Skip to main content
Log in

From cytotoxicity to biocompatibility testing in vitro: cell adhesion molecule expression defines a new set of parameters

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determination of potential cytotoxicity is a central issue in current biocompatibility testing standards such as ISO and ASTM. Most of these tests do not assess biocompatibility of a biomaterial with regard to cell function. This study was aimed at screening a number of potential parameters that could be included in assessment of cell functional aspects of biocompatibility. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were seeded directly on titanium, NiCr alloy, CoCr alloy, PMMA, PE, PU, PVC, and silicone, or were exposed to the material extracts. Cytotoxicity was assessed for these materials through MTT conversion, crystal violet protein determination and Ki67 expression. In addition, expression of the cell adhesion molecules E-selectin, cadherin-5 and PECAM, as well as of the adhesion-associated proteins fibronectin and vinculin (focal adhesions), was determined by immunocytochemistry and western blotting. Cytotoxicity was not detected with the material extracts. Cells were able to adhere to bare metals, but not polymers. Fibronectin preadsorption resulted in adhesion and spreading also on the polymers. Cells were able to establish cell–cell contacts and focal adhesions. Western blotting, in combination with differential detergent extraction, indicated that linkage of cell–cell adhesion markers to the cytoskeleton may be used as an additional parameter relevant to cell function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. E. DAVIES, Anat. Rec. 245 (1996) 426.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. E. JAFFE, R. L. NACHMANN, C. G. BECKER and C. R. MINICK, J. Clin. Invest. 52 (1973) 2745.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. GILLIES, N. DIDIER and M. DENTON, Anal. Biochem. 159 (1986) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. KUENG, E. SILBER and U. EPPENBERGER, ibid. 182 (1989) 16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. A. SCRAGG and L. R. FERREIRA, ibid. 198 (1991) 80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. GROTH and G. ALTANKOV, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 7 (1995) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. ALTANKOV, F. GRINNELL and T. GROTH, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30 (1996) 385.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. I. ERTEL, B. D. RATNER, A. KAUL, M. B. SCHWAY and T. A. HORBETT, ibid. 28 (1994) 667.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. RE, A. ZANETTI, M. SIRONI, N. POLENTARUTTI, L. LANFRANCONE, E. DEJANA and F. COLOTTA, J. Cell. Biol. 127 (1994) 537.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. C. BATES, L. F. LINCZ and G. F. BURNS, Canc. Metastasis Rev. 14 (1995) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. SCOTT, L. CASSIDY and A. BUSACCO, J. Invest. Dermatol. 108 (1997) 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KOOTEN, T.G.V., KLEIN, C.L., KOHLER, H. et al. From cytotoxicity to biocompatibility testing in vitro: cell adhesion molecule expression defines a new set of parameters. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 8, 835–841 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018541419055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018541419055

Keywords

Navigation