Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

Abstract

This reflection chapter begins with a brief history of the events that have driven theory development in the field of conflict resolution, as well as the author’s own evolution and process in taking a leadership role in identifying the necessity of cultural consideration in conflict resolution. The four waves proposed in this book are discussed, particularly the fourth wave, which is the context of the projects in these chapters. Finally, the bigger picture is examined in terms of themes drawn from the chapters, including building power and empowerment, “cultures” of mediation, roles of mediators, tension between harmony and justice and general lessons learned. The chapter ends with a discussion of hybridity in the field, both past and present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I learned a lot from these authors and colleagues, and I write with gratitude in recognizing how the work that I (and others!) began decades ago to make culture, context, and difference relevant for our field has matured into the varieties of research, theory, and, above all, practice, represented here.

References

  • Avruch, K. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K. (2009). What is training all about? Negotiation Journal, 25(2), 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K. (2012). Context and pretext in conflict resolution. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K. (2013). Does our field have a centre? Thoughts from the academy. International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, 1(1), 10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., & Black, P. W. (1987). A ‘generic’ theory of conflict resolution: A critique. Negotiation Journal, 3(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., & Black, P. W. (1990). Ideas of human nature in contemporary conflict resolution theory. Negotiation Journal, 6(3), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., & Black, P. W. (1991). The culture question and conflict resolution. Peace and Change, 16(1), 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., & Black, P. W. (1993). Conflict resolution in intercultural settings: Problems and prospects. In D. Sandole & H. van der Merwe (Eds.), Conflict resolution theory and practice: Integration and application (pp. 131–145). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., & Black, P. W. (1996). ADR, Palau, and the contribution of anthropology. In A. Wolfe & H. Yang (Eds.), Anthropological contributions to conflict resolution (pp. 47–63). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., Black, P. W., & Scimecca, J. (Eds.). (1991). Conflict resolution: Cross-cultural perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K., & Mitchell, C. (Eds.). (2013). Conflict resolution and human needs: Linking theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1962). Conflict and defence: A general theory. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigg, M. (2008). The new politics of conflict resolution: Responding to difference. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. W. (1979). Deviance, terrorism, and war. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (Eds.). (2013). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1991, rev. 1997). Negotiating across cultures. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzig, R. (1973). Towards the creation of a complementary, decentralized system of criminal justice. Stanford Law Review, 26, 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. (1963). The Kpelle moot: A therapeutic model for the informal settlement of disputes. Africa, 33, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1990). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochman, T. (1981). Black and white styles in conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, J., & Cormick, G. (1978). The ethics of intervention in community disputes. In G. Bermant, H. Kehman, & D. Warwick (Eds.), The ethics of social intervention (pp. 205–232). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1991). Of nets, nails and problems: The folk language of conflict resolution in a Central American setting. In K. Avruch, P. W. Black, & J. Scimecca (Eds.), Conflict resolution: Cross cultural perspectives (pp. 165–186). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGinty, R., & Firchow, P. (2016). Top-down and bottom-up narratives of peace and conflict. Politics, 36(3), 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B. (2004). Beyond neutrality: Confronting the crisis in conflict resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996). The trouble with the adversary system in a postmodern multicultural world. William and Mary Law Review, 38, 5–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (2001). Towards a theory of conflict and culture. In P. K. Chew (Ed.), The culture and conflict reader (pp. 47–51). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R., & McKersie, R. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. (1994). Negotiating with Romans, part I. Sloan Management Review, 35(2), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Avruch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Avruch, K. (2018). Towards the Fourth Wave of Conflict Resolution Practice. In: d'Estrée, T., Parsons, R. (eds) Cultural Encounters and Emergent Practices in Conflict Resolution Capacity-Building. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71102-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics