Skip to main content
Log in

Postoperative colonic motility in patients following laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Clinical reports on laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy (LASC) suggest that the period of postoperative inhibition of gastrointestinal motility is shortened as compared to open sigmoid colectomy (OSC). We aimed to specifically investigate whether colonic motility increases more rapidly following LASC compared to OSC. LASC was performed in 11 patients and OSC in nine patients for recurrent diverticulitis or carcinoma. During surgery a manometry catheter was inserted into the colon via the anus, and the tip was placed in the splenic flexure. Continuous manometric recordings were performed from the day of surgery until postoperative day 3 with a four-channel microtransducer manometry system combined with a portable data logger. The postoperative colonic motility index was 101± 18, 199 ± 30, and 163 ±27 mm Hg/min on days 1,2, and 3 after LASC, respectively, which was increased compared to indexes of 53 ± 15, 71 ± 18, and 76 ± 23 following OSC (mean ± standard error of the mean; P < 0.05). The amplitude but not the frequency of contractions was higher following LASC compared to OSC. Following LASC, patients requested a similar amount of pain medication but resumed oral food more rapidly on postoperative days 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), and they were discharged from the hospital earlier (P < 0.05). Colonic motility in particular and the patient’s condition in general seem to improve more rapidly following LASC compared to the open procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW. Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. Similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:485–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic colectomy vs. traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 1996;10:15–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ. Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 45:1309–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Alabaz AJN, Nessim A, Joo JS. Laparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1397–1400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP. Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: Are there differences? Am Surg 1993;59:549–553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Whelan RL, Trokel M, Laird DA, Terry MB, Treat MR. Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted vs. open bowel resection in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:S67-S72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Horvath KD, Marvin MR, Laird DA, Whelan RL. Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs. laparoscopic bowel resection in mice. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1035–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SW, Southall JC, Gleason NR, Huang EH, Bessler M, Whelan RL. Time course of difference in lymphocyte proliferation rate after laparotomy vs. CO2 insufflation. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:145–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk, Stösslein R, Müller JM. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2001;15:600–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tollesson PO, Cassuto J, Rimbäck G. Patterns of propulsive motility in the human colon after abdominal operations. Eur J Surg 1992;158:233–236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tittel A, Schippers E, Anurov M, Öttinger A, Schumpelick V. Shorter postoperative atony after laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection. Surg Endosc 2001;15:508–512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreis ME, Kasparek M, Zittel TT, Becker HD, Jehle EC. Neostigmine increases postoperative colonic motility in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Surgery 2001;130:449–456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen PA. Piritramide (R3365), a potent analgesic with unusual chemical structure. J Pharm Pharmacol 1961;13:513–530.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassotti G, Crowell MD, Whitehead WE. Contractile activity of the human colon: Lessons from 24 hour studies. Gut 1993;34:129–133.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Deller DJ, Wangel AG. Intestinal motility in man. I. A study combining the use of intraluminal pressure recording and cineradiography. Gastroenterology 1965;48:45–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritchie JA, Ardan GM, Truelove SC. Motor activity of the sigmoid colon of humans. A combined study by intraluminal pressure recording and cineradiography. Gastroenterology 1962;43:642–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Champault GG, Barrar C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline JM. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma. A prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E. Results of laparoscopic vs. open resection for colon cancer in patients with minimum followup of 3 years. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1 158–1161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Graber JN, Schulte WJ, Condon RE, Cowles VE. Relationship of duration of postoperative ileus to extent and site of operative dissection. Surgery 1982;92:88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson JP. Postoperative motility of the large intestine in man. Gut 1975;16:689–692.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schippers E, Holscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Siewert JR. Return of interdigestive motor complex after abdominal surgery. End of postoperative ileus? Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:621–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cali RL, Meade PG, Swanson MS, Freeman C. Effect of morphine and incision length on bowel function after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:163–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holzer P, Lippe IT, Amann R. Participation of capsaicinsensitive afferent neurons in gastric motor inhibition caused by laparotomy and intraperitoneal acid. Neuroscience 1992; 48:715–722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwarz NT, Kalff JC, Türler A, Engel BM, Watkins SC, Billiar TR, Bauer AJ. Prostanoid production via COX-2 as a causative mechanism of rodent postoperative ileus. Gastroenterology 2001;121:1354–1371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Simmons RL, Bauer AJ. Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg 1998;228:652–663.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Snape WJ, Wright SH, Batlle WM, Cohen S. The gastrocolonic response: Evidence for a neural mechanism. Gastroenterology 1979;77:1235–1240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kreis ME, Thiers G, Zittel TT, et al. Early postoperative food intake induces colonic motility following colorectal surgery in patients. Gastroenterology 1999;116:S0140.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frantzides CT, Cowles V, Salaymeh B, Tekin E, Condon RE. Morphine effects on human colonic myoelectric activity in the postoperative period. Am J Surg 1992;163:144–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huge A, Kreis ME, Zittel TT, Becker HD, Starlinger MJ, Jehle EC. Postoperative colonic motility and tone in patients after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:932–939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Falk PM, Beart RW, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons RJ. Laparoscopic colectomy: A critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kehlet H, Morgensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 1999;86:227–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Basse L, Raskov HH, Jakobsen DH, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel HW, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002;89:446–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerated recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H. Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg 2001;88:1498–1500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin E. Kreis M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasparek, M.S., Müller, M.H., Glatzle, J. et al. Postoperative colonic motility in patients following laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 7, 1073–1081 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2003.08.006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2003.08.006

Key words

Navigation