Skip to main content

Small Bowel and Colonic Dysfunction After Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Neurogastroenterology

Abstract

Surgery of the small intestine and colon is commonly performed in children for a variety of indications ranging from congenital anatomic abnormalities to need for enteral feeding access to underlying motility disorders. Under most circumstances, nonemergent operations allow time for a multidisciplinary team approach between surgeons and gastroenterologists to devise a thorough preoperative diagnostic strategy. Unfortunately, abdominal catastrophes such as malrotation with volvulus often preclude the luxury of time before surgery necessitating a strong relationship between surgeon and gastroenterologist to address the potential consequences of such an event. Under both circumstances, the motility of the small bowel and colon remains a critical feature that often predicts the success of an operation and, most importantly, the prognosis of the patient. This chapter aims to address several of the more prevalent motility disorders observed in children after small bowel and colonic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goulet O, Ruemmele F, Lacaille F, et al. Irreversible intestinal failure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004; 38(3):250–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin CA, Bernabe KQ, Taylor JA, et al. Resection-induced intestinal adaptation and the role of enteric smooth muscle. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(6):1011–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Citters GW, Lin HC. Ileal brake: neuropeptidergic control of intestinal transit. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006;8(5):367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson JS, Quigley EM, Adrian TE. Factors affecting outcome following proximal and distal intestinal resection in the dog: an examination of the relative roles of mucosal adaptation, motility, luminal factors, and enteric peptides. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44(1):63–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchiyama M, Iwafuchi M, Matsuda Y, et al. Intestinal motility after massive small bowel resection in conscious canines: comparison of acute and chronic phases. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;23(3):217–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Uchiyama M, Iwafuchi M, Ohsawa Y, et al. Intestinal myoelectric activity and contractile motility in dogs with a reversed jejunal segment after extensive small bowel resection. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(6):686–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quigley EM, Thompson JS. The motor response to intestinal resection: motor activity in the canine small intestine following distal resection. Gastroenterology. 1993;105(3):791–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scolapio JS, Camilleri M, Fleming CR. Gastrointestinal motility considerations in patients with short-bowel syndrome. Dig Dis. 1997;15(4–5):253–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Remington M, Malagelada JR, Zinsmeister A, et al. Abnormalities in gastrointestinal motor activity in patients with short bowels: effect of a synthetic opiate. Gastroenterology. 1983;85(3):629–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt T, Pfeiffer A, Hackelsberger N, et al. Effect of intestinal resection on human small bowel motility. Gut. 1996;38(6):859–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bianchi A. Intestinal loop lengthening–a technique for increasing small intestinal length. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15(2):145–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HB, Fauza D, Garza J, et al. Serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP): a novel bowel lengthening procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(3):425–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Figueroa-Colon R, Harris PR, Birdsong E, et al. Impact of intestinal lengthening on the nutritional ­outcome for children with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(7):912–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Javid PJ, Kim HB, Duggan CP, et al. Serial transverse enteroplasty is associated with successful short-term outcomes in infants with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(6):1019–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weber TR, Powell MA. Early improvement in ­intestinal function after isoperistaltic bowel lengthening. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(1):61–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber TR. Isoperistaltic bowel lengthening for short bowel syndrome in children. Am J Surg. 1999;178(6): 600–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reinshagen K, Zahn K, Buch C, et al. The impact of longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring on liver function in short bowel syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18(4):249–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Modi BP, Javid PJ, Jaksic T, et al. First report of the international serial transverse enteroplasty data registry: indications, efficacy, and complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang RW, Javid PJ, Oh JT, et al. Serial transverse enteroplasty enhances intestinal function in a model of short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2): 223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avitzur Y, Grant D. Intestine transplantation in children: update 2010. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010;57(2): 415–31. table.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Galea MH, Holliday H, Carachi R, et al. Short-bowel syndrome: a collective review. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(5):592–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Georgeson KE, Breaux Jr CW. Outcome and intestinal adaptation in neonatal short-bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(3):344–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Beath S, Pironi L, Gabe S, et al. Collaborative strategies to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic intestinal failure including those who are referred for small bowel transplantation. Transplantation. 2008;85(10):1378–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufman SS, Atkinson JB, Bianchi A, et al. Indications for pediatric intestinal transplantation: a position paper of the American Society of Transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2001;5(2):80–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mousa H, Bueno J, Griffiths J, et al. Intestinal motility after small bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1998;30(6):2535–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson CP, Sarna SK, Zhu YR, et al. Effects of intestinal transplantation on postprandial motility and regulation of intestinal transit. Surgery. 2001;129(1):6–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiyochi H, Ono A, Miyagi K, et al. Extrinsic reinnervation one year after intestinal transplantation in rats. Transplant Proc. 1996;28(5):2542.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kiyochi H, Ono A, Yamamoto N, et al. Extrinsic nerve preservation technique for intestinal transplantation in rats. Transplant Proc. 1995;27(1):587–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Blanc-Louvry I, Ducrotte P, Peillon C, et al. Roux-en-Y limb motility after total or distal gastrectomy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(4):408–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang YM, Liu XL, Xue DB, et al. Myoelectric activity and motility of the Roux limb after cut or uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(47):7699–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Le Blanc-Louvry I, Ducrotte P, Lemeland JF, et al. Motility in the Roux-Y limb after distal gastrectomy: relation to the length of the limb and the afferent duodenojejunal segment—an experimental study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1999;11(5):365–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klaus A, Weiss H, Kreczy A, et al. A new biliodigestive anastomosis technique to prevent reflux and stasis. Am J Surg. 2001;182(1):52–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jen HC, Rickard DG, Shew SB, et al. Trends and outcomes of adolescent bariatric surgery in California, 2005–2007. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e746–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Loux TJ, Haricharan RN, Clements RH, et al. Health-related quality of life before and after bariatric surgery in adolescents. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(7):1275–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harrison MR, Bjordal RI, Langmark F, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the hidden mortality. J Pediatr Surg. 1978;13(3):227–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Skari H, Bjornland K, Haugen G, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis of mortality factors. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(8):1187–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cannon C, Dildy GA, Ward R, et al. A population-based study of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Utah: 1988–1994. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(6): 959–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Moore A, Umstad MP, Stewart M, et al. Prognosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;38(1):16–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vanamo K, Rintala RJ, Lindahl H, et al. Long-term gastrointestinal morbidity in patients with congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(4): 551–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Peetsold MG, Kneepkens CM, Heij HA, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: long-term risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(4):448–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kieffer J, Sapin E, Berg A, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(9):1330–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Arena F, Romeo C, Baldari S, et al. Gastrointestinal sequelae in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Int. 2008;50(1):76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kilby MD. The incidence of gastroschisis. BMJ. 2006;332(7536):250–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ledbetter DJ. Gastroschisis and omphalocele. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(2):249–60. vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vermeij-Keers C, Hartwig NG, van der Werff JF. Embryonic development of the ventral body wall and its congenital malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996;5(2):82–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hoyme HE, Higginbottom MC, Jones KL. The vascular pathogenesis of gastroschisis: intrauterine interruption of the omphalomesenteric artery. J Pediatr. 1981;98(2):228–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Phillips JD, Raval MV, Redden C, et al. Gastroschisis, atresia, dysmotility: surgical treatment strategies for a distinct clinical entity. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(12): 2208–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Snyder CL, Miller KA, Sharp RJ, et al. Management of intestinal atresia in patients with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(10):1542–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hoehner JC, Ein SH, Kim PC. Management of gastroschisis with concomitant jejuno-ileal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(6):885–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kato T, Tzakis AG, Selvaggi G, et al. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in children. Ann Surg. 2006;243(6):756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Durkin ET, Lund DP, Shaaban AF, et al. Age-related differences in diagnosis and morbidity of intestinal malrotation. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(4):658–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Penco JM, Murillo JC, Hernandez A, et al. Anomalies of intestinal rotation and fixation: consequences of late diagnosis beyond two years of age. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(8):723–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Devane SP, Coombes R, Smith VV, et al. Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms after correction of malrotation. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67(2):218–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. la Vecchia LK, Grosfeld JL, West KW, et al. Intestinal atresia and stenosis: a 25-year experience with 277 cases. Arch Surg. 1998;133(5):490–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cezard JP, Aigrain Y, Sonsino E, et al. Postobstructive enteropathy in infants with transient enterostomy: its consequences on the upper small intestinal functions. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(11):1427–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Cezard JP, Cargill G, Faure C, et al. Duodenal manometry in postobstructive enteropathy in infants with a transient enterostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(11):1481–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Preston DM, Hawley PR, Lennard-Jones JE, et al. Results of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation in women (Arbuthnot Lane’s disease). Br J Surg. 1984;71(7):547–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Pikarsky AJ, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing colectomy for colonic inertia. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(2): 179–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kayama H, Koh K. Clinical and experimental studies on gastrointestinal motility following total colectomy: direct measurement (strain gauge force transducer method, barium method) and indirect measurement (hydrogen breath test, acetaminophen method). J Smooth Muscle Res. 1991;27(2):97–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. You YT, Wang JY, Changchien CR, et al. Segmental colectomy in the management of colonic inertia. Am Surg. 1998;64(8):775–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Lundin E, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, et al. Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg. 2002;89(10):1270–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Villarreal J, Sood M, Zangen T, et al. Colonic diversion for intractable constipation in children: colonic manometry helps guide clinical decisions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;33(5):588–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Martin MJ, Steele SR, Mullenix PS, et al. A pilot study using total colonic manometry in the surgical evaluation of pediatric functional colonic obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):352–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Martin MJ, Steele SR, Noel JM, et al. Total colonic manometry as a guide for surgical management of functional colonic obstruction: preliminary results. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(12):1757–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Fortunato M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gomez, R., Lopez, H.N., Fortunato, J.E. (2013). Small Bowel and Colonic Dysfunction After Surgery. In: Faure, C., Di Lorenzo, C., Thapar, N. (eds) Pediatric Neurogastroenterology. Clinical Gastroenterology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-709-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-709-9_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-709-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics