Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental phases and STM expression during Arabidopsis shoot organogenesis

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoot organogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana wasstudied with regard to the timing of key developmental phases and expression ofthe SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) gene.Shoot regeneration in the highly organogenic ecotype C24 was affected byexplanttype and age. The percentage of C24 cotyledon explants producing shootsdecreased from 90% to 26% when donor seedlings were more than 6 dold, but 96% of root explants produced shoots regardless of the age of thedonorplant. Using explant transfer experiments, it was shown that C24 cotyledonexplants required about 2 days to become competent and another 8-10 days tobecome determined for shoot organogenesis. A C24 line containing the promoterofthe SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) genelinked to the β-glucuronidase(GUS) gene was used as a tool for determining the timingofde novo shoot apical meristem (SAM) development incotyledon and root explants. Cotyledon and root explants from anSTM:GUS transgenic C24 line were placed on shoot inductionmedium and GUS expression was examined after 6-16 days ofculture. GUS expression could be found in localizedregionsof callus cells on root and cotyledon explants after 12 days indicating thatthese groups of cells were expressing the STM gene, hadreached the key time point of determination, and were producing an organizedSAM. This was consistent with the timing of determination as indicated byexplant transfer experiments. Root explants from anSTM:GUStransgenic Landsberg erecta line and a two-step tissue culture method revealedasimilar pattern of localized GUS expression duringde novo shoot organogenesis. This is the first studydocumenting the timing and pattern of expression of theSTMgene during de novo shoot organogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akama K., Shiraishi H., Ohta S., Nakamura K., Okada K. and Shimura Y. 1992. Efficient transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison of the efficiencies with various organs, plant ecotypes and Agrobacterium strains. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barghchi M., Turgut K., Scott R. and Draper J. 1994. High-frequency transformation from cultured cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes “C24” and “Landsberg erecta”. Plant Growth Regul. 4: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton M. and Poethig R.S. 1993. Formation of the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana: An analysis of development in the wild type and in the shoot meristemless mutant. Development 119: 823–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary A., Uttamchandain S.J., Smets R., VanOnckelen H.A. and Howell S.H. 2001. Arabidopsis mutants with increased organ regeneration in tissue culture are more competent to respond to hormonal signals. Planta 213: 700–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury A.M. and Signer E.R. 1989. Relative regeneration proficiency of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Plant Cell Rep. 8: 368–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson M.L. and Warnick D.A. 1983. Competence and determination in the process of in vitro shoot organogenesis. Dev. Biol. 95: 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson M.L. and Warnick D.A. 1985. Temporal requirement for phytohormone balance in the control of organogenesis in vitro. Dev. Biol. 112: 494–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czakó M., Wilson J., Yu X. and Márton L. 1993. Sustained root culture for generation and vegetative propagation of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 603–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Block M. and Van Lijsebettens M. 1998. B-Glucuronidase enzyme histochemistry on semithin sections of plastic-embedded Arabidopsis explants. In: Martinez-Zapater J. and Salinas J. (eds), Methods in Molecular Biology, Arabidopsis Protocols. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ, pp. 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis C. and Surridge C. 2000. Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Nature 408: 791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulieu H. 1991. Inheritance of the regeneration capacity in the genus Petunia. Euphytica. 53: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger E.A., Hasegawa P.M. and Tigchelaar E.C. 1981. Diallel analysis of shoot-forming capacity among selected tomato genotypes. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 102: 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson R.A. 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koornneef M., Bade J., Hanhart C., Horsman K., Schel J., Soppe W. et al. 1993. Characterization and mapping of a gene controlling shoot regeneration in tomato. Plant J. 3: 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langridge P., Lazzeri P. and Lörz H. 1991. A segment of rye chromosome 1 enhances growth and embryogenesis of calli derived from immature embryos of wheat. Plant Cell Rep. 10: 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long J.A. and Barton M.K. 1998. The development of apical embryonic pattern in Arabidopsis. Development 125: 3027–3035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long J.A., Moan E.I., Medford J.I. and Barton M.K. 1996. A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 379: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz E.M. 1997. Genetic control of cell division patterns in developing plants. Cell 88: 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris P.C. and Altmann T. 1994. Tissue culture and transformation. In: Meyerowitz E.M. and Somverville C.R. (eds), Arabidopsis. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 173–222.

  • Murashige T. and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadolska-Orchzyk A. and Malepszy S. 1989. In vitro culture of Cucumis sativus L. 7. Genes controlling plant regeneration. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 836–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa S., Yasutani I., Fukuda H., Komamine A. and Sugiyama M. 1998. Organogenic response in tissue culture of srd mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton D.A. and Meinke D.W. 1988. High-frequency plant regeneration from cultured cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz O.J. and Beaty R.M. 1996. Propagation from nonmeristematic tissues — organogenesis. In: Trigiano R.N. and Gray D.J. (eds), Plant Tissue Culture Concepts and Laboratory Exercise. CRC press, Boca Raton, New York, London, Tokyo, pp. 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvekens D., Van Montagu M. and Van Lijsebettens N. 1988. Agrobacerium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 5536–5540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasutani I., Ozawa S., nishida T., Sugiyama M. and Komamine A. 1994. Isolation of temperature-sensitive mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana that are defective in the redifferentiation of shoots. Plant Physiol. 105: 815–822.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Auer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Qh., Fisher, R. & Auer, C. Developmental phases and STM expression during Arabidopsis shoot organogenesis. Plant Growth Regulation 37, 223–231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020838712634

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020838712634

Navigation