Abstract
Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin assembly at cell membranes drives the formation of protrusions or endocytic vesicles. To identify the mechanism by which different membrane deformations can be achieved, we reconstitute the basic membrane deformation modes of inward and outward bending in a confined geometry by encapsulating a minimal set of cytoskeletal proteins into giant unilamellar vesicles. Formation of membrane protrusions is favoured at low capping protein (CP) concentrations, whereas the formation of negatively bent domains is promoted at high CP concentrations. Addition of non-muscle myosin II results in full fission events in the vesicle system. The different deformation modes are rationalized by simulations of the underlying transient nature of the reaction kinetics. The relevance of the regulatory mechanism is supported by CP overexpression in mouse melanoma B16-F1 cells and therefore demonstrates the importance of the quantitative understanding of microscopic kinetic balances to address the diverse functionality of the cytoskeleton.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
For actin, most, if not all of de novo nucleation appears at cell membranes resulting in characteristic self-organization effects, which can lead to the formation of filopodia or lamellipodia1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. One key player is the nucleating Arp2/3 complex, which initiates the formation of the dendritic-like, branched networks at the plasma membrane and leads to the propulsion of spherical objects12,13,14,15,16 in absence of any motor proteins. ATP hydrolysis driven filament polymerization against the plasma membrane is sufficient to push the membrane forward. Thereby the resulting membrane growth speed depends on the number of pushing actin filaments17,18. The biochemical properties of the Arp2/3 complex have been well characterized19,20. The Arp2/3 complex is activated by VCA (verprolin, central, acidic) domains of N-WASP (Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein) and SCAR/WAVE (suppressor of cAMP receptor/WASP-family verprolin-homologous protein) proteins at the plasma membrane to create new branches from preexisting mother filaments. Coupled to the outside of a lipid vesicle, such actin networks can create sufficient forces to produce protrusions into the vesicle by self-stabilization of the membrane21. Surprisingly, the very same nucleation and growth processes are also thought to be responsible for the formation of negative curvatures in the plasma membrane and final membrane fission, as found in endocytosis22,23,24,25. However, still very little is known about the processes that allow cells to switch between these two fundamentally different deformation modes. Clearly, the microscopic organization of the actin cytoskeleton defines its function, yet how it is achieved remains to be resolved. A central regulator of the microscopic network properties is heterodimeric capping protein (CP)15,26,27,28,29. It binds to actin filament barbed ends to inhibit polymerization30. In the presence of CP branching by Arp2/3 complex is favoured15, whereas depletion of CP results in the formation of actin bundles and thus switches from lamellipodium to filopodium formation2,7,29. Local monomer depletion is a second parameter, which controls network density and architecture. The local depletion leads to different growth velocities of the polymerizing actin network and controls steering of the actin network31.
To study the physical principles underlying membrane deformation in vitro reconstitution systems are a promising approach21,32,33,34,35,36,37. By reconstitution of actin cortices inside of giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) it was shown that only contractile actin cortices are capable to drive shape remodelling and blebbing36,37, while in the absence of any molecular motors no shape deformation of the membrane could be observed35.
In the present study, we encapsulated actin, Arp2/3 complex and CP inside of GUVs and localized Arp2/3 complex activation to the membrane by coupling His-tagged VCA to nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) lipids. We show that a limited pool of actin monomers can lead to inhomogeneous actin polymerization, where CP regulates the local actin density at the membrane. We found two distinct network architectures, which deformed the membrane either outwards or inwards. Only at high CP concentrations and in presence of the molecular motor non-muscle myosin II (NMM II) membrane invaginations were induced, which ultimately led to fission events. Simulating the underlying reaction diffusion kinetics under depleting protein pool conditions revealed that two distinct network patterns of actin growth beneath the membrane could be distinguished. The resulting inhomogeneous growth velocity profile of the network promoted the formation of membrane protrusions at low CP concentration and induced negative membrane curvatures at high CP concentration. Overexpression of CP in B16-F1 cells supported the role of CP in switching between these two deformation modes, since besides diminished lamellipodium formation and inhibition of microspikes, increased CP concentration markedly amplified the number of intracellular vesicles. Altogether, CP controls membrane localized growth kinetics of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerization and thereby determines membrane shape deformations.
Results
Arp2/3 complex-induced polymerization at the membrane
We manufactured a minimal model system of a cytoskeletal vesicle by encapsulating actin monomers and actin-binding proteins into vesicles with a radius of 10–25 µm using a modified emulsion transfer technique continuous droplet interface crossing encapsulation (cDICE) (Fig. 1a)37,38. The lipid membrane was composed of a mixture of Egg-PC, PEG-PE and Ni-NTA. The encapsulation of actin monomers alone resulted in the spontaneous nucleation and polymerization of actin filaments spanning the vesicle’s volume without any enrichment of the network at the membrane (Fig. 1b). In the following series of experiments we added Arp2/3 complex, His-tagged VCA from N-WASP and profilin to the solution prior to encapsulation. Profilin blocks polymerization at the pointed end of actin filaments and diminishes the spontaneous actin nucleation in the vesicle’s volume. His-tagged VCA was tethered to the membrane by Ni-NTA lipids to restrict Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerization to the membrane resulting in localized networks due to the self-amplifying nature of Arp2/3 complex. Still a significant amount of actin was polymerized spontaneously, resulting in a fine volume spanning network (Fig. 1c). This is consistent with measurements from bulk actin-pyrene assays, which showed that despite the presence of profilin actin assembly was instantaneously initiated due to high amounts of VCA-activated Arp2/3 complex (Fig. 1d).
CP is the central component for localized network formation
CP binds to actin filament barbed ends and in cooperation with profilin suppresses spontaneous nucleation and elongation of filaments in solution as seen in actin-pyrene fluorescence measurements (Supplementary Figure 1). Measurements of pyrene fluorescence of the full system in the presence of 20 nM CP thus showed a lag phase of 1.5 ± 0.3 min in the polymerization curve (Fig. 1d). During encapsulation in vesicles this lag phase should ensure that the Arp2/3 complex can freely diffuse to the membrane before its activation as nucleation of actin was effectively suppressed within the volume of the vesicles. Indeed the encapsulation of this system into vesicles resulted for 78% of the vesicles in the localization of actin networks at the membrane without appearance of any visible volume spanning network. Two types of network morphologies could be distinguished (Fig. 1e). In 36% of the vesicles, spatially separated actin patches (domains) appeared at the membrane (Supplementary Figure 2). In 42% of the vesicles, almost homogeneous closed cortices were observed. This suggests that small fluctuations of CP concentrations are already sufficient to modify nucleation rates leading to the formation different domain morphologies.
A further increase of CP resulted in the formation of three distinct domain morphologies of actin, which could be distinguished based on their curvature: (i) convex actin protrusions (protrusion) with a length of up to 4 µm (Fig. 2a). These were able to push forward the vesicle’s membrane and induced a convex deformation of the membrane (Supplementary Figure 3). (ii) Concavely bent actin domains (concave domain), which induced a localized negative curvature into the vesicle’s membrane (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Figure 3) and (iii) flat actin domains, which had no discernible change of membrane curvature (Fig. 2c). The appearance and distribution of the different vesicle morphologies depended on the CP concentration (Fig. 2d). While the vesicles with a protrusion configuration almost exclusively appeared at 40 nM, the concavely bent domains were observable for several CP concentrations (from 40 to 120 nM) (Supplementary Figure 4).
Only at low (20 nM) and high (120 and 180 nM) CP concentrations closed cortex formation was observable (40% and 60%, respectively) (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Figure 4). However, cortex morphology was distinct: at 20 nM CP the cortex appeared as an almost homogenously grown network (Supplementary Figure 2), whereas at 120 nM CP the cortex consisted of many small actin domains, which overlapped with each other (Fig. 2d). In the latter case, concavely bent areas were observable within the cortex in 30% of the vesicles (Supplementary Figure 4). A further increase of CP to 180 nM led to the appearance of volume spanning networks (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Figure 4). Importantly, only one type of domain morphology was exclusively present in each vesicle; no vesicles were observed where two types of morphologies appeared simultaneously.
We also labelled VCA with a fluorescent dye to ensure that the observed domain formation was induced by actin polymerization and not by VCA clustering. The distribution of VCA in the absence of any actin polymerization was homogeneous at the membrane for several hours (Fig. 2e). Arp2/3 complex labelled in the same manner bound homogeneously to the membrane via the membrane adsorbed VCA molecules in the absence of any actin polymerization (Fig. 2f). In the presence of localized actin polymerization VCA started to concentrate at the polymerization sites (Fig. 2g). Thus, domain formation was not induced by any VCA clustering. Rather nucleation seeds of actin formed randomly at the membrane and led to an increased accumulation of VCA in the polymerizing actin domains.
Domain nucleation and growth is controlled by CP
To characterize the growth process of the differently shaped domains we obtained time-dependent snapshots at 40 and 120 nM CP (Fig. 3a, b). We observed that the time of actin seed formation at the membrane strongly depended on the CP concentration. At 40 nM CP nucleation was initiated rapidly as small actin patches appeared immediately, whereas at 120 nM CP seeds were only recognizable at a later time (4 min). After 4 min domain formation was fully completed at 40 nM CP and after 7 min at 120 nM CP. The formation of concave actin domains was observed at both CP concentrations, whereas the formation of protrusions appeared only at 40 nM CP (Supplementary Figure 5). Protrusion formation was quick as compared to the formation of concave domains. Membrane deformations could be observed after 7 min (Fig. 3a, b), whereas a membrane protrusion became instantly visible (Supplementary Figure 5).
These observations indicate that the finite pool of actin monomers must compete with all nucleation sites such that the monomers are already consumed before the nucleation sites can grow large enough to fuse together. Consequently, separate actin domains of different filament density emerge at the membrane. In accordance, a correlation between the number of domains in a vesicle and the type of morphology was found (Supplementary Figure 6). The number of domains was lower for protrusions compared to concave domains and flat domains. As soon as the monomer pool was fully consumed the heterogeneities within the network remained stable for several hours.
For a better characterization of CP-dependent domain growth, we performed total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) measurements of actin domains growing on a His-VCA functionalized lipid monolayer at different CP concentrations. We observed that domain growth became more confined and the number of domains increased with an increase of CP (Supplementary Figure 7). This is consistent with the CP-dependent results from the actin-pyrene measurements. Here, the lag phase before polymerization initiation increased with an increasing CP concentration, whereas polymerization speed decreased with an increase of CP (Supplementary Figure 8).
NMM II is most efficient to bend actin domains at high CP
The diameter of the concavely bent domains was about 5 µm for 40 and 60 nM CP, respectively, while at 120 nM CP a significant decrease of their size to 3.2 µm was observable (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Figure 9). This correlated inversely to the domain curvature, which increased with an increasing CP concentration from −0.1 µm−1 to −0.13 µm−1 (Fig. 4b). Scatter plots also confirmed that the domain size directly correlated to the domain curvature. Only at domain diameters lower than 4 µm, we measured curvatures higher than −0.2 µm-1 (Fig. 4c). Curvatures up to −0.5 µm−1 could be observed, but in none of the vesicles the formation of strong membrane invaginations nor any fission events were seen. The interplay of the polymerized actin gel with the membrane was not strong enough to induce full detachment of the invaginations. Thus, we added NMM II to the solution prior to encapsulation. The resulting contractile response of the motors within the actin network was strongly dependent on the CP concentration.
At 20 nM CP the presence of NMM II resulted in the formation of star-like actin clusters with a diameter of a few micrometres (Fig. 4d). In some cases, global deformations of the vesicle into non-spherical shapes were observable. Here the NMM II induced tensions were balanced by the osmotic pressure37.
The addition of NMM II at a CP concentration of 60 nM resulted in formation of domains, which remained connected to the membrane. The diameters of the domains contracted from 5 to 3.2 µm (Fig. 4a) and small membrane invaginations were discernible in 52% of the vesicles. Complete fission events occurred in 3.7% of the vesicles (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Figure 10). A slight curvature increase of the concave domains from −0.1 µm−1 to −0.12 µm−1 was observed (Fig. 4b).
A further increase of CP to 120 nM was sufficient to promote fission events of membrane invaginations in 27.5% of the vesicles (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Figure 10). This was consistent with a curvature increase from −0.13 µm−1 to −0.22 µm−1 (Fig. 4b). The domain diameters remained constant (Fig. 4a).
Structure of actin domains depends on CP
To understand how CP affects the network growth process we modelled the membrane localized network growth by a system of consecutive elementary reaction equations14,33. All involved protein pools are finite, and equilibrate either by two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) diffusion processes. The network growth and chemical composition are determined by the two antagonistic key players Arp2/3 and CP. The Arp2/3 complex must be activated by VCA (Fig. 5a), which is localized at the membrane and needs to bind an actin monomer prior to activation. Upon activation, activated Arp2/3 complex (Arp2/3*) induces the nucleation of new filaments by branching from an existing filament ends. CP terminates barbed end elongation, which results in shorter filaments and less branching possibilities. The elongation and branching rates are set by the available monomer pool and the availability of Arp2/3*. As all monomeric actin is incorporated into the network at the membrane, we computed the network growth as the density of barbed ends with time (Fig. 5b). Hence the time dependence reflects the vertical network growth.
At the start of the simulation all VCA is bound to the membrane in the inactive state, and all other proteins are monomeric inactive and in the bulk. The VCA-G actin complex formation and subsequent activation of Arp2/3 is almost instantaneous, while the nucleation of first actin filaments are delayed. These filaments are necessary to initiate network growth (seeding) and once they are formed a rapid increase in the density of barbed ends is observed (initial growth). As the pool of available Arp2/3* is finite and capping antagonizes branching, the growth rates of barbed ends decrease (transient phase) and barbed end density finally reaches a steady state. The growth processes towards the steady state are controlled by CP (Fig. 5b).
To observe the steady state, we first discuss the case of a distant infinite reservoir of proteins, in which concentration gradients could still occur. The system started far away from equilibrium. This resulted in a branching dominated by the initial growth phase that transitioned into the CP concentration-dependent steady-state. Increasing CP concentration lowered the steady-state barbed end density (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Figure 11). The steady-state concentration of available Arp2/3* was higher with increasing CP, as the available barbed end density was decreased, which in turn resulted in a lower branching rate (Fig. 5d, e).
Directly after a seeding event of a domain only few barbed ends were present. Increasing CP concentration resulted in a decrease of the growth rate, as also experimentally observed in pyrene assays. The low barbed end density resulted in an accumulation of Arp2/3*, as VCA activated more Arp2/3 complex than requested by the network (Fig. 5c, d). Subsequently, the high Arp2/3* concentration was rapidly transformed into branches due to the self-amplifying reaction. The binding rate of CP is slower and thus it needed some time that CP could follow up and counteracted this increase of the activated Arp2/3* and barbed end density (Fig. 5e). Together with the steady-state conditions two distinct cases emerged: for low CP (40 nM), the increasing barbed end density slowly levelled off to a high steady-state concentration. Simultaneously, the Arp2/3* concentration rapidly reached its steady-state value. The balance between the rates of Arp2/3* activation and capping resulted in a transient and weak peak of branching events. For high CP (80, 120 nM), the initial increase in barbed end density was slower than at low CP, the resulting barbed end maximum was much higher than the steady-state level. This resulted in a peak of the barbed end densities.
Next, we considered systems with finite reservoirs and observed the spatial spreading along the membrane, which was implemented as a diffusive random walk of the barbed ends scaled by the local polymerization speed in a time dependent effective 2D simulation. In addition to the kinetic effects, now the depletion of the molecules during the growth process established gradients in the barbed end densities. The depletion of CP and actin monomers was found to be equivalent to continuously changing the starting conditions. We adjusted the simulation volume to take account for the observed number of domains that share the protein pools in the vesicles. At all CP concentrations, the behaviour discussed above was modulated by the global protein pool depletion. This corresponded to continuously dropping steady-state levels, which resulted in an initial peak for all cases.
At low CP concentration (40 nM), a continuous growth with a transient peak of barbed ends density was observable, which resulted from the drop of the steady-state levels. As the actin pools get used up, the maximum of the peak decreased continuously during spreading along the membrane. The growth and spreading of the barbed end density along the membrane resulted in a flat radial distribution of barbed ends after 40 s (Fig. 5f). Raising the CP concentration (80 nM), we again observed the peak of barbed end densities due to the excess in Arp2/3*. As the network spread along the membrane, filaments entered membrane regions that also exhibited this excess in Arp2/3*. This resulted in a polymerization wave, creating a propagating high barbed end density at the rim of the domain and a lower density in the middle (Fig. 5f).
At the highest here studied CP concentration (120 nM), the concentration profiles became flat again (Fig. 5f). This was due to the implementation of the number of domains in the simulation, effectively reducing the available monomer pool. This additional depletion by competition of multiple domains shows that global conditions are also essential for the growth process of the domains.
Here, the experimentally observed nucleation at multiple sites due to the increased CP results in local variation of polymerization conditions. Overall, we observed CP-dependent radial patterns of the barbed end density that we relate to the geometry of the observed actin domains in vesicles, considering that network growth velocities directly depend on the barbed end density17.
CP overexpression induces vesicle formation in B16-F1 cells
Finally, we tested the capability of CP to induce membrane deformations in cells. To this end we overexpressed heterodimeric CP in the widely used B16-F1 mouse melanoma cells using a doxycycline-inducible expression system. Quantification of the CP beta 2 chain by densitometry revealed a 2.1-fold overexpression on average (Supplementary Figure 12), but given the high variability of the expression levels in the cells as assessed by immunofluorescence intensity of the HA-labelled CP alpha 1 chain, we assume that CP overexpression in the strong overexpressors must be considerably higher. Ectopically expressed CP accumulated at the leading edge, and consistent with previous work reporting on the explosive increase of filopodia in CP-depleted B16-F1 cells29, we found that the formation of microspikes was largely inhibited in the strong CP overexpressors, as opposed to the numerous microspikes in the lamellipodia of untransfected control cells (Fig. 6a, b). As expected the thickness of the lamellipodium also decreased from 1.7 to 0.7 µm in cells overexpressing CP (Fig. 6c). Most importantly, however, the cells strongly overexpressing CP exhibited a substantial increase of actin-containing vesicles by about 50% (Fig. 6d). However, since neither the endosomal marker Rab7, nor the lysosomal marker LAMP1 or the fluid-phase marker TRITC dextrane was found to colocalize with the majority of these CP-containing vesicles, we could exclude the possibility that the formed vesicles were regular endosomes, lysosomes or vesicular structures entrapped by micropinocytosis (Supplementary Figure 13). Our observations therefore clearly corroborate the view that an increase of CP concentration is already sufficient to induce and shift membrane deformations from concave to convex in vivo, but further implies that overexpression of CP alone without upregulation of the other components of the machinery and appropriate signalling is not sufficient to increase the number of endocytic vesicles.
Discussion
Our work shows that already a variation of CP concentration between 20 and 180 nM results in distinct growth conditions within networks formed by Arp2/3 complex, which induce either positively or negatively curved membrane deformations. Low CP concentrations ensure fast network nucleation and growth at the membrane, which results in the formation of homogeneous cortices. Higher CP concentrations slow down nucleation efficiency of the network such that a few nucleation sites appear at the membrane and the finite actin pool is partitioned between those. Distinct actin domains form at the membrane, which ultimately induce shape deformations in the membrane. High CP concentrations slow down network extension, thus over time slow and confined growing domains emerge at the membrane until they are densely packed to form closed cortices. This balance between nucleation and growth speed finally leads to the observed appearance of volume spanning networks at the highest CP concentrations studied here (180 nM). The temporal resolved TIRF-measurements of domain growth on a lipid monolayer dependent on the CP concentration confirm that Arp2/3 induced nucleation and domain growth correlate with the CP concentration. Confocal measurement of the distribution of fluorescent VCA at the vesicle’s membrane identified an up-concentration of the Arp2/3 activator during polymerization, which is in agreement with experimental and theoretical work1,10.
By kinetic simulations we identified that the out of equilibrium nature of the reaction kinetics of actin and its binding proteins are responsible for the observed deformations. The coupled kinetic equations result in two distinct non-uniform polymerization patterns leading to inhomogeneous barbed end density profiles. These can be directly linked to different protrusion velocities of the growing networks based on a ratchet model for membrane protrusions39. Compared to in vivo and most in vitro studies (that use a ~100-fold VCA density14,15), the number of barbed ends in our model system is low (<=450/µm2) and therefore we assume that protrusion velocities are not dominated by monomer depletion, but rather by membrane tension17,40. In this regime the load per filament decreases with increasing network density. Consequently, the protrusion velocity increases exponentially with an increasing number of barbed ends17. For low CP concentrations the number of barbed ends is constant along the membrane. Therefore, the network grows homogeneously and an actin protrusion is formed. For higher CP concentrations the number of barbed ends is lower in the domain centre than at the domain edges. Thus, the network protrusion is faster at the domain edges and slower in the domain centre. A concave actin domain is formed. Although the kinetic simulations are able to rationalize the emerging structures, it remains a major challenge to combine the kinetic simulations with mechanical responses of the complete system.
Our experiments further reveal that CP is an important regulator of the network structures in cells. While upregulation of CP leads to an increased formation of actin-containing vesicles, decrease of lamellipodium width and the inhibition filopodia formation, a down regulation was previously shown to result in an explosive increase of filopodia and complete suppression of lamellipodia formation17. The strong interdependence of the network structures results from a homeostasis effect of the actin cytoskeleton structures in cells, as first demonstrated to be an important mechanism in fission yeast41,42. In this case, the limited actin monomer pool is split between the different actin structures, depending on the activation of the nucleation factors Arp2/3 complex and formin.
In our experiments the growth-induced network stresses alone were not sufficient to induce fission of the invaginations from the membrane in the in vitro system. By the addition of NMM II membrane fission events are induced in a CP-dependent manner and endocytic-type vesicles were formed in the in vitro system. The requirement of myosins is in accordance with observations in vivo43,44,45,46. Further studies are needed to shed light on the dynamics and physical mechanisms behind membrane fission events.
To conclude, we demonstrated that the growth conditions of branched actin networks are decisive for fulfilling their multiple tasks. CP controls in a concentration-dependent manner of the microscopic assembly kinetics, which in turn alters the mechanical properties of the growing network sufficiently to induce either negative or positive curvatures to the actin network and the attached vesicle membrane. A detailed finite-element analysis of the CP-dependent growth patterns is required to fully link microscopic actin assembly to mesoscopic membrane deformations. In cells the CP regulatory protein CARMIL and V-1 were identified to tightly control the amount of available CP47,48,49, which could be decisive for cells to switch between the diverging demands of function. It is the balance between the presence of nucleation factors and CPs, which sets the final function of cytoskeletal structures via the assembly kinetics. This underlines the urgent need to understand the full reaction kinetics in networks beyond the steady-state conditions.
Methods
Protein purification
G-actin was purified from rabbit skeletal muscle by a modified protocol of Spudich et al.50. It was stored at 4 °C in G-Buffer (2 mM Tris, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 0.2 mM DTT and 0.005% NaN3, pH 8.0). G-actin was labelled with Atto 488 NHS-ester (Jena Bioscience)51 at cysteine 374 or with N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide to perform pyrene assays52. Arp2/3 complex was extracted from pig brain and purified as described previously53. It was fluorescently labelled by adding a 3-fold excess of maleimide Atto 647N dye (Atto-Tec) and incubated while rotating for 2 h at −4 °C. Finally, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 mM DTT and the excess dye was removed by a NAP size-exclusion chromatography column (NAP-25 Columns, GE Healthcare). The C-terminal domain (VCA) of murine N-WASP was expressed in BL21 Codon Plus DE3-RIPL (Agilent Technologies) as a His-tagged protein overnight in LB medium. After purification by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography in SoniBuffer (50 mM Na2HPO4, 50 mM NaH2PO4·2H2O, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0), the protein was dialysed against storage buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, pH 7.0) and stored at −80 °C. We kept the histidine-tag to enable the binding of VCA to Ni-NTA lipids. VCA was labelled by the addition of a 3-fold excess of maleimide dye Atto 647N (Atto-Tec) and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. Afterwards it was quenched by 1 mM DTT and the excess dye was removed by size-exclusion chromatography using a NAP-25 column (GE Healthcare). Profilin (mPfn2a) was expressed in BL21 Codon Plus DE3-RIPL (Agilent Technologies) as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein. After its purification it was dialysed against 20 mM Tris (pH 7), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT and stored at 4 °C54. The GST-tag was removed by proteolytic cleavage after purification. The mouse α1- and β2-subunits of CP55 cloned into pRSFDuet™-1 (Novagen) were expressed in BL21 Codon Plus DE3-RIPL (Agilent Technologies) and purified using flag-tag affinity chromatography. The cells were grown at 37 °C until the A600 nm of 0.6 was reached. The expression was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM IPTG and shaking was continued overnight. The cells were collected and resuspended in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol. After centrifugation (30,000 r.p.m., 10 min, 4 °C) supernatant was mixed with 100 µl ANTI-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma Aldrich) per 100 ml supernatant, rotated for 90 min at 4 °C and then centrifuged at low speed (500 r.p.m.). Beads were washed several times with the same buffer before adding 100 µl FLAG Peptide (Sigma Aldrich F3290-25mg lyophilized powder) per 1 ml buffer. After a 1 h incubation on a rotating wheel at 4 °C they were centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 r.p.m. Supernatant with CP was dialysed against 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT overnight then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. NMM II was purified from human blood platelets and stored at −20 °C in 60% sucrose following a standard protocol56.
Encapsulation
The encapsulated protein solutions were mixed on ice directly before vesicle production. Here 3 µM G-actin, 300 nM VCA, 300 nM Arp2/3 complex, 13.5 µM profilin and the desired amount of CP were added to the polymerization buffer (10 mM imidazole, 3 mM MgCl2, 30 mM KCl, 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4). We replaced 10% of unlabelled G-actin by covalently labelled Atto 488 actin to mark the network structures fluorescently. To measure the contractile behaviour dependent on CP, 5 µM non-muscle myosin II were added additionally to the encapsulation mix. In all experiments the amount of all protein buffers was kept constant. Only 300 nM VCA (25% were labelled with Atto 647N) were encapsulated in the absence of any other proteins to study effects of VCA clustering on domain formation. To study VCA induced Arp2/3 clustering, we encapsulated 300 nM of Arp2/3 (35% were labelled with Atto 647N) additional to 300 nM VCA. The osmotic pressure of the outside solution, which was prepared of 1 M glucose, was adapted 10 to 20 mosmol higher compared to the encapsulated solution. A total concentration of 0.5 mM lipids were dissolved in a mixture of 14% mineral oil (Sigma Aldrich, M3516), 80 % silicone oil (Roth, 4020.1) and 6% decane (Sigma Adlrich, D901) as previously described37. The final lipid oil mixture contained 87.4% Egg-PC (Sigma Aldrich, P3556), which was dissolved at 50 mg/ml in a chloroform/methanol mixture (9:1, v/v), 10% Ni-NTA (Avanti Lipids, 790404 C) and 2.5% PEG2000 PE (Avanti, Lipids, 880160 C). To label the membrane 0.06% of the fluorescent lipid Texas Red (Thermo Fischer, T1395MP) was added to the lipid mix. Vesicles were produced for 5 min at 5 °C using a slightly modified protocol of the recently published cDICE encapsulation method38. We used capillaries with a diameter of 40 µm to prevent protein clogging and adapted the speed of rotation to 1200 r.p.m. The capillary was injected in a solution containing 70% decane and 30% mineral oil. The vesicles were imaged 30 min after production and remained stable for several hours. All reported experiments we performed at least twice with different preparations of proteins. Quality of protein charges were determined by bulk assays.
Pyrene assays
The polymerization kinetics of the encapsulated protein mixtures were measured by pyrene assays. To this end 20% of the unlabelled G-actin were replaced by pyrenyl actin. The measurements were carried out with the microplate reader SpectraMax M5 (Molecular Devices).
Imaging and data acquisition
Bright-field and epifluorescence images of the vesicles were taken by a ×63 numerical aperture (NA) 1.3 oil immersion objective on a commercially built Leica Microscope DMI3000 B in combination with a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER camera. Confocal images were taken by a ×63 NA 1.4 oil immersion objective with on a Leica TSC SP5. The temporal evolution was observed by acquiring 3D stacks of epifluorescence snapshots with a ×100 NA 1.4 oil immersion objective or a ×40 NA (1.25–0.75) oil immersion objective on a commercially built Leica Microscope DMI3000 B. The 3D image acquisition was started one minute after finishing the encapsulation process. We acquired snapshots of the 3D epifluorescence stacks of the vesicles every three minutes in order to avoid any artefacts by phototoxicity.
Imaging of fixed cells was performed with an LSM510Meta confocal microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a ×63/1.3 Plan-Neofluar objective using the 488 nm and 543 nm laser lines.
Confocal and fluorescent images were used to measure the domain length and curvature by ImageJ. Actin domains at the membrane were counted with the 3D object counter provided by ImageJ.
Vector construction
For the expression of human heterodimeric CP the bicistronic IRES Tet-On 3G inducible expression system (Clontech) was employed. pTRE3G-IRES is a Tet-inducible, bicistronic mammalian expression vector designed to coexpress two genes of interest under the control of the Tet-responsive promoter pTRE3. pCMV-Tet3G expresses Tet-On 3G, a tetracycline-controlled transactivator that exhibits high activity in the presence of the inducer doxycycline. To generate pTRE3G-IRES-HA-CPα1, the corresponding sequence was amplified by PCR from cDNA as a MluI-BamHI fragment using the primers 5′-CGCACGCGTATGTATCCTTACGACGTGCCTGACTACGCCATGGCCGACTTCGATGATCGTGTG-3′ and 5′-GAGGGATCCTTAAGCATTCTGCATTTCTTTGCC-3′ and inserted into the same sites of the second multiple cloning site (MCS2) of pTRE3G-IRES. The longer upstream primer contained additional sequences to allow expression of the α1 subunit with an N-terminal HA epitope (aa YPYDVPDYA) for later immunostaining. The corresponding sequence encoding the β2 subunit was amplified by PCR as a SalI-EagI fragment using the primers 5′-CGCGTCGACATGAGTGATCAGCAGCTGGAC-3′ and 5′-GAGCGGCCGTTAGCATTGCTGCTTTCTCTTC-3′ and inserted into the same sites of MCS1 in pTRE3G-IRES-HA-CPα1 yielding pTRE3G-IRES-HA-CPα1/CPβ2. All sequences were verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell culture and transfections
B16-F1 mouse melanoma cells (ATCC CRL-6323) were grown in DMEM with 4.5 g/l glucose (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FCS (Biowest), 2 mM UltraGlutamine (Lonza) and 1% of a 100× penicillin/streptomycin stock solution (Biowest) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Absence of mycoplasma was routinely checked by the VenorGeM Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Sigma). Transfections were carried out with JetPrime (Polyplus), according to the manufacturers’ protocols at a 4:1 ratio of pTRE3G-IRES-HA-CPα1/CPß2 and pCMV-Tet3G. Prior to transfection the cells were seeded on glass coverslips coated with 25 µg/ml laminin (Sigma) overnight. Induction of CP overexpression was induced by addition of 1 µg/ml of Doxycyclin (Clontech) 4 h after the transfection.
Fixation, labelling and analyses of cells
After 24 h of induction, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min, extracted with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 min and stained with fluorescent phalloidin to visualize filamentous actin and with anti-HA monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (undiluted hybridoma supernatant), which is a subclone of H26DO57, to visualize the HA epitope. Atto550-phalloidin (1:200 dilution, # AD 550-81; Atto-Tec) was used to stain F-actin and secondary goat-anti-mouse Alexa488-labelled antibodies (1:1,000 dilution; #A32723) were from Thermo Fisher. Anti-Rab7 antibody (1:200 dilution; #9367) was from Cell Signalling, anti-LAMP1 antibody (1:200; #ab24170) was from Abcam, and lysine-fixable TRITC dextrane (1 mg/ml; 70,000 MW, #D1818) was from Thermo Fisher. For immunohistochemistry, secondary Alexa-555-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit polyclonal antibodies (1:1,000 dilution; #A21429; Invitrogen) were used. Immunoblotting was performed according to standard protocols using undiluted hybridoma supernatant of anti-HA monoclonal antibody 12CA5, anti-CP-beta monoclonal antibody (1:200; #sc-136502; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (1:1000; #6C5; Calbiochem). Primary antibodies in immunoblots were visualized with phosphatase-coupled anti-mouse IgG (1:1,000, #115-055-62; Dianova). Lamellipodium thickness was determined by ImageJ. The phalloidin fluorescence intensity in lamellipodia was measured at four different positions to calculate the full width half maximum for two independent experiments (n = 2). For counting the number of CP-containing vesicles the Matlab-based program SpatTrack58 for denoising was used. Subsequently the data was segmented by ImageJ.
Code availability
The COMSOL code for the simulations is available from A.R.B. upon reasonable request.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from A.R.B. upon reasonable request.
References
Gov, N. S. & Gopinathan, A. Dynamics of membranes driven by actin polymerization. Biophys. J. 90, 454–469 (2006).
Haviv, L. et al. Reconstitution of the transition from lamellipodium to filopodium in a membrane-free system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4906–4911 (2006).
Zimmermann, J. & Falcke, M. Formation of transient lamellipodia. PLoS ONE 9, e87638 (2014).
Blanchoin, L. et al. Direct observation of dendritic actin filament networks nucleated by Arp2/3 complex and WASP/Scar proteins. Nature 404, 1007–1011 (2000).
Svitkina, T. M. & Borisy, G. G. Arp2/3 complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in dendritic organization and treadmilling of actin filament array in lamellipodia. J. Cell Biol. 145, 1009–1026 (1999).
Orly, G., Naoz, M. & Gov, N. S. Physical model for the geometry of actin-based cellular protrusions. Biophys. J. 107, 576–587 (2014).
Vignjevic, D. et al. Formation of filopodia-like bundles in vitro from a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160, 951–962 (2003).
Kovar, D. R., Harris, E. S., Mahaffy, R., Higgs, H. N. & Pollard, T. D. Control of the assembly of ATP- and ADP-actin by formins and profilin. Cell 124, 423–435 (2006).
Cramer, L. P., Siebert, M. & Mitchison, T. J. Identification of novel graded polarity actin filament bundles in locomoting heart fibroblasts. Implications for the generation of motile force. J. Cell Biol. 136, 1287–1305 (1997).
Lee, K., Gallop, J. L., Rambani, K. & Kirschner, M. W. Self-assembly of filopodia-like structures on supported lipid bilayers. Science 329, 1341–1345 (2010).
Carlsson, A. E. Growth of branched actin networks against obstacles. Biophys. J. 81, 1907–1923 (2001).
Bernheim-Groswasser, A., Wiesner, S., Golsteyn, R. M., Carlier, M.-F. & Sykes, C. The dynamics of actin-based motility depend on surface parameters. Nature 417, 308–311 (2002).
Enculescu, M. & Falcke, M. Actin-based propulsion of spatially extended objects. New J. Phys. 13, 53040 (2011).
Wiesner, S. et al. A biomimetic motility assay provides insight into the mechanism of actin-based motility. J. Cell Biol. 160, 387–398 (2003).
Akin, O. & Mullins, R. D. Capping protein increases the rate of actin-based motility by promoting filament nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex. Cell 133, 841–851 (2008).
Loisel, T. P., Boujemaa, R., Pantaloni, D. & Carlier, M. F. Reconstitution of actin-based motility of Listeria and Shigella using pure proteins. Nature 401, 613–616 (1999).
Mogilner, A. & Edelstein-Keshet, L. Regulation of actin dynamics in rapidly moving cells. A quantitative analysis. Biophys. J. 83, 1237–1258 (2002).
Peskin, C. S., Odell, G. M. & Oster, G. F. Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations. The Brownian ratchet. Biophys. J. 65, 316–324 (1993).
Mullins, R. D., Heuser, J. A. & Pollard, T. D. The interaction of Arp2/3 complex with actin: nucleation, high affinity pointed end capping, and formation of branching networks of filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6181–6186 (1998).
Pantaloni, D., Boujemaa, R., Didry, D., Gounon, P. & Carlier, M.-F. The Arp2/3 complex branches filament barbend ends: functional antagonism with capping proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 385–391 (2000).
Liu, A. P. et al. Membrane-induced bundling of actin filaments. Nat. Phys. 4, 789–793 (2008).
Johannes, L., Parton, R. G., Bassereau, P. & Mayor, S. Building endocytic pits without clathrin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 311–321 (2015).
Römer, W. et al. Actin dynamics drive membrane reorganization and scission in clathrin-independent endocytosis. Cell 140, 540–553 (2010).
Berro, J. & Pollard, T. D. Synergies between Aip1p and capping protein subunits (Acp1p and Acp2p) in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and cell polarization in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3515–3527 (2014).
Kukulski, W., Schorb, M., Kaksonen, M. & Briggs, J. A. G. Plasma membrane reshaping during endocytosis is revealed by time-resolved electron tomography. Cell 150, 508–520 (2012).
Galland, R. et al. Fabrication of three-dimensional electrical connections by means of directed actin self-organization. Nat. Mater. 12, 416–421 (2013).
Weichsel, J. & Schwarz, U. S. Two competing orientation patterns explain experimentally observed anomalies in growing actin networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6304–6309 (2010).
Hug, C. et al. Capping protein levels influence actin assembly and cell motility in dictyostelium. Cell 81, 591–600 (1995).
Mejillano, M. R. et al. Lamellipodial versus filopodial mode of the actin nanomachinery. Cell 118, 363–373 (2004).
Schafer, D. A., Jennings, P. B. & Cooper, J. A. Dynamics of capping protein and actin assembly in vitro: uncapping barbed ends polyphosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 135, 169–179 (1996).
Boujemaa-Paterski, R. et al. Network heterogeneity regulates steering in actin-based motility. Nat. Commun. 8, 655 (2017).
Abu Shah, E. & Keren, K. Symmetry breaking in reconstituted actin cortices. elife 3, e01433 (2014).
Simunovic, M. et al. Friction mediates scission of tubular membranes scaffolded by BAR proteins. Cell 170, 172–184.e11 (2017).
Pezeshkian, W. et al. Mechanism of Shiga toxin clustering on membranes. ACS Nano 11, 314–324 (2017).
Pontani, L.-L. et al. Reconstitution of an actin cortex inside a liposome. Biophys. J. 96, 192–198 (2009).
Carvalho, K. et al. Cell-sized liposomes reveal how actomyosin cortical tension drives shape change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16456–16461 (2013).
Loiseau, E. et al. Shape remodeling and blebbing of active cytoskeletal vesicles. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500465 (2016).
Abkarian, M., Loiseau, E. & Massiera, G. Continuous droplet interface crossing encapsulation (cDICE) for high throughput monodisperse vesicle design. Soft Matter 7, 4610 (2011).
Mogilner, A. & Oster, G. The physics of lamellipodial protrusion. Eur. Biophys. J. 25, 47–53 (1996).
Abraham, V. C., Krishnamurthi, V., Taylor, D. L. & Lanni, F. The actin-based nanomachine at the leading edge of migrating cells. Biophys. J. 77, 1721–1732 (1999).
Suarez, C. et al. Profilin regulates F-actin network homeostasis by favoring formin over Arp2/3 complex. Dev. Cell 32, 43–53 (2015).
Burke, T. A. et al. Homeostatic actin cytoskeleton networks are regulated by assembly factor competition for monomers. Curr. Biol. 24, 579–585 (2014).
Liu, J., Sun, Y., Oster, G. F. & Drubin, D. G. Mechanochemical crosstalk during endocytic vesicle formation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 36–43 (2010).
Sun, Y., Martin, A. C. & Drubin, D. G. Endocytic internalization in budding yeast requires coordinated actin nucleation and myosin motor activity. Dev. Cell 11, 33–46 (2006).
Carlsson, A. E. & Bayly, P. V. Force generation by endocytic actin patches in budding yeast. Biophys. J. 106, 1596–1606 (2014).
Cheng, J., Grassart, A. & Drubin, D. G. Myosin 1E coordinates actin assembly and cargo trafficking during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2891–2904 (2012).
Edwards, M. et al. Capping protein regulators fine-tune actin assembly dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 677–689 (2014).
Jung, G. et al. V-1 regulates capping protein activity in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6610–E6619 (2016).
Fujiwara, I., Remmert, K., Piszczek, G. & Hammer, J. A. Capping protein regulatory cycle driven by CARMIL and V-1 may promote actin network assembly at protruding edges. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1970–E1979 (2014).
Spudich, J. A. & Watt, S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 4866–4871 (1971).
Kellogg, D. R., Mitchison, T. J. & Alberts, B. M. Behaviour of microtubules and actin filaments in living Drosophila embryos. Development 103, 675–686 (1988).
Cooper, J. A., Walker, S. B. & Pollard, T. D. Pyrene actin. Documentation of the validity of a sensitive assay for actin polymerization. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 4, 253–262 (1983).
Egile, C. et al. Activation of the Cdc42 effector N-WASP by the Shigella flexneri Icsa protein promotes actin nucleation by Arp2/3 complex and bacterial actin-based motility. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1319–1332 (1999).
Di Nardo, A., Gareus, R., Kwiatkowski, D. & Witke, W. Alternative splicing of the mouse profilin II gene generates functionally different profilin isoforms. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3795–3803 (2000).
Falck, S. et al. Biological role and structural mechanism of twinfilin-capping protein interaction. EMBO J. 23, 3010–3019 (2004).
Pollard, T. D. [31] Purification of nonmuscle myosins. Methods Enzymol. 85, 331–356 (1982).
Niman, H. L. et al. Generation of protein-reactive antibodies by short peptides is an event of high frequency: implications for the structural basis of immune recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4949–4953 (1983).
Lund, F. W. et al. SpatTrack: an imaging toolbox for analysis of vesicle motility and distribution in living cells. Traffic 15, 1406–1429 (2014).
Acknowledgements
Research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via the SFB863 and FA330/11-1 (J.F.) and by the ERC via the project SelfOrg. The continuous support by the Nanosystems Initiative Munich is acknowledged. A.R.B. acknowledges the hospitality of the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science at the University of Berkeley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.D., F.C.K, J.F. and A.R.B. planned the experiment, K.D. and P.B. carried out the experiments; J.F carried out the CP overexpression experiments in the B16-F1 cells. F.C.K. and F.B. performed the theoretical modelling; K.D. and A.R.B. performed data analysis; C.J.C. provided important insights into the elastic modelling of actin gels; K.D., F.C.K., J.F. and A.R.B. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dürre, K., Keber, F.C., Bleicher, P. et al. Capping protein-controlled actin polymerization shapes lipid membranes. Nat Commun 9, 1630 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03918-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03918-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Composite branched and linear F-actin maximize myosin-induced membrane shape changes in a biomimetic cell model
Communications Biology (2024)
-
A condensate dynamic instability orchestrates actomyosin cortex activation
Nature (2022)
-
Intra-bundle contractions enable extensile properties of active actin networks
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Dynamic self-assembly of compartmentalized DNA nanotubes
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Reconstitution of contractile actomyosin rings in vesicles
Nature Communications (2021)