Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA1

  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isozyme and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) have been applied to studies of genetic relationships and germplasm management in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). However, isozymes identify relatively few polymorphisms, and RFLPs are technically complex, expensive, and not compatible for the high through-put required for rigorous assessment of this narrow-based germplasm. Since random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers do not manifest such shortcomings, a study was conducted in cucumber to examine genetic relationships in diverse germplasm, assess the usefulness of RAPD markers in distinguishing elite accessions, and compare the relative effectiveness of RAPD markers to that of isozyme and RFLP markers. One hundred and eighteen C. sativus accessions were analyzed using variation at 71 RAPD loci (44 mapped and 27 unmapped). Genetic distances among accessions were estimated using the simple matching coefficient complement, and analyzed using multi-dimensional scaling. Each accession had a unique marker profile, indicating that RAPD analysis was useful in genotypic differentiation. Germplasm grouping patterns were consistent with individual accession origins, theoretical dispersal routes and discriminating morphological characters (i.e., sex expression and fruit length to diameter ratio). Although elite accessions were discriminated by RAPD profiling, their genetic distances were relatively small (between 0.01 and 0.58), indicating limited genetic diversity in this germplasm array. Assessment of a subset of the germplasm array using RAPDs resulted in genetic distance measurements more similar to published genetic distance estimates by RFLP markers (Spearman rank correlation, rs = 0.7–0.8) than estimates by isozyme markers (rs = 0.4). Data indicate that RAPD markers have utility for analysis of genetic diversity and germplasm management in cucumber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brothwell, D. & P. Brothwell, 1969. Food in Antiquity: A Survey of the Diet of Early Peoples. Fredrick A. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkhuizen, A., W.C. Kennard, M.J. Havey & J.E. Staub, 1996. RFLP variation and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber. Euphytica 90: 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galun, E., 1961. Study of the inheritance of sex expression in the cucumber. The interaction of major gene with modifying genetic and non-genetic factors. Genetica 32: 134–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J.D., 1976. Nonparametric Methods for Quantitative Analysis. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horejsi, T., 1998. Random amplified polymorphic DNA and sequence characterized amplified regions for studies of genetic diversity and downy mildew resistance in cucumber. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, E.K. & R.L. Lower, 1978. Cucumis hardwickii: a source of germplasm for the cucumber breeder. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rpt. 1: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennard, W.C., K. Poetter, A. Dijkhuizen, V. Meglic, J.E. Staub & M.J. Havey, 1994. Linkage among RFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease-resistance, and morphological markers in narrow and wide crosses of cucumber. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knerr, L.D., J.E. Staub, D.J. Holder & B.P. May, 1989. Genetic diversity in Cucumis sativus L. assessed by variation at 18 allozyme coding loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicki, B., 1969. Investigations on sex determination in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Genet. Pol. 10: 3–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. & M. Wish, 1978. Multidimensional scaling. In Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publ., Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik, E.E., 1966. Searching gene centers of the genus Cucumis through host-parasite relationship. Euphytica 15: 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lower, R.L. & M.D. Edwards, 1986. Cucumber breeding. In M.J. Basset (Ed.), Breeding Vegetable Crops, pp. 173–207. AVI Publishing. Westport, CI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., M.R. Knox, M.J. Ambrose, J.K.M. Brown & T.H.N. Ellis, 1996. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in pea assessed by RFLP-and PCR-based methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1103–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis, T., E.F. Fritsch & J. Sambrook, 1982. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreight, J.D. & J.E. Staub, 1993. Indo–US Cucumis germplasm expedition. HortScience 28: 467.

  • Meglic, V., F. Serquen & J.E. Staub, 1996. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L): I. A reevaluation of the U.S. germplasm collection. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 43: 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglic, V. & J.E. Staub, 1996a. Inheritance and linkage relationships of isozyme and morphological loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 865–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglic, V. & J.E. Staub, 1996b. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L): II. An evaluation of selected cultivars released between 1846 and 1978. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 43: 547–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka, T. & Y. Ogihara, 1997. Applicability of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 597–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, L.W. & T.C. Wehner, 1990. Review of genes and linkage groups of cucumber. HortScience 25: 605–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafalski, J.A. & S.V. Tingey, 1993. Genetic diagnosis in plant breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends Genet. 9: 275–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, J.B., J. Nienhuis, P. Skroch, J. Tivang & M.K. Slocum. 1994. Comparison of RAPD and RFLP genetic markers in determining genetic similarity among Brassica oleracea L. genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 909–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serquen, F.C., J. Bacher & J.E. Staub, 1997. Mapping and QTL analysis of horticultural traits in a narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random-amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Mol. Breed. 3: 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifriss, O., 1961. Sex control in cucumber. J. Hered. 52: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & P.H. Sneath, 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, D.M., J. Tivang, J. Nienhuis, J.T. Miller, D.S. Douches & A. Contreras-M., 1996. Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potato). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 532–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J.E. & V. Meglic, 1993. Molecular genetic markers and their legal relevance for cultigen discrimination: a case study in cucumber. HortTechnology 3: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J.E., F. Serquen & M. Gupta, 1996a. Genetic markers, map construction, and their application in plant breeding. HortScience 31: 729–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J.E., A. Gabert & T.C. Wehner, 1996b. Plant variety protection: a consideration of genetic relationships. HortScience 31: 1086–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J.E., J. Bacher & K. Poetter, 1996c. Sources of potential errors in the application of random amplified polymorphic DNAs in cucumber. HortScience 31: 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J.E., F. Serquen & J.D. McCreight, 1997a. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L): III. An evaluation of Indian germplasm. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 44: 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, J.E., J. Box, V. Meglic, T.F. Horejsi & J.D. McCreight, 1997b. Comparison of isozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA data for determining intraspecific variation in Cucumis. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 44: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. & J. H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, E.L., 1919. Notes on edible plants. In: Hedrick, U. P. (Ed.) Report of the N.Y. Ag. Ex. Stat. for the year 1919m, Vol. 2, part II. Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatlioglu, T., 1993. Cucumber Cucumis sativus L. In: G. Kalloo and B. O. Bergh (Eds), Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops, pp. 197–234. Pergamon Press, Ltd., Tarrytown, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thormann, C.E., M.E. Ferreira, L.E.A. Camargo, J.G. Tivang & T.C. Osborn, 1994. Comparison of RFLP and RAPD markers for estimating genetic relationships within and among cruciferous species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 973–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, R. & W. Powell, 1992. Using RAPD markers for crop improvement. Trends Biotech. 10: 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, T.W. & G.N. Davis, 1962. Cucurbits: Botany, Cultivation, and Utilization. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., 1989. SYSTAT: the System for Statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski & S.V. Tingey, 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horejsi, T., Staub, J.E. Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA1. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46, 337–350 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008650509966

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008650509966

Navigation