Skip to main content
Log in

Implied Volatility in the U.K. Commercial Property Market: Empirical Evidence Based on Transaction Data

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary aim of this research is to compute implied volatility based on a stochastic contingent claim valuation model proposed by Dixit and Pindyck (1994). Over the sample period of 1984 to 1997, and with approximately 20,000 commercial property transactions in the United Kingdom, we find that implied volatility of rental returns is in the region of 24.83 percent. Over the same sample period, the historical and conditional standard deviations of the log returns of transaction-based rental series is estimated to be 15.60 percent and 35.64 percent, respectively. The tests of information content of these risk measures show that there is strong orthogonality in the information impounded in implied volatility estimates compared to that contained in historical standard deviations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum, A.E. (1989). A Critical Examination of the Measurement of Property Investment Risk. Discussion Paper 22, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.

  • Blundell, G., and C. Ward. (1987). “Property Portfolio Allocation: A Multi-factor Model,” Land Development Studies 4(2), 145-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics 31, 307-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., R. F. Engle, and J. M. Wooldridge. (1988). “A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time Varying Covariance,” Journal of Political Economy 96, 116-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiras, D., and S. Manaster. (1978). “The Information Content of Option Prices and a Test of Market Ef®ciency,” Journal of Financial Economics 6, 213-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. E., and C. M. Lewis. (1992). “Stock Market Volatility and the Information Content of Stock Index Options,” Journal of Econometrics 52, 267-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., and R. S. Pindyck. (1994). Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. (1982). “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UnitedKingdom Inflation,” Econometrica 50, 987-1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., D. Lilien, and R. Robins. (1987). “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model,” Econometrica 55, 391-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, H., and R. Rendleman. (1976). “Standard Deviations of Stock Price Ratios Implied in Option Prices,” Journal of Finance 31(2), 369-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizieri, C., and S. Satchell. (1992). “The Variance of Property Returns: Some Problems of Time-Weighted Measures,” Journal of Property Valuation and Investment 10(2), 541-547.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. (1986). “The Value ofWaiting to Invest.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(4), 707-727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanthakumaran, N., and G. Newell. (1995). “An Empirical Evaluation of UK Property Performance Indices,” Proceedings of the “The Cutting Edge” Property Research Conference of The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. (pp. 75-92), The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. B. (1991). “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach,” Econometrica 59, 347-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991). “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment,” Journal of Economic Literature 29, 1110-1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A., and R. C. Zisler. (1991). “Risk and Return in Real Estate,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 4, 175-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R., and R. P. Trippi. (1978). “Common Stock Volatility Expectations Implied by Option Premia,” Journal of Finance 32, 129-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. S. (1997). “The Stochastic Behavior of Commodity Prices: Implications for Valuation and Hedging,” Journal of Finance 52(3), 923-973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, K., Sing, T.F. Implied Volatility in the U.K. Commercial Property Market: Empirical Evidence Based on Transaction Data. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 20, 5–24 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007824720502

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007824720502

Navigation