Abstract
Based on several recent meetings between the scholarly and practice communities of the conflict resolution field, the author observes that our understanding of what we consider to be conflict resolution is changing rapidly, and that the context of a particular dispute is often determining. To continue to build knowledge in the field, scholars and reflective practitioners should examine such topic areas as the nature of practice; differences between in-house and external mediation; expectations of all parties about change and outcomes; and the ethics of intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCE
Kriesberg, L. 1998. Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. New York: Bowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Warfield, W. Some Minor Reflections on Conflict Resolution: The State of the Field as a Moving Target. Negotiation Journal 18, 381–384 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021014625337
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021014625337