Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of RAPD, STS, ISSR and AFLP molecular methods used for assessment of genetic diversity in hop (Humulus lupulus L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cluster analysis of ten hop (Humulus lupulus L.) varieties and the comparison of amplified DNA polymorphism were assessed using RAPD, STS, ISSR and AFLP molecular methods. Thirty-five RAPD primers generated an average of 13.4 products with 5.7 polymorphic products (42.3% of polymorphism). Ten STS primer combinations generated an average of 9.3 products with 6.6 polymorphic products (71% of polymorphism). Seven ISSR microsatellite polymorphic primers and seven primer combinations generated an average of 12.9 products with 4.2 polymorphic products (32.6% of polymorphism) in agarose gels and 86.2 products with 24.3 polymorphic products (28.3% of polymorphism) in polyacrylamide gels. A total of 56 AFLP primer combinations generated an average of 91 products with 52.5 polymorphic products (57.6% of polymorphism). All molecular methods accurately distinguished all tested varieties, except for Osvald’s clones (31, 72 and 114), which were only distinguished by AFLP. The similarities between varieties were revealed by cluster analyses. These analyses were very similar for all molecular methods. Pairwise values of JCS (Jaccard’s similarity coefficient) ranged from 0.02 to 1.0 and the mean JCS values ranged from 0.395 (AFLP) to 0.462 (ISSR). The highest correlation coefficient was between ISSR and RAPD (0.966) and the lowest was between AFLP and STS (0.867). STS had the highest correlation of chemical data with molecular methods (0.592) and ISSR had the lowest (0.435).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M.S. & M.J. Fedele, 1994. A DNA-based identification procedure for hop leaf tissue.J Inst Br 100: 283–285.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araki, S., Y. Tsuchiya, T. Masachika, T. Tamaki & K. Shinotsuka, 1998.Identification of hop cultivars by DNA marker analysis. J Amer Soc Br Chem 56: 93–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M.M.,O. Panaud & S.R. McCouch, 1999. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 98: 780–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, M., H.F. Utz & A.E. Melchinger, 1999. Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci 39: 228–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J.L., N.S. Scott & M.R. Thomas, 1996. DNA typing of hops (Humulus lupulus) through application of RAPD and microsatellite marker sequences converted to sequence tagged sites (STS). Euphytica 91: 277–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, M.-T., J.A. Cabezas, J.C. Sancha F. Martínez de Toda & J.M. Martínez-Zapater, 1998. Application of AFLPs to the characterization of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. genetic resources. A case study with accessions from Rioja (Spain). Theor Appl Genet 97: 51–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, I.D., E.A.B. Aitken & L.W. Smith, 1997. Application of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR)markers to plant genetics. Electrophoresis 18: 1524–1528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P., 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur ladistribution florale. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 44: 223–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakše, J., J. Šuštar-Vozliĉ & B. Javornik,1994. Identification of hop cultivars by RAPD markers. Proc Intl Colloquium on the Impact of Plant Biotechnology on Agriculture. Rogla, Slovenia, pp. 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, L. & S. Seefelder, 1998. Diversity of selected hopcultivars detected by fluorescent AFLPs. Theo Appl Genet 96: 112–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krajl, D., J. Zupanec, D. Vasilj, S. Kralj & J. Pšeniĉnik, 1991. Variability of essential oils of hops, Humulus lupulus L. J Inst Br 97: 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.A., 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. CancRes 27: 209–220.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, A., 1998. The practical application of PCR for the verification of hop variety.MBAA Tech Q 35: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neve, R.A., 1991. Hops. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, B.J.,H.J. Newbury, M.T. Jackson & B.V. Ford-Lloyd, 1997. Contrasting genetic diversity relationships are revealed in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using different marker types. Mol Breed 3: 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patzak, J., P. Oriniaková, J. Matoušek & P. Svoboda, 1999. Czech hop characterization using RAPD method and genetic distance analysis of selected genotypes. Pl Prod 45: 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, V.E. & P. McCarty, 1992. Varietal identification of hops and hoppellets. MBAA Techn Quart 29: 81–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, M. & S.T. Kenny, 1996. Random amplifiedpolymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in hop, Humulus lupulus: level of genetic variability and segregation in progeny. Theor Appl Genet 92: 334–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polley, A., E. Seigner & M.W. Ganal, 1997. Identification of sex in hop (Humuluslupulus) using molecular markers. Genome 40: 357–361.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., M. Morgante, C. Andre, M. Hanafey, J. Vogel, S. Tingey & A. Rafalski, 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for gemplasm analysis. Molec Breed 2: 225–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.G. & T.T. Tanimoto, 1960. A computerprogram for classifying plants. Science 132: 1115–1118.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof, M.A., K.M. Soliman, R.A. Jorgensen & R.W. Allard, 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014–8018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sensi, E., R. Vignani, W. Rohde & S. Biricolti, 1996. Characterization of genetic biodiversity with Vitis vinifera L. Sangiovese and Colorino genotypes by AFLP and ISTR DNA marker technology. Vitis 35: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šuštar-Vozliĉ, J. & B. Javornik,1999. Genetic relationships in cultivars of hop, Humulus lupulus L., determined by RAPD analysis. Plant Breed 118: 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya, Y., S. Araki, M. Takashio & T. Tamaki, 1997. Identification of hop varieties using specificprimers derived from RAPD markers. J Ferment Bioeng 84: 103–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vejl, P., 1997. Identification ofgenotypes in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) by RAPD analysis using program GelManager forWindows. Pl Prod 43: 325–333.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski & S.V. Tingey, 1990. DNA polymorphismamplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 6531–6535.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabeau, M. & P. Vos, 1993. Selective restriction fragment amplification. A general method for DNA fingerprinting. European patent application no. 924026297. Publication no. 0534858.

  • Zietjiewicz, E., A. Rafalski & D. Labuda, 1994. Genomefingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hop Research Institute Co. Ltd., Kadaňská 2525, Žatec, 438 46, Czech Republic

    Josef Patzak

Authors
  1. Josef Patzak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patzak, J. Comparison of RAPD, STS, ISSR and AFLP molecular methods used for assessment of genetic diversity in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica 121, 9–18 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012099123877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012099123877

Search

Navigation