Abstract
Is technology value-free or is it value-laden? How does technology affect human autonomy? These questions, viewed within the context of medicine, are the focus of attention in this article. The central argument is that we need neither to subscribe to the value-neutrality dictum nor to the all-encompassing value-ladenness thesis to explain the pertinent position of technology in medicine. Technology is constitutive of and strongly implicated in difficult questions of value. This, however, does not mean that technology is identical to (or neutral to) these value-laden questions. Technology poses issues of value, but only some of these relate to technology qua technology. Hence, it makes a difference whether we discuss general questions of value posed by technology or whether we discuss the value-ladenness of technology. Admitting technological value-ladenness does not imply that we are subject to a technological imperative that reduces our autonomy, on the contrary, it explains how technology increases our responsibility. This is particularly prominent in medicine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Callahan, D.: 1996, The Goals of Medicine: Setting New Priorities. Hastings Center Report, November-December.
Cassell, E.J.: 1993, 'The Sorcerer's Broom. Medicine's Rampant Technology', Hastings Center Report 23 (6), 32–39.
Cragg, A.W.: 1976, 'Functional Words, Facts and Values', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6, 77–94.
Davidson, S.N.: 1995, 'Technological Cancer: Its Causes and Treatment', Healtcare Forum J 38 (2), 52–58.
Dworkin, G.: 1982, 'Is More Choice Better than Less?', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7, 47–62.
Ellul, J.: 1964, The Technological Society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Fischer, E.S. and H.G. Welch: 1999, 'Avoiding the Unintended Consequences of Growth in Medical Care', JAMA 281, 446–453.
Gordon, T.J. 1969, 'The Feedback Between Technology and Values', in: K. Baier and N. Rescher (eds.), Values and the Future. New York: The Free Press.
Hanson, M.J.: 1999, 'The Idea of Progress and the Goals of Medicine', in: M.J. Hanson and D. Callahan (eds.), The Goals of Medicine: The Forgotten Issues in Health Care Reform. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 137–151.
Hellerstein, D.: 1983, 'Overdosing on Medical Technology', Technol Rev 86 (6), 12–17.
Hofmann, B.: 2001, 'The Technological Invention of Disease', J Med Ethics: Medical Humanities 27, 10–19.
Jennett, B.: 1994, 'Medical Technology, Social and Health care Issues', in: R. Gillon (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 861–872.
Jonas, H.: 1985, Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Frankfurt a.M: Insel Verlag.
Landes, D.S.: 1969, The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merton, R.K.: 1995, 'The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect', Social Forces 74, 379–424.
Mitcham, C.: 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mitcham, C.: 1995, 'Philosophy of Technology', in: W.T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of bioethics. New York: MacMillan, pp. 2477–2484.
Nordin, I.: 1999, 'The Role of Science in Medicine', Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20, 229–244.
Reiser, S.J.: 1978, Medicine and the Reign of Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reiser, S.J.: 1995, 'Technology', in: W.T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: MacMillan, pp. 2472–2477.
Ryle, G.: 1976, The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguine Books.
Sundström, P.: 1998, 'Interpreting the Notion That Technology is Value-Neutral', Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1, 41–45.
Thomas, L.: 1977, 'On the Science and Technology of Medicine', in: J.H. Knowles (ed.), Doing Better and Feeling Worse: Health in the United States. New York: W.W. Norton.
Tymstra, T.: 1989, 'The Imperative Character of Medical Technology and the Meaning of “Anticipated Decision Regret”', Int J of Technology Assessment in Health Care 5, 207–213.
Veatch, R.M.: 1976. Value-Freedom in Science and Technology: A Study of the Importance of the Religious, Ethical, and other Socio-cultural Factors in Selected Medical Decisions Regarding Birth Control, Harvard dissertations in religion; no. 8 (Missoula, Montana: Published by Scholars Press for Harvard Theological Review).
Winner, L.: 1977, Autonomous Technology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofmann, B. Technological medicine and the autonomy of man. Med Health Care Philos 5, 157–167 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016070531526
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016070531526