Skip to main content
Log in

Winter Host Plant Specialization in a Host-Alternating Aphid

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The host alternating aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), feeds in summer on several different species of grasses but is monophagous on its winter host, Prunus padus L. The monophagy on P. padus could be a result of the restricted host range of the several different generations colonizing, or feeding, on this host during autumn–winter–spring. This study shows that the winter host plant specificity of R. padi is controlled mainly by the preference of the females remigrating (gynoparae) to the winter host, P. padus, in autumn. The other generations living on the winter host, i.e., sexual females, males, and spring generations, all accept a broader range of winter hosts. One alternative host plant, Prunus spinosa L., could be utilized by all generations associated with the winter host, except for the females remigrating at autumn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Blackman, R. L., and Eastop, V. F. (1994). Aphids on the World's Trees: An Identification and Information Guide, CAB International/British Museum, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. A. M., Dawson, G.W., Griffiths, D. C., Pettersson, J., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Woodcock, C. M. (1990). Sex attractant pheromone of damson-hop aphid Phorodon humuli (Homoptera, Aphididae). J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 3455-3465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, S. P. (1981). Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. III. Anthocharis cardamines (L.) survival, development and oviposition on different hostplants. Oecologia 51: 91-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. F.G. (1976). Reproductive strategies of the alate morphs of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi L. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 817-830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. F. G., and Glen, D. M. (1971). Morph determination in the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.). Ann. Appl. Biol. 68: 11-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastop, V. F. (1973). Deductions from the present day host plants of aphids and related insects. In van Emden, H. F. (ed.), Insect/Plant Relationships, Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. London, No. 6. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldemond, J. A. (1990). Choice of host plant as a factor in reproductive isolation of the genus Cryptomyzus (Homoptera, Aphididae). Ecol. Entomol. 15: 43-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldemond, J. A., Dixon, A. F. G., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Woodcock, C. M. (1993). Specificity of sex pheromones, the role of host plant odour in the olfactory attraction of males, and mate recognition in the aphid Cryptomyzus. Physiol. Entomol. 18: 137-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, J. (1980). Reproductive, morphological and behavioural affinities between the alate gynoparae and virginoparae of the aphid, Aphis fabae. Physiol. Entomol. 6: 385-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, J., Storer, J. R., Nottingham, S. F., Peace, L., Harrington, R., Merritt, L., Wadhams, L. J., and Wood, D. K. (1994). The attraction of sex pheromone and plant volatiles for field attraction of male bird-cherry aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi. Proc. Brighton Crop Protect. Conf. Pest Dis. 3: 1223-1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heie, O. (1986). The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. III. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, Vol 17, E. J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press, Leiden, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille Ris Lambers, D. (1950). Host plants and aphid classification. Proc. 8th Int. Congr. Entomol., Stockholm, Sweden, 1948, pp. 141-144.

  • Hille Ris Lambers D. (1979). Aphids as botanists? Symb. Bot. Upssala 22: 114-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpf, H.-U., and Schreier, P. (1992). 3-Hydroxy-5,6-epoxy-β-ionol β-D-glucopyranoside and 3-hydroxy-7,8-dihydro-β-ionol β-D-glucopyranoside: New C13 norisoprenoid glucoconjugates from sloe tree (Prunus spinosa L.) leaves. J. Agr. Food Chem. 40: 1898-1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, N., Nylin, S., and Wedell, N. (1994). Host plant utilization in the comma butterfly: Sources of variation and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 99: 132-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leather, S. R. (1982). Do gynoparae and males need to feed? An attempt to allocate resources in the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 31: 386-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leather, S. R. (1986). Host monitoring by aphid migrants: Do gynoparae maximise offspring fitness? Oecologia 68: 367-369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitter, C., and Farrel, B. (1991). Macroevolutionary aspects of insect/plant relationships. In Bernays, E. (ed.), Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. 3, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 35-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F. P. (1958). Wirtswahlversuche mit Gynoparen von Myzus persicae (Sulz.) und von Aphis fabae Scop. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzensch. 65: 405-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottingham, S. F., Hardie, J., Dawson, G. W., Hick, A. J., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Woodcock, C. M. (1991). Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of aphids to host and nonhost plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 17: 1231-1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, J. (1970a). Studies on Rhopalosiphum padi (L.). I. Laboratory studies on olfactometric responses to the Prunus padus L. Lantbrk. Annal. 36: 381-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, J. (1970b). An aphid sex attractant. Entomol. Scand. 1: 63-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, J. (1993). Odour stimuli affecting autumn migration of Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera, Homoptera). Ann. Appl. Biol. 122: 417-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, J. P. (1948). The oat bird-cherry aphis, Rhopalosiphum padi, L., and comparision with R. crataegellum, Theo. (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 38: 157-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1988). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Editions, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, J. T. (1978). Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: New evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora. Science 201: 745-747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H., and Southwood, R. (1984). Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatchell, G. M., and Parker, S. J. (1990). Host plant selection by migrant Rhopalosiphum padi in autumn and the occurrence of an intermediate morph. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54: 237-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, K. F. A., Dixon, A. F. G., and Eagles, G. (1984). Non-feeding by adult gynoparae of Rhopalosiphum padi and its bearing on the limiting resource in the production of sexual females in host alternating aphids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 36: 9-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. A. (1987). Cyclical parthenogenesis and the evolution of host range in aphids. In Holman, J., Pelikán, J., Dixon, A. F. G., and Weismann, L. (eds.), Population Structure, Genetics and Taxonomy of Aphids and Thysanoptera: Proceedings of the International Symposia, Held at Smolenice,Czechoslovakia, Sept. 9–14, 1985, SPB Academic, The Hague, pp. 39-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C. (1975). The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preference and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecologia 18: 185-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandström, J.P., Pettersson, J. Winter Host Plant Specialization in a Host-Alternating Aphid. Journal of Insect Behavior 13, 815–825 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007806416332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007806416332

Navigation