Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing a Tree for Community Leaders: Contexts and Processes in Collaborative Inquiry

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This paper presents collaborative research between a university-based team and a grass roots community organization on the south side of Chicago. The purpose of the work is to document the nature of community leadership as expressed by members of the host organization. Using a semistructured interview, 77 community members nominated by the host organization were asked about various aspects of their community work. Qualitative analyses of interview text generated a set of 56 codes concerning different aspects of community leadership as reported by grassroots leaders. These codes were subsequently grouped together into five conceptually linked dimensions of community leadership. A“ leadership tree” that simultaneously analyzes and visually displays each of these five dimensions of community leadership was created. Implications of the methodology used to create the leadership tree are discussed for the salience of qualitative methods in community research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ahrne, G. (1994). Social organizations: Interaction, outside and between organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azelton, L. S. (1995). Boundary spanning and community leadership: African American leaders in the Greater Roseland Area. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.

  • Bagby, M. (1996). Documenting community leadership [Videotape recording]. University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Psychology.

  • Bartunek, J. M., & Louis, M. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. Qualitative research methods, (Vol. 40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy of inquiry: Action research and participatory research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19, 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Community Education and Action (1991). Participatory research: An annotated bibliography. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemers, M. (1993). An integrative theory of leadership. In M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 293–319). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernail, R. (1996). Presenting qualitative data. Internet document http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-3/presenting.html.

  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complimentary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1996). Talking back to Sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodologies. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in social science. In G. Bowles & R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp.105–116). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. (1990). Some emerging standards for community research and action: Aid from a behavioral perspective. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology (pp. 64–75). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. (1995). Cognitive resources and leadership performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & Weis, L. (1996). Writing the “wrongs” of fieldwork: Confronting our own research/writing dilemmas in urban ethnographies. Qualitative Inquiry, 2,(3), 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, R., & Peterman, W. (1992, June). Roseland community credit needs assessment. The Nathalie P. Vorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement. University of Illinois at Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenwick, D. S., Heller, K., Linney, J. A., & Pargament, K. I. (1990). Criteria of excellence I. Models for adventuresome research in community psychology: Commonalties, dilemmas, and future directions. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology (pp. 76–87). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glidewell, J. C., Kelly, J. G., Bagby, M., & Dickerson, A. (1998). Community leadership: Theory and practice. In R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F. J. Posavic, F. B. Bryant, L. Heath, E. Henderson-King, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, & S. Myers (Eds.), Applications of theory and research on groups to social issues. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, S, Fox-Cardamone, L., Haseleu, J., Brown, R., & Irwin, L. (1996). Grassroots political action as an intergroup phenomenon. Journal of Social Issues, 52,(1), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. (1992). Leadership, followership, self, and others. Leadership Quarterly, 3(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, T., & Stewart, A. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies. In M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85–106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. (1980). Organizing: A guide for grassroots leaders. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1968). Toward an ecological conception of preventive interventions. In J. W. Carter (Ed.), Research contributions from psychology to community mental health. New York: Behavioral Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1992). Ecological inquiry and collaborative enterprise: A commentary on the “Chicago Experience.” In J. G. Kelly (Chair), African American leaders: Research as a collaborative process. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

  • Kelly, J. G., & Hess, R. E. (1986). (Eds.). The ecology of prevention: Illustrating mental health consultation. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. Prevention in the Human Services, 3, 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingry-Westergaard, C., & Kelly, J. G. (1990). A contextualist epistemology for ecological research. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology (pp. 23–31). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardon, C. (1995). An assessment of empowerment in the context of community leadership. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.

  • Leslie, A. R. (1992). Community Area, 49, 129–130; 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, C. & Mamiya, L. (1990). The black church in the African American experience. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. E., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 631–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, B., Florin, P., Stevenson, J., Kerman, B., & Mitchell, R. E. (1995). Empowerment praxis in community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 699–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, L. O. (1994). Validation of an instrument to assess the personal visions of African American community leaders. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.

  • Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (Eds.). (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. OISE Press: Ontario Institute for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Brown, B. B., & Taylor, R. B. (1996). The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestby, J., Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Rich, R., & Chavis, D. (1990). Benefits, costs, incentive management and participation in voluntary organizations: A means to understanding and promoting empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 117–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (1994). (Ed.). Participation in human inquiry: Research with people. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinfeld, S. (1992). Documenting the Community Research Panel. In J. G. Kelly (Chair), African-American leaders: Research as a collaborative process. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

  • Seidel, J., & Kelle, U. (1995). Different functions of coding in the analysis of textual data. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 52–61). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P., & Hughey, J. (1996). Mechanisms of empowerment: Psychological processes for members of power-based community organizations. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P., Hughey, J., Gensheimer, L. K., & Adams-Leavitt, W. (1995). Organizing for power: A comparative case study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1994). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, S. D. (1996). Trees of community activists: Rationale and visual display. In J. G. Kelly (Chair), Varieties of community leadership: A method to define community activism. Symposium conducted at the 60th Anniversary Convention of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.

  • Tandon, S. D. (1997). The views of community leaders: A multimethod approach to assess personal strengths and community resources. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.

  • Tandon, S. D., Azelton, L. S., Bagby, M., Mock, L. O., & Strickland, D. (1996). In J.G. Kelly (Chair), Reciprocal gains from a research relationship. Symposium conducted at the Midwestern conference of the Society for Community Research and Action.

  • Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F., & Jason, L. (Eds.). (1990). Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and method. Washington DC: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J. (1986). Consultation as a preventive intervention: Comments on ecologically based case studies. Prevention in the Human Services, 4, 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., Kelly, J. G., & Todd, D. M. (1972). The social environment of the high school: Guidelines for individual change and organizational development. In S. E. Golann & C. Eisdorfer (Eds.), Handbook of community mental health (pp. 331–406). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, F. B., Pargament, K. I., & Gatz, M. (1983). The resource collaborator role: A model for interactions involving psychologists. American Psychologist, 38, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. H., & Florin, P. (Eds.). (1990). Citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research [special section]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18.

  • Wilkerson, I. (1992, June 21). Two neighborhoods and a wall called race. The New York Times.

  • Williams, L. (1996). An annotated bibliography for participatory and collaborative field research methods. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Community Partnership Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581–599.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Darius Tandon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tandon, S.D., Azelton, L.S., Kelly, J.G. et al. Constructing a Tree for Community Leaders: Contexts and Processes in Collaborative Inquiry. Am J Community Psychol 26, 669–696 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022149123739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022149123739

Navigation