Skip to main content
Log in

Electroporation Increases DNA Synthesis in Cultured Plant Protoplasts

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bio/Technology Submit manuscript

Abstract

DNA synthesis increased significantly in isolated Prunus and Solanumprotoplasts electroporated at 250V cm−1 for 87 μsec and 750V cm−1 for 29 μsec respectively. This increase correlates with an earlier onset of division of protoplast-derived cells in culture. Inhibition of cell wall synthesis did not affect electro-enhancement of DNA synthesis. Electrostimulation of DNA synthesis coupled with enhanced division may have applications to protoplast systems and plant genetic engineering in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rathore, K.S. and Goldsworthy, A. 1985 Electrical control of shoot regeneration in plant tissue cultures. Bio/Technology 3:1107–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gill, R., Mishra, K.P. and Rao, P.S. 1987. Stimulation of shoot regeneration of Vigna acomtifolia by electrical control. Annals of Bot. 60:399–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldsworthy, A. and Rathore, K.S. 1985. The electrical control of growth in plant tissue cultures: the polar transport of auxin. J. Exp. Bot. 36:1134–1141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rech, E.L., Ochatt, S.J., Chand, P.K., Power, J.B. and Davey, M.R. 1987. Electro-enhancement of division of plant protoplast-derived cells. Protoplasma 141:169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochatt, S.J., Chand, P.K., Rech, E.L., Davey, M.R. and Power, J.B. 1988. Electroporation-mediated stimulation of plant regeneration from Colt cherry (Prunus avium ×pseudocerasus) protoplasts. Plant Sci. 54:165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chand, P.K., Ochatt, S.J., Rech, E.L., Power, J.B. and Davey, M.R. 1988. Electroporation stimulates plant regeneration from protoplasts of the woody medicinal species Solanum dulcamara L. J. Exp. Bot. (submitted)

  7. Takahashi, K., Kaneko, I., Date, M. and Fukuda, E. 1986. Effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in culture. Experientia 42:185–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Byus, C.V., Pieper, S.E. and Adey, W.R. 1987. The effects of low-energy 60-Hz environmental electromagnetic fields upon the growth-related enzyme ornithine decarboxylase. Carcinogenesis 8:1385–1389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinosita, K. and Tsong, T.Y. 1977 Voltage-induced pore formation and hemolysis of human erythrocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 471:227–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann, E., Schaefer-Rider, M., Wang, Y. and Hofschneider, P.H. 1982. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric field. EMBOJ J. 1:841–845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shillito, R.D., Saul, M.W., Paszkowski, J., Müller, M. and Potrykus, I. 1985. High efficiency direct gene transfer to plants. Bio/Technology 3:1099–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fromm, M.E., Taylor, L.P. and Walbot, V. 1986. Stable transformation of maize after gene transfer by electroporation. Nature 319:791–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hibi, T., Kano, H., Sugiura, M., Kazami, T. and Kimura, S. 1986. High efficiency electro-transfection of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts with tobacco mosaic virus RNA. J. Gen. Virol. 67:2037–2042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodan, G.A., Bourret, L.A. and Norton, L.A. 1978. DNA synthesis in cartilage cells is stimulated by oscillating electric fields. Science 199:690–692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindner, P., Neumann, E. and Rosenheck, K. 1977. Kinetics of permeability changes induced by electric impulses in chromaffin granules. J. Membrane Biol. 32:231–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Libbof, A.R., Williams, T., Strong, D.M. and Wistar, R. 1984 Time-varying magnetic fields: effect on DNA synthesis. Science 223:818–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ochatt, S.J., Cocking, E.C. and Power, J.B. 1987. Isolation, culture and plant regeneration of Colt cherry protoplasts (Prunus avium × pseudocerasus). Plant Sci. 50:139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galbraith, D.W. and Shields, D.A. 1982. The effects of inhibitors of cell wall synthesis on tobacco protoplast development. Physiol. Plant. 55:25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kao, K.N. and Michayluk, M. 1975. Nutritional requirements for growth of Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126:105–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rech, E., Ochatt, S., Chand, P. et al. Electroporation Increases DNA Synthesis in Cultured Plant Protoplasts. Nat Biotechnol 6, 1091–1093 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0988-1091

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0988-1091

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation