Skip to main content
Log in

Decrease of Na+ conductance during desensitisation of the frog endplate

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE membrane depolarisation of the frog endplate caused by acetylcholine (ACh), either released from the nerve terminals or applied externally, decreases when such applications of ACh are persisted or repeated1,2. This phenomenon, known as ‘densitisation’ or ‘inactivation’ of the receptor to ACh, was first analysed by Katz and Thesleff1 and was suggested to be caused by a change in the receptor molecule from an effective to a refractory state. Subsequent investigations revealed that the rate of this desensitisation depends both on the extracellular concentration of Ca2+ ([Ca2+]0)3–5 and on membrane potential6; being speeded up by increasing [Ca2+]0 or hyperpolarisation of the membrane. These observations and others, demonstrating that the endplate membrane became permeable to Ca2+ during the action of ACh (ref. 7), led to the hypothesis that desensitisation was brought about by transmembrane movement of Ca2+ and the combination of the ions with anionic sites on the inner surface of the endplate membrane4,5. The question then arises of whether desensitisation is caused by molecular changes in the ACh receptor or by those of the subsequent step directly controlling the ionic conductance of the endplate membrane. This subsequent step may involve a macro molecule which has been termed “ion channel” or “ion conductance modulator”8. In an attempt to answer this question, we measured changes in the equilibrium potential of the endplate membrane during desensitisation, using a voltage-clamp technique9,10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz, B., and Thesleff, S., J. Physiol., Lond., 138, 63–80 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thesleff, S., Acta Physiol. scand., 34, 218–231 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manthey, A. A., J. gen. Physiol., 49, 963–976 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Manthey, A. A., J. gen. Physiol., 56, 407–419 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nastuk, W. L., and Parsons, R. L., J. gen. Physiol, 56, 218–249 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Magazanik, L. G., and Vyskocil, F., J. Physiol., Lond., 210, 507–518 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeuchi, N., J. Physiol., Lond., 167, 141–155 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuba, K., Albuquerque, E. X., and Barnard, E. A., Science, 181, 853–856 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oomura, Y., and Tomita, T., in Electrical Activity of Single Cells (edit. by Katsuki, Y.), 181–205 (Igaku Shoin, Tokyo, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takeuchi, A., and Takeuchi, N., J. Neurophysiol., 22, 395–411 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuba, K., Chikazawa, K., and Koketsu, K., Jap. J. Physiol., 26, 159–175 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Magazanik, L. G., and Vyskocil, F., J. Physiol., Lond., 249, 285–300 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KUBA, K., KOKETSU, K. Decrease of Na+ conductance during desensitisation of the frog endplate. Nature 262, 504–505 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262504a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262504a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation