Abstract
Mammalian inner ear hair cell loss leads to permanent hearing and balance dysfunction. In contrast to the cochlea, vestibular hair cells of the murine utricle have some regenerative capacity. Whether human utricular hair cells regenerate in vivo remains unknown. Here we procured live, mature utricles from organ donors and vestibular schwannoma patients, and present a validated single-cell transcriptomic atlas at unprecedented resolution. We describe markers of 13 sensory and non-sensory cell types, with partial overlap and correlation between transcriptomes of human and mouse hair cells and supporting cells. We further uncover transcriptomes unique to hair cell precursors, which are unexpectedly 14-fold more abundant in vestibular schwannoma utricles, demonstrating the existence of ongoing regeneration in humans. Lastly, supporting cell-to-hair cell trajectory analysis revealed 5 distinct patterns of dynamic gene expression and associated pathways, including Wnt and IGF-1 signaling. Our dataset constitutes a foundational resource, accessible via a web-based interface, serving to advance knowledge of the normal and diseased human inner ear.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hearing and vestibular disorders affect over 460 million people worldwide1. In the inner ear, auditory and vestibular hair cells are essential for detecting sound and head motions. Genetic mutations, ototoxins, noise exposure, and aging are known to cause hair cell degeneration, leading to permanent hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction2,3,4. While the loss of mammalian auditory hair cells is irreversible, mouse models have shown that vestibular hair cells turn over during homeostasis and regenerate after damage, albeit to a limited degree5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Prior studies examining the regenerative capacity of the human inner ear have been limited to showing hair cell regeneration using aminoglycoside-damaged organotypic cultures of utricles procured from surgical patients13,14. Whether these phenomena similarly occur in the human utricle in vivo has not yet been demonstrated, in part because obtaining normal and diseased human inner ear tissues is exceedingly challenging.
The human inner ear is housed in the temporal bone, making it accessible only via surgery15,16. Because biopsy of the human inner ear may render it non-functional, the majority of work done on the human inner ear has been performed on postmortem, cadaveric tissues16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. A few studies on viable inner ear tissues from fetuses and organoids derived from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells have characterized morphological and molecular features of the developing human inner ear26,27,28,29,30,31,32, however, the transcriptomic signature of the healthy, adult human inner ear has remained elusive because of the difficulty of obtaining live samples for such experiments.
An alternative approach is to analyze live inner ear tissues extracted during surgery from patients affected by vestibular schwannoma, a benign tumor of the myelin-forming cells of the vestibulocochlear nerve. Patients with vestibular schwannoma develop hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction33,34, presumably due to spiral ganglion cell loss caused by nerve compression35 or hair cell degeneration caused by secreted factors36. In certain cases, vestibular schwannoma patients warrant surgical resection via a translabyrinthine approach where inner ear tissues are sacrificed15,37. Utricles harvested from vestibular schwannoma patients during surgery have served as the primary model system to characterize hair cell morphology17,23,38, their capacity to regenerate after aminoglycoside damage in vitro13,14, and responsiveness to Atoh1 overexpression to induce ectopic hair cells13. However, it remains undetermined in these diseased samples whether hair cell regeneration occurs spontaneously in human utricles in vivo.
In this study, we successfully characterized and validated utricular single-cell transcriptomes in adult organ donors and vestibular schwannoma patients. Our computational analysis showed that adult human utricles are composed of 13 cell types with unique molecular signatures, with transcriptomes of human hair cells and supporting cells modestly correlating with those in mice. Single-cell transcriptomic trajectory analysis revealed dynamic changes as supporting cells transition into hair cells in both vestibular schwannoma and organ donor utricles. Relative to organ donor utricles, vestibular schwannoma utricles show significantly more hair cell loss and a ~14-fold increase of hair cell precursors (POU4F3+ and GFI1+, MYO7A-negative). Together, we have demonstrated spontaneous, unmanipulated hair cell regeneration in the adult human utricle and the underlying transcriptional changes during homeostasis and in response to damage. These rare datasets represent foundational tools to guide the investigation of human hair cell regeneration and define molecular similarities and differences between human and mouse vestibular organs.
Results
Transcriptional heterogeneity of the mature human utricle
To characterize the human utricle, we harvested tissues from two cohorts: organ donors and vestibular schwannoma patients (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Data 1). We previously devised a surgical approach to procure unilateral or bilateral utricles from organ donors (OD)39,40, who lacked any history of auditory or vestibular dysfunction (Supplementary Data 1). In parallel, utricles were procured from patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas and ipsilateral auditory and/or vestibular deficits, undergoing a translabyrinthine approach for tumor resection (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a).
Because vestibular schwannoma patients suffer from auditory and/or vestibular deficits and because hair cell degeneration is detected in their cochlear and utricular organs postmortem17,23, we hypothesized that vestibular schwannoma utricles are damaged whereas those from organ donors may serve as normal controls (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1a, Supplementary Data 1). Four vestibular schwannoma and two organ donor utricles were subject to single-cell isolation and sequencing. Sensory epithelia were enzymatically and mechanically purified from surrounding stromal and neural tissues (Supplementary Fig. 1b), yielding a total of 27,631 single cells that were sequenced (15,309 organ donor cells and 12,322 vestibular schwannoma cells, Fig. 1b’, Supplementary Fig. 2a). Samples from eight captures (four vestibular schwannoma samples with one capture each, and two organ donor samples in four captures) were sequenced (10x Genomics platform), and cells underwent quality control metrics and downstream analyses (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Our integrated dataset (both organ donor and vestibular schwannoma) contained a median of 953 genes per cell (Supplementary Fig. 1d) and unsupervised clustering identified 13 cell states (Fig. 1b). We annotated the cell clusters based on known marker genes in the mammalian inner ear (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 1e), including 13 different cell types with 6645 cluster-defining genes (Wilcoxon test, FDR < 0.01, Fig. 1c): supporting cells (FBXO2, GFAP, KRT19, clusters 1, 5, 6), hair cells (CIB3, GPX2, LRRC10B, ESPN, cluster 7), roof cells (CITED1, cluster 9), dark cells (HBD, KCNQ1, IGF-1, cluster 2), stromal cells (COCH, cluster 0), melanocytes (PMEL, DCT, cluster 11), vascular cells (FLT1, cluster 10), macrophages (CCL3, cluster 3), pericytes (RGS5, VWF, cluster 8), Schwann cells (MBP, cluster 12), and immune cells (SERPINE2, cluster 4).
To further restrict our analyses to cells in the sensory epithelium, we focused on clusters defined as hair cells, putative hair cell precursors, and supporting cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a, a’). As expected, EPCAM expression was robust in these sensory epithelial cell clusters (Fig. 1d). Expression of SOX2, a known marker of supporting cells and type II hair cells in human, was enriched in a subset of hair cells and supporting cells, while expression of MYO7A, a known human generic hair cell marker38, is the highest in cluster 7 (Fig. 1d). Subsetting and visualization with similarity weighted non-negative embedding (SWNE) showed eight cell states representing utricle sensory epithelial cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a’). SWNE was used for all 2-dimensional visualization of reduced dimensions to optimally capture global and local relationships among cells and clusters41. The final analysis consisted of 5837 organ donor and 4358 vestibular schwannoma utricular cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a’, c). Differential gene expression analysis identified 5321 cluster-defining genes (Supplementary Fig. 2a’), yielding five subsets of supporting cells (n = 9200 cells, clusters 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4), one putative hair cell precursor group (n = 154 cells, cluster 7), and two hair cell subtypes (n = 498 type I hair cells, cluster 5 and n = 343 type II hair cells, cluster 6) (Supplementary Fig. 2d, e). A bootstrapping algorithm was utilized to generate all cell clustering parameters and determine cluster robustness (Supplementary Fig. 2b-b”)42. A dot plot illustrating differential gene expression among these 8 clusters is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2f. Together, this dataset represents the molecular identities of distinct cell types of the adult human utricle.
Molecular identity of human hair cells and supporting cells
The sensory epithelium is comprised of sensory hair cells and non-sensory supporting cells (Fig. 2a). To identify human hair cell- and supporting cell-defining genes, we performed a direct comparison without the putative hair cell precursors (Fig. 2b). We identified 1251 enriched genes in hair cells and 1259 enriched genes in supporting cells with at least 2-fold expression difference (LFC > 2, FDR < 0.01, Fig. 2c). Among the 24 most differentially expressed genes in hair cells (CABP2, CIB3, GPX2, ESPN, CD164L2, SYT14, SNCG, CPE, STRC, SMPX, ABCA5, POU4F3) and supporting cells (CLU, GFAP, TMSB4X, CLDN4, TMSB10, CD9, VIM, ELF3, IFITM3, S100A10, KRT8, ANXA2, Fig. 2d, e), we validated 13 genes by performing in situ hybridization and immunolabeling on utricles procured from other organ donors and vestibular schwannoma patients. Both anti-MYO7A and SYT14 labeled all hair cells in organ donor and vestibular schwannoma samples (Fig. 2f, g, Supplementary Fig. 2g), where fewer hair cells and a flatter epithelium were observed. As in mice, human supporting cell nuclei reside in the basal layer of the sensory epithelium and project cytoplasmic processes to the luminal surface (Fig. 2f)43. As computationally predicted, both anti-GFAP and ANXA2 selectively marked supporting cells from organ donor and vestibular schwannoma tissues (Fig. 2f, g). Expression plots confirmed ANXA2 and SYT14 as pan-markers of supporting cells and hair cells, respectively (Fig. 2h). Similarly, in situ hybridization validated PPP1R27 and LRRC10B to be expressed in all hair cells and CD9 in supporting cells (Supplementary Fig. 2g). Finally, we separately analyzed single cells from organ donor and vestibular schwannoma patients and similarly found individual cell clusters, including hair cells and supporting cells among subsetted sensory epithelial cells (Supplementary Fig. 3a–h). These results highlight common gene expression profiles of hair cells and supporting cells between human organ donor and vestibular schwannoma utricles through integrated and separate analyses.
Spatial and transcriptomic properties of hair cell subtypes
Utricular hair cells of both mouse and human fall into two main subtypes (~50% each of type I and II)44 (Fig. 3a). In mice, this distinction is based on morphology, innervation, composition of ion channels, and gene expression44,45,46,47. However, in humans, this configuration has only been shown using morphological assessments of postmortem tissues17,18. In our integrated dataset of the sensory epithelium, differential gene expression revealed two putative hair cell subpopulations (Supplementary Fig. 2d), which we presumed to represent type I and type II hair cells (Fig. 3b, c). Forty-eight genes were highly expressed in human type I hair cells and 79 genes in type II hair cells (Fig. 3c, LFC > 2 and FDR < 0.01). In addition, we separately analyzed single cells from organ donor and vestibular schwannoma patients and found similar differentially expressed genes among type I and type II hair cells (Supplementary Fig. 3e, j).
We next validated 6 of these differentially expressed genes in the utricular sensory epithelia of organ donors and vestibular schwannoma patients (Fig. 3f–i, Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). In the mouse and human utricular sensory epithelium, hair cell subtypes have distinct shapes: type I hair cells are amphora-shaped and harbor calyx innervation, while type II hair cells are goblet-shaped and display basolateral cytoplasmic processes. Both hair cell subtypes have their nuclei closer to the epithelial surface, contrasting with those of supporting cells that are closer to the basal surface12,17,22,43 (Fig. 3a).
In organ donor tissues, the morphology of MYO7A+ hair cells was maintained and expression of ADAM11 was exclusive to amphora-shaped type I hair cells with Tuj1+ calyceal innervation (Fig. 3f, f’). Type II hair cells displayed basolateral processes and were specifically marked by both anti-SOX2 and KCNH6 (Fig. 3h, h’). In vestibular schwannoma patients, despite the loss of lamination and cell loss, both ADAM11 and KCNH6 expression are similarly restricted to type I (Tuj1+ calyceal innervated) and II hair cells (SOX2+), respectively (Fig. 3g, g’, i, i’). These results validate the transcriptomic data showing enrichment of ADAM11 and KCNH6 in type I and II hair cells, respectively, in both cohorts (Fig. 3j). Furthermore, we validated the expression of enriched type I hair cell (CRABP1 and VSIG10L2) and type II hair cell genes (CALB1) (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). These results confirmed the presence of two transcriptionally distinct human utricular hair cell subtypes in both organ donor and vestibular schwannoma utricles.
Comparison of mouse and human utricular cell transcriptomes
To assess the similarities among the transcriptomes of human and mouse utricular hair cells and supporting cells, we compared our integrated dataset to that recently generated from the adult mouse utricle48. We performed a rank Spearman correlation analysis using the intersection of differentially expressed genes between human and mouse cell types49. Among genes expressed in human hair cells subtypes, only a minority is shared with those in mouse hair cell subtypes (25.9 and 32.3% of type I and II hair cells, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 4c–e). Among the 13 most enriched type I hair cell genes in human utricle (VSIG10L2, BMP2, CLDN5, ALDH1A3, TAC1, FBXW7, CRABP1, OCM, ATP2B2, PGA5, LINC02568, PRKCD, ADAM11, Fig. 3d), nine have been reported in the mouse inner ear but only three showed expression restricted to type I hair cells45,46,47,48.
Reciprocally, we examined genes in mouse utricular hair cell subtypes and compared them to our human dataset, and found that some type I hair cell genes (45.7%) and only 29.8% of type II hair cell genes are shared (Supplementary Fig. 4c–e). Except for SOX2, CXCL14, KCNH6 and BRIP1, none of the enriched human type II hair cell genes (CALB1, CSRP2, HTRA1, MORC1, SCNN1A, GNAS, NDUFA4L2, B3GNT10, CHRNA1, Fig. 3e) were previously reported to be enriched in mouse type II hair cells47,48. Similarly, the established mouse type II hair cell markers ANXA4 and MAPT45,46 were not enriched in the human type II hair cell cluster (Fig. 3c). Unexpectedly, the mouse type I hair cell marker, CALB150 (Supplementary Fig. 4f–h), was enriched in human type II hair cells (Supplementary Fig. 4b). We next quantified the degree of correlation among transcriptomes of human and mouse utricles and found significant, albeit modest, correlation among type I hair cells (0.729), type II hair cells (0.628), and supporting cells (0.829) (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Together, these data suggest that the transcriptome profiles of utricular hair cells and supporting cells only partially overlap between mice and human.
Diversity of supporting cell subtypes
Differential gene expression results show several pan-supporting cell markers (Fig. 2c, e), of which we have validated GFAP and ANXA2 (Fig. 2f). The mouse and human utricles are organized spatially into the central striolar and peripheral extrastriolar zones (Fig. 4a)24 with distinct gene expressions described in mice47,51. The striolar region may be more critical for utricular function as mutant mice missing this domain exhibit abnormal vestibular responses51. Differential gene expression shows 26 genes enriched in striolar supporting cells and 31 genes in extrastriolar supporting cells (Fig. 4b, c). TECTB, which marks striolar supporting cells in mouse and chicken utricles46, was also enriched in human striolar supporting cells (Fig. 4c). We validated SFRP2 and FRZB in sections of utricular sensory epithelia and found that striolar supporting cells robustly expressed SFRP2 whereas extrastriolar supporting cells expressed FRZB (Fig. 4f–f””), as predicted by computational analyses (Fig. 4c–e, g). Interestingly, although GFAP was not found differentially expressed computationally, anti-GFAP staining was relatively more robust among extrastriolar supporting cells (Fig. 4f”–f””, g). These results confirmed the presence of two transcriptionally and spatially distinct human utricular supporting cell subtypes.
Hair cell degeneration in vestibular schwannoma utricle
Postmortem studies on utricles from vestibular schwannoma patients have reported hair cell degeneration17,23. To independently verify these results and determine whether supporting cells mount a regenerative response, we first immunolabeled utricles for hair cells (MYO7A+) and supporting cells (MYO7A− and SOX2+) from organ donor (n = 5, 4 males and 1 female, aged 42.0 ± 25.5) and vestibular schwannoma subjects (n = 13, 9 males and 4 females, aged 50.5 ± 16.7). As a secondary control, we included utricles from cadavers (n = 4, 2 males and 2 females, aged 75.8 ± 5.9, Supplementary Data 1) without any history of auditory and vestibular deficits. Compared to organ donors or cadavers, vestibular schwannoma utricles contained significantly fewer hair cells (~78% fewer, p < 0.001, Fig. 5a–d, Supplementary Fig. 5a–b”, d–g) and supporting cells (~21% fewer, p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 5a’–c). Hair cell counts from individual vestibular schwannoma patients were comparable despite variability of age, gender, laterality, tumor size, or history of radiation in the cohort (Supplementary Fig. 5f, Supplementary Data 1). We found no significant correlation among age, tumor size, auditory function with counts of hair cells or supporting cells among vestibular schwannoma patients (Supplementary Data 1). Collectively, these results further indicate that vestibular schwannoma utricles represent diseased organs whereas organ donor and cadaveric organs serve as normal controls.
To characterize the degree of degeneration, we immunolabeled sections of organ donor and vestibular schwannoma utricles for the hair cell marker MYO7A and supporting cell marker GFAP. Compared to organ donor utricles, vestibular schwannoma utricles contained fewer hair cells and the epithelium appeared thinner, resulting in less lamination of hair cell and supporting cell nuclei (Fig. 5e, f). Hair cells in the vestibular schwannoma sensory epithelium appeared short and round, and many lacked hair bundles (Fig. 5e, f). Using TUJ1+ calyces or SOX2 protein expression as markers of type I and II hair cells, respectively, we found that vestibular schwannoma organs had significantly fewer of both type I and II hair cell subtypes than organ donor tissues. However, there was disproportionally more type I hair cells in the vestibular schwannoma than organ donor utricles (3.51 versus 0.99, respectively, Fig. 5g, h, Supplementary Fig. 5h, i), suggesting a previously unrecognized, preferential loss of type II hair cells.
Similar to previous observations38,52, we observed cytocauds, which are actin-rich cables in degenerating hair cells in vestibular schwannoma but not organ donor utricles, suggesting ongoing hair cell degeneration in the former (Fig. 5i, j, Supplementary Fig. 5j, j’). While phalloidin-labeled bundles were apparent in most MYO7A+ hair cells in the organ donor utricle, few bundle-bearing hair cells were observed in the vestibular schwannoma utricles (10.7% of 1473 hair cells from 3 vestibular schwannoma utricles, Fig. 5k–m). Remnant hair bundles appeared damaged (splayed) or short (13.4% and 56.1% of 157 hair cells from 3 vestibular schwannoma utricles, Fig. 5m). This contrasts with the organ donor utricles where 89.3% of hair cells displayed bundles, with most appearing long (61.1%, n = 236 hair cells from 1 utricle, Fig. 5k–m, Supplementary Fig. 5k, l). Under scanning electron microscopy, hair bundles with a staircase pattern and packed stereocilia were rarely found (Fig. 5n) in vestibular schwannoma utricles, whereas others lacked stereocilia and kinocilium and instead displayed remnants of short bundles at the apical surfaces (Fig. 5o, p, Supplementary Fig. 5m, o). In other cases, stereocilia within a hair bundle had fused (Fig. 5q). Lastly, we found individual hair cells with two distinct hair bundles located at the opposite poles of the apical surface (Fig. 5q–s), one with taller and thicker stereocilia than the other, possibly corresponding to different maturation stages, perhaps an indication of ongoing repair or regeneration that has been previously suggested and analyzed38,52. Together, these results indicate ongoing hair cell degeneration and hair bundle damage in the vestibular schwannoma utricles.
Using our integrated single-cell RNAseq dataset focusing on the sensory epithelium, we performed comparative analysis based on cell types between organ donor and vestibular schwannoma utricles. We focused the comparative analysis to five categories: type I and type II hair cells, hair cell precursors, and extrastriolar and striolar supporting cells (manually grouped among subtypes). For type I hair cells, we identified 1442 genes in both organ donor and vestibular schwannoma (e.g., MTRNR2L8, HSPA1A, and HSPA1B for organ donor and LGMN, RPS4Y1, and CAMK2N1 for vestibular schwannoma utricles (Supplementary Fig. 6a)). For type II hair cells, there were a total of 1125 genes in both organ donor and vestibular schwannoma (e.g., HSPA1A, HSPA1B, and DNAJB1 for organ donor and PTGDS, SNHG14, and EEF1G for vestibular schwannoma utricles (Supplementary Fig. 6b)). Comparison of hair cell precursor cells shows 1729 organ donor and vestibular schwannoma genes, whereas extrastriolar and striolar supporting cells as a group showed 2183 and 2204 genes, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 6c–e). Overall, this comparison identified genes enriched according to normal (organ donor) or diseased (vestibular schwannoma) conditions (Supplementary Fig. 6). Since there remains remarkable overlap among the transcriptomes of the different sensory epithelial cell types, the significance of these enriched genes is yet to be determined.
Transcriptomic and trajectory analysis of the human utricle
Both the mouse and human utricle demonstrate a limited degree of hair cell regeneration by supporting cells7,8,10,13,14, although spontaneous regeneration in vestibular schwannoma utricle in vivo has not been directly observed. To define the molecular underpinning of human hair cell regeneration, we used the CellRank algorithm to detect cell-cell transitions during differentiation53. We utilized the pseudotime kernel feature of CellRank that computes directed transition cell state probabilities. Pseudotime values were obtained using Palantir, an algorithm that predicts cell trajectories as a probabilistic process54. Using our subsetted sensory epithelial cells, we set the starting point as supporting cells within cluster 1 for pseudotime analysis and used CellRank to determine directed cell trajectories (Fig. 6a). Cell-cell transition matrix created by CellRank is then projected onto the reduced dimensions SWNE plot to show trajectories of individual cells as streams. Our data shows that the hair cell precursor group is projected to differentiate from a supporting cell state towards the type I and type II hair cell states (Fig. 6a, b), further implicating that supporting cell-hair cell transition occurs in vivo (Fig. 6c). To delineate genes directing supporting cell to hair cell transition and validate the findings from CellRank, we created unbiased trajectories using Slingshot (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b)55, focusing on two lineages that originate from supporting cells to type I and type II hair cells via the intermediate hair cell precursors (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Fig. 7b).
Using a generalized additive model fit onto the two lineages of type I and type II hair cells, we identified 9731 and 4315 significant, dynamically expressed genes along the two respective trajectories (Fig. 6d, e). An association test detected five patterns of dynamic gene expression in type I and II hair cell lineages: rapidly upregulated, rapidly downregulated, gradually upregulated, gradually downregulated, and transiently upregulated (Fig. 6d, e). Both the type I and II lineages display rapidly upregulated and downregulated genes (type I: GPX2, CIB3, GABP2 and CD9, GSN, SPARCL1; type II: CETN2, OTOF, ABCA5, and AGR2, GFAP, TMSB4X, Fig. 6f, f’), implicating shared features of hair cell specification and differentiation. To identify divergent genes among the type I and type II lineages, we computed the Different End Test and identified genes upregulated solely in type I hair cells (ADAM11, VSIG10L2, and ESPN) and type II hair cells (SOX2, CXCL14, and CSRP2, Fig. 6f”). These results suggest that regeneration of type I and II hair cells share most but not all molecular features.
To characterize mechanisms driving supporting cell-to-hair cell transition, we analyzed dynamically expressed genes in type I and II lineages and found 199 and 185 associated canonical pathways, respectively (Fisher’s Exact Test, p < 0.05), most of which were shared by both lineages. Shared pathways included acute phase response, IGF-1, Interferon, ERK/MAPK signaling, and Wnt/ß-catenin signaling (Fig. 6g). In mice, Wnt signaling have been shown to regulate regeneration of the utricle11, but the effects on the other signaling pathways on human hair cell regeneration are not known. Moreover, 157 and 139 biological function GO terms were identified for dynamically expressed genes in the type I and II lineages (FDR < 0.05), including ones pertinent to inner ear function (Fig. 6h). These results serve as a mechanistic framework for characterizing naturally occurring human hair cell regeneration.
Hair cell precursors in vestibular schwannoma utricles
To characterize hair cell precursors, we examined dynamically expressed genes as supporting cells transition into hair cells along pseudotime lineages. As markers of hair cells (Fig. 2), SYT14 and MYO7A were upregulated while the supporting cell marker ANXA2 was downregulated (Supplementary Fig. 8a). In vestibular schwannoma utricles, where almost all hair cells expressed SYT14 and MYO7A and supporting cells expressed ANXA2, we found occasional elongated cells co-expressing ANXA2, SYT14, and MYO7A, the latter at a relatively lower intensity than in hair cells proper (Supplementary Fig. 8b–b””), suggesting a transitory cell state between a supporting cell and hair cell in vivo.
We further sought and characterized these elongated, MYO7A-low hair cell precursors by immunostaining for MYO7A and performing in situ hybridization for the hair cell marker GPX2 (Fig. 7a, b). GPX2 expression gradually increases along pseudotime similar to MYO7A and SYT14 (Fig. 6f). In sections, GPX2+, MYO7A-low cells span the basement membrane and the apical lumen of the sensory epithelium (Fig. 7a), unlike MYO7A-high hair cells which are relatively shorter and whose basolateral surface is separate from the basement membrane.
To confirm the presence of hair cell precursors in vivo and to further identify drivers of hair cell regeneration, we examined transcription factors among the identified dynamically expressed genes56. A total of 642 significant dynamically expressed transcription factors were identified in both type I and II lineages (Fig. 7b, c). These include ATOH1, POU4F3, and GFI1 which are required for hair cell development, survival, and maturation in mice57,58,59 (Fig. 7b, c). Next, we found that GPX2+, MYO7A-low hair cell precursors expressed ATOH1, which is typically low or undetectable in hair cells and supporting cells (Fig. 7d, Supplementary Fig. 8c). To differentiate the GPX2+, MYO7A-low, ATOH1+ hair cell precursors from GPX2+, MYO7A-high, ATOH1 negative hair cells, we measured and found the nuclei distance from the basement membrane of the sensory epithelium to be significantly smaller in the former (Fig. 7e). The nuclei of hair cell precursors are located at a level not significantly different from those of supporting cells, further implicating them as supporting cells transitioning to become hair cells.
Given that POU4F3 and GFI1 were rapidly upregulated along the pseudotime trajectories (Fig. 7f), we postulated that they would label both hair cell precursors and differentiated hair cells. As expected, in organ donor and vestibular schwannoma utricles, all MYO7A+ hair cells were marked with anti-POU4F3 and anti-GFI1 antibodies. Strikingly, a subset of SOX2+, MYO7A− supporting cells expressed POU4F3 or GFI1 protein and mRNA in both the organ donor and vestibular schwannoma utricles (Fig. 7g, h, Supplementary Fig. 8d–h, i–l), with the latter displaying significantly more POU4F3- (13.98 vs. 1.01%, p < 0.01, Fig. 7i) or GFI1-positive hair cell precursors (12.79 vs. 0.19%, p < 0.05, Fig. 7j). Collectively, these results unveil transcriptomes of human hair cell precursors, which were more prevalent in vestibular schwannoma than organ donor utricles in vivo.
Discussion
Inner ear sensory hair cells are specialized mechanoreceptors required for hearing and balance functions. Unlike the mammalian cochlea, the vestibular organs have a limited capacity to regenerate lost hair cells60. Rodents have served as the primary model system examining mammalian vestibular hair cell regeneration, relying on toxins or transgenic approaches to induce damage8,10. Prior studies using tissues procured from vestibular schwannoma patients showed that supporting cells can spontaneously regenerate hair cells after gentamicin treatment in vitro; likewise, ectopic hair cells can form in response to ATOH1 overexpression13,14,38. Here, we procured utricles from organ donor and vestibular schwannoma subjects. The former cohort lacked any history of auditory or vestibular dysfunction, while the latter exhibited hearing loss and/or vestibular dysfunction. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis and in vivo validation experiments revealed conserved transcriptomes of hair cells and supporting cells, despite significant and ongoing degeneration in the vestibular schwannoma organs. Moreover, we found that only a minority of mouse and human hair cell and supporting cell genes overlap, despite significant correlation among those shared genes. By analyzing dynamically expressed genes in the supporting cell-hair cell trajectories, we uncovered markers of hair cell precursors and unexpectedly discovered that significantly more hair cell precursors reside in the vestibular schwannoma than organ donor utricles. Our study reveals candidate mechanisms driving spontaneous human hair cell regeneration and serves as a data-rich resource for research on human auditory and vestibular disorders.
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis has been instrumental in defining cellular heterogeneity in the mouse inner ear as well as discovering candidate mechanisms of development, hair cell regeneration, and pathogenesis of auditory dysfunction61. While these studies can serve as foundational models for human disease, investigations on the human inner ear have almost exclusively relied on postmortem, cadaveric tissues17,18,20,21,22,23,24,25 or tissues originating from fetuses or diseased inner ears. In the current study, transcriptomes of distinct cell types from the healthy and diseased mature, human inner ear serve as benchmarks guiding future works.
Because the mouse and human inner ear organs share histologic features and constituents essential for hearing and balance functions62,63,64, mouse models are commonly used to study human auditory and vestibular diseases. Several pathways posited to regulate human vestibular hair cell regeneration (Wnt/ß-catenin, Neurotrophin) were previously linked to regeneration in the mouse vestibular system11,65, while others have unknown functions (Interferon, IGF-1) (Fig. 6g). When comparing enriched genes between human and mouse utricles45,46,47, we found that most genes of hair cells and supporting cells do not overlap. Such an interspecies difference has previously been suggested in the refined cell subtypes of the mouse and human immune systems66,67. Along a similar vein, divergence of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels is known between mouse and human brains68. Such a divergence has implications for translating mouse studies to humans and emphasizes the importance of investigating human auditory and vestibular organs. As we only validated a subset of hair cell and supporting cell genes, the interpretation of other genes of interest may warrant further characterization.
Our study serves as an invaluable resource to study human inner ear diseases. As a case in point, we interrogated the expression patterns of 53 human hearing loss- and 15 vestibulopathy-related genes in our integrated dataset, 8 of which were linked to both conditions. By determining the mean relative expression of these genes, we found that 27 hearing loss genes are uniquely expressed in hair cells and that seven non-sensory cell types highly expressed 38 hearing loss genes (Supplementary Fig. 9a). Among the 20 vestibulopathy-related genes, five are uniquely expressed in hair cells and 11 in seven non-sensory cell types (Supplementary Fig. 9b). In contrast to the rich literature on the pathogenesis of hearing loss genes in hair cells, studies on non-sensory cell types and vestibulopathy-related genes are scarce, and our study establishes a foundation for these future studies.
Inner ear tissues collected from vestibular schwannoma patients have served as the primary model system to study human hair cell regeneration13,14,38. Although hair cells are known to have degenerated in inner ear tissues from vestibular schwannoma patients17,23, these studies on regeneration have employed ototoxins to ablate remaining hair cells in vitro. By comparing vestibular schwannoma to organ donor utricles, we discovered that the former represents damaged tissues with active regeneration in situ and therefore is a distinct model system of human hair cell degeneration and regeneration.
In mice, lineage-tracing experiments show that regenerating hair cells are primarily type II and that they incompletely differentiate8,10,12. Our results suggest that regenerating human hair cells display a spectrum of differentiation. While these results may indicate that human vestibular hair cell regeneration, as in mice, requires exogenous factors to enhance the degree of regeneration and differentiation, it is also possible that ongoing damage from vestibular schwannoma modulates these processes.
In summary, using vestibular tissues procured from adult human organ donors and vestibular schwannoma patients, we have revealed the transcriptomes of inner ear sensory and non-sensory cells. We show that vestibular schwannoma utricles harbor both degenerating sensory cells and hair cell precursors. The adult human inner ear has to date remained an enigma at the molecular level, and it is of utmost public health importance to decipher mechanisms of damage and repair. Our results present a foundational resource for future studies on human auditory and vestibular function and diseases.
Methods
Ethics and experimental animals
Whole organ utricles from patients with vestibular schwannoma, organ donors, and cadavers were collected under protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of Stanford University (IRB 27500, 48579, 38993, 50076), Donor Network West’s internal ethics committee (IRB #STAN-17−200) and its medical advisory board, University of California, Los Angeles (IRB 10-001449) and Yale University (IRB 2000027777). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Participants did not receive compensation for their participation.
Wild-type C57BL/6 J (Jackson Laboratory, #000664) female mice were used. Experiments involving animals were conducted under the animal protocol (#18606) approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Human vestibular organ procurement
Whole organ utricles were collected intraoperatively from patients with vestibular schwannoma and organ donors. For vestibular schwannoma patients, utricles were procured from patients undergoing translabyrinthine resection of tumors. Briefly, a neurotologist (R.K.J., P.S.M., N.B., J.C.A., L.S.M., K.V.) opened the vestibule by drilling with a diamond burr on low speed, microdissected out the utricle and removed the attached ampullae. The utricle was then placed in phosphate buffered solution (PBS, pH 7.4; Electron Microscopy Services) on ice until further analysis (<10 min).
Organ donors were referred by Donor Network West (San Ramon, CA). Bilateral utricles were harvested from organ donors as previously described39,40. Briefly, a post-auricular incision was made followed by a transcanal approach to expose the middle ear. The tympanic membrane, malleus, and incus were removed while keeping the stapes in situ. To expose the vestibular organs, the bony covering of the vestibule was thinned using a diamond burr on low speed, the stapes footplate removed, and the oval window widened. The utricle was harvested from the elliptical recess and placed in PBS on ice for single-cell RNA sequencing analysis or in 4% paraformaldehyde for histologic analysis.
For cadaveric utricles, temporal bones were collected 10–14 h postmortem, following which specimens were microdissected from temporal bones acquired at autopsy as previously described19.
Human subject inclusion criteria
Three cohorts were included in the study. In the first cohort, twenty-four patients (24 ears) with vestibular schwannoma were enrolled from Stanford University and Yale University (Palo Alto, CA and New Haven, CT). Adult subjects with a vestibular schwannoma diagnosed by MRI and hearing loss documented by audiograms were included. Those undergoing a translabyrinthine approach for tumor resection between March 2015 and April 2022 were enrolled into the study. The second cohort included 9 ears from 6 (pediatric and adult) organ donors enrolled through Donor Network West (San Ramon, CA) between January 2018 and July 2020. Both cardiac and brain death donors with no known history of otologic disorders were included. The last cohort consisted of 4 ears from 4 postmortem adult cadavers from University of California, Los Angeles (Los Angeles, California) between February 2015 and January 2017.
Clinical information
The following was collected for all cohorts: age, gender, and laterality (Supplementary Data 1). For the first cohort, we also collected information pertaining to vestibular symptoms (dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance) or physical signs (positive Romberg sign or unsteady gait), tumor size (longest diameter and its orthogonal measurement in the axial view of the cisternal component), pure tone averages (PTAs) (calculated using 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), word recognition scores, and history of radiation (Supplementary Data 1). To examine the associations between continuous variables and histological results, we used bivariable Spearman’s correlation. To compare the histological results between gender and other dichotomous clinical factors (Y/N), we used the Wilcoxon rank sum test. All analyses were performed using the SAS system, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) (Supplementary Data 1).
Cryosections
Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (PBS pH 7.4; Electron Microscopy Services) for 16−24 h at 4 °C. After washing in PBS, tissues were cryoprotected in a sucrose gradient (15%, 20%, and 30% for 1 h each), embedded in 100% OCT, and frozen on dry ice. Sections were cut at 10–15 μm and frozen at −80 °C.
Immunohistochemistry12,69
Utricles from vestibular schwannoma patients and organ donors were fixed in 4% PFA (in PBS, pH 7.4; Electron Microscopy Services) for 40 min at RT or 20 h at 4 °C. Tissues were blocked with 5% goat or donkey serum, 0.1% tritonX-100, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.02% sodium azide (NaN3) in PBS at pH 7.4 for 1−2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibodies diluted in the same blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. The next day, after washing with PBS, tissues were incubated with secondary antibodies diluted in 0.1% tritonX-100, 0.1% BSA, and 0.02% NaN3 solution in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. After PBS washing, specimens were mounted in antifade Fluorescence Mounting Medium (DAKO) or ProlongGold (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and coverslipped. We used antibodies against the following markers: MYOSIN7A (1:1000-5000; Proteus Bioscience), SOX2 (1:200-500, R&D and 1:400 Santa Cruz Biotechnology), POU4F3 (1:400, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GFI1 (gift from H. Bellen), GFAP (1:250-1000, Sigma), TUJ1 (1:1000, Neuromics), Osteopontin (1:200; R&D) and CALBINDIN1 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technologies). Secondary antibodies were conjugated with Alexa 488 (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa 546 (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa 647 (1:250, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa 594 (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or Alexa 405 (1:250, Abcam). Fluorescent-conjugated phalloidin (1:1000; Sigma) and DAPI (1:10000; Invitrogen) were used.
Cadaveric temporal bones were fixed in 10% formalin for 6–24 months before microdissection. Utricles were then microdissected, placed individually in a rotary shaker, and incubated for 3 h in a blocking solution containing 2% BSA fraction V (Sigma), 0.1% TritonX-100 (Sigma) diluted in PBS and incubated at 6 °C. Subsequently, the blocking solution was removed, and tissues were incubated with anti-MYOSIN7A in a rotatory shaker for 72 h at 4 °C. Next, tissues were washed with PBS (20 min × 5) and incubated with the secondary biotinylated antibodies (1:1000 in PBS, Vector Labs) for 2 h at RT. Afterwards, tissues were washed again in PBS (20 min × 5) and incubated with the ABC complex (Vector Labs). The antigen-antibody reaction was visualized using 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Vector Labs). Lastly, utricles were washed with PBS (20 min × 5) and flat-mounted on glass slides and coverslipped with hard mount VECTASHIELD solution. Cryosections of mouse utricles subjected to the same protocol were used as positive controls. As negative controls, the primary antibody was omitted or preabsorbed with the antigen and the immunoreaction was performed as described above. No immunoreaction was detected in both types of negative controls.
Image acquisition and analysis
Images of whole mounts and sections were acquired using confocal microscopy (LSM700 or LSM880, Carl Zeiss Microscopy), Axioplan 2 microscope coupled to a MRC5 (bright field) camera, and using Axiovision AC software (Release 4.8, Carl Zeiss). Z-stack images were taken at 0.5–1 µm intervals. Data was analyzed with Image J64 (Fiji, NIH) and Adobe Photoshop (Creative Cloud, Adobe Systems).
In situ hybridization
Detection of gene expression was performed using RNAscopeTM technology (Newark, CA). Probes are listed in the Source Data file.
Detection of POU4F3 and GFI1 in Supplementary Fig. 8 was performed using the V2.5 HD Red RNAscopeTM detection system (Cat# 322350, ACDBio). Experiments were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the following modifications: slides were pre-baked at 60 °C for 30 min before tissue processing, boiling was performed for 90 s, and the Protease Plus was diluted 1:3. In some cases, protease digestion was carried out at different temperatures to appropriately balance penetration of probes with retention of immunohistochemical antigens.
Detection of SYT14, ANXA2, PPP1R27, LRRC10B, and KCNH6 in Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 4b and 8b was performed using the RNAscopeTM Fluorescent Multiplex kit (Cat# 320850). Experiments were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Tissue prep: 320535-TN 11022018, Detection: ACD 320293-UM 03142017), with the following modifications for some tissues to optimize signal quality: boiling time 2.5–5 min, protease time 30 min–1 h, protease temperature 22–40 °C.
Detection of KCNH6, ADAM11, FRZB, SFRP2, GPX2, ATOH1, CD9, CRABP1, and VSIG10L2 in Figs. 3, 4, 7, Supplementary Fig. 2, and 4a were performed using the RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex kit V2 (Cat# 323100) with the Co-Detection Ancillary kit (Cat# 323180). Experiments were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Tissue prep: MK 51-150 RevB 2/11/21 Appendix D, Detection: ACD 323100-USM 2/27/2019), with the following modification: boiling time 2.5–5 min. 20× SCC buffer (AM 9770, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to store the slides overnight after probe application.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Utricle samples were isolated in washing buffer (0.05 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.2, 10 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.9% NaCl), the otolithic membrane was removed with a brush, and fixed in 4% PFA in 0.05 mM HEPES Buffer pH 7.2, 10 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.9% NaCl for 30 min at RT. The samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% PFA in 0.05 mM HEPES Buffer pH 7.2, 10 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.9% NaCl overnight at 4 °C, then washed, dehydrated in ethanol (30%, 75%, 100%, and 100%, 5 min incubation) and processed to the critical drying point using Autosamdri-815A (Tousimis). Samples were mounted on studs using silver paint and coated with 5 nm of Palladium (sputter coater EMS150TS; Electron Microscopy Sciences). Samples were imaged at 5 kV on a FEI Magellan 400 XHR Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities.
Cell quantification
Using utricles from vestibular schwannoma patients and organ donors, cells were quantified from z-stack images of 25,600 µm2, then normalized to 10,000 µm2 using Image J64 unless otherwise stated. Images were taken from 1–8 representative areas from the whole sensory epithelium for analyses. For cadaveric utricles, cells were quantified from images of 10,000 µm2. For hair cell precursor cell nuclei quantification, ATOH1+ cells that had low expression of cytoplasmic GPX2+ were identified. Epithelium was rotated to be parallel to image frame, and the distance from the center of each nucleus to the basement membrane was measured. The nuclei of the immediate surrounding hair cells (MYO7A+) and supporting cells (GFAP+) were measured in the same way.
Single-cell isolation
Utricles from vestibular schwannoma patients or organ donors were placed in DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific/Gibco, 11-039-021) with 5% FBS during transport to the laboratory. Tissues were then washed twice in DMEM/F12 and any debris and bone microdissected away. The whole utricle was then incubated with thermolysin (0.5 mg/mL; Sigma–Aldrich, T7902) for 45 min at 37 °C prior to mechanical separation of the sensory epithelium from underlying stroma. Next, the whole utricles or the sensory epithelium were digested using Accutase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 00-4555-56) for 20 min at 37 °C and single-cell suspension was obtained by trituration using a 1 ml pipette. Single-cell suspension was achieved using a 40 μm filter. DMEM/F12 media with 5% FBS was used for this step. Cells were then centrifuged at 300 rcf for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed, and cells were resuspended in media. Number of cells per microliter was quantified using a hemocytometer.
The single-cell suspension was then loaded onto a 10× Chromium controller (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA) using manufacturer’s recommended protocols at the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility. Following cDNA amplification and library prep, the sample was loaded onto an Illumina HiSeq4000 for sequencing. Two vestibular schwannoma samples were separately processed as described above using two separate 10x Genomics captures and subsequently sequenced in separate lane. One human organ donor sample was also processed as above, and the sample was split into two 10x Genomics capture runs and sequenced on two separate lanes.
Data preprocessing and quality control
Standard 10x Genomics CellRanger pipeline was utilized for demultiplexing, alignment, and quantification. Filtered count matrices for each capture (8 total) were then loaded into R to create a SeuratObject. We used the DoubletFinder method to identify and exclude doublets from eight separate 10x captures with a total of 2240 doublets detected using default parameters70. Cells with at least 300 features and with less than 20% mitochondrial genes were kept (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Cells from two vestibular schwannoma utricles were excluded because they displayed >20% mitochondrial genes. The vestibular schwannoma SeuratObjects were then combined, and the organ donor SeuratObjects were combined.
Normalization and data integration
Seurat’s reciprocal PCA and reference integration method was used to integrate the 8-cell captures post quality control. The NormalizeData function was first employed followed by the top 2000 highly variable genes for each condition (organ donor and vestibular schwannoma). Data was then scaled using the ScaleData function and integration anchors identified using the reciprocal principal component analysis reduction in Seurat v371. The integrated data object was then scaled using ScaleData function in Seurat. For integrated comparison of organ donor and vestibular schwannoma sample cell subtypes, Seurat’s default pipeline was used where the FindMarkers function was used to compare the same cell type between the two conditions. For separate analysis, the organ donor and vestibular schwannoma samples were merged as above and taken through the entire outlined pipeline separately.
Cell clustering
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the first 20 PCAs. Initial standard UMAP was used for data visualization, followed by clustering with a resolution of 0.2. The chooseR algorithm was used to identify the optimal resolution of 0.2 for cell clustering42 (Supplementary Fig. 2b–b”). We represent our data using UMAP as well as the previously described Similarity Weighted Non-negative Embedding (SWNE) method for preserving both local and global data structure41. The SWNE Seurat wrapper function was used per default parameters.
Cell annotation was carried out based on marker genes as described in the literature72,73,74,75,76. To focus our analysis on the sensory epithelium, we excluded certain cell clusters (dark cells, stromal cells, melanocytes, vascular cells, roof cells, macrophages, immune cells, and Schwann cells). The remaining cells were then reclustered and used for further downstream analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2). The chooseR algorithm was run again following subsetting to arrive at a clustering resolution of 0.2.
Differential gene expression
The Wilcoxon rank sum test from Seurat71,77 was used for identification of differentially expressed genes among the different cell groups with default parameters that utilized the Bonferroni correction for false-discovery (FDR < 0.01). Cell clusters were defined based on known marker genes for each cluster. Only positive marker genes were kept in the differential gene expression analysis. When comparing two groups of cells (Figs. 2, 3, 4), we used pseudobulk analysis using the DESeq2 algorithm. Each 10× capture was considered as a separate run, generating 4 replicates that were used for pseudobulk analysis purposes. For example, there are hair cells from two organ donor and four vestibular schwannoma utricles that were compared generating a robust differential gene expression comparison. For generation of volcano plots, DESeq2 results were plotted using EnchancedVolcano with indicated thresholds.
Trajectory analyses
To identify candidate hair cell precursors, we focused our analysis on the sensory epithelial cells and known hair cell, and supporting cell genes. Seurat clustering identified five supporting cell subtypes, two types of hair cells, and one group of putative hair cell precursors. We first reprocessed our data to work more easily in a Python environment. The raw fastq files generated from Illumina sequencing were aligned using STARsolo on a local high performance computing cluster (ACCRE – Vanderbilt University)78. These were combined to create an anndata object for analysis in Python. Eight unfiltered anndata objects were then loaded into a Jupyter notebook. They were filtered against the barcodes (cells) in the finalized Seurat object containing the SWNE reduced dimensions. The combined anndata object contained the same cell names (barcodes) as the original SWNE Seurat object. Next, we used CellRank’s pseudotime kernel method to calculate the cell-cell transition matrix53. First, Palantir trajectory analysis was used on the SWNE plot with a start cell in cluster 154. This generated pseudotime data that were used in CellRank’s Pseudotime Kernel function. The cell-cell transition matrix directions were then projected onto the SWNE plot (Fig. 6a).
To validate the CellRank cell-cell transition matrix direction, we used another trajectory analysis algorithm for further analysis. Slingshot was used to connect the cell states on the reduced dimensions as visualized by the SWNE plot (Supplementary Fig. 7a)55. The reduced dimensions as captured by SWNE was used to build this trajectory using the Slingshot algorithm55 (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Fig. 7a). We defined the starting point as cluster 1, and endpoints as the two hair cell types. Unbiased lineage trajectory modeling identified four different lineages (Supplementary Fig. 7b) using the default 6 knots within the tradeSeq package79. We chose to focus our analysis on the two lineages that generated type I and type II hair cells (Fig. 6b). A generalized additive model (GAM) was then used to fit the dynamic expression of each gene along each lineage using the fitGAM function in tradeSeq. Dynamically expressed genes were identified along each lineage using the AssociationTest function. Significantly associated genes were determined using an FDR ≤ 0.01. The diffEndTest function in tradeSeq identified genes with dynamic expressions that significantly diverge following a common test expression level (Fig. 6f). The plotSmoothers function allowed the plotting of expression of select individual genes along pseudotime.
Pathway analysis
Genes that passed tradeSeq association test, which assesses significant changes in gene expression as a function of pseudotime, for either type I or type II hair cell lineages with an FDR ≤ 0.01, were uploaded into Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, QIAGEN Inc., https://digitalinsights.qiagen.com/IPA) for core analysis80. IPA was performed to identify canonical pathways that are most significant to type I and type II hair cell lineages. Gene Ontology was performed using DAVID to reveal significant biological processes81,82.
Statistics & reproducibility
Statistical analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad). Ordinary one-way or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons, or unpaired student’s t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data shown as mean ± S.D. Unless otherwise indicated, experiments were replicated 3 or more times. The experiments were not randomized, and the investigators were not blinded to experimental groups during data analysis.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All relevant data and source data are included in this article and Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper. The single-cell RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession code GSE207817. The processed data has further been deposited in a user-friendly manner in the gEAR portal, which is a website for visualization and analysis of multiomic data under the following URL: https://umgear.org/p?l=human-utricle-sc-atlas. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The following publicly available algorithms and software were used for data analysis presented in this manuscript: DoubletFinder (v2.0.3), scater (v1.18.6), chooseR (helper functions found at: https://github.com/MenonLab/chooseR), Seurat (v4.0.2), tradeSeq (v1.5.07), slingshot (v1.8.0), pheatmap (v1.0.12), swne (v0.6.14), Palantir (v1.3.0), CellRank (v2.0.0), Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, and DAVID. Publicly available vignettes and code were used as well as default settings unless otherwise stated in the text. There was no custom code or algorithms generated.
References
WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss (2021).
Maudoux, A., Vitry, S. & El-Amraoui, A. Vestibular deficits in deafness: clinical presentation, animal modeling, and treatment solutions. Front. Neurol. 13, 816534 (2022).
Morton, C. C. & Nance, W. E. Newborn hearing screening-a silent revolution. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 2151–2164 (2006).
Iyer, A. A. & Groves, A. K. Transcription factor reprogramming in the inner ear: turning on cell fate switches to regenerate sensory hair cells. Front. Cell Neurosci. 15, 660748 (2021).
Bucks, S. A. et al. Supporting cells remove and replace sensory receptor hair cells in a balance organ of adult mice. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18128 (2017).
Burns, J. C., Cox, B. C., Thiede, B. R., Zuo, J. & Corwin, J. T. In vivo proliferative regeneration of balance hair cells in newborn mice. J. Neurosci. 32, 6570–6577 (2012).
Forge, A., Li, L., Corwin, J. T. & Nevill, G. Ultrastructural evidence for hair cell regeneration in the mammalian inner ear. Science 259, 1616–1619 (1993).
Golub, J. S. et al. Hair cell replacement in adult mouse utricles after targeted ablation of hair cells with diphtheria toxin. J. Neurosci. 32, 15093–15105 (2012).
Kawamoto, K., Izumikawa, M., Beyer, L. A., Atkin, G. M. & Raphael, Y. Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the mouse utricle following gentamicin ototoxicity. Hear. Res. 247, 17–26 (2009).
Sayyid, Z. N., Wang, T., Chen, L., Jones, S. M. & Cheng, A. G. Atoh1 directs regeneration and functional recovery of the mature mouse vestibular system. Cell Rep. 28, 312–324.e314 (2019).
Wang, T. et al. Lgr5+ cells regenerate hair cells via proliferation and direct transdifferentiation in damaged neonatal mouse utricle. Nat. Commun. 6, 6613 (2015).
Wang, T. et al. Uncoordinated maturation of developing and regenerating postnatal mammalian vestibular hair cells. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000326 (2019).
Taylor, R. R. et al. Regenerating hair cells in vestibular sensory epithelia from humans. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34817 (2018).
Warchol, M. E., Lambert, P. R., Goldstein, B. J., Forge, A. & Corwin, J. T. Regenerative proliferation in inner ear sensory epithelia from adult guinea pigs and humans. Science 259, 1619–1622 (1993).
Feghali, J. G. & Kantrowitz, A. B. The transcranial translabyrinthine approach to acoustic neuromas. Skull Base Surg. 4, 132–135 (1994).
Oghalai, J. S. et al. Harvesting human hair cells. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 109, 9–16 (2000).
Hizli, O. et al. Quantitative vestibular labyrinthine otopathology in temporal bones with vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 154, 150–156 (2016).
Kaya, S., Schachern, P. A., Tsuprun, V., Paparella, M. M. & Cureoglu, S. Deterioration of vestibular cells in labyrinthitis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 126, 89–95 (2017).
Lopez, I. et al. Estimation of the number of nerve fibers in the human vestibular endorgans using unbiased stereology and immunohistochemistry. J. Neurosci. Methods 145, 37–46 (2005).
Lopez, I. A. et al. Erratum to: immunohistochemical techniques for the human inner ear. Histochem. Cell Biol. 146, 389 (2016).
Merchant, S. N. A method for quantitative assessment of vestibular otopathology. Laryngoscope 109, 1560–1569 (1999).
Merchant, S. N. et al. Temporal bone studies of the human peripheral vestibular system. Normative vestibular hair cell data. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 181, 3–13 (2000).
Sans, A., Bartolami, S. & Fraysse, B. Histopathology of the peripheral vestibular system in small vestibular schwannomas. Am. J. Otol. 17, 326–324 (1996).
Watanuki, K. & Schuknecht, H. F. A morphological study of human vestibular sensory epithelia. Arch. Otolaryngol. 102, 853–858 (1976).
Senn, P. et al. Progenitor cells from the adult human inner ear. Anat. Rec. 303, 461–470 (2020).
Nie, J. & Hashino, E. Generation of inner ear organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods Cell Biol. 159, 303–321 (2020).
Ueda, Y., Moore, S. T. & Hashino, E. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into inner ear organoids. Methods Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2021_448 (2021).
Johnson Chacko, L. et al. Growth and cellular patterning during fetal human inner ear development studied by a correlative imaging approach. BMC Dev. Biol. 19, 11 (2019).
Roccio, M. et al. Molecular characterization and prospective isolation of human fetal cochlear hair cell progenitors. Nat. Commun. 9, 4027 (2018).
Chen, W., Cacciabue-Rivolta, D. I., Moore, H. D. & Rivolta, M. N. The human fetal cochlea can be a source for auditory progenitors/stem cells isolation. Hear. Res. 233, 23–29 (2007).
Chen, W. et al. Human fetal auditory stem cells can be expanded in vitro and differentiate into functional auditory neurons and hair cell-like cells. Stem Cells 27, 1196–1204 (2009).
Moore, S. T. et al. Generating high-fidelity cochlear organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 30, 950–961.e957 (2023).
Gupta, V. K., Thakker, A. & Gupta, K. K. Vestibular schwannoma: what we know and where we are heading. Head. Neck Pathol. 14, 1058–1066 (2020).
Matthies, C. & Samii, M. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): clinical presentation. Neurosurgery 40, 9–10 (1997). 1-9; discussion.
Eggink, M. C. et al. Human vestibular schwannoma reduces density of auditory nerve fibers in the osseous spiral lamina. Hear. Res. 418, 108458 (2022).
Soares, V. Y. et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from human vestibular schwannomas associated with poor hearing damage cochlear cells. Neuro Oncol. 18, 1498–1507 (2016).
House, W. F. Transtemporal bone microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas. Evolution of transtemporal bone removal of acoustic tumors. Arch. Otolaryngol. 80, 731–742 (1964).
Taylor, R. R. et al. Characterizing human vestibular sensory epithelia for experimental studies: new hair bundles on old tissue and implications for therapeutic interventions in ageing. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 2068–2084 (2015).
Aaron, K. A. et al. Selection criteria optimal for recovery of inner ear tissues from deceased organ donors. Otol. Neurotol. 43, e507–e514 (2022).
Vaisbuch, Y. et al. Surgical approach for rapid and minimally traumatic recovery of human inner ear tissues from deceased organ donors. Otol. Neurotol. 43, e519–e525 (2022).
Wu, Y., Tamayo, P. & Zhang, K. Visualizing and interpreting single-cell gene expression datasets with similarity weighted nonnegative embedding. Cell Syst. 7, 656–666 e654 (2018).
Patterson-Cross, R. B., Levine, A. J. & Menon, V. Selecting single cell clustering parameter values using subsampling-based robustness metrics. BMC Bioinform. 22, 39 (2021).
Pujol, R., Pickett, S. B., Nguyen, T. B. & Stone, J. S. Large basolateral processes on type II hair cells are novel processing units in mammalian vestibular organs. J. Comp. Neurol. 522, 3141–3159 (2014).
Rusch, A., Lysakowski, A. & Eatock, R. A. Postnatal development of type I and type II hair cells in the mouse utricle: acquisition of voltage-gated conductances and differentiated morphology. J. Neurosci. 18, 7487–7501 (1998).
McInturff, S., Burns, J. C. & Kelley, M. W. Characterization of spatial and temporal development of Type I and Type II hair cells in the mouse utricle using new cell-type-specific markers. Biol. Open https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.038083 (2018).
Burns, J. C., Kelly, M. C., Hoa, M., Morell, R. J. & Kelley, M. W. Single-cell RNA-Seq resolves cellular complexity in sensory organs from the neonatal inner ear. Nat. Commun. 6, 8557 (2015).
Jan, T. A. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of inner ear sensory and non-sensory cells revealed by single-cell transcriptomics. Cell Rep. 36, 109358 (2021).
Wang, T. et al. Precise genetic control of ATOH1 enhances maturation of regenerated hair cells in the mature mouse utricle. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3190105/v1 (2023).
Tosches, M. A. et al. Evolution of pallium, hippocampus, and cortical cell types revealed by single-cell transcriptomics in reptiles. Science 360, 881–888 (2018).
Prins, T. J., Myers, Z. A., Saldate, J. J. & Hoffman, L. F. Calbindin expression in adult vestibular epithelia. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens Neural Behav. Physiol. 206, 623–637 (2020).
Ono, K. et al. Retinoic acid degradation shapes zonal development of vestibular organs and sensitivity to transient linear accelerations. Nat. Commun. 11, 63 (2020).
Kanzaki, S., Beyer, L. A., Canlon, B., Meixner, W. M. & Raphael, Y. The cytocaud: a hair cell pathology in the waltzing Guinea pig. Audio. Neurootol. 7, 289–297 (2002).
Lange, M. et al. CellRank for directed single-cell fate mapping. Nat. Methods 19, 159–170 (2022).
Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019).
Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom. 19, 477 (2018).
Hu, H. et al. AnimalTFDB 3.0: a comprehensive resource for annotation and prediction of animal transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D33–D38 (2019).
Erkman, L. et al. Role of transcription factors Brn-3.1 and Brn-3.2 in auditory and visual system development. Nature 381, 603–606 (1996).
Hertzano, R. et al. Transcription profiling of inner ears from Pou4f3(ddl/ddl) identifies Gfi1 as a target of the Pou4f3 deafness gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2143–2153 (2004).
Bermingham, N. A. et al. Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284, 1837–1841 (1999).
Atkinson, P. J., Huarcaya Najarro, E., Sayyid, Z. N. & Cheng, A. G. Sensory hair cell development and regeneration: similarities and differences. Development 142, 1561–1571 (2015).
Wu, M., Xia, M., Li, W. & Li, H. Single-cell sequencing applications in the inner ear. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 637779 (2021).
Kikkawa, Y. et al. Advantages of a mouse model for human hearing impairment. Exp. Anim. 61, 85–98 (2012).
Avraham, K. B. Mouse models for deafness: lessons for the human inner ear and hearing loss. Ear Hear. 24, 332–341 (2003).
Ohlemiller, K. K. Mouse methods and models for studies in hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5132550 (2019).
Hume, C. R., Kirkegaard, M. & Oesterle, E. C. ErbB expression: the mouse inner ear and maturation of the mitogenic response to heregulin. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4, 422–443 (2003).
Cheng, Y. et al. Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human. Nature 515, 371–375 (2014).
Gilbertson, S. E. & Weinmann, A. S. Conservation and divergence in gene regulation between mouse and human immune cells deserves equal emphasis. Trends Immunol. 42, 1077–1087 (2021).
Hodge, R. D. et al. Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex. Nature 573, 61–68 (2019).
Lopez, I. A. et al. Immunohistochemical techniques for the human inner ear. Histochem. Cell Biol. 146, 367–387 (2016).
McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst. 8, 329–337 e324 (2019).
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e1821 (2019).
Summers, K. M., Bush, S. J. & Hume, D. A. Network analysis of transcriptomic diversity amongst resident tissue macrophages and dendritic cells in the mouse mononuclear phagocyte system. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000859 (2020).
Sole-Boldo, L. et al. Single-cell transcriptomes of the human skin reveal age-related loss of fibroblast priming. Commun. Biol. 3, 188 (2020).
Wilms, V., Koppl, C., Soffgen, C., Hartmann, A. M. & Nothwang, H. G. Molecular bases of K(+) secretory cells in the inner ear: shared and distinct features between birds and mammals. Sci. Rep. 6, 34203 (2016).
Hammond, T. R. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of microglia throughout the mouse lifespan and in the injured brain reveals complex cell-state changes. Immunity 50, 253–271 e256 (2019).
Bry, M., Kivela, R., Leppanen, V. M. & Alitalo, K. Vascular endothelial growth factor-B in physiology and disease. Physiol. Rev. 94, 779–794 (2014).
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).
Kaminow, B., Yunusox, D. & Dobin, A. STARsolo: accurate, fast and versatile mapping/quantification of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq data. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.05.442755 (2021).
Van den Berge, K. et al. Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data. Nat. Commun. 11, 1201 (2020).
Kramer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. Jr & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30, 523–530 (2014).
Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).
Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank our laboratory for insightful comments on the manuscript, J. Oghalai, W. Dong, J. Burns, D. Ellwanger, J.P. Cartailler, T. Cheng and gEAR team for excellent technical support, Y. Ma for statistical analyses, H. Bellen for sharing reagents, and A. Salehi and staff at Donor Network West and Stanford Otolaryngology surgeons for assistance with tissue procurement. This work was supported by NSF ECCS-2026822 (the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities), S10OD018220, S10OD021763 (Stanford Functional Genomics Facility), the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health, Stanford NIH-NCATS-CTSA UL1 TR001085, Child Health Research Institute of Stanford University, NIDCD/NIH R21DC015879, National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670938 and 82071056 (T.W.), Stanford University Medical Scholars Research Program, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Medical Fellows Program, NIDCD/NIH F30DC015698 (Z.N.S.), American Hearing Research Foundation, R01DC016318 (D.N.), U24DC015910 (A.I. and I.A.L.), R01DC016409, R01AG081608, R21DC019457, the Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute (N.G.), K08DC019683, Hearing Research, Inc., VUMC Discovery Scholars Program (T.A.J.) and R01DC016919, R01DC013910, R01DC020879, R01DC021110, T32DC015209, K24DC020986, U24DC020857, Department of Defense MR130316, Akiko Yamazaki and Jerry Yang Faculty Scholar Fund, and California Initiative in Regenerative Medicine RN3-06529 (A.G.C.), and generous support by the Yu, Ogawa, and Donoho families and the Bill and Susan Oberndorf Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.W., S.E.B., D.K.H., G.S.K., I.A.L., N.G., T.A.J., A.G.C. designed experiments. D.K.H., G.S.K., Z.N.S., K.A.A., Y.V., J.C.A., L.S.M., P.S.M., N.H.B., R.K.J., J.K., A.I., I.A.L., T.A.J. procured tissues. T.W., A.H.L., N.P., D.W., S.E.B., N.G., D.N., T.A.J., I.A.L., M.S., A.G.C. performed experiments. T.W., A.H.L., S.E.B., G.S.K., P.J.A., R.Z., N.G., S.H., T.A.J., A.G.C. analyzed data. T.W., A.H.L., S.E.B., P.J.A., N.G., T.A.J., A.G.C. prepared the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Ling, A.H., Billings, S.E. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic atlas reveals increased regeneration in diseased human inner ear balance organs. Nat Commun 15, 4833 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48491-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48491-y
- Springer Nature Limited