Skip to main content
Log in

Endothelin-A Receptor Antagonism during Acute Myocardial Infarction in Rats

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endothelin levels are increased in rats with experimentally induced myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endothelin-A (ETA) receptor antagonism alters ventricular remodeling and the development of heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI). We administered 10 mg/kg/day of A-127722 to rats post-MI for 6 weeks. A hemodynamic study was performed and passive pressure-volume curves obtained. In rats without infarcts, ETA receptor antagonist (n=8; vehicle, n = 5) had no effect. However, in rats with infarcts ETA antagonism (n = 14, MI = 35%; vehicle: n = 19, MI = 32%) reduced systemic arterial and LV systolic (but not end-diastolic) pressures and shifted the pressure-volume relationship to the right. Because LV mass was not changed, the volume-to-mass ratio was increased and was correlated inversely with the ability of the LV to maximally develop pressure. This increase in volume at low distending pressures was also coupled with a tendency (P < 0.06) for reduced scar thickness, suggesting that early initiation of an ETA receptor antagonism increased infarct expansion. The reduction in blood pressure offset the increase in volume such that wall stresses were unchanged, as was LV mass. The early use of ETA receptor antagonism in the rat model of myocardial infarction did not beneficially alter LV remodeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: Experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation 1990;81:1161-1172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shanoff HM, Little JA, Csima A, Yano R. Heart size and ten-year survival after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1969;78:608-614.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White HM, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PWT, Whitlock RML, Wild HD. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987;76:44-51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. St. John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, et al. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction: The protective effects of captopril. Circulation 1994;89:68-75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rouleau JL, Moye LA, Champlain J, et al. Activation of neurohumoral systems following acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:80D-86D.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deedwania PC. Endothelin, the bad actor in the play: A marker or mediator of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:939-942.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Packer M. The neurohormonal hypothesis: A theory to explain the mechanism of disease progression in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:248-254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeffer MA, Pfeffer JM, Steinberg C, Finn P. Survival after an experimental myocardial infarction: Beneficial effects of long-term therapy with captopril. Circulation 1985;72:406-412.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Influence of chronic captopril therapy on the infarcted left ventricle of the rat. Circ Res 1985;57:84-95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigations. N Engl J Med 1992;327:669-677.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kober RA, Torp-Pedersen C, Calser JE, et al. The Trandalopril Cardiac Evolution (TRACE) Study Group. A clinical trial of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor trandalopril in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1670-1676.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet 1999;353:2001-2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CIBIS-II Investigators and Committees. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study-II (CIBIS-II): A randomized trial. Lancet 1999;353:9-13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Australia/New Zealand Heart Failure Research Collaborative Group. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of carvedilol in patients with congestive heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1997;349:375-380.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eichhorn EJ, Bristow MR. Medical therapy can improve the biologic properties of the chronically failing heart: A new era in the treatment of heart failure. Circulation 1996;94:2285-2296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bristow MR. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2000;101:558-569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiowski W, Sutsch G, Hunziker P, et al. Evidence for endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction in severe chronic heart failure. Lancet 1995;346:732-736.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ray SG, McMurray JJ, Morton JJ, Dargie HJ. Circulating endothelin in acute ischaemic syndromes. Br Heart J 1992;67:383-386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. King AJ, Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Brenner BM. Systemic homodynamic effects of endothelin in rats. Am J Physiol 1990;258:H787-H792.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamirisa P, Frishman WH, Kumar A. Endothelin and endothelin antagonism: Role in cardiovascular health and disease. Am Heart J 1995;130:601-610.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA. Endothelin: Molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Pharmacol Rev 1994;46:325-415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyauchi T, Masaki T. Pathophysiology of endothelin in the cardiovascular system. Annu Rev Physiol 1999;61:391-415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfeffer MA, Pfeffer JM, Fishbein MC, et al. Myocardial infarct size and ventricular function in rats. Circ Res 1979;44:503-512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fletcher PJ, Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in rats with healed myocardial infarction: Effects on systolic function. Circ Res 1981;49:618-626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Fletcher PJ, Braunwald E. Progressive ventricular remodeling in rat with myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol 1991;260:H1406-H1414.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hutchins GM, Bulkley BH. Infarct expansion versus extension: Two different complications of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:1127-1132.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levin ER. Endothelins. N Engl J Med 1995;333:356-363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grossman JD, Morgan JP. Cardiovascular effects of endothelin. News Physiol Sci 1997;12:113-117.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Salvati P, Chierchia S, Dho L. Proarrhythmic activity of intracoronary endothelin in dogs: Relation to the site of administration and to changes in regional flow. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991;17:1007-1014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DeNucci G, Thomas R, D'Orleans-Juste P, et al. Pressor effects of circulating endothelin are limited by its removal from the pulmonary circulation and by the release of prostacyclin and endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;85:9797-9800.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Benigni A, Remuzzi G. Endothelin antagonists. Lancet 1999;353:133-138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Omland T, Lie RT, Aakvaag A, Dickstein K. Plasma endothelin determination as a prognostic indicator of 1-year mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994;89:1573-1579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Opgenorth TJ, Adler AL, Calzadilla S, et al. Pharmacological characterization of A-127722: An orally active and highly potent ETA-selective receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 1996;276:473-481.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cowburn PJ, Cleland JGF, McArthur JD, et al. Endothelin B receptors are functionally important in mediating vasoconstriction in the systemic circulation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:932-938.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hammerman H, Kloner RA, Schoen FJ, Brown EJ, Hale S, Braunwald E. Indomethacin-induced scar thinning after experimental acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1983;67:1290-1295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jugdutt BI. Delayed effects of early infarct-limiting therapies on healing after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1985;72:907-914.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Solomon A, Gersh B. The open-artery hypothesis. Annu Rev Medicine 1998;49:63-76.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling-concepts and clinical implications: A consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:569-582.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mulder P, Richard V, Derumeaux G, et al. Role of endogenous endothelin in chronic heart failure: Effects of long-term treatment with an endothelin antagonist on survival, hemodynamics, and cardiac remodeling. Circulation 1997;96:1976-1982.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fraccarollo D, Hu K, Galuppo P, Gaudron P, Ertl G. Chronic endothelin receptor blockade attenuates progressive ventricular dilation and improves cardiac function in rats with myocardial infarction: Possible involvement of myocardial endothelin system in ventricular remodeling. Circulation 1997;96:3963-3973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Oie E, Bjonerheim R, Grogaard HK, Kongshaug H, Smiseth OA, Attramadal H. ET-receptor antagonism, myocardial gene expression, and ventricular remodeling during CHF in rats. Am J Physiol 1998;275:H868-H877.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sakai S, Miyauchi T, Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi I, Goto K, Sugishita Y. Inhibition of myocardial endothelin pathway improves long-term survival in heart failure. Nature 1996;384:353-355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mulder P, Richard V, Bouchart F, Derumeaux G, Munter K, Thuillez C. Selective ETA receptor blockade prevents left ventricular remodeling and deterioration of cardiac function in experimental heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 1998;39:600-608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nguyen QT, Cernacek P, Calderoni A, et al. Endothelin A receptor blockade causes adverse left ventricular remodeling but improves pulmonary artery pressure after infarction in the rat. Circulation 1998;98:2323-2330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu K, Schmidt TJ, Hoffmann KD, Earl G. Aggravation of left ventricular remodeling by a novel specific endothelin ETA antagonist EMD94246 in rats with experimental myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1998;32:505-508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weber KT, Sun Y, Tyagi SC, Cleutjens JPM. Collagen network of the myocardium: Function, structural remodeling and regulatory mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1994;26:279-292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fareh J, Touyz RM, Schiffrin E, Thibault G. Endothelin-1 and angiotensin II receptors in cells from rat hypertrophid heart: Receptor regulation and intracellular Ca2+ modulation. Circ Res 1996;78:302-311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeffer, J.M., Finn, P.V., Zornoff, L.A. et al. Endothelin-A Receptor Antagonism during Acute Myocardial Infarction in Rats. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 14, 579–587 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007890126061

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007890126061

Navigation