Skip to main content
Log in

Root distributions partially explain 15N uptake patterns in Gliricidia and Peltophorum hedgerow intercropping systems

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative distributions of tree and crop roots in agroforestry associations may affect the degree of complementarity which can be achieved in their capture of below ground resources. Trees which root more deeply than crops may intercept leaching nitrogen and thus improve nitrogen use efficiency. This hypothesis was tested by injection of small doses of (15NH4)2SO4 at 21.8 atom% 15N at different soil depths within established hedgerow intercropping systems on an Ultisol in Lampung, Indonesia. In the top 10 cm of soil in intercrops of maize and trees, root length density (Lrv) of maize was greater than that of Gliricidia sepium trees, which had greater Lrv in this topsoil layer than Peltophorum dasyrrachis trees. Peltophorum trees had a greater proportion of their roots in deeper soil layers than Gliricidia or maize. These vertical root distributions were related to the pattern of recovery of 15N placed at different soil depths; more 15N was recovered by maize and Gliricidia from placements at 5 cm depth than from placements at 45 or 65 cm depth. Peltophorum recovered similar amounts of 15N from placements at each of these depths, and hence had a deeper N uptake distribution than Gliricidiaor maize. Differences in tree Lrv across the cropping alley were comparatively small, and there was no significant difference (P<0.05) in the uptake of 15N placed in topsoil at different distances from hedgerows. A greater proportion of the 15N recovered by maize was found in grain following 15N placement at 45 cm or 65 cm depth than following placement at 5 cm depth, reflecting the later arrival of maize roots in these deeper soil layers. Thus trees have an important role in preventing N leaching from subsoil during early crop establishment, although they themselves showed a lag phase in 15N uptake after pruning. Residual 15N enrichment in soil was strongly related to application depth even 406 days after 15N placement, demonstrating the validity of this approach to mapping root activity distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiefnawati R 1995 Pengaruh naugan, kompetisi serapan air dan hara tanaman pagar terhadap pertumbuhan dan produksi jagung pada ultisol daerah Lampung Utara. MSc Thesis. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang. 63 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinnifesi F K, Kang B T and Ladipo D O 1998 Structural root form and fine root distribution of some woody species evaluated for agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 42, 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinnifesi F K, Kang B T, Sanginga N and Tijani-Eniola H 1997 Nitrogen use efficiency and N competition between Leucaena hedgerows and maize in an alley cropping system. Nutr. Cyc. Agroec. 47, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J M and Ingram J S I 1993 Tropical soil biology and fertility, a handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 221 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMSF 1995 Guide to field experiments on biological management of soil fertility in North Lampung, Sumatera, Indonesia. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia. 79 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadisch G, Rowe E C and van Noordwijk M 1997 Nutrient harvesting-the tree root safety net. Agrofor. Forum 8, 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Willigen P and van Noordwijk M 1987 Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency. PhD thesis. Agricultural Unversity, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 282 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass W B, Peterson G A, Hauck R D, and Olson R A 1971 Recovery of residual nitrogen by corn (Zea mays L.) from various soil depths as affected by 15N tracer techniques. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35, 290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood D J, Gerwitz A, Stone D A and Barnes A 1982 Root development of vegetable crops. Plant Soil 68, 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B 1999 The importance of root distributions for hydrology, biogeochemistry, and ecosystem functioning. In Integrating Hydrology, Ecosystem Dynamics, and Biogeochemistry in Complex Landscapes. Eds J Tenhunen and P Kabat. pp 219–240. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jama B, Buresh R J, Ndufa J K and Shepherd K D 1998 Vertical distribution of roots and soil nitrate: Tree species and phosphorus effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 280–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesley S J, Stacey C L, Gregory P J and Buresh R J 1998 Sieve effects on root length and biomass measurements of maize (Zea mays) and Grevillea robusta. Plant Soil 207, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen K, Buresh R J, Coe R and Kipleting K M 1999 Root length and nitrate under Sesbania sesban: Vertical and horizontal distribution and variability. Agrofor. Syst. 42, 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao M R, Muraya P and Huxley P A 1993 Observations of some tree root systems in agroforestry intercrop situations, and their graphical representation. Expl. Ag. 29, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe E C 1999 The safety-net role of tree roots in hedgerow intercropping systems. PhD Thesis. Wye College, University of London, UK. 288 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe E C and Cadisch G 2001 Implications of heterogeneity on procedures for estimating plant 15N recovery in hedgerow intercrop systems. Agrofor. Syst.

  • Rowe E C, Hairiah K, Giller K E, van Noordwijk M and Cadisch G 1999 Testing the safety-net role of hedgerow tree roots by 15N placement at different soil depths. Agrofor. Syst. 43, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhigwa B A, Gichuru M P, Mambani B and Tariah N M 1992 Root distribution of Acioa barteri, Alchornea cordifolia, Cassia siamea and Gmelina arborea in an acid Ultisol. Agrofor. Syst. 19, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G 1995 Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 30, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G and Zech W 1995 Aboveground and belowground biomass dynamics in a sole cropping and an alley cropping system with Gliricidia sepium in the semi-deciduous rain-forest zone of West Africa. Agrofor. Syst. 31, 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant D 1975 A test of the modified line intersect method for determining root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heide J, Setijono S, Syekhfani M S, Flach E N, Hairiah K, Ismunandar S, Sitompul S M and van Noordwijk M 1992 Can low external input cropping systems on acid upland soils in the humid tropics be sustainable? Background of the UniBraw / Nitrogen management project in Bunga Mayang (Sunkai Selaten, Kotabumi, S. Sumatera, Indonesia). Agrivita 15, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M and Brouwer G 1991 Review of quantitative root length data in agriculture. In Plant Roots and their Environment. Eds B L McMichael and H Persson. pp 515–525. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M and Lusiana B 1999WaNuLCAS: a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 43, 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Widianto, Heinen M, and Hairiah K 1991 Old tree root channels in acid soils in the humid tropics; important for crop root penetration, water infiltration and nitrogen management. Plant Soil 134, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Cadisch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowe, E.C., van Noordwijk, M., Suprayogo, D. et al. Root distributions partially explain 15N uptake patterns in Gliricidia and Peltophorum hedgerow intercropping systems. Plant and Soil 235, 167–179 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011961409353

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011961409353

Navigation