Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal rearrangements as the source of variation in the number of chromosomes in Pseudis (Amphibia, Anura)

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cytogenetic study of Pseudis specimens from three localities in Rio Grande do Sul State, the southernmost Brazilian, was performed to identify karyotypic characteristics that could account for differences in vocalization pattern and body size. Individuals from around Tainhas were compared to those of São Jerônimo and Eldorado do Sul. Specimens from these latter two localities were identified as Pseudis minuta, while those from the former were classified as Pseudis sp. (aff. minuta). The populations from São Jerônimo and Eldorado do Sul had 2n = 24 chromosomes, classified as metacentric, submetacentric and subtelocentric. The population from Tainhas had 2n = 28 chromosomes, with four pairs of telocentric chromosomes. Modelling of these 28 chromosomes and testing for fusion in the centromeric/telomeric regions yielded a karyotype of 2n = 24 chromosomes, similar to that of the other populations. The similarity was reinforced by the location of the NORs and heterochromatin. The Tainhas population showed an increase in heterochromatin, as seen by the presence of additional C-bands, especially in the telocentric chromosomes. These data suggest that the two karyotypes described in this work had a common ancestry. There is evidence that the differentiation of these karyotypes may have occurred by chromosome fission and heterochromatin addition. Based on the present karyotype (2n = 28) and on morphological and vocalization studies by other researchers, we conclude that the Tainhas population may represent a new species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batistic, R.F., 1989. Aspectos citogenéticos da evolução em Phyllomedusa (Anura, Amphibia). PhD Thesis. Faculty of Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 203 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrio, A & D.P. Rubel, 1970. Caracteristicas del cariótipos de los pseudidos. Physis (Tomo 29) 79: 505–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beçak, M.L., L. Denaro & W. Beçak, 1970. Polyploidy and mechanisms of karyotypic diversification in Amphibia. Cytogenetics 9: 225–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, J.P., 1973. Evolution of anuran karyotypes, pp. 337–349 in Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans: Contemporary Research on Major Problems, edited by J.L. Vial. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, J.P., 1991. The influence of life history on karyotypic evolution in frogs, pp. 233–257 in Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C.J., 1974. Chromosome evolution in selected treefrogs including casque-headed species Pternohyla, Triprion, Hyla and Smilisca). Am. Mus. Novitat. 2541: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.D. & S.K. Sessions, 1991. Nomenclature for chromosomes, pp. 431–432 in Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M., 1988. Variação e evolução cromossômica: variação estrutural, pp. 112–124 in Introdução à citogenética geral. Editora Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W.M. & D.A. Black, 1980. Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36: 1014–1015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., 1980. C-banding studies on Australian hylid frogs: secondary constriction structure and the concept of euchromatin transformation. Chromosoma 80: 191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., N. Contreras & R.L. Honeycutt, 1990. Variation within and between nucleolar regions in Australian hylid frogs (Anura) shown by 18S and 28S in situ hybridization. Genetics 80: 17–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., 1991. The evolution of the amphibian genome, pp. 359–391 in Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution, edited by Green, M.D. & S.K. Sessions. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwet, A., 2000. The genus Pseudis (Anura: Pseudidae) in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, with description of a new species. Amphibia-Reptilia 21: 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura, I., M. Nishioka, L.J. Bordikin & Z. Wu, 1995. The origin of the brown frogs with 2n=24 chromosomes. Experientia 51: 79–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi, A., 1973. Amphibia, pp. 233–348 in Cytotaxonomy and Vertebrate Evolution, edited by A.B. Chiarelli & E. Capana. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J.M., 1973. The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions, pp. 351–445 in Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans: Contemporary Research and Major Problems, edited by J.L. Vial. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, M., 1982. Chromosome banding in Amphibia VII. Analysis of the structure and variability of NORs in Anura. Chromosoma 87: 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, M, C. Steinlein, W. Feichtinger & M. Poot, 1993. Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XVIII. Karyotype evolution and genomic size variation in Pleurodema (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Cytogenet. Cell. Genet. 62: 42–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, E.M., E.S. Robinson & N.G. Stephenson, 1972. Karyotypic variation within the genus Leiopelma (Amphibia, Anura). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 14: 691–702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Busin, C.S., Vinciprova, G. & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. Chromosomal rearrangements as the source of variation in the number of chromosomes in Pseudis (Amphibia, Anura). Genetica 110, 131–141 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017957716678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017957716678

Navigation