Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) is a lysosomal storage disorder characterized by an accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), including heparan sulfate, in the body. Major manifestations involve the central nerve system (CNS), skeletal deformation, and visceral manifestations. About 30% of MPS II is linked with an attenuated type of disease subtype with visceral involvement. In contrast, 70% of MPS II is associated with a severe type of disease subtype with CNS manifestations that are caused by the human iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS)-Pro86Leu (P86L) mutation, a common missense mutation in MPS II. In this study, we reported a novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model, an analogous mutation to human IDS-P86L. In this mouse model, a significant impairment of IDS enzyme activity in the blood with a short lifespan was observed. Consistently, the IDS enzyme activity of the body, as assessed in the liver, kidney, spleen, lung, and heart, was significantly impaired. Conversely, the level of GAG was elevated in the body. A putative biomarker with unestablished nature termed UA-HNAc(1S) (late retention time), one of two UA-HNAc(1S) species with late retention time on reversed-phase separation,is a recently reported MPS II-specific biomarker derived from heparan sulfate with uncharacterized mechanism. Thus, we asked whether this biomarker might be elevated in our mouse model. We found a significant accumulation of this biomarker in the liver, suggesting that hepatic formation could be predominant. Finally, to examine whether gene therapy could enhance IDS enzyme activity in this model, the efficacy of the nuclease-mediated genome correction system was tested. We found a marginal elevation of IDS enzyme activity in the treated group, raising the possibility that the effect of gene correction could be assessed in this mouse model. In conclusion, we established a novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model that consistently recapitulates the previously reported phenotype in several mouse models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, OMIM #309900), or Hunter syndrome, is caused by a pathogenic mutation of iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS), characterized by an accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), including heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate1. MPS II is associated with several clinical manifestations involving the central nerve system (CNS), skeletal deformity, and visceral manifestations2. The prevalence of MPS II may vary depending on the population. Previous studies have reported a high prevalence in Asian countries, such as Japan, China, Taiwan, and Korea, while there is a lower prevalence among Caucasians and African Americans3. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is an established treatment strategy that is effective for visceral disorders4. To improve the CNS phenotype, a lot of effort has been made in the development of therapy5. Such strategies have included the modification of therapeutic IDS enzymes; in this case, an IDS enzyme fused to a monoclonal antibody against an insulin receptor that is expressed in brain endothelial cells at a higher concentration6. Another approach involves the intrathecal administration of recombinant enzymes in the brain7.
There are two disease subtypes of MPS II8. The severe type of MPS II involves cognitive impairment and developmental delays in the body. The affected individuals typically represent maximal development at 4–6 years of age, followed by mental decline9. In contrast, the attenuated type of MPS II shows a milder phenotype, including visceral manifestations and bone deformation. Approximately 70% of MPS II cases are known to be severe, while the rest are linked to the attenuated type8. The most frequently observed genotype for the severe type of MPS II involves the recombination of IDS-IDS2, where the IDS2 is a pseudogene of the IDS gene on the X chromosome. In sharp contrast, missense mutations have been commonly identified in the attenuated type of MPS II. In fact, nearly 80% of genotypes identified in this disease subtype involve missense mutations8. The rest of missense mutations are linked to the severe type of MPS II. Importantly, any missense mutations close to the catalytic center human Cys84 or mouse Cys86 tend to be involved in the severe type. For example, human Pro86 is a hot-spot missense mutation that is associated with the severe type8.
Growing evidence has demonstrated that there is an MPS disease type-specific biomarker in humans10,11,12. Among these species, a specific accumulation of UA-HNAc (1S) (where UA, HNAc, and S represent uronic acid, N-acetylhexosamine, and sulfur, respectively), with late retention time on reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been described in the urine of MPS II-affected individuals12. This observation was further supported by the fact that this biomarker was also elevated in dried blood spots (DBSs) in neonates13. It is not clear whether this heparan sulfate-derived biomarker for MPS II in humans could also be elevated in an MPS II mouse model.
More recently, the three-dimensional structure of human IDS proteins has been reported14. Based on this model, the missense mutation involved in the attenuated type of MPS II is mostly located on the surface of the IDS protein. In contrast, those involved in the severe type were localized, at least in part, near the catalytic center human IDS-Cys84. The human IDS enzyme needs to be activated by the formation of a formylglycine from human IDS-C84 by an enzyme formylglycine generating enzyme (FGE, OMIM #607939), a Golgi enzyme encoded by the SUMF1 gene15. This cysteine is located within the established target motif of the FGE reaction with an amino acid sequence CXPXR, where C, X, P, and R stands for cysteine, any amino acids, proline, and arginine, respectively. In this study, we generated a novel Ids-Pro88Leu (P88L) MPS II mouse model harboring an analogous pathogenic mutation of human IDS-P86L (ClinVar accession: VCV000527322.5; variation ID: 527322) and reported its biochemical phenotype.
Results
Generation of a novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model
CXPXR motif is a target motif in IDS protein for FGE (Fig. 1A,B, Supplementary Fig. S1). To generate a novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model, a guide RNA (gRNA) was microinjected into the nucleus and cytoplasm of in vitro fertilized oocytes, and they were transferred to a pseudopregnant mouse (Fig. 1C). Pups were identified using DNA sequencing (Fig. 1D). We were able to obtain six pups of the expected mouse Ids-P88L (c.C263T) mutants, equivalent to human IDS-P86L (c.C257T) (Table 1). These mice were born at the Mendelian ratio, as expected, based on the genotyping using an allele-specific quantitative PCR (Supplementary Fig. S2). The IDS enzyme activity of this mouse model was impaired in DBSs, whereas other enzyme activity of lysosomal storage disorder (LSD), such as α-galactosidase A (GLA), α-glucosidase (GAA), α-iduronidase (IDUA), acid β-glucosidase (ABG), acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), and galactosylceramidase (GALC), either remained within normal range or elevated significantly by LC–MS/MS-based enzyme assay (Fig. 1E, Supplementary Table S1). The established Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model exhibited an abnormal facial appearance with a short lifespan (Fig. 1F,G).
Visceral phenotype of the novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model
We next investigated the visceral phenotype of our newly established Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model. First, we found that the IDS enzyme activity in the liver, kidney, spleen, lung, and heart was significantly decreased at 2 and 6 months of age (Fig. 2A). We then examined the level of GAGs, a well-established biomarker for all MPS disease types, including MPS II. As observed in humans, the GAG concentration in the live, kidney, spleen, lung, and heart was elevated in this mouse model at 2 and 6 months of age, respectively (Fig. 2B).
An accumulation of UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time) in the novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model
Heparan sulfate is one of the molecular species of GAGs. UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time) is a recently reported MPS II-specific biomarker from heparan sulfate13. Thus, we further examined the levels of putative biomarkers, including UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time), in our Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table S2). We found an elevation of UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time) in the liver of this model at 2 and 6 months of age, respectively (Fig. 3A arrowhead and Fig. 3B). An occasional elevation of UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time) was also observed in other tissues, such as the kidney, at 2 months, and the lung and heart, at 6 months, respectively. In contrast, another biomarker, such as UA-HNAc (1S) (early retention time), a biomarker for MPS I, was not consistently elevated at 2 and 6 months of age in our Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model (Fig. 3C). Other biomarkers for different MPS disease type, such as HN-UA (1S) for MPS IIIA and HNAc-UA (1S) for MPS IVA, were also not elevated in this model (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Therapeutic effect of nuclease-mediated gene editing
Finally, we examined the therapeutic effect of gene editing on this Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model. We first prepared three groups of mice: (1) a control group with wild-type mice treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); (2) an MPS II disease group with an Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model treated with PBS; and (3) a treated group with an Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model treated with a mixture of Cas9 nuclease, gRNA, and single strand oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) for template DNA (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Fig. 4). At the time of injection, the mice were treated with either PBS or a therapeutic mixture via hydrodynamic injection. At day 7, the blood was collected, and the IDS enzyme activity was measured. We found that, in the control group, the IDS enzyme activity in DBS was 4.72 ± 0.44 μmol/h/L blood (mean ± SEM, n = 4) (Fig. 4B). Under the same conditions, the IDS enzyme activity of the MPS II disease group was 0.04 ± 0.03 μmol/h/L blood (n = 4). When we treated the Ids-P88L mouse model with a therapeutic mixture, we found that these mice showed 0.23 ± 0.07 μmol/h/L blood (n = 4) of IDS enzyme activity. Under these conditions, the elevation of IDS enzyme activity in the treated group was calculated as 4.2% based on the measured IDS enzyme activity.
Discussion
In this study, we established a novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model. The phenotype of this model recapitulated the previously established disease model, such as attenuated enzyme activity and an elevation of GAG in the body. These data indicate that our animal model exhibited a similar phenotype as previously reported16,17,18. Furthermore, UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time) is a recently reported novel biomarker for MPS II in humans12. We also ensured that this biomarker was elevated in our MPS II mouse model. The effect of nuclease-mediated gene correction in the Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model appeared to be marginal, raising the possibility that an alternative strategy, including the expression of therapeutic IDS cDNA, could provide a better therapeutic outcome.
There are two roles for human IDS-P86 and mouse Ids-P88. First, matured sulfatase, including IDS, requires formylglycine, an oxidized form of cysteine, by an enzyme called FGE15. These cysteine residues are found in the CXPXR motif, a known short sequence specifically found in all sulfatases in humans and mice. In fact, this motif has been identified in 87 proteins in humans by bioinformatics research19, whereas there are only 17 sulfatase genes in humans15, suggesting that P in the CXPXR motif is a prerequisite for sulfatase activity (Fig. 1A,B). In fact, a previous biochemical study using a 23-mer peptide demonstrated that FGE reacts with IDS at 30% of the reaction rate compared to arylsulfatase A/cerebroside sulfatase, demonstrating that the IDS enzyme is a reasonably good substrate for FGE20. Second, empirical evidence has suggested that because proline is a naturally occurring imino acid lacking a Cα atom that is capable of freely rotating α-amino acid in its polypeptide, the replacement of proline with other natural amino acids (i.e. α-amino acid) leads to the deformation of the protein’s tertiary structure. Such a hypothesis could also be applicable in human IDS-P86L because this mutation leads to a severe type of MPS II disease subtype with CNS involvement.
Genome editing technology is now a widely used DNA manipulation technique that has revolutionized experimental biology21. Essentially, a Cas9 protein binds to the target DNA sequence together with a gRNA through a short sequence with three nucleotides known as a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence, followed by DNA cleavage by Cas9 nuclease. There are two mechanisms by which DNA cleavage occurs. One is non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which occurs regardless of cell cycle status. In contrast, homology-directed repair (HDR) is another mechanism that is active only during the G2/S phase. When gRNA was injected into mouse fertilized egg cells, 65% of a C-to-T conversion (5 males and 8 females in 20 mice) was detected in our experiment (Table 1). Other mutations included two 1-base insertions, a 5-base deletion, and a small deletion, suggesting that NHEJ appeared to be predominant. Genome editing technology has also been receiving a lot of attention as a therapy for genetic disorders22. In this sense, HDR provides a platform for therapeutic strategies by introducing a correct nucleotide sequence. Currently, gene correction by HDR could occur at low frequency, as reported in previous studies23,24,25. In fact, our results, with a marginal correction of enzyme activity, appear to be consistent with these data.
Gene therapy is an anticipating therapy. For example, adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based intravenous infusion is one such strategy of gene therapy in humans26. To gain its maximal effect, the AAV-based transgene has been administered multiple times to the site of disease or a relatively small compartment, such as the brain27,28. Currently, in addition to gene therapy, a variety of treatment strategies have been developed. ERT is an established therapy that infuses a recombinant therapeutic enzyme into the patient. A classical delivery method infuses a recombinant enzyme intravenously4. This therapy is effective for visceral manifestations, including hepatosplenomegaly. In sharp contrast, this conventional ERT is not effective for CNS manifestation. To overcome this drawback, a recombinant IDS enzyme fused to an anti-insulin receptor antibody has been developed5,6,18. Separately, intrathecal administration of the IDS enzyme has also been under development and is in the late stages of clinical studies7,29. In the case of MPS II, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) appears not to be chosen for therapy in clinical settings, while other MPS disease types, such as MPS I, IIIA-D, IVA/B, VI, and VII, are treated with HSCT. The reason for this difference between MPS II and other types of MPS remains unclear, but it has been suggested that hematopoietic-cell-based cross-correction may not be efficient in the IDS enzyme.
Heparan sulfate is degraded in the lysosome with multiple enzymes, including IDS30. The biochemical nature of UA-HNAc (1S) (late retention time) has not yet been elucidated, but this biomarker is highly likely to contain a disaccharide consisting of uronic acid and N-acetylhexosamine with one sulfate group11,12. Because humans and mice have many hydrolases, the responsible enzyme has not yet been identified31. Given that non-specific hydrolysis of heparan sulfate into this biomarker would play a major role, the identification of such hydrolase might be rather difficult because (1) these hydrolases are likely to present at high concentrations in the cells and (2) the concentration of heparan sulfate-derived degradation products is much lower than endogenous or exogenous disaccharides, such as lactose, maltose, and sucrose, particularly in the liver. Apart from humans and mice, recent studies have shown that several metabolizing enzymes for heparan sulfate are also found in Bacteroides and Firmicutes intestinal bacteria32,33,34. The mechanism of its degradation in the bacterium appears to be different from that of the mammalian mechanism. In bacteria, heparin lyase 1–3 play an important role at the early stage of heparan sulfate degradation. From the viewpoint of substrate specificity, heparin lyase 1 catalyzes the hydrolysis of glycosidic linkage of the non-reducing end of iduronic acid, while heparin lyase 3 degrades heparan sulfate next to glucuronic acid35. Aside from them, heparan lyase 2 has both activity for heparan sulfate degradation. Furthermore, it is known that certain intestinal bacteria, such as Bacteroides iotathetaomicron, contain a variety of additional heparan sulfate-modifying enzymes32,33,34,36,37. However, an estimated contribution of gut microbiome-derived enzymes has been suggested at approximately 10% in healthy humans38,39, thus their contribution to an elevation of HS disaccharide species seemed to be small.
In conclusion, we established a novel Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model. Overall, the phenotype of this animal model appeared to be consistent with previously established MPS II mouse models. Future studies on the development of therapeutic strategies could be performed using this animal model.
Materials and methods
Reagents
1-Phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (PMP: CAS 89-25-8) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industries (Tokyo, Japan). Chondroitin disaccharide di-4S (∆HexA-GalNAc(4S), CAS 136144-56-4) was purchased from Carbosynth (Berkshire, UK). The other reagents were of the highest grade and commercially available.
Generation of the Ids-P88L MPS II mouse model
For the generation of mutant mice, a gRNA with the following sequence was used: GTGAGGAAGGACACTCGACACTCGACTTGG, where PAM was underlined21. The sgRNA was synthesized using a CUGA7 gRNA synthesis kit (Nippon Gene Co., Ltd., Toyama, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A mixture of Cas9 protein (100 ng/μL), sgRNA (250 ng/μL), and ssODN (100 ng/μL) was microinjected into the nucleus and cytoplasm of in vitro fertilized oocytes prepared from C57BL/6 × DBA/2 F1 hybrid. The oocytes were cultured overnight and transferred to the oviducts of pseudopregnant ICR females. The pups were identified using DNA sequencing, as described below.
Animals
The F0-generation mice were mated with C57BL/6 mice (CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The genotype of the F1 mice was confirmed using the Sanger sequence. The F1 mice were intercrossed, and their offspring F2 animals were used for further experiments. The mice were fed with standard chow ad libitum (CE-2, CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) and were maintained on 12-h-light/dark cycles (8:00–20:00). This study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org).
Animal ethics
The protocol for animal experiments was approved by the Animal Committee of the National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Genotyping
For genotyping, genomic DNA from mouse tail clippings or tissue was isolated by standard procedures. For DNA sequencing-based genotyping, the genome DNA was amplified using a set of the following primers: forward primer, GGCAAGGCCCTAATCCTACT; reverse primer, AGAAACAAAAGGCCCAGGTT. The PCR product was then diluted using distilled water, treated with ExoSAP-IT and labeled with a BigDye terminator sequencing kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA). Finally, the fluorescence-labeled DNA was sequenced using a capillary sequencer of 3130xl (Thermo Fischer Scientific). For probe-based genotyping, we used the following primers: forward: CATTTGCTTCTGCTCCTTAAC; reverse: CAATTCCTACTGGAGGGTACA; Fluorescein-aminohexyl (FAM)-labeled probe for wild-type allele: TCG + ACT + T + G + GTGC; Hexachlorofluorescein (HEX)-labeled probe for mouse Ids-P88L allele: TCGA + CT + T + A + GTGCG, where + denotes locked DNA (Integrated DNA technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Genotyping was performed using a Thunderbird Probe qPCR mix (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan). The temperature was maintained at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 15 s. The QuantStudio 12 K Flex Real-Time PCR System was used (Thermo Fischer Scientific).
DBS preparation
Blood was collected from the retro-orbital vein with a 75-μL plain hematocrit capillary (Hirschmann, Eberstadt, Germany). Blood was spotted on filter paper for newborn screening (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan)40. The samples were dried at room temperature overnight and then stored at − 20 °C prior to use.
GAG quantification
Tissue homogenate was pretreated with Proteinase K (0.2 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) in 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8) at 56 °C overnight. Then, the amount of released GAG was quantified using a colorimetric assay with 1,9-dimehtyl-methylene blue dye (Blyscan, Northern Ireland, UK), as previously reported41,42. A standard curve was generated using chondroitin sulfate. The GAG level in the tissue extract was adjusted by its protein concentration, as determined by a BCA assay kit (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan).
Quantification of IDS enzyme activity
Liver, kidney, spleen, lung, and heart tissues were homogenized in MilliQ water (Millipore, Tokyo, Japan), and protein extracts were obtained by manual homogenization. The IDS activity in the homogenate was determined as previously described with a slight modification43,44. In brief, the sample (5 μL) was incubated with the substrate at 37 °C for 20 h (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). After the termination of the enzyme reaction with methanol and ethyl acetate, the reaction products were extracted into ethyl acetate using a 96-well plate (cat# 260252, Thermo Fischer Scientific). An aliquot (0.2 mL) of the upper layer was evaporated under a nitrogen stream. The residue was then reconstituted with a mixture of acetonitrile/water = 20/80 with 0.2% formic acid (Kanto Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). Finally, enzyme activity was determined by quantifying the accumulation of the enzyme reaction product using LC–MS/MS equipped with a Xevo TQ-S micro tandem mass spectrometer and an H-class UPLC chromatograph (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA)43.
Quantification of MPS-specific biomarkers
The MPS-specific biomarkers were quantified using LC–MS/MS as described previously45. In brief, an aliquot of tissue homogenate (10 μL) was mixed with a previously described PMP solution (0.1 mL) and reacted at 70 °C for 90 min for derivatization. The reaction was then acidified using 0.5 M formic acid (0.5 mL, Kanto Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) and chloroform (0.5 mL, Wako Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature, the lower layer was discarded. This was performed four times in total. Then, the aqueous layer was dried under nitrogen at 70 °C. Finally, the sample was reconstituted with a solution containing 0.1% formic acid in methanol/water = 10/90 (0.3 mL). The PMP derivatives were separated on a BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm, Waters Corporation) at 0.3 mL/min at 40 °C. A TQ-S micro tandem mass spectrometer and an H-class UPLC chromatograph were used (Waters Corporation).
Longevity observation
The mice were continuously observed for the development of humane endpoint criteria, or until death occurred. When the symptoms of late-stage clinical manifestation, such as urine retention, rectal prolapse, and protruding penis, became irreversible, or when the mice showed significant weight loss, dehydration, or morbidity, it was considered the humane endpoint.
Hydrodynamic injection
At day 1, the mice (approximately 30–40 g) were injected with either 10% (v/w) PBS or PBS containing a mixture of a plasmid of Cas9 (2.5 μg/mL), a plasmid of gRNA (12.5 μg/mL), and an ssODN of template DNA (75 ng/mL) by retro-orbital vein. On day 7, blood was removed for DBS preparation by a microcapillary, as described above.
Statistics
Data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. For all comparisons, significance was set at P < 0.05.
Data availability
The datasets of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Muenzer, J. Overview of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology 50, v4–v12. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker394 (2011).
Jones, S. A. et al. Mortality and cause of death in mucopolysaccharidosis type II—a historical review based on data from the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS). J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 32, 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-009-1119-7 (2009).
Meikle, P. J., Hopwood, J. J., Clague, A. E. & Carey, W. F. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 281, 249–254 (1999).
Muenzer, J. et al. Ten years of the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS): Insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry. J. Rare Dis. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0635-z (2017).
Okuyama, T. et al. A phase 2/3 trial of pabinafusp alfa IDS Fused with anti-human transferrin receptor antibody, targeting neurodegeneration in MPS-II. Mol. Ther. 29, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.039 (2021).
Sonoda, H. et al. A blood-brain-barrier-penetrating anti-human transferrin receptor antibody fusion protein for neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II. Mol. Ther. 26, 1366–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.02.032 (2018).
Muenzer, J. et al. A phase I/II study of intrathecal idursulfase-IT in children with severe mucopolysaccharidosis II. Genet. Med. 18, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.36 (2016).
Kosuga, M. et al. Molecular diagnosis of 65 families with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) characterized by 16 novel mutations in the IDS gene: Genetic, pathological, and structural studies on iduronate-2-sulfatase. Mol. Genet. Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.05.003 (2016).
Holt, J. B., Poe, M. D. & Escolar, M. L. Natural progression of neurological disease in mucopolysaccharidosis type II. Pediatrics 127, e1258–e1265. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1274 (2011).
Fuller, M., Meikle, P. J. & Hopwood, J. J. Glycosaminoglycan degradation fragments in mucopolysaccharidosis I. Glycobiology 14, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/GLYCOB/CWH049 (2004).
Nielsen, T. C., Rozek, T., Hopwood, J. J. & Fuller, M. Determination of urinary oligosaccharides by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to Hunter syndrome. Anal. Biochem. 402, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AB.2010.04.002 (2010).
Saville, J. T., McDermott, B. K., Fletcher, J. M. & Fuller, M. Disease and subtype specific signatures enable precise diagnosis of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Genet Med. 21, 753–757. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0136-z (2019).
Herbst, Z. M., Urdaneta, L., Klein, T., Fuller, M. & Gelb, M. H. Evaluation of multiple methods for quantification of glycosaminoglycan biomarkers in newborn dried blood spots from patients with severe and attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis-I. Int. J. Neonatal. Screen 6, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJNS6030069 (2020).
Demydchuk, M. et al. Insights into Hunter syndrome from the structure of iduronate-2-sulfatase. Nat. Commun. 8, 15786. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15786 (2017).
Dierks, T. et al. Molecular basis of multiple sulfatase deficiency, mucolipidosis II/III and Niemann-Pick C1 disease-Lysosomal storage disorders caused by defects of non-lysosomal proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 710–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBAMCR.2008.11.015 (2009).
Garcia, A. R., Pan, J., Lamsa, J. C. & Muenzer, J. The characterization of a murine model of mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 30, 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-007-0641-8 (2007).
Lee, J. H., Choe, Y. H., Kim, S. J., Paik, K. H. & Jin, D. K. Changes in glycogen and glycosaminoglycan levels in hepatocytes of iduronate-2-sulfatase knockout mice before and after recombinant iduronate-2-sulfatase supplementation. Yonsei Med. J. 52, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.3349/YMJ.2011.52.2.263 (2011).
Okuyama, T. et al. Iduronate-2-sulfatase with anti-human transferrin receptor antibody for neuropathic mucopolysaccharidosis II: A phase 1/2 trial. Mol. Ther. 27, 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.12.005 (2019).
Sardiello, M., Annunziata, I., Roma, G. & Ballabio, A. Sulfatases and sulfatase modifying factors: An exclusive and promiscuous relationship. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 3203–3217. https://doi.org/10.1093/HMG/DDI351 (2005).
Preusser-Kunze, A. et al. Molecular characterization of the human Calpha-formylglycine-generating enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 14900–14910. https://doi.org/10.1074/JBC.M413383200 (2005).
Inui, M. et al. Rapid generation of mouse models with defined point mutations by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 4, 5396. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05396 (2014).
Raguram, A., Banskota, S. & Liu, D. R. Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2022.03.045 (2022).
Yin, H. et al. Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 551–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/NBT.2884 (2014).
Yin, H. et al. Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/NBT.3471 (2016).
Farbiak, L. et al. All-in-one dendrimer-based lipid nanoparticles enable precise HDR-mediated gene editing in vivo. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.202006619 (2021).
Laoharawee, K. et al. Dose-dependent prevention of metabolic and neurologic disease in murine MPS II by ZFN-mediated in vivo genome editing. Mol. Ther. 26, 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMTHE.2018.03.002 (2018).
Laoharawee, K. et al. Prevention of neurocognitive deficiency in mucopolysaccharidosis type II mice by central nervous system-directed, AAV9-mediated iduronate sulfatase gene transfer. Hum. Gene Ther. 28, 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1089/HUM.2016.184 (2017).
Motas, S. et al. CNS-directed gene therapy for the treatment of neurologic and somatic mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome). JCI Insight 1, e86696. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.86696 (2016).
Muenzer, J. et al. Long-term open-label phase I/II extension study of intrathecal idursulfase-IT in the treatment of neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II. Genet. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIM.2022.04.002 (2022).
Mashima, R., Okuyama, T. & Ohira, M. Physiology and pathophysiology of heparan sulfate in animal models: Its biosynthesis and degradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS23041963 (2022).
Drula, E. et al. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: Functions and literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D571–D577. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAB1045 (2022).
Cartmell, A. et al. How members of the human gut microbiota overcome the sulfation problem posed by glycosaminoglycans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7037–7042. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1704367114 (2017).
Luis, A. S. et al. A single sulfatase is required to access colonic mucin by a gut bacterium. Nature 598, 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-021-03967-5 (2021).
Luis, A. S. et al. Sulfated glycan recognition by carbohydrate sulfatases of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41589-022-01039-X (2022).
Han, Y. H. et al. Structural snapshots of heparin depolymerization by heparin lyase I. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 34019–34027. https://doi.org/10.1074/JBC.M109.025338 (2009).
Ndeh, D. et al. Metabolism of multiple glycosaminoglycans by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron is orchestrated by a versatile core genetic locus. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-020-14509-4 (2020).
Pudlo, N. A. et al. Diverse events have transferred genes for edible seaweed digestion from marine to human gut bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 30, 314-328.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHOM.2022.02.001 (2022).
Wardman, J. F., Bains, R. K., Rahfeld, P. & Withers, S. G. Carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in the gut microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41579-022-00712-1 (2022).
McNeil, N. I. The contribution of the large intestine to energy supplies in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 39, 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/39.2.338 (1984).
Oda, E. et al. Newborn screening for Pompe disease in Japan. Mol. Genet. Metab. 104, 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.09.002 (2011).
de Jong, J. G. N., Wevers, R. A., Laarakkers, C. & Poorthuis, B. J. H. M. Dimethylmethylene blue-based spectrophotometry of glycosaminoglycans in untreated urine: A rapid screening procedure for mucopolysaccharidoses. Clin. Chem. 35, 1472–1477. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/35.7.1472 (1989).
Mashima, R., Sakai, E., Tanaka, M., Kosuga, M. & Okuyama, T. The levels of urinary glycosaminoglycans of patients with attenuated and severe type of mucopolysaccharidosis II determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2016.03.009 (2016).
Mashima, R., Ohira, M., Okuyama, T. & Tatsumi, A. Quantification of the enzyme activities of iduronate-2-sulfatase, N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase and N-acetylgalactosamine-4-sulfatase using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.12.001 (2018).
Ohira, M., Okuyama, T. & Mashima, R. Quantification of 11 enzyme activities of lysosomal storage disorders using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 17, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2018.08.005 (2018).
Herbst, Z. M. et al. Evaluation of two methods for quantification of glycosaminoglycan biomarkers in newborn dried blood spots from patients with severe and attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis Type II. Int. J. Neonatal. Screen https://doi.org/10.3390/IJNS8010009 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (19K07952; 22K07927) to RM and a Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development to TO (21ae0201004h0004) and RM (22ae0201004h0005).
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mashima, R., Ohira, M., Okuyama, T. et al. A novel mucopolysaccharidosis type II mouse model with an iduronate-2-sulfatase-P88L mutation. Sci Rep 13, 7865 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34541-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34541-w
- Springer Nature Limited