Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of morphine and incision length on bowel function after colectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Return of bowel function remains the rate-limiting factor in shortening postoperative hospitalization of patients with colectomies. Narcotics are most commonly used in the management of postoperative pain, even though they are known to affect gut motility. Narcotic use has been felt to be proportional to the length of the abdominal incision. The aim of this study was to determine whether return of bowel function after colectomy is directly related to narcotic use and to evaluate the effect of incision length on postoperative ileus. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of 40 patients who underwent uncomplicated, predominantly left colon and rectal resections was performed. Morphine administered by patient controlled analgesia was the sole postoperative analgesic. The amount of morphine used before the first audible bowel sounds, first passage of flatus and bowel movement, and incision length were recorded. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between all variables. RESULTS: The strongest correlation was between time to return of bowel sounds and amount of morphine administered (r=0.74;P=0.001). There were also significant correlations between morphine use and time to report of first flatus (r=0.47;P=0.003) and time to bowel movement (r=0.48;P=0.002). There was no relationship between incision length and morphine use or incision length and return of bowel function in the total group. CONCLUSIONS: Return of bowel sounds, reflecting small-intestine motility after colectomy, correlated strongly with the amount of morphine used. Similarly, total morphine use adversely affects colonic motility. Because no relationship with incision length was found, efforts to optimize the care of patients with colectomies should be directed less toward minimizing abdominal incisions and more toward diminishing use of postoperative narcotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livingston EH, Passaro EP Jr. Postoperative ileus. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:121–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Condon RE, Sarma SK. Motility after abdominal surgery. Clin Gastroenterol 1982;11:609–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufman PN, Krevsky B, Malmiud LS,et al. Role of opiate receptors in the regulation of colon transit. Gastroenterology 1988;94:1351–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frantzides CT, Cowles V, Samaymeh B, Tekin E, Condon RE. Morphine effects on human colonic myoelectric activity in the postoperative period. Am J Surg 1992;163:144–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic Colectomy. Ann Surg 1992;216:703–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beart RW Jr. Laparoscopic colectomy: status of the art. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S47–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce CJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Rusin LC. Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(Suppl):S1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramos JM, Beart RW Jr, Goes R, Ortega AE, Schlinkert RL. The role of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: a prospective evaluation of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:494–501.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M, Nathason LK, Siu S, Stitz RW. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:155–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ortega AE, Beart RW Jr, Steele GD Jr, Winchester DP, Greene FL. Laparoscopic bowel surgery registry preliminary results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:681–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D,et al. Prospective comparison of open versus laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(Suppl):S35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:651–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP. Immediately recognizable benefits and drawbacks after laparoscopic colon resection for benign disease. Surg Endosc 1997;11:802–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goh YC, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Early postoperative results of a prospective series of laparoscopicvs. open anterior resections for rectosigmoid cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:776–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bokey EL, Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Newland RC. Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(Suppl):S24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hotokezaka M, Dix J, Mentis EP, Minasi JS, Schirmer BD. Gastrointestinal recovery following laparoscopic vs open colon surgery. Surg Endosc 1996;10:485–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferray AA, Cowels VE, Condon RE, Schultw WJ. Opioid and nonopioid analgesic drug effects on colon contractions in monkeys. Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:1417–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cataldo PA, Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ. Ketorolac and patient controlled analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;76:435–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. O'Hara DA, Fanciullo G, Hubbard L,et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ketorolac versus morphine by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 1997;17:891–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kenny GN, McArdle CS, Aitken HH. Parenteral ketorolac: opiate-sparing effect and lack of cardiorespiratory depression in the perioperative patient. Pharmacotherapy 1990;10:127S-31S.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tusek DL, Church JM, Strong SA, Grass JA, Fazio VW. Guided imagery: a significant advance in the care of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:172–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ. Laparoscopic-assisted and minilaparotomy approaches to colorectal diseases are similar in early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cali, R.L., Meade, P.G., Swanson, M.S. et al. Effect of morphine and incision length on bowel function after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 163–168 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236975

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236975

Key words

Navigation