Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

The role of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for perforated appendicitis is under investigation. A retrospective study was conducted to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy (OA) for perforated appendicitis. From January 2001 through December 2003, 229 patients with perforated appendicitis were treated at Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital. LA was successfully completed in 91 of 99 patients. OA was performed in 130 patients. Operation time was longer in the LA group (mean ± SD =96.1±43.1 vs. 67.8±32.2 minutes, P<0.01). Return of oral intake was faster in the LA group (3.2±2.4 vs. 5.0±7.0 days, P<0.01). The intravenous antibiotic usage period was shorter in the LA group (4.4±2.8 vs. 6.3±7.1 days, P<0.01). The postoperative wound infection rates were 15.2 % (LA group) and 30.7% (OA group). The overall infectious complication rates were 19% in the LA group and 37% in the OA group (P<0.01). Hospital stay days were shorter for the LA group (6.3±2.9 vs. 9.3±8.6 days, P<0.01). Our results indicated that laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective procedure for treating patients with perforated appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15:59–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 1999;177:250–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999;9:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Surland S, Lafering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 1999;42:377–383.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:398–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJG. Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: Association with age and sex of patient and with appendectomy rate. Eur J Surg 1998;158:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S, Matheson NA. Preventing wound infection after appendectomy: A review. Br J Surg 1988;75:1023–1032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 1996;131:509–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonanni F, Reed J III, Hartzell G, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:273–278.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson AB, Peetz ME. Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 1998;12:940–943.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khalili TM, Hiatt JR, Savar A, Lau C, Margulies DR. Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy. Am Surg 1999;65:965–967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg 1998;175:232–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wei PL, Hunag MT, Chen TC, Wang W, Lee WJ. Is mini-laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for children. Surg Laparosc Encosc Percutan Tech 2004;14:61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 2002;26:1485–1488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E. Results of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1700–1705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. An evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 2004;18:969–973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao CC, Lin CS, Jang CC. Laparoscopic appendectomy for ruptured appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1999;9:271–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open verus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219:725–731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen JB, Smithers MB, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL. Laparoscopic verus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 1996;20:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, et al. Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 1995;222:256–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang MT, Wei PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ. Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: A comparative study. Surg Laparosc Encosc Percutan Tech 2001;11:306–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu JM, Chen KH, Lin HF, Tseng LM, Tseng SH, Huang SH. Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:447–450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2001;15:660–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1783–1785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stoltzing H, Thon K. Perforated appendicitis: Is laparoscopic operation advisable? Dig Surg 2000;17:620–626.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Attwood SE, Hill ADK, Murphy PG, Thomton J, Stephens RB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic verus open appendectomy. Surgery 1992;112:497–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Rue Lai M.D., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, HF., Wu, JM., Tseng, LM. et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 906–910 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.012

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.012

Key words

Navigation