Abstract
Studies that have examined the effect of experimental increases in predation risk on diet selectivity have shown both decreased and increased diet selectivity. A possible explanation for these disparate results emerges from an examination of the prey sets used in these studies, which differed in the relationship between the values of risk components associated with the capture of different prey types (‘danger’) and their profitabilities. When less profitable prey were more dangerous, selectivity increased with predation risk. When prey were equally dangerous, selectivity did not change. Finally, when the more profitable prey were also more dangerous, selectivity decreased with risk. Here, we examine theoretically the influence of a forager's estimate of the probability that a predator is present (φ) on the selection of diets from prey sets with varying danger–profitability relationships. A dynamic programming model is used to determine the maximum attack time (or distance) for each of two types of prey, differing in their energetic content, for a range of forager energy state and φ levels. The diets which would result if foragers attacked prey according to the rules provided by the dynamic model are then determined. The model results indicate that the prey danger–profitability relationship determines the diet selectivity response to φ, confirming that variation in this relationship could be responsible for the range of experimental results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chesson, J. (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59, 211–215.
Edmunds, M. (1974) Defence in Animals. Longman, New York.
Gilliam, J.F. (1990) Hunting by the hunted: Optimal prey selection by foragers under predation hazard. In Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection (R.N. Hughes, ed.), pp. 797–818. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Godin, J.-G.J. (1990) Diet selection under the risk of predation. In Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection (R.N. Hughes, ed.), pp. 739–769. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Godin, J.-G.J. and Smith, S.A. (1988) A fitness cost of foraging in the guppy. Nature 333, 69–71.
Houtman, R. (1995) The influence of predation risk on within-patch foraging decisions of cryptic animals. PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.
Houtman, R. and Dill, L.M. (1994) The influence of substrate color on the alarm response of tidepool sculpins (Oligocottus maculosus; Pisces, Cottidae). Ethology 96, 147–154.
Hugie, D.M., Thuringer, P.L. and Smith, R.J.F. (1991) The response of the tidepool sculpin, Oligocottus maculosus, to chemical stimuli from injured conspecifics, alarm signalling in the Cottidae (Pisces). Ethology 89, 322–334.
Ibrahim, A.A. and Huntingford, F.A. (1989) Laboratory and field studies of the e.ect of predation risk on foraging in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behaviour 109, 46–57.
Lima, S.L. (1988) Vigilance and diet selection: A simple example in the dark-eyed junco. Can. J. Zool. 66, 593–596.
Lima, S.L. and Dill, L.M. (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619–640.
Mangel, M. and Clark, C.W. (1988) Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Milinski, M. (1984) A predator's costs of overcoming the confusion-effect of swarming prey. Anim. Behav. 32, 1157–1162.
Morey, S.R. (1990) Microhabitat selection and predation in the Pacific treefrog, Pseudacris regilla. J. Herpetol. 24, 292–296.
Newman, J.A., Parsons, A.J., Thornley, J.H.M., Penning, P.D. and Krebs, J.R. (1995) Optimal diet selection by a generalist grazing herbivore. Funct. Ecol. 9, 255–268.
Stephens, D.W. and Krebs, J.R. (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houtman, R., Dill, L.M. The influence of predation risk on diet selectivity: A theoretical analysis. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 251–262 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006544031697
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006544031697