Abstract
Streptococcus gallolyticus LL009 produces gallocin D, a narrow spectrum two component bacteriocin with potent activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Gallocin D is distinct from gallocin A, a separate two component bacteriocin produced by S. gallolyticus. Although the gene clusters encoding gallocin A and gallocin D have a high degree of gene synteny, the structural genes are highly variable and appear to have undergone gene shuffling with other streptococcal species. Gallocin D was analysed in laboratory-based experiments. The mature peptides are 3,343 ± 1 Da and 3,019 ± 1 Da and could be readily synthesized and display activity against a vancomycin resistant Enterococcus strain EC300 with a MIC value of 1.56 µM. Importantly, these bacteriocins could contribute to the ability of S. gallolyticus to colonize the colon where they have been associated with colorectal cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With the rise of antibiotic resistant pathogens and the decreasing number of novel antibiotics, the search for alternative antimicrobials is of increasing importance1. Bacteriocins are potential antimicrobial candidates and consist of different classes of ribosomally-synthesized antimicrobial peptides which are either narrow or broad spectrum2. Narrow spectrum bacteriocins are of particular interest as targeted therapeutics since they could be expected to have minimal impact on resident microbiota3,4. Bacteriocin-producing bacteria have been isolated from a range of sources including food, skin, and the gastrointestinal tracts of both animals and humans5. Among the functions attributed to bacteriocins are competition, quorum sensing and host signalling6. They are classified into multiple types; class I are lantibiotics such as nisin which are subject to post-translational modification, and class II that are unmodified or cyclic peptides. The class II bacteriocins are divided into several subgroups7.
Class IIb are two-peptide bacteriocins where the two components are required for maximal activity. The structural genes encoding them are usually adjacently located, together with a gene encoding an immunity protein that protects the cell from being killed by its own bacteriocin8. Class IIb bacteriocin operons usually also contain an ABC transporter and an accessory protein. Both peptides are synthesised as pre-peptides with a leader sequence at the N terminal that is cleaved during export at a GG motif to produce the extracellular mature active peptide. This cleavage is performed by the ABC transporter or a peptidase which recognises the leader sequence, and transports the peptide across the cell membrane. Two-component bacteriocins require both peptides for optimal activity and both peptides interact with one another at the same target site to form one antibacterial unit. The mode of action of these bacteriocins involves the binding of the peptides to a target in the cell membrane, leading to pore formation causing leakage and cell death.
Streptococcus gallolyticus ssp gallolyticus, formerly described as S. bovis biotype I, is an opportunistic pathogen associated with infectious endocarditis (IE) and colorectal cancer (CRC)9. It is hypothesized that altered conditions in the colon associated with cancer provide an environment in which S. gallolyticus is able to thrive and colonise. This ability is linked to the production of a two component bacteriocin gallocin, for clarification referred to as gallocin A. In one study, using a murine model of CRC, colonisation of tumour bearing mice by S. gallolyticus UCN34 was mediated by production of gallocin A encoded by two structural genes, gallo_2020 and gallo_2021, hereafter designated gllA1 and gllA210. The bacteriocin is active against enterococci, potentially creating a niche in the colon for S. gallolyticus colonisation. An S. gallolyticus UCN34 in which gllA1 and gllA2 were knocked out lacked this colonisation advantage in tumour bearing mice. In this study, we describe a strain of S. gallolyticus which harbours distinct structural genes in place of gllA1 and gllA2. These structural genes are similar to genes encoding a bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus infantarius ssp infantarius (Sii)11.
Streptococcus gallolyticus and S. infantarius are both members of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC) which is divided into seven subspecies; S. gallolyticus, S. infantarius, S. gallolyticus ssp macedonicus (Sgm), S. gallolyticus ssp pasteurianus (Sgp), Streptococcus lutetiensis, Streptococcus alactolyticus, and S. equinus12,13. SBSEC members have been isolated from human, animal and food sources, with an estimated carriage rate of 5% in healthy adults. S. gallolyticus has been linked with IE and CRC in humans, while S. infantarius is found in fermented foods, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa14,15,16,17,18. S. infantarius has also been linked to CRC in an African cohort, although this did not correlate to consumption of traditional fermented food containing species of S. infantarius. This suggests a separation between commensal, opportunistic pathogen, and food lineages19,20. The SBSEC genomes have been studied for their ability to colonise in their associated niche, for example some strains such as S. gallolyticus retain tannin degrading abilities associated with survival in ruminant animals18,21,22. Other strains such as S. infantarius and S. gallolyticus ssp pasteurianus have lost this ability and have undergone a genome reduction associated with an adaption to the dairy environment18. This has been discussed at length for members of the SBSEC, and it has been suggested that isolation source is associated with strain lineage23,24. S. gallolyticus strains have retained the largest genomes and most diverse functional capabilities and have been found in both healthy individuals and patients with underlying disease. It has been found in 74% of CRC patients and preferentially associates with tumour tissue9,25.
This study analysed class IIb bacteriocins in S. gallolyticus and S. infantarius and highlights the ability of these strains to adapt to their niche. Based on the discovery of bacteriocin structural genes in our new isolate S. gallolyticus LL009, we completed an in silico screen on available sequences of other SBSEC members. This analysis revealed that a similar bacteriocin operon is present in each S. gallolyticus strain analysed, but S. gallolyticus LL009 contains distinct structural and immunity genes. The bacteriocin, termed gallocin D, is a variant of a bacteriocin produced by another dairy isolate S. infantarius LP9011. A similar bacteriocin operon is also present in members of the related S. infantarius. The bacteriocin produced by S. gallolyticus LL009, that we designate gallocin D, was synthesized and analysed for activity against related S. gallolyticus strain and other clinically-relevant pathogens. It was found to have activity against clinically important pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin resistant enterococci and another S. gallolyticus strain.
Results
Identification of the bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus gallolyticus LL009
Streptococcus gallolyticus LL009 (Sgg LL009) was isolated from raw goat milk sourced in New Zealand; milk samples were stored at − 20 °C until processing. The strain was initially isolated by streaking 10 µl of milk onto Streptococcus thermophilus selective agar that was incubated at 42 °C for 24 h. To test for bacteriocin production, individual isolates were streaked onto BHI agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C, aerobically. When overlaid with Lb. delbrueckii ssp bulgaricus LMG 6,901, zones of inhibition were observed around the colonies of Sgg LL009 (Fig. 1). No antimicrobial activity was observed when a cell-free supernatant was tested by well diffusion assay, but a zone of clearing was observed when cell-containing broth was used in this assay. Inhibitory activity was restored to the cell free supernatant when Tween80 was added. We designated this bacteriocin activity as gallocin D, pending further analysis.
Sgg LL009 was tested for the production of capsular exopolysaccharide (EPS), a feature of some S. gallolyticus strains. Colonies were positive for the loop touch test and were white on ruthenium red supplemented medium, indicating a ropy type EPS26,27. On sucrose supplemented medium, a large amount of mucous type EPS was produced.
Sgg LL009 was not completely resistant to any antibiotic tested (Table 1). It is non-proteolytic in that no zones of clearing were observed surrounding colonies on 10% (w/v) reconstituted skim milk (RSM). A green colouration was observed surrounding cells on blood agar for hemolysis testing, indicative of alpha hemolysis. Alpha hemolysis is defined as bruising of the red blood cells and not true lysis.
In silico analysis of Streptococcus gallolyticus LL009
Following draft genome sequencing of the gallocin D producer Sgg LL009, in silico analysis was performed using BAGEL4 and antiSMASH to identify bacteriocin-associated genes28,29. A single bacteriocin operon was identified in Sgg LL009 that consists almost entirely of genes also found in the gallocin A operon of strain S. gallolyticus DSM16831 (Fig. 2A). The predicted function of each gene is shown in Table 2. However, the bacteriocin structural genes (gllD1 and gllD2) and that encoding the immunity protein (gllDI) do not have homologs in the gallocin A producing S. gallolyticus. These genes are homologous to genes found in the infantaricin ABCDEFG bacteriocin cluster from S. infantarius LP90 (Fig. 2B). The predicted structural genes in the LL009 operon are variants of infantaricin A, where gllD1 shares 98% amino acid identity with infA1, while gllD2 shares 90% amino acid identity with infA2. The predicted molecular weight of gllD2, 3,019.54 Da, is consistent with the 3,021.29 Da mass found by MALDI TOF mass spectrometry analysis (Fig. 1). This mass could not be matched to any known bacteriocin in the bactibase database.
Organisation of the predicted operon encoding the bacteriocin, aligned to the operon of (A) type strain S. gallolyticus DSM 16,831, with below alignment of structural genes; gllA2 and gllD2 show 42% identity, gllA1 and gllD1 share 22% identity. (B) S. infantarius LP90 infantaricin ABCDEFG bacteriocin cluster. Genes in line with the same background colour are homologous and the amino acid percent identity is indicated.
Nine strains of S. gallolyticus and S. infantarius with available genomic data (including Sgg LL009) were analysed for the presence of bacteriocin operons (Table 3). The ABC transporters are highly conserved in both species, with 97% amino acid identity (Fig. 3). Infantaricin A is encoded by the infantaricin ABCDEFG bacteriocin operon in S. infantarius LP90. Twelve structural bacteriocin genes can be identified in the operon, ten of which make up five two-peptide bacteriocins11. There is significant variation in the structural gene arsenal of each strain. Each previously sequenced strain of S. gallolyticus contained the gallocin A structural genes, gllA1and gllA2, while all S. infantarius strains other than CJ18 contained a homolog of infantaricin C. The infantaricin C bacteriocin genes, infC1 and infC2, in S. infantarius LP90 have 66% and 78% identity with gllA1 and gllA2, respectively. One strain of S. gallolyticus ssp macedonicus has gllA2 next to a gene with 60% identity to gllA1. Sgg LL009 is the only S. gallolyticus strain that lacks a homolog for gallocin A, and instead harbours a variant of infantaricin A, here termed gallocin D.
Comparison of the operons of all strains analysed. Genes in line with the same background colour are homologous (> X% amino acid sequence identity indicated), while the white background represents genes for which no homologs have been found between strains; box 1 shows the immunity protein and infantaricin A in S. infantarius strains and immunity protein and the gallocin D variant in S. gallolyticus LL009; box 2 shows potential homologs for gallocin A.
Synthesis and spectrum of inhibition of infantaricin A and gallocin D
The gallocin D1 prepeptide encoded by gllD1 is 51 amino acids and the D2 pre-peptide encoded by gllD2 is 52 amino acids in length, while the active peptides are predicted to be 30 and 29 amino acids, respectively. We synthesised both D1 and D2 peptides for further characterisation, the mass of the synthesized D2 peptide matched the observed mass of 3,021 Da. The D2 peptide displays no activity in a well diffusion assay against Lb. delbrueckii ssp bulgaricus, while the D1 peptide has solo activity, which is enhanced when in a 1:1 combination with D2. When tested against pathogenic bacteria, both peptides are required for activity. The infantaricin A peptides were also synthesized and it was found that the peptides cross-complemented each other, A1/D2 or D1/A2 (Fig. 4).
(A) Mixing gallocin D and infantaricin A peptides indicates that any combination of the alpha and beta peptides results in activity, concentration in µM across the top. ‘Rugby ball’ shape seen between wells indicates where the peptides meet following diffusion into the media, showing complementary activity. (B) Alignment of sequences of the prepeptides from both species, the double glycine cleavage point is underlined.
A number of indicator organisms were tested to determine the spectrum of activity, using both the overlay method on a plate and a well diffusion assay using the synthesized peptide (Table 4). The bacteriocin was active against a narrow range of indicator organisms that included the clinically important pathogens S. pneumoniae and vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) strains but was inactive against other unrelated pathogenic and commensal bacteria. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the gallocin D peptide was assessed at 1.56 µM against VRE EC300.
Streptococcus gallolyticus DPC6501 was isolated from a porcine jejunum in a previous study and is reported to produce a bacteriocin30. This strain was tested for sensitivity to Sgg LL009 and the synthesized gallocin D peptides. The overlay assay of Sgg LL009 showed zones of inhibition against S. gallolyticus DPC6501 and a zone of inhibition from 15 µM gallocin D peptides was observed in a well diffusion assay (Fig. 5).
Resistance development in VRE EC300 against gallocin D
The microtitre plates from the MIC determination experiment were plated in an attempt to identify growth of VRE EC300. Following 24 h growth, VRE EC300 cells from the control and wells containing 100 µM gallocin D, the highest concentration included, were spread plated on BHI, and then sub-cultured into fresh BHI. At 24 h, the sub-cultured broths were serially diluted and plated. The bacteriocin treated cells showed no growth at any dilution, while the untreated cells reached 4.9 × 108 cfu ml−1. At this concentration and inoculum, no colonies were found following treatment with gallocin D.
For the time-kill assay actively growing VRE EC300 at 108 cfu ml−1 was treated with gallocin D at 15.6 µM, 10 × the MIC value. Within the first 4 h, VRE EC300 was undetectable in all treated broths, while the untreated control remained at 108 cfu ml−1. At 6 h, VRE EC300 was detected in treated broths while at 24 h the treated broths were lower than the untreated control at 107 cfu ml−1 (Fig. 6).
Discussion
The bacteriocin operons within the S. gallolyticus subspecies gallolyticus of the SBSEC were found to be generally highly conserved, with the exception of the newly isolated Sgg LL009 which lacks the gallocin A structural genes and has different structural genes and a putative immunity gene at this locus. The structural genes in Sgg LL009 are variants of genes in an infantaricin A producing S. infantarius LP90 (Sii LP90), and its associated immunity gene. Infantaricin A is encoded by an operon with seven predicted bacteriocin structural genes, of which infC shows sequence homology to the gallocin A structural genes. Sgg LL009 is the only genome analysed found to lack genes for gallocin A/infantaricin C, and contain a variant of previously identified infantaricin A. In a BLAST search limited to the SBSEC, no gallocin D hits were found outside of the S. gallolyticus or S. infantarius species and only one potential gallocin A homolog was identified in S. macedonicus.
Gallocin A is a two-peptide bacteriocin which has been reported to give S. gallolyticus a competitive advantage in conditions found in in the gut of patients with CRC. This bacteriocin is absent from closely related species, but we identified possible homologs in S. infantarius strains, and gllA2 was found in S. gallolyticus ssp macedonicus together with a gene with 60% identity to gllA1. High genome plasticity has been reported in the SBSEC and S. gallolyticus is reported to have retained the largest genome and highest functional capacity. Two human isolates of S. infantarius, NCTC 13,760 and ATCC BAA-102 possess the infantaricin ABCDEFG bacteriocin operon while the dairy isolate Sii CJ18 does not have the complete operon. Sgg LL009 and Sii LP90 were isolated from goat and water buffalo raw milk samples, respectively. In previous comparative genomics studies, high numbers of IS elements were found in these species. The organisation of the operon and high sequence identity between genes suggests that transfer of bacteriocin structural genes occurred between these strains due to adaptive pressure in the microbe-rich environment of the gut21. Sgg LL009 has unique structural genes which are produced within the gallocin D operon.
The association between S. gallolyticus and CRC is not fully understood31, but it is thought that the conditions in the colon when tumours are present provide a suitable niche for S. gallolyticus if competitors can be controlled with gallocin A. Gallocin A and gallocin D share similar characteristics and target organisms. Gallocin A production is enhanced in the presence of secondary bile acids, a known risk factor of CRC. The cell free supernatant of S. gallolyticus UCN34 shows no activity in a well diffusion assay in the absence of a detergent or secondary bile acids, a feature that is also observed for Sgg LL009 producing gallocin D10. S. gallolyticus mutants lacking gllA1 and gllA2 do not have the same colonisation advantage in tumour-bearing mice, leading to the conclusion that S. gallolyticus is not a causative factor of CRC but does promote its acceleration if pre-malignant tumours are present and the strain colonises. Both gallocin A and gallocin D target enterococci, with enhanced bacteriocin production in CRC conditions. This suggests that Sgg LL009 could well retain the colonisation advantage seen in S. gallolyticus UCN34 in CRC conditions, despite their distinct amino acid sequences.
The operons in the various S. gallolyticus strains were strikingly similar with the exception of the bacteriocin structural genes, suggesting that these bacteriocins would be subject to similar regulation and would be produced under similar conditions. Whether this strain would have a protective effect in the colon is unclear. It is likely, due to their similar target organisms and production characteristics, that this strain of S. gallolyticus producing gallocin D would occupy the same niche as S. gallolyticus producing gallocin A. Further studies are required to assess if this gallocin D producing S. gallolyticus is able to colonise and accelerate cancer development.
This work confirms horizontal gene transfer of bacteriocin structural genes between members of the SBSEC, which have been shown to have high genome plasticity18. Sgg LL009 and Sii CJ18 are both dairy isolates and both show the most “unusual” operons; the structural and immunity genes of Sgg LL009, and Sii CJ18 has the lowest number of bacteriocin structural genes of all the Sii strains. This hints at a role for these bacteriocins, gallocin D and infantaricin A, in streptococcal strains colonising ruminant animals. Further identification of bacteriocin producers from the SBSEC could lead to further evidence of shuffling of bacteriocin structural genes.
A further strain of bacteriocin producing S. gallolyticus from our culture collection, S. gallolyticus DPC6501, is sensitive to gallocin D, which strongly indicates that the genomic annotation of the immunity protein is correct. This is the only predicted immunity protein present in Sgg LL009 and absent in related S. gallolyticus strains and also the only immunity protein shared between Sgg LL009 and the infantaricin A producer. Sgg LL009 is not inhibited by Sgg DPC6501, this strain has not been sequenced, but is known to be a bacteriocin producer from previous work30. We hypothesise that Sgg LL009 is not susceptible to gallocin A, but that synthesized gallocin D could provide an alternative strategy for the control of S. gallolyticus infections.
The application of gallocin D is not limited to its potential role in controlling the growth of other S. gallolyticus strains in CRC. It is a narrow spectrum bacteriocin with potent activity against VRE, opportunistic pathogens that are particularly relevant in hospital settings, for patients who are immunocompromised and those under antibiotic treatment for endocarditis32. VRE can infect the urinary tract, surgical wounds or the bloodstream and are spread by direct contact. Many patients who develop VRE infections have underlying illnesses and due to antibiotic resistance this infection can lead to serious problems or fatalities33. The kill curve of gallocin D shows it can reduce the numbers of VRE from 108 cfu ml−1 to undetectable levels in two hours, though the cells regrow after 8 h. Importantly, when added to growing cells at 105 cfu ml−1, which is regarded as a clinical infection, the VRE EC300 did not recover and no resistant colonies were found. This suggests that the mode of action of this bacteriocin is related to cell contact; if the bacteriocin is present in the right ratio to cells the infection can be cleared. The MIC and resistance testing results for gallocin D show that it completely kills VRE EC300 when present at 105 cfu ml−1, and gallocin D is present at the MIC of 1.56 µM.
Conclusions
A combination of laboratory and in silico analyses led to the discovery and characterisation of gallocin D, a class IIb bacteriocin with activity against VRE, S. pneumoniae, and a related strain of S. gallolyticus. Gallocin D is a variant of infantaricin A produced by closely-related S. infantarius species. The operon is similar to those found in other S. gallolyticus genomes, with the exception of the structural and immunity genes. This work highlights the shuffling of bacteriocin structural genes within these closely related species. Gallocin D could be applied for treatment of VRE infections, and potentially for the control of other species of S. gallolyticus.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains culture conditions
S. gallolyticus LL009 was isolated from raw goat milk produced in New Zealand on S. thermophilus agar at 42 °C. S. gallolyticus LL009 was routinely cultured under aerobic conditions at 37 °C, in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom), all other reagents were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (Wicklow, Ireland) unless otherwise stated. Indicator strains used and their incubation conditions are listed in Table 3.
Draft genome sequencing
DNA was extracted using a Genelute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma) and prepared for sequencing using a Nextera XT kit (Illumina) for library preparation. DNA was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer. Sequencing was carried out using an Illumina MiSeq platform with paired-end 2 × 300 base pair reads at the Teagasc Sequencing Centre, Teagasc Food Research Centre Moorepark. Assembly was performed de novo using SPADES and automatically annotating using GAMOLA34. The whole genome sequence was run through Bagel4 and antiSMASH to search for bacteriocin genes. The genome was also compared to other available S. gallolyticus and S. infantarius genomes from NCBI listed in Table 4.
Antimicrobial activity assays
Sgg LL009 was grown on BHI agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Sgg LL009 was assayed against various indicator organisms, listed in Table 4 along with incubation conditions. Plates were overlaid with MRS agar (7.5 g L−1 agar) seeded with L. bulgaricus LMG6901 and incubated overnight at 37 °C, anaerobically. Activity was defined by a clearing in the overlay medium.
Overnight cultures were centrifuged and filtered to obtain cell free supernatant (CFS). MRS agar was seeded with an overnight culture of L. bulgaricus LMG6901 and wells were made. Both broth and CFS were added to the wells in 50 µl volumes. Plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Triton X-100 was added to CFS at 1% concentrations. All assays were performed in triplicate. The well diffusion method was repeated using synthesized gallocin D, using peptides alone and in combination (1:1).
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations of gallocin D (D1D2) were carried out in triplicate in microtitre plates as previously described35. Briefly, VRE EC300 was grown overnight in BHI broth at 37 °C and subcultured at 0.5% into fresh broth. The strain was grown to OD600 of 0.5 and diluted to a final concentration of 105 cfu ml−1 in a final volume of 100 µl. Synthesized gallocin D peptides in a 1:1 ratio were made up to 100 µM concentration and serially diluted to a concentration of 0.98 µM in sterile water. The peptide solutions were added at 100 µl volumes to the VRE broth. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 16 h, MIC was determined as the lowest concentration causing visible inhibition of growth.
Resistance testing
In order to assess resistance development by VRE EC300, the MIC protocol was repeated. The microtitre wells containing 100 µM gallocin D and control wells were plated directly and cultured in fresh BHI broth. At 24 h, the sub-cultured broths were serially diluted and plated. The whole microtitre plate was reincubated for a further 48 h and observed for cloudiness indicative of growth.
Kill curve
VRE EC300 was grown overnight in BHI and adjusted in fresh BHI to a final concentration of 108 cfu ml−1. Synthesized gallocin D was added at concentration of 10 × MIC (15.6 µM) to triplicate testing broths, and sterile water added to control VRE broths. Samples were taken at multiple time points until 8 h and again at 24 h, serial diluted in MRD and plated on BHI medium. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C before colonies were enumerated.
Colony mass spectrometry
Colony MALDI-TOF MS (Axima TOF2 MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer, Shimadzu Biotech) was used to determine the molecular mass of the peptides present on the surface of colonies as follows: cells were first mixed in 70% (v/v) 2-propanol/0.1% TFA (IPA) and vortex mixed, the sample was separated by centrifugation at 14,000 r.p.m and the supernatant was subsequently used for analysis. A MALDI target plate was precoated with CHCA matrix solution, 0.5 µL of the supernatant from the cell extract was then placed on the target and a final layer of matrix solution was added. Positive-ion linear mode was used to identify the peptide masses on an Axima TOF2 MALDI TOF mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Biotech, Manchester, UK). The masses detected were then compared to those of known bacteriocins.
Peptide synthesis and purification
Peptides were synthesised by microwave-assisted solid phase peptide synthesis (MW-SPPS) performed on a Liberty Blue microwave peptide synthesizer (CEM Corporation. Mathews, NC, USA). Gallocin D1 was synthesized on a H-Cys(Trt)-HMPB)-ChemMatrix resin and Gallocin D2 was synthesised on H-Phe-HMPB-ChemMatrix resin (PCAS BioMAtrix Inc., Quebec, Canada). Crude peptide was purified using RP-HPLC on a Semi Preparative Jupiter Proteo C12 (10 × 250 mm, 4 µ, 90 Å) column (Phenomenex, Cheshire, UK) running acetonitrile 0.1% TFA gradients specific to the peptide of interest. Fractions containing the desired molecular mass were identified using MALDI-TOF-mass spectrometry in positive in linear mode and were pooled and lyophilized on a Genevac HT 4X lyophiliser (Genevac Ltd., Ipswich, UK).
Growth curve
A single colony of VRE was inoculated into BHI medium and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h, and subcultured at 1% into fresh medium. Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and24 hours for OD600 and plating. OD was read in duplicate, 100 µl was serially diluted in MRD to 10–8 and plated on BHI agar. Plates were incubated for 24 h and enumerated. Experiments were completed in triplicate, each with technical duplicates.
Antibiotic resistance
The MIC value of sixteen antibiotics was assessed using the VetMIC Lact-1 and Lact-2 MIC determination plates (National Veterinary Institute, Sweden). The antibiotics tested were ampicillin, penicillin, vancomycin, erythromycin, virginiamycin, tetracycline, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, gentamycin, streptomycin, neomycin, linezolid, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim. Briefly, colonies were resuspended in MRD at a concentration of ~ 1 × 108 cfu ml−1 and transferred into ISO-MRS broth for a final inoculum of 5 × 105 cfu ml−1. VetMIC plates were inoculated with 100 µl, sealed and incubated for 24 h. Evidence of growth was determined using a backlight, MIC value is the lowest concentration completely inhibiting growth. EFSA guidelines do not have specific values for S. gallolyticus, so values were interpreted using S. thermophilus values and the defined values for other Gram positive bacteria36.
Exopolysaccharide screening
Multiple screening methods were used to test for ropy and non-ropy type EPS; ruthenium red agar, the loop touch test and sucrose-supplemented MRS. Ruthenium red was filter sterilised, added to cooling MRS agar at 0.08% and mixed before pouring plates27. For the loop touch test, a sterile loop was touched to a single colony and slowly pulled away. A string between the loop and colony was recorded as a positive result. 10% (w/v) sucrose and 10% (w/v) lactose supplemented MRS plates were autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min and poured, a mucous phenotype was characterised as a positive result.
Proteolysis
10% reconstituted skim milk (RSM) was autoclaved at 121 °C for 5 min and combined with a 3% (w/v) agar solution, autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min, the solutions were allowed to cool to ~ 45 °C and combined 1:1, and poured into petri dishes. Previously grown Sgg LL009 was re-streaked onto the RSM plates and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h, plates were viewed every 24 h. Proteolysis was defined as clear zones surrounding colonies.
Hemolysis
Tryptic Soy Agar was prepared 5% v/v sterile defibrinated horse blood was pre-warmed, added to the sterile agar and mixed well before pouring. Previously grown Sgg LL009 was re-streaked onto the plates and incubated for 72 h, plates were viewed every 24 h for lysis, defined as a clearing or discolouration of the agar.
References
Chikindas, M. L., Weeks, R., Drider, D., Chistyakov, V. A. & Dicks, L. M. Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.49, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.011 (2018).
Arnison, P. G. et al. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: Overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat. Prod. Rep.30, 108–160. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2np20085f (2013).
Rea, M. C. et al. Thuricin CD, a posttranslationally modified bacteriocin with a narrow spectrum of activity against Clostridium difficile. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107, 9352–9357. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913554107 (2010).
Rea, M. C. et al. Effect of broad- and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials on Clostridium difficile and microbial diversity in a model of the distal colon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108(Suppl 1), 4639–4644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001224107 (2011).
Collins, F. W. J. et al. Bacteriocin Gene-Trait matching across the complete Lactobacillus Pan-genome. Sci. Rep.7, 3481–3481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03339-y (2017).
Dobson, A., Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P. & Hill, C. Bacteriocin production: A probiotic trait?. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05576-11 (2012).
Cotter, P. D., Hill, C. & Ross, R. P. Bacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.3, 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1273 (2005).
Nissen-Meyer, J., Oppegård, C., Rogne, P., Haugen, H. S. & Kristiansen, P. E. Structure and mode-of-action of the two-peptide (class-IIb) bacteriocins. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins2, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-009-9021-z (2010).
Andres-Franch, M. et al.Streptococcus gallolyticus infection in colorectal cancer and association with biological and clinical factors. PLoS ONE12, e0174305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174305 (2017).
Aymeric, L. et al. Colorectal cancer specific conditions promote Streptococcus gallolyticus gut colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, E283–E291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715112115 (2018).
Pintado, C. C. Caracterización bioquímica y genética de la infantaricina A: una nueva bacteriocina antineumocócica producida por la cepa de origen lácteo Streptococcus infantarius subesp. infantarius LP90 (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 2015).
Dekker, J. P. & Lau, A. F. An update on the Streptococcus bovis group: Classification, identification, and disease associations. J. Clin. Microbiol.54, 1694–1699. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02977-15 (2016).
Schlegel, L., Grimont, F., Ageron, E., Grimont, P. A. & Bouvet, A. Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex and related species: Description of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus subsp. nov., S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus subsp. nov. and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.53, 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02361-0 (2003).
Willhauck-Fleckenstein, M. et al.Streptococcus gallolyticus infection in colorectal cancer and association with biological and clinical factors. Int. J. Cancer12, e0174305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174305 (2017).
Isenring, J. et al.Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus endocarditis isolate interferes with coagulation and activates the contact system. Virulence9, 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2017.1393600 (2018).
Jans, C., Bugnard, J., Njage, P. M. K., Lacroix, C. & Meile, L. Lactic acid bacteria diversity of African raw and fermented camel milk products reveals a highly competitive, potentially health-threatening predominant microflora. LWT Food Sci. Technol.47, 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.01.034 (2012).
Boleij, A., van Gelder, M. M., Swinkels, D. W. & Tjalsma, H. Clinical Importance of Streptococcus gallolyticus infection among colorectal cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis.53, 870–878. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir609 (2011).
Jans, C. & Boleij, A. The road to infection: Host–microbe interactions defining the pathogenicity of Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex members. Front. Microbiol.9, 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00603 (2018).
Kaindi, D. W. M. et al. Colorectal cancer-associated Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius differ from a major dairy lineage providing evidence for pathogenic, pathobiont and food-grade lineages. Sci. Rep.8, 9181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27383-4 (2018).
Kaindi, D. W. M. et al. Investigating the association between African spontaneously fermented dairy products, faecal carriage of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius and colorectal adenocarcinoma in Kenya. Acta Trop.178, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.10.018 (2018).
Jans, C., Meile, L., Lacroix, C. & Stevens, M. J. Genomics, evolution, and molecular epidemiology of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC). Infect. Genet. Evol.33, 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.09.017 (2015).
Rusniok, C. et al. Genome sequence of Streptococcus gallolyticus: Insights into its adaptation to the bovine rumen and its ability to cause endocarditis. J. Bacteriol.192, 2266–2276. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01659-09 (2010).
Papadimitriou, K. et al. Comparative genomics of the dairy isolate Streptococcus macedonicus ACA-DC 198 against related members of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex. BMC Genomics15, 272. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-272 (2014).
Jans, C. et al. Comparative genome analysis of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius CJ18, an African fermented camel milk isolate with adaptations to dairy environment. BMC Genomics14, 200–200. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-200 (2013).
Kumar, R., Herold, J. L., Schady, D. & Davis, J. Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus promotes colorectal tumor development. PLoS Pathog.13, e1006440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006440 (2017).
Vescovo, M., Scolari, G. L. & Bottazzi, V. Plasmid-encoded ropiness production in Lactobacillus casei SSP. casei. Biotechnol. Lett.11, 709–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044102 (1989).
Dabour, N. & LaPointe, G. Identification and molecular characterization of the chromosomal exopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene cluster from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris SMQ-461. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71, 7414–7425. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.7414-7425.2005 (2005).
Blin, K. et al. antiSMASH 4.0—Improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucl. Acids Res.45, W36–W41. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx319 (2017).
van Heel, A. J. et al. BAGEL4: A user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucl. Acids Res46, W278–W281. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky383 (2018).
O’Shea, E. F. et al. Characterization of enterocin- and salivaricin-producing lactic acid bacteria from the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.291, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01427.x (2009).
Butt, J. Serology of Streptococcus gallolyticus subspecies gallolyticus and its association with colorectal cancer and precursors. PLoS ONE141, 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30765 (2017).
Ziakas, P. D., Thapa, R., Rice, L. B. & Mylonakis, E. Trends and significance of VRE colonization in the ICU: A meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS ONE8, e75658–e75658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075658 (2013).
Marchi, A. P. et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates colonizing and infecting haematology patients: Clonality, and virulence and resistance profile. J. Hosp. Infect.99, 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.010 (2018).
Altermann, E. & Klaenhammer, T. R. GAMOLA: A new local solution for sequence annotation and analyzing draft and finished prokaryotic genomes. OMICS7, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623103322246557 (2003).
Field, D. et al. Bioengineered nisin A derivatives with enhanced activity against both Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens. PLoS ONE7, e46884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046884 (2012).
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J.10, 2740. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2740 (2012).
Acknowledgements
D.H. is supported by a Teagasc Walsh Fellowship. This work was supported by funding from JPI Food Processing for Health Longlife Project and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under grant number SFI/12/RC/2273 in APC Microbiome Ireland. We would also like to acknowledge Dairy Goat Co-operative (Hamilton, New Zealand) for providing goat milk samples for the isolation of the Streptococcus gallolyticus LL009 strain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.S., and R.P.R. were involved in study design, guidance with experiments, and interpretation of the results. D.H. performed the in silico screen, isolated the bacteriocin producer, characterized the spectrum of inhibition, performed whole-genome sequencing, and wrote the manuscript. P.M.O’C. performed MALDI-TOF MS, bacteriocin purification, and peptide synthesis. All authors took part in reviewing the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, D., O’Connor, P.M., Altermann, E. et al. Extensive bacteriocin gene shuffling in the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex reveals gallocin D with activity against vancomycin resistant enterococci. Sci Rep 10, 13431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70328-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70328-z
- Springer Nature Limited