Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Spray-drop Data

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE spray-drop method of Williams and Backus1,2 is a valuable technique in electron microscopy for the estimation of virus concentrations. A statistical analysis was described in the original papers3. In 1958 we showed4 that this analysis was valid and gave a test to check that in any estimation the pairs of numbers used were unlikely to contain variations due to causes other than purely random ones. We pointed out that the ratio between the number of virus (Vi) and the number of latex (Li) in the ith drop can be expected to vary between one drop and the next for two reasons. There is the variation due to random movements of the particles, both virus and latex, in suspensions at ordinary temperatures which introduces an uncertainty into whether a particle is in or not in a drop at the instant of formation. This introduces a variation in the numbers of particles expected in drops of the same size from a uniformly mixed suspension. It will have a Poisson distribution and has been termed by us inherent variation. The second reason is due to experimental factors—inadequate mixing, contamination during spraying, aggregation of particles, etc., and these have been termed induced variations. Our test shows whether the pairs of numbers obtained from a series of drops contain variations in excess of that which would be expected from the inherent variation alone. This test does not make any assumption about drop size and may be applied to a collection of droplets of any size distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, R. C., and Backus, R. C., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 71, 4052 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Backus, R. C., and Williams, R. C., J. App. phys., 21, 11 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luria, S. E., Williams, R. C., and Backus, R. C., J. Bact., 61, 179 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson, K. I., and Taylor, W. B., Brit. J. App. Phys., 9, 264 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Opfell, J. B., Nature, 186, 822 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson, D. H., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 61, 321 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bresse, jun., S. S., and Trautman, R., Virology, 10, 57 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crocker, T. T., and Bennett, B. M., J. Immunol., 69, 183 (1952).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMSON, K., TAYLOR, W. Analysis of Spray-drop Data. Nature 200, 813–814 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200813a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200813a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation