Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature Nanotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The atomic force microscope is broadly used to study the morphology of cells1,2,3,4,5, but it can also probe the mechanics of cells. It is now known that cancerous cells may have different mechanical properties to those of normal cells6,7,8, but the reasons for these differences are poorly understood9. Here, we report quantitatively the differences between normal and cancerous human cervical epithelial cells by considering the brush layer on the cell surface. These brush layers, which consist mainly of microvilli, microridges and cilia, are important for interactions with the environment. Deformation force curves obtained from cells in vitro were processed according to the ‘brush on soft cell model’10. We found that normal cells have brushes of one length, whereas cancerous cells have mostly two brush lengths of significantly different densities. The observed differences suggest that brush layers should be taken into account when characterizing the cell surface by mechanical means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Raw force curves of normal and cancerous cells.
Figure 2: Processed raw force data from Fig. 1.
Figure 3: Representative force curves.
Figure 4: Brush parameters for cells derived from the force curves of Fig. 2.
Figure 5: Visualization of the brushes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Habelitz, S. et al. Peritubular dentin lacks piezoelectricity. J. Dental Res. 86, 908–911 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, S. & Hoh, J. H. Modulation of repulsive forces between neurofilaments by sidearm phosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324, 489–496 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sokolov, I., Subba-Rao, V. & Luck, L. A. Change in rigidity in the activated form of the glucose/galactose receptor from E. coli: A phenomenon that will be key to the development of biosensors. Biophys. J. 90, 1055–1063 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sokolov, I., Iyer, S. & Woodworth, C. D. Recover of elasticity of aged human epithelial cells in-vitro. Nanomedicine: NBM 2, 31–36 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berdyyeva, T. K., Woodworth, C. D. & Sokolov, I. Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: Direct measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 81–92 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross, S. E., Jin, Y.-S., Rao, J. & Gimzewski, J. K. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nature Nanotech. 2, 780–783 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldmann, W. H. et al. Differences in elasticity of vinculin-deficient F9 cells measured by magnetometry and atomic force microscopy. Exp. Cell Res. 239, 235–242 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lekka, M. et al. Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. 28, 312–316 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sokolov, I. in Cancer Nanotechnology—Nanomaterials for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy (eds Nalwa, H. S. and Webster, T.) 43–59 (APS, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sokolov, I., Iyer, S., Subba-Rao, V., Gaikwad, R. M. & Woodworth, C. D. Detection of surface brush on biological cells in vitro with atomic force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 023902 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han, J. D. & Rubin, C. S. Regulation of cytoskeleton organization and paxillin dephosphorylation by cAMP. Studies on murine Y1 adrenal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29211–29215 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, I. H., Co, C. C. & Ho, C. C. Alteration of human neuroblastoma cell morphology and neurite extension with micropatterns. Biomaterials 26, 6599–6609 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berdyyeva, T., Woodworth, C. D. & Sokolov, I. Visualization of cytoskeletal elements by the atomic force microscope. Ultramicroscopy 102, 189–198 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suresh, S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater. 3, 413–438 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shoelson, B., Dimitriadis, E. K., Cai, H., Kachar, B. & Chadwick, R. S. Evidence and implications of inhomogeneity in tectorial membrane elasticity. Biophys. J. 87, 2768–2777 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimitriadis, E. K., Horkay, F., Bechara, K. & Chadwick, R. S. Issues concerning the measurement of elastic properties at microscopic scales with the AFM. Biophys. J. 82, 56A (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pugacheva, E. N., Jablonski, S. A., Hartman, T. R., Henske, E. P. & Golemis, E. A. HEF1-dependent Aurora A activation induces disassembly of the primary cilium. Cell 129, 1351–1363 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, H. G. & Hoh, J. H. Entropic exclusion by neurofilament sidearms: a mechanism for maintaining interfilament spacing. Biochemistry 36, 15035–15040 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen, M., Klein, E., Geiger, B. & Addadi, L. Organization and adhesive properties of the hyaluronan pericellular coat of chondrocytes and epithelial cells. Biophys. J. 85, 1996–2005 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, L. M., Gardner, M. J., Catterall, J. B. & Turner, G. A. Hyaluronic acid secreted by mesothelial cells: A natural barrier to ovarian cancer cell adhesion. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 13, 373–380 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Toole, B. in Cell Biology of the Extracellular Matrix (ed. Hay, E.) 259–294 (Plenum Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmerman, E., Geiger, B. & Addadi, L. Initial stages of cell-matrix adhesion can be mediated and modulated by cell-surface hyaluronan. Biophys. J. 82, 1848–1857 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, L., Underhill, C. B. & Chen, L. Hyaluronan on the surface of tumor cells is correlated with metastatic behavior. Cancer Res. 55, 428–433 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Israelachivili, J. in Intermolecular and Surface Forces 2nd edn (Academic Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Butt, H. J. et al. Steric forces measured with the atomic force microscope at various temperatures. Langmuir 15, 2559–2565 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Emerson, R. J. T. & Camesano, T. A. Nanoscale investigation of pathogenic microbial adhesion to a biomaterial. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 6012–6022 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Woodworth, C. D., Doniger, J. & Dipaolo, J. A. Immortalization of human foreskin keratinocytes by various human papillomavirus DNAs corresponds to their association with cervical carcinoma. J. Virol. 63, 159–164 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsuprun, V. & Santi, P. Crystalline arrays of proteoglycan and collagen in the tectorial membrane. Matrix Biol. 15, 31–38 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lim, D. J. & Rueda, J. Distribution of glycoconjugates during cochlea development. A histochemical study. Acta Otolaryngol. 110, 224–233 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matzke, R., Jacobson, K. & Radmacher, M. Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 607–610 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding for this work from grants by the National Science Foundation no. 0304143 (I.S.), National Cancer Institute no. 1R15CA126855-01 (C.D.W.), and operational funds of Nanoengineering and Biotechnology Laboratories Center (NABLAB). Tissue was obtained from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network. We are thankful to S. Minko, V. Privman and E. Katz for useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.S. conceived and designed the experiments. S.I., R.M.G., V.S.R. and I.S. performed AFM and confocal measurements. C.D.W. and I.S. performed EM measurements. R.M.G. performed the critical electrolyte study. R.M.G., V.S.R. and I.S. analysed the data. S.I., C.D.W. and I.S. co-wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Sokolov.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 973 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iyer, S., Gaikwad, R., Subba-Rao, V. et al. Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells. Nature Nanotech 4, 389–393 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.77

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.77

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation