Skip to main content
Log in

Some Minor Reflections on Conflict Resolution: The State of the Field as a Moving Target

  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

Abstract

Based on several recent meetings between the scholarly and practice communities of the conflict resolution field, the author observes that our understanding of what we consider to be conflict resolution is changing rapidly, and that the context of a particular dispute is often determining. To continue to build knowledge in the field, scholars and reflective practitioners should examine such topic areas as the nature of practice; differences between in-house and external mediation; expectations of all parties about change and outcomes; and the ethics of intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCE

  • Kriesberg, L. 1998. Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. New York: Bowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Warfield, W. Some Minor Reflections on Conflict Resolution: The State of the Field as a Moving Target. Negotiation Journal 18, 381–384 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021014625337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021014625337

Keywords

Navigation