-Seq libraries were generated using the Accel-NGS 2S Plus DNA library kits (Swift Sciences) and amplified by PCR for 11–13 cycles. High molecular weight smear was removed in the library by right side size selection using SPRI beads (Beckman Coulter). The libraries were quantified by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the high sensitivity DNA assay and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 (UCSF Center of advanced technology) in a single strand 50 bp run.
Next generation DNA sequence data analysis
For RNA-Seq data analysis, raw reads were assessed for run quality using fastqc version 0.72 followed by alignment to reference genome (mm10) using RNA STAR Galaxy version 2.6.0b-1 with default settings. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using feature Counts Galaxy version 1.6.3 and DESeq2 Galaxy version 2.11.40.2. For ChIP-Seq data analysis, raw reads from MED1 or H3K27ac ChIP-seq sequencing experiments were assessed for quality using fastqc version 0.72, followed by mapping to reference genome (mm10) using BWA Galaxy version 0.7.15.1 with standard settings. Pooled peak calling was performed with MACS2 callpeak version 2.1.0.20140616.0 using broad peak settings and a minimum FDR cutoff of 0.05. Raw-files for available H3K27ac ChIP-Seq datasets in public from wild-type mice hair stem cell progenies were downloaded from the NCBI-SRA database (SRR1573273 and SRR1573274) and analyzed as described above. To assess significantly different peak occupancy between two experimental groups, peak files (MACS2) were analyzed with DiffBind Galaxy version 2.6.6.4 or 2.10.0. Peak size and location were visualized with IGV version 2.3.92. MAYO using group auto-scale for comparable visualization of all shown groups. Peak intensity around TSS (±10 kbp) as well as genomic peak distribution was assessed with CEAS software (Version1.0.0, Cistrome, Liu Lab). Gene-ontology analysis for MED1 or H3K27ac distal intergenic cis-regulatory elements was performed using GREAT version 3.0.0 (Bejerano Lab, Stanford). Super enhancer analysis was performed using the ROSE package and the software NaviSE. Overlapping typical and super-enhancers between the shown comparisons were assessed with Bedtools (version 2.29) using a minimum overlap of 50%. Motif analysis (de novo and known) was performed using HOMER software. Curated gene-sets used for analyses in this study are provided upon requests.
Statistics and reproducibility
All the experiments using Med1 cKO and littermate control mice (n = 3) were repeated with at least two litters, and reproducibility was confirmed. The experiments using cultured dental epithelia were conducted in duplicates for microarray, and reproducibility was confirmed. Histologic analyses were performed using 2 sections per mouse per each group of cKO and Ctrl, and representative images are shown. Statistical significance was calculated using software integrated methods or two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. If not differently noted, differences with a p-value of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The array data were previously submitted to a public database (GEO/NCBI/NIH http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) and are available with accession numbers GSE50503 (GSM1220311 to GSM1220316) which are part of the under super-series GSE50504 at URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50501. The ChIP-seq data are available with accession number GSE221565. RNA-seq data are available under the GEO accession number GSE232190 at the following URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE232190. Source data underlying figures are presented in Supplementary Data 1.
References
Wabik, A. & Jones, P. H. Switching roles: the functional plasticity of adult tissue stem cells. EMBO J. 34, 1164–1179 (2015).
Garcia-Prat, L., Sousa-Victor, P. & Munoz-Canoves, P. Proteostatic and metabolic control of stemness. Cell Stem Cell 20, 593–608 (2017).
Middendorp, S. et al. Adult stem cells in the small intestine are intrinsically programmed with their location-specific function. Stem Cells 32, 1083–1091 (2014).
Adam, R. C. et al. Pioneer factors govern super-enhancer dynamics in stem cell plasticity and lineage choice. Nature 521, 366–370 (2015).
Kaltschmidt, B., Kaltschmidt, C. & Widera, D. Adult craniofacial stem cells: sources and relation to the neural crest. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 8, 658–671 (2012).
Jimenez-Rojo, L., Granchi, Z., Graf, D. & Mitsiadis, T. A. Stem cell fate determination during development and regeneration of ectodermal organs. Front. Physiol. 3, 107 (2012).
Yoshizaki, K., Fukumoto, S., Bikle, D. D. & Oda, Y. Transcriptional regulation of dental epithelial cell fate. Int J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8952 (2020).
Manini, I. et al. Multi-potent progenitors in freshly isolated and cultured human mesenchymal stem cells: a comparison between adipose and dermal tissue. Cell Tissue Res. 344, 85–95 (2011).
Bianco, P. “Mesenchymal” stem cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 677–704 (2014).
Bianco, P., Robey, P. G. & Simmons, P. J. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell 2, 313–319 (2008).
Wang, X. P. et al. An integrated gene regulatory network controls stem cell proliferation in teeth. PLoS Biol. 5, e159 (2007).
Klein, O. D. et al. An FGF signaling loop sustains the generation of differentiated progeny from stem cells in mouse incisors. Development 135, 377–385 (2008).
Mitsiadis, T. A. & Graf, D. Cell fate determination during tooth development and regeneration. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 87, 199–211 (2009).
Fuchs, E., Tumbar, T. & Guasch, G. Socializing with the neighbors: stem cells and their niche. Cell 116, 769–778 (2004).
Juuri, E. et al. Sox2 marks epithelial competence to generate teeth in mammals and reptiles. Development 140, 1424–1432 (2013).
Juuri, E. et al. Sox2+ stem cells contribute to all epithelial lineages of the tooth via Sfrp5+ progenitors. Dev. Cell 23, 317–328 (2012).
Morita, R. et al. Tracing the origin of hair follicle stem cells. Nature 594, 547–552 (2021).
Gonzales, K. A. U. & Fuchs, E. Skin and its regenerative powers: an alliance between stem cells and their niche. Dev. Cell 43, 387–401 (2017).
Sundberg, J. P., Peters, E. M. & Paus, R. Analysis of hair follicles in mutant laboratory mice. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 10, 264–270 (2005).
Botchkarev, V. A. & Flores, E. R. p53/p63/p73 in the epidermis in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a015248 (2014).
Greco, V. et al. A two-step mechanism for stem cell activation during hair regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 4, 155–169 (2009).
Alonso, L. & Fuchs, E. The hair cycle. J. Cell Sci. 119, 391–393 (2006).
Sakai, Y. & Demay, M. B. Evaluation of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation in vitamin D receptor knockout mice. Endocrinology 141, 2043–2049 (2000).
Lin, C. R. et al. Pitx2 regulates lung asymmetry, cardiac positioning and pituitary and tooth morphogenesis. Nature 401, 279–282 (1999).
Han, X. et al. The transcription factor NKX2-3 mediates p21 expression and ectodysplasin-A signaling in the enamel knot for cusp formation in tooth development. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 14572–14584 (2018).
Naveau, A. et al. Isl1 Controls patterning and mineralization of enamel in the continuously renewing mouse incisor. J. Bone Min. Res 32, 2219–2231 (2017).
Panteleyev, A. A., Paus, R., Ahmad, W., Sundberg, J. P. & Christiano, A. M. Molecular and functional aspects of the hairless (hr) gene in laboratory rodents and humans. Exp. Dermatol 7, 249–267 (1998).
Basel-Vanagaite, L. et al. RIN2 deficiency results in macrocephaly, alopecia, cutis laxa, and scoliosis: MACS syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 254–263 (2009).
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
Malik, S. & Roeder, R. G. Dynamic regulation of pol II transcription by the mammalian Mediator complex. Trends Biochem.Sci. 30, 256–263 (2005).
Kornberg, R. D. Mediator and the mechanism of transcriptional activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 235–239 (2005).
Taatjes, D. J. The human Mediator complex: a versatile, genome-wide regulator of transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 315–322 (2010).
Oda, Y. et al. Coactivator MED1 ablation in keratinocytes results in hair-cycling defects and epidermal alterations. J. Invest. Dermatol. 132, 1075–1083 (2012).
Oda, Y., Chalkley, R. J., Burlingame, A. L. & Bikle, D. D. The transcriptional coactivator DRIP/mediator complex is involved in vitamin D receptor function and regulates keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 130, 2377–2388 (2010).
Yue, X., Izcue, A. & Borggrefe, T. Essential role of Mediator subunit Med1 in invariant natural killer T-cell development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17105–17110 (2011).
Jiang, P. et al. Key roles for MED1 LxxLL motifs in pubertal mammary gland development and luminal-cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6765–6770 (2010).
Jia, Y. et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-binding protein null mutation results in defective mammary gland development. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10766–10773 (2005).
Zhang, X. et al. MED1/TRAP220 exists predominantly in a TRAP/ Mediator subpopulation enriched in RNA polymerase II and is required for ER-mediated transcription. Mol. Cell 19, 89–100 (2005).
Yoshizaki, K. et al. Ablation of coactivator Med1 switches the cell fate of dental epithelia to that generating hair. PLoS ONE 9, e99991 (2014).
Yoshizaki, K. et al. Mediator 1 contributes to enamel mineralization as a coactivator for Notch1 signaling and stimulates transcription of the alkaline phosphatase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 13531–13540 (2017).
Wang, S. K. et al. Fam83h null mice support a neomorphic mechanism for human ADHCAI. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 4, 46–67 (2016).
Gamage, T. H. et al. STIM1 R304W in mice causes subgingival hair growth and an increased fraction of trabecular bone. Cell Calcium 85, 102110 (2020).
Zhurakivska, K. et al. An unusual case of recurrent gingival hirsutism. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. 129, e200–e203 (2020).
Morioka, K., Arai, M. & Ihara, S. Steady and temporary expressions of smooth muscle actin in hair, vibrissa, arrector pili muscle, and other hair appendages of developing rats. Acta Histochem. Cytochem. 44, 141–153 (2011).
Chai, Y. et al. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127, 1671–1679 (2000).
Xuan, D. et al. Effect of cleidocranial dysplasia-related novel mutation of RUNX2 on characteristics of dental pulp cells and tooth development. J. Cell. Biochem. 111, 1473–1481 (2010).
Chu, Q. et al. Ablation of Runx2 in ameloblasts suppresses enamel maturation in tooth development. Sci. Rep. 8, 9594 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. SATB1 establishes ameloblast cell polarity and regulates directional amelogenin secretion for enamel formation. BMC Biol. 17, 104 (2019).
Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
Lien, W. H. et al. Genome-wide maps of histone modifications unwind in vivo chromatin states of the hair follicle lineage. Cell Stem Cell 9, 219–232 (2011).
Kang, Y., Kim, Y. W., Kang, J. & Kim, A. Histone H3K4me1 and H3K27ac play roles in nucleosome eviction and eRNA transcription, respectively, at enhancers. FASEB J. 35, e21781 (2021).
Wei, Y. et al. Human skeletal muscle-derived stem cells retain stem cell properties after expansion in myosphere culture. Exp. Cell Res. 317, 1016–1027 (2011).
Kim, K. H. et al. EGR3 is a late epidermal differentiation regulator that establishes the skin-specific gene network. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139, 615–625 (2019).
House, J. S., Zhu, S., Ranjan, R., Linder, K. & Smart, R. C. C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta are required for Sebocyte differentiation and stratified squamous differentiation in adult mouse skin. PLoS ONE 5, e9837 (2010).
Zhang, W. & Yelick, P. C. Tooth repair and regeneration: potential of dental stem cells. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 501–511 (2021).
Saito, K. et al. Sox21 regulates Anapc10 expression and determines the fate of ectodermal organ. iScience 23, 101329 (2020).
Zheng, L. W., Linthicum, L., DenBesten, P. K. & Zhang, Y. The similarity between human embryonic stem cell-derived epithelial cells and ameloblast-lineage cells. Int J. Oral. Sci. 5, 1–6 (2013).
Takeo, M. et al. Expansion and characterization of epithelial stem cells with potential for cyclical hair regeneration. Sci. Rep. 11, 1173 (2021).
Song, Y. et al. Low temperature culture enhances ameloblastic differentiation of human keratinocyte stem cells. J. Mol. Histol. 50, 417–425 (2019).
Jia, Y. et al. Transcription coactivator PBP, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-binding protein, is required for PPARalpha-regulated gene expression in liver. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 24427–24434 (2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms. Sun Hee Kim Wong for maintaining the mice and technical assistance. We are also grateful to Dr. L. Hu, C. Fong for technical support. We also thank Dr. A.J. Van Wijnen for support in epigenetic questions. This work was supported by the NIH grant R21 DE025357 (Y.O.), R01 AR050023 (D.D.B.), DOD grant CA110338 (D.D.B.), and VA Merit I01 BX003814-01 (D.D.B.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Y.O., R.T., K.Y., S.F., P.D., and D.D.B; Methodology: Y.O., R.T., T.N., and K.Y.; Investigation: Y.O., R.T., T.N., and K.Y.; Writing-original draft: Y.O. Writing-review and editing: R.T., Y.O., S.F., P.D., and D.D.B; Funding acquisition: D.D.B., Y.O., S.F., and K.Y., Resources: R.T., K.Y., S.F., D.D.B., and Y.O.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Oliver Duverger, Thomas Diekwisch, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Joao Manuel de Sousa Valente. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thaler, R., Yoshizaki, K., Nguyen, T. et al. Mediator 1 ablation induces enamel-to-hair lineage conversion in mice through enhancer dynamics. Commun Biol 6, 766 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05105-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05105-5
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Adult dental epithelial stem cell-derived organoids deposit hydroxylapatite biomineral
International Journal of Oral Science (2023)