Skip to main content
Log in

In Vivo Evaluation of Acyclovir Prodrug Penetration and Metabolism Through Rat Skin Using a Diffusion/Bioconversion Model

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. In order to evaluate the in vivo penetration of prodrugs which undergo metabolism in skin, we analyzed thein vivo penetration profiles of acyclovir prodrugs based on a two-layer skin diffusion model in consideration of metabolic process.

Methods. Acyclovir prodrugs (e.g., valerate, isovalerate and pivarate) were used as model prodrugs and the amounts excreted in urine were measured after percutaneous application. In vivo penetration profiles were then estimated by employing a deconvolution method and the penetration of acyclovir prodrugs was analyzed using a diffusion model. Subsequently, diffusion, partitioning and metabolic parameters were compared under in vitro and in vivo conditions.

Results. Although total penetration amounts at the end of the experiment were similar for the three prodrugs, the ratio of intact prodrug to total penetration amount differed significantly. Moreover, the excretion and absorption profiles were also very different for each prodrug. Enzymatic hydrolysis rate constants calculated under in vivo conditions were considerably larger than those obtained in the skin homogenate and in vitro penetration experiments.

Conclusions. The present skin diffusion/bioconversion model combined with computer analysis enables us to comprehensively account for diffusion, partitioning and metabolism during in vivo percutaneous absorption. Nevertheless, different enzymatic hydrolysis rate constants obtained under bothin vivo and in vitro conditions demonstrate the difficulty of obtaining accurate values for in vivo enzymatic activity from related in vitro experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. H. Bando, F. Yamashita, T. Takagi, Y. Takakura, and M. Hashida. Pharm. Res. 13:427–432 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M. K. Ghosh and A. K. Mitra. Pharm. Res. 7:251–255 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. K. H. Valia, K. Tojo and Y. W. Chien. Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 11:1133–1173 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. E. Riviere, J. D. Brooks, P. L. Williams, E. MaGown, and M. L. Francoeur. Int. J. Pharm. 127:213–217 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Liu, W. I. Higuchi, A. H. Ghanem, and W. R. Good. Pharm. Res. 11:1777–1784 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Yamashita, H. Bando, Y. Koyama, S. Kitagawa, Y. Takakura, and M. Hashida. Pharm. Res. 11:185–191 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Bando, M. Sahashi, T. Takagi, F. Yamashita, Y. Takakura, and M. Hashida. Int. J. Pharm. 135:91–102 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Yamashita, H. Bando, Y. Takakura, and M. Hashida. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 18:1787–1789 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Yamashita, T. Yoshioka, Y. Koyama, H. Okamoto, H. Sezaki, and M. Hashida. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 16:690–697 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. W. J. Lambart, W. I. Higuchi, K. Knutson, and S. L. Krill. J. Pharm. Sci. 78:925–932 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Tojo. Int. J. Pharm. 43:201–205 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. H. Guy and J. Hadgraft. Int. J. Pharm. 20:43–51 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. D. Miranda and S. S. Good. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 3:1–8 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Shao, G. B. Park, R. Krishnamoorthy, and A. K. Mitra. Pharm. Res. 11:237–242 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Bundgaard, A. Hoelgaard, and B. Mollgaard. Int. J. Pharm. 15:285–292 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bando, H., Sahashi, M., Yamashita, F. et al. In Vivo Evaluation of Acyclovir Prodrug Penetration and Metabolism Through Rat Skin Using a Diffusion/Bioconversion Model. Pharm Res 14, 56–62 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012003416968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012003416968

Navigation