Skip to main content
Log in

Anastomosis Groups, Pathogenicity and Sensitivity to Fungicides of Rhizoctonia solani Isolates Collected on Potato Crops in France

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A collection of 241 isolates of Rhizoctonia solani obtained from potato plants grown in different areas in France was characterized for anastomosis grouping, symptomatology on tubers of different cultivars and sensitivity to three fungicides. Most isolates collected belonged to (anastomosis groups (AGs)) AG 3, but 2% and 4% of the isolates were AG 5 and AG 2-1. AG 3 and AG 2-1 isolates were mostly obtained from sclerotia on tubers, but all AG 5, some AG 3 and some AG 2-1 isolates were recovered from superficial tuber alterations, like deformations, corky or scabby lesions. Sclerotia were formed on tubers produced by healthy stem cuttings grown in soil artificially infested with AG 3, but not on tubers grown in soil infested with either AG 5 or AG 2-1. No variation in susceptibility to sclerotial formation was observed among five potato cultivars. In all cases, a large proportion of tubers showed superficial corky lesions, often associated with deformations. The proportion of tubers with lesions and deformations was highest in soil infested with AG 2-1 and significantly lower on cv. Samba in all treatments. All isolates were highly sensitive to flutolanil, iprodione and pencycuron, except the AG 5 isolates, moderately sensitive to pencycuron. These results show that, although AG 3 is the most common R. solani group on potato in France, AG 5 and AG 2-1 may be present. Isolates differed for pathogenicity. In vitro sensitivity to fungicides varied among AGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson NA (1982) The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Annual Review of Phytopathology 20: 329-347

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker KF (1970) Types of Rhizoctonia diseases and their occurrence. In: Parmeter JR Jr (ed) Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology (pp 125-148) University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Balali GR, Neate SM, Scott ES, Whisson DL and Wicks TJ (1995) Anastomosis group and pathogenicity of isolates of Rhizoctonia solani from potato crops in South Australia. Plant Pathology 44: 1050-1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandy BP, Zanzinger DH and Tavantzis SM (1984) Isolation of anastomosis group 5 of Rhizoctonia solani from potato field oils in Maine. Phytopathology 74: 1220-1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchek-Mechiche K, Pasco C, Andrivon D and Jouan B (2000) Differences in host range, pathogenicity to potato cultivars and response to soil temperature among Streptomyces species causing common and netted scab in France. Plant Pathology 49: 3-10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bounou S, Jabaji-Hare SH, Hogue R and Charest PM (1999) Polymerase chain reaction-based assay for specific detection of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 isolates. Mycological Research 103: 1-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion C, Perraton B, Jouan B and Chatot C (1999) Diversity of Rhizoctonia solani pathogenic on potato in France and in the Mediterranean Basin. Abstracts of Conference Papers, Posters and Demonstration, 14th Triennial Conference of the EAPR, Sorrento 2-7 May 1999: 519-520

  • Carling DE and Leiner RH (1986) Isolation and characterization of Rhizoctonia solani and binucleate R. solani-like fungi from aerial stems and subterranean organs of potato plants. Phytopathology 76: 725-729

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE and Leiner RH (1990) Effect of temperature on virulence of Rhizoctonia solani and other Rhizoctonia on potato. Phytopathology 80: 930-934

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Leiner RH and Westphale PC (1989) Symptoms, signs and yield reduction associated with Rhizoctonia disease of potato induced by tuberborne inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3. American Potato Journal 66: 693-701

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Kuninaga S and Brainard KA (2002) Hyphal anastomosis reactions, rDNA-internal transcribed spacer sequences, and virulence levels among subsets of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group-2 (AG-2) and AG-BI. Phytopathology 92: 43-50

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand T and Logan C (1983) Cultural and pathogenic variation in potato isolates of Rhizoctonia solani in Northern Ireland. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 81: 585-589

    Google Scholar 

  • Csinos AS and Stephenson MG (1999) Evaluation of fungicides and tobacco cultivar resistance to Rhizoctonia solani incited target spot, damping off and sore shin. Crop Protection 18: 373-377

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubeta MA and Vilgalys R (1997) Population biology of the Rhizoctonia solani complex. Phytopathology 87: 480-484

    Google Scholar 

  • Escande AR and Echandi E (1991) Protection of potato from Rhizoctonia canker with binucleate Rhizoctonia fungi. Plant Pathology 40: 197-202

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr LJ (1979) Practical nuclear staining procedures for Rhizoctonia-like fungi. Phytopathology 69: 958-961

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeger MJ, Hide GA, van den Boogert PHJF, Termorshuizen AJ and van Baarlen P (1996) Pathology and control of soil-borne fungal pathogens of potato. Potato Research 39: 437-469

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouan B (1997) Les principales causes d'altérations superficielles des tubercules. La Pomme de Terre Française 499: 30-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataria HR and Verma PR (1989) Variations in the sensitivity to fungicides among different anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 11: 192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataria HR, Hugelshofer U and Gisi U (1991) Sensitivity of Rhizoctonia species to different fungicides. Plant Pathology 40: 203-211

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach LD and Garber RH (1970) Control of Rhizoctonia. In: Parmeter JR Jr (ed) Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology (pp 189-198) University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin SB, Lucas LT and Campbell CL (1984) Comparative sensitivity of Rhizoctonia solani and Rhizoctonia-like fungi to selected fungicides in vitro. Phytopathology 74: 778-781

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies JD (1970) Introduction: The first century of Rhizoctonia solani. In: Parmeter JR Jr (ed) Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology (pp 3-5) University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi A (1987) Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Annual Review of Phytopathology 25: 125-143

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter JR Jr and Whitney HS (1970) Taxonomy and nomenclature of the imperfect state. In: Parmeter JR Jr (ed) Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology (pp 7-19) University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter JR Jr, Sherwood RT and Platt WD (1969) Anastomosis grouping among isolates of Thanatephorus cucumeris. Phytopathology 59: 1270-1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar O, Julian MC and Rubio V (2000) Primers based on specific rDNA-ITS sequences for PCR detection of Rhizoctonia solani, R. solani AG 2 subgroups and ecological types, and binucleate Rhizoctonia. Mycological Research 104: 281-285

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JHM, Schilder MT and Dijst G (1997a) Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2 isolates causing bare patch in field grown tulips in the Netherlands. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 265-279

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JHM, Salazar O, Rubio V and Keijer J (1997b) Identification of Rhizoctonia solani associated with field-grown tulips using ITS rDNA polymorphism and pectic zymograms. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 607-622

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte K (1989) Effects of soil-borne Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on yield and quality of ten potato cultivars. Potato Research 32: 367-376

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edn. Freeman WH and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner DR (1987) Efficacy of pencycuron against isolates representing different anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani and Rhizoctonia-like binucleate fungi. Plant Disease 71: 515-518

    Google Scholar 

  • Turff R (2002) Fungus more complex than first thought. Potato Review: 4-6

  • Ueyama I, Araki Y, Kurogochi S, Yoneyama K and Yamaguchi I (1990) Mode of action of the phenylurea fungicide pencycuron in Rhizoctonia solani. Pesticide Science 30: 363-365

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilgalys R and Gonzalez D (1990) Ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms in Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 80: 151-158

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgen-Calleros G, Olalde-Portugal V and Carling DE (2000) Anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani on potato in Central Mexico and potential for biological and chemical control. American Journal of Potato Research 77: 219-224

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhold AR, Bowman T and Hall DH (1978) Rhizoctonia disease of potato in California. American Potato Journal 55: 56-57

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DA (1976) Improved likelihood ratio tests for complete contingency tables. Biometrika 63: 33-37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campion, C., Chatot, C., Perraton, B. et al. Anastomosis Groups, Pathogenicity and Sensitivity to Fungicides of Rhizoctonia solani Isolates Collected on Potato Crops in France. European Journal of Plant Pathology 109, 983–992 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003829.83671.8f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003829.83671.8f

Navigation