Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling support for stochastic programs

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many decision problems, some of the factors considered are subject to significantuncertainty, randomness, or statistical fluctuations: these circumstances motivate the studyof stochastic models. The paper is intended to provide an overview of modelling toolsavailable for the development, analysis, solution and maintenance of stochastic programs.A brief introduction to some important model forms is followed by a review of suitablemodelling and computational environments, including algebraic modelling languages.Aspects of problem description, solution methodology, report generation, and visual problemrepresentation, as well as certain auxiliary tools and diagnostics are discussed. An extensivelist of references is provided, to give further pointers into a challenging field of greatpractical importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.A. Ariyawansa and D.D. Hudson, Performance of a benchmark implementation of the Van Slyke and Wets algorithm for stochastic two-stage stochastic programs on the Sequent/Balance, Concurrency: Practice and Experience 3(1991)109 – 128.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.A. Ariyawansa and P.L. Jiang, Polynomial cutting plane algorithms for two-stage stochastic linear programs based on ellipsoids, volumetric centers and analytic centers, Working Paper, Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Avriel and A.C. Williams, The value of information and stochastic programming, Operations Research 18(1970)947–954.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.E. Baker, A hierarchical/relational approach to modelling, Computer Science in Economics and Management 3(1990)63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E.M.L. Beale, On minimizing a convex function subject to linear inequalities, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 17(1955)173 – 184.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.F. Benders, Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems, Numerische Mathematik 4(1962)238– 252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Bereanu, The distribution problem in stochastic linear programming, Methods of Operations Research 8(1970)22 – 35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.J.M. Beulens and H-J. Sebastian (eds.), Optimization-Based Computer-Aided Modelling and Design, Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Bharadwaj, L. Choobineh and B. Shetty, Model management systems: A survey, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)17 – 67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.R. Birge, Decomposition and partition methods for stochastic programming problems. Operations Research 33(1985)989–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.R. Birge, M.A.H. Dempster, H.I. Gassmann, E.A. Gunn, A.J. King and S.W. Wallace, A standard input format for multiperiod stochastic linear programs, Committe on Algorithms Newsletter 17 (1988)1 – 19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.R. Birge, C.J. Donohue, D.F. Holmes and O.G. Svintsitski, A parallel implementation of the nested decomposition algorithm for multistage stochastic linear programs, Technical Report 94-1, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.R. Birge and D.F. Holmes, Efficient solution of two-stage stochastic linear programs using interior point methods, Computational Optimization and Applications 1(1992)245 – 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.R. Birge and S.W. Wallace, A separable piecewise linear upper bound for stochastic linear programs, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 25(1988)725– 739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Bisschop and R. Entriken, AIMMS: The Modelling System, Paragon Decision Technology, Haarlem, The Netherlands, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Borland, Paradox Engine User's Guide, Borland International, Inc., Scotts Valley, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borland, Quattro Pro (Version 4.0), Borland International, Inc., Scotts Valley, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Brooke, D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus, GAMS – A User's Guide, The Scientific Press, Redwood City, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Chance-constrained programming, Management Science 5(1959) 73 –79.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Chance-constraints and normal deviates, Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(1962)134– 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chesapeake Decision Sciences, MIMI: Manager for Interactive Modeling Interfaces – User's Manual, Chesapeake Decision Sciences, New Providence, NJ, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.W. Chinneck, Finding minimal infeasible sets of constraints in infeasible mathematical programs, Technical Report SCE-93-01, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.W. Chinneck, MProbe (Version 1.01) User's Manual, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, 1996 (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.W. Chinneck and E.W. Dravnieks, Locating minimal infeasible constraint sets in linear programs, ORSA Journal on Computing 3(1991)157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Collins, The Collins Dictionary of the English Language, Collins, London/Glasgow, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A.R. Conn, N. Gould and Ph.L. Toint, LANCELOT: A F ORTRAN Package for for Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization (Release A), Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 17, Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.R. Conn, N. Gould and Ph.L. Toint, Numerical experiments with the LANCELOT package (Release A) for large-scale nonlinear optimization, Mathematical Programming 73(1996)73 – 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. CPLEX Optimization, CPLEX (Version 4.0), CPLEX Optimization, Inc., Incline Village, NV, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Cunningham and L. Schrage, The LINGO modelling language, Technical Report, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Czyzyk, R. Fourer and S. Mehrotra, A study of the augmented system and column-splitting approaches for solving two-stage stochastic linear programs by interior-point methods, Technical Report 93-5, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G.B. Dantzig, Linear programming under uncertainty, Management Science 1(1955)197 – 206.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G.B. Dantzig and G. Infanger, Large-scale stochastic linear programs: Importance sampling and Benders decomposition, Technical Report SOL 91-4, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G.B. Dantzig and G. Infanger, Multi-stage stochastic linear programs for portfolio optimization, Technical Report SOL 91-11, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G.B. Dantzig and A. Madansky, On the solution of two-stage linear programs under uncertainty, in: Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symp. on Math. Stat. Prob., ed. I.J. Neyman, 1961, pp. 165 – 176.

  35. G.B. Dantzig and P. Wolfe, Decomposition principle for linear programs, Operations Research 8(1960)101– 111.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dash Associates, XPRESS-MP, Dash Associates, Ltd., Blisworth, Northants, UK, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  37. M.A.H. Dempster (ed.), Stochastic Programming, Academic Press, London, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.A.H. Dempster, Introduction to stochastic programming, in: [37], pp. 3 – 59.

  39. M.A.H. Dempster, On Stochastic Programming II: Dynamic problems under risk, Stochastics 25 (1988)15– 42.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M.A.H. Dempster and G. Consigli, Dynamic stochastic programming for asset-liability management, Annals of Operations Research(1996).

  41. M.A.H. Dempster and H.I. Gassmann, Stochastic programming: Using the expected value of perfect information to simplify the decision tree, in: Proceedings of the 15th IFIP Conference on System Modelling and Optimization, Zürich, Switzerland, 1991, pp. 301–303.

  42. M.A.H. Dempster and A.M. Ireland, A financial expert decision support system, in: [120], pp. 415–440.

  43. M.A.H. Dempster and R.T. Thompson, EVPI-based importance sampling solution procedures for multistage stochastic linear programmes on parallel MIMD architectures, Proceedings of the POC96 Conference, Versailles, 1996, submitted to Annals of Operations Research.

  44. A.S. Drud, CONOPT – A GRG Code for Large Scale Nonlinear Optimization – Reference Manual, ARKI Consulting and Developments A/S, Bagsvæerd, Denmark, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  45. N.C.P. Edirisinghe and W.T. Ziemba, Bounding the expectation of a saddle function with application to stochastic programming, Mathematics of Operations Research 19(1994)314 – 340.

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. Edwards, J. Birge, A. King and L. Nazareth, A standard input format for computer codes which solve stochastic programs with recourse and a library of utilities to simplify its use, Working Paper WP-85-03, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yu.M. Ermoliev, Stochastic quasi-gradient methods, in: [48], pp. 141 – 185.

  48. Yu.M. Ermoliev and R.J-B Wets (eds.), Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization, Springer, Berlin, 1988.

  49. C.A. Floudas and P.M. Pardalos, A Collection of Test Problems for Constrained Global Optimization Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 455, Springer, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  50. R. Fourer, Modelling languages versus matrix generators for linear programming, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 9(1983)143 – 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. R. Fourer, Proposed new AMPL features – stochastic programming extensions, Working Paper, 1996, World Wide Web, http://www.ampl.com/cm/cs/what/ampi/NEW/FUTURE/stoch.html.

  52. R. Fourer, D.M. Gay and B.W. Kernighan, AMPL: A Modelling Language for Mathematical Programming, The Scientific Press, San Fransisco, CA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  53. K. Frauendorfer, Bounding the expectation of a function of a multivariate random variable – with application to stochastic programming, 11th Symposium on Operations Research, Darmstadt, 1986, Methods of Operations Research 57, Athenäum/Hain/Hanstein, Königstein/Ts., 1987, pp. 13 – 23.

    Google Scholar 

  54. R.M. Freund and S. Mizuno, Interior point methods: Current status and future directions, Optima 51(October 1996)1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Frontline Systems, Excel Solver Upgrade (for Excel Versions 5.0 and 7.0), Frontline Systems, Incline Village, NV, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  56. A. Gaivoronski, Implementation of stochastic quasi-gradient methods, in: [48], pp. 313 –351.

  57. S.J. Gartska, The economic equivalence of several stochastic programming models, in: [37], pp. 83 –92.

  58. H.I. Gassmann, MSLiP: A computer code for the multistage stochastic linear programming problem, Mathematical Programming 47(199)407– 423.

  59. H.I. Gassmann, Interior point methods in stochastic programming, Working Paper WP-91-4, School of Business Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  60. H.I. Gassmann, Stochastic programming: Models and algorithms, Plenary lecture delivered at the Nordic Operations Research Symposium, Trondheim, Norway, June 11, 1993.

  61. H.I. Gassmann and A.M. Ireland, Scenario formulation in an algebraic modelling language, Annals of Operations Research 59(1995)45 – 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. H.I. Gassmann and A.M. Ireland, On the formulation of stochastic linear programs using algebraic modelling languages, Annals of Operations Research 64(1996)83 –112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. H.I. Gassmann and E. Schweitzer, Proposed extensions to the SMPS input format for stochastic programs, Working Paper WP-96-1, School of Business Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  64. H.I. Gassmann and W.T. Ziemba, A sharp upper bound on the expectation of a convex function, Mathematical Programming Study 27(1986)39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  65. D.M. Gay, Hooking your solver to AMPL, Numerical Analysis Manuscript 93-10, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, 1993 (revised version: August, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  66. A.M. Geoffrion, An introduction to structured modeling, Management Science 33(1987)547 – 588.

    Google Scholar 

  67. A.M. Geoffrion, Computer-based modeling environments, European Journal of Operational Research 41(1989)33 – 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. A.M. Geoffrion, FW/SM: A prototype structured modeling environment, Management Science 37(1991)1513 – 1538.

    Google Scholar 

  69. P.W. Glynn and D.L. Iglehart, Importance sampling for stochastic simulation, Management Science 35(1989)1367 – 1392.

    Google Scholar 

  70. H.J. Greenberg, A Computer-Assisted Analysis System for Mathematical Programming Models and Solutions: A User's Guide for ANALYZE, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  71. H.J. Greenberg, Modeling by Object-Driven Linear Elemental Relations: A User's Guide for MODLER, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  72. H.J. Greenberg, A bibliography for the development of an intelligent mathematical programming system, Technical Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  73. H.J. Greenberg, Mathematical Programming Glossary, 1996, World Wide Web, http://wwwmath. cudenver.edu/~hgreenbe/glossary/glossary.html.

  74. H.J. Greenberg and F.H. Murphy, A comparison of mathematical programming modeling systems, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)177 – 238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Stochastic decomposition: An algorithm for two-stage linear programs with recourse, Mathematics of Operations Research 16(1991)650 – 669.

    Google Scholar 

  76. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Guidelines for a computer implementation of stochastic decomposition algorithms, Technical Report, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  77. D.F. Holmes, A collection of stochastic programming problems, Technical Report 94-11, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, 1994.

  78. T. Hürlimann, Reference Manual for the LPL Modeling Language (Version 3.1), Institute for Automation and Operations Research, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  79. T. Hürlimann, LPL: A mathematical programming language, OR Spektrum 15(1993)43 – 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. G. Infanger, Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs, Technical Report SOL 91-6, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  81. International Business Machines, Mathematical Programming Subsystem – Extended (MPSX) and Generalized Upper Bounding (GUB) Program Description, Document No. SH20-0968-1, IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  82. International Business Machines, Mathematical Programming Subsystem – Extended (MPSX) and Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) Program Description, Document No. GH19-1091-0. IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  83. International Business Machines, Optimization Subroutine Library Guide and Reference, Document No. SC23-0519-02. IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  84. R.H.F. Jackson, P.T. Boggs, S.C. Nash and S. Powell, Guidelines for reporting results of computational experiments: Report of the ad hoc committee, Mathematical Programming 49(1991)413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. C.V. Jones, Visualization and Optimization, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  86. P. Kall, Stochastic Linear Programming, Springer, Berlin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  87. P. Kall (ed.), System Modelling and Optimization, Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  88. P. Kall and J. Mayer, SLP-IOR: A model management system for stochastic linear programming – system design, in: [8], pp. 139 –157.

  89. P. Kall and J. Mayer, A model management system for stochastic linear programming, in: [87], pp. 580 – 587.

  90. P. Kall and J. Mayer, Model management for stochastic linear programming, Working Paper, Institute of Operations Research, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  91. P. Kall and J. Mayer, SLP-IOR: An interactive model management system for stochastic linear programs, Working Paper, Institute of Operations Research, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  92. P. Kall, A. Ruszczyński and K. Frauendorfer, Approximation techniques in stochastic programming, in: [48], pp. 33 – 64.

  93. P. Kall and S.W. Wallace, Stochastic Programming, Wiley, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  94. E. Keller, GENSLP: A program for generating input for stochastic linear programs with complete recourse, Working Paper, Institute of Operations Research, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  95. J.E. Kelley, The cutting-plane method for solving convex programs, Journal of SIAM 8(1960)703 – 712.

    Google Scholar 

  96. A.J. King, Stochastic programming problems: Examples from the literature, in: [48], pp. 543 –567.

  97. A.J. King, SP/OSL (Version 1.0) – Stochastic Programming Interface Library. User's Guide, Working Paper, IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  98. W.K. Klein Haneveld, Duality in Stochastic Linear and Dynamic Programming, Springer, Berlin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  99. D. Klingman, A. Napier and J. Stutz, NETGEN: A program for generating large scale capacitated assignment, transportation, and minimum cost flow network problems, Management Science 20 (1974)814– 821.

    Google Scholar 

  100. R. Krishnan, Model management: Survey, future directions, and a bibliography, ORSA Computer Science Technical Section Newsletter 14(1993)1 –16.

    Google Scholar 

  101. B. Kristjansson, MPL Modelling System User Manual (Version 2.8), Maximal Software, Inc., Arlington, VA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  102. C.A.C. Kuip, Algebraic languages for mathematical programming, European Journal of Operational Research 67(1993)25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. G. Laporte and F.V. Louveaux, The integer L-shaped method for stochastic integer programs, Cahiers de la Faculté des Sciences Economiques et Sociales, Université Namur, Namur, Belgium, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  104. L.S. Lasdon and A.D. Waren, GRG2 User's Guide, School of Business Administration, University of Texas, Austin, TX, and College of Business Administration, Ohio State University, Cleveland, OH, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  105. A.M. Law and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modelling and Analysis, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  106. LINDO Systems, LINGO Optimization Modeling Language, LINDO Systems, Inc., Chicago, IL, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  107. LINDO Systems, What's Best!, LINDO Systems, Inc., Chicago,IL, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lotus Development Corporation, Lotus 1-2-3 (Release 4), Lotus Development Corporation, Cambridge, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  109. I.J. Lustig, J.M. Mulvey and T.J. Carpenter, The formulation of stochastic programs for interior point methods, Technical Report SOR 89-16, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  110. P-C. Ma, F.H. Murphy and E.A. Stohr, A graphics interface for linear programming, Communications of the ACM 32(1989)996 – 1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. P-C. Ma, F.H. Murphy and E.A. Stohr, An implementation of LPFORM, Working Paper, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 1994, submitted to the ORSA Journal on Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  112. A. Madansky, Bounds on the expectation of a convex function of a multivariate random variable, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30(1959)743 –746.

    Google Scholar 

  113. A. Madansky, Inequalities for stochastic linear programming problems, Management Science 6(1960)197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. M. Makowski, LP-DIT – Data interchange tool for linear programming problems (Version 1.20), Working Paper WP-94-36, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  115. K. Marti (ed.), Stochastic Optimization: Numerical Methods and Technical Applications, Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  116. MathWorks (The), MATLAB for Windows (Version 4.2c.1), The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  117. J. Mayer, Computational techniques for probabilistic constrained optimization problems, in: [115], pp. 141 – 164.

  118. Microsoft, Microsoft Access User's Guide (Version 2.0), Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Microsoft, Microsoft Excel User's Guide (Version 5.0), Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  120. G. Mitra (ed.), Mathematical Methods for Decision Support, Springer, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  121. H.D. Mittelmann and P. Spellucci, Decision tree for optimizations software, 1997, World Wide Web, http://plato.la.asu.edu/guide.html.

  122. J.J. Moré and S.J. Wright, Optimization Software Guide, Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  123. J.M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczyński, A new scenario decomposition method for large-scale stochastic optimization, Operations Research 43(1995)477 – 490.

    Google Scholar 

  124. J.M. Mulvey and H. Vladimirou, Solving multistage stochastic networks: An application of scenario aggregation, Technical Report SOR-88-1, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  125. B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders, MINOS 5.1 User's Guide, Technical Report SOL 83-20R, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 1983 (revised: January 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  126. S.S. Nielsen and S. Zenios, Solving multistage stochastic network programs on massively parallel computers, Working Paper, Department of Management Science and Information Systems, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Optimization Technology Center, The Optimization Technology Center Home Page, 1996, World Wide Web, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/home/otc/

  128. Palisade, @RISK (Version 3.5), Palisade Corporation, Newfield, NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Palisade, BestFit (Version 2.0), Palisade Corporation, Newfield, NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  130. J.D. Pintér, Deterministic approximations of probability inequalities, ZOR – Methods and Models of Operations Research, Series Theory 33(1989)219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  131. J.D. Pintér, Global Optimization in Action, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  132. J.D. Pintér, LGO – A Program System for Continuous and Lipschitz Global Optimization. User's Guide, Pintér Consulting Services, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  133. J.D. Pintér, Continuous global optimization software: A brief review, Optima 52(December 1996)1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  134. A. Prékopa, Contributions to the theory of stochastic programming, Mathematical Programming 3(1973)202 – 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. A. Prékopa, Numerical solutions of probabilistic constrained programming problems, in: [48], pp. 123 – 139.

  136. A. Prékopa, Stochastic Programming, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  137. A. Prékopa, S. Ganczer, I. Deák and K. Patyi, The STABIL stochastic programming model and its experimental application to the electrical energy sector of the Hungarian economy, in: [37], pp. 357 – 368.

  138. C.T. Ragsdale, Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Management Science, Course Technology, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  139. H. Raiffa and R. Schlaifer, Applied Statistical Decision Theory, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  140. R. Reinhardt, ISYTOP – Interactive System for Teaching Optimization, Department of Operations Research and Stochastics, Institute of Mathematics, Technical University of Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  141. R.T. Rockafellar, Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm, SIAM Journal on Optimization and Control 14(1976)877–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. R.T. Rockafellar and R.J-B Wets, The principle of scenario aggregation in optimization under uncertainty, Working Paper WP-87-119, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  143. S. Ross, A First Course in Probability, 2nd ed., Collier-MacMillan, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  144. A. Ruszczyń ski, A regularized decomposition method for minimizing a sum of polyhedral functions, Mathematical Programming 35(1986)309 – 333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. A. Ruszczyński, Parallel decomposition of multistage stochastic programs, Mathematical Programming 58(1992)201 – 228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. S. Savage, FASTQM: Fundamental Analytical Spreadsheet Tools for Quantitative Management, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  147. S. Sen, R.D. Doverspike and S. Cosares, Network planning with random demand, Technical Report, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  148. L. Schrage, Linear, Integer and Quadratic Programming with LINDO, 3rd ed., Scientific Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  149. K. Schittkowski, Nonlinear Programming Codes – Information, Tests, Performance, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 183, Springer, Berlin, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  150. K. Schittkowski, EASY-FIT – Parameter Estimation in Dynamic Systems (Version 1.0), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  151. StatSoft, STATISTICA (Release 5), StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  152. B. Strazicky, Some results concerning an algorithm for the discrete recourse problem, in: [37], pp. 263 – 274.

  153. T. Szántai, A computer code for solution of probabilistic constrained stochastic programming problems, in: [48], pp. 229 – 235.

  154. M.A. Trick, Michael Trick's Operations Research Page, 1996, World Wide Web, http://mat.gsia. cmu.edu/.

  155. R. Van Slyke and R.J-B Wets, L-shaped linear programs with applications to control and stochastic programming, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17(1969)638 – 663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. S.W. Wallace and R.J-B Wets, Preprocessing in stochastic programming: The case of uncapacitated networks, ORSA Journal on Computing 1(1989)252 – 270.

    Google Scholar 

  157. S.W. Wallace and R.J-B Wets, Preprocessing in stochastic programming: The case of linear programs, ORSA Journal on Computing 4(1992)42 – 59.

    Google Scholar 

  158. S.W. Wallace and R.J-B Wets, Preprocessing in stochastic programming: The case of capacitated networks, ORSA Journal on Computing 7(1995)44– 62.

    Google Scholar 

  159. R.J-B Wets, Stochastic programs with recourse: A basic theorem for multistage problems, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 21(1972)201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. R.J-B Wets, Stochastic programming: Solution techniques and approximation schemes, in: Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art, eds. A. Bachem, M. Grötschel and B. Korte, Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 566 – 603.

    Google Scholar 

  161. R.J-B Wets, Challenges in stochastic programming, Working Paper WP-94-32, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  162. W.L. Winston, Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, 3rd ed., Duxbury Press/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  163. W.L. Winston and S.C. Albright, Practical Management Science, Spreadsheet Modelling and Applications, Duxbury Press/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  164. S. Wolfram, Mathematica – A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Wolfram Research, Mathematica – A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. User's Guide for Microsoft Windows (Version 2.2), Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gassmann, H. Modelling support for stochastic programs. Annals of Operations Research 82, 107–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018998216791

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018998216791

Keywords

Navigation